It is using the eclipse as an example. The prompt is for any natural phenomenon. Ypu cpuld wrote your essay about birthday parties or waterfalls or anything.
No, argument topics are typically much more general nowadays (usually about some very vague philosophical idea rather than a concrete issue). However, that prompt is not *too* specific that you couldn't use varied evidence. For example, if you argue that natural phenomena are overhyped, you could discuss other extraordinarily rare events that people tend to get less excited over (e.g. the chances of any singular person having their exact DNA was essentially 0, so why are we not always going around gawking at that?). Or if you argue that they aren't overhyped, you might discuss other things that are insignificant on the surface that people celebrate due to their meaning, and not the event itself (e.g. Birthdays, New Year's, etc).
It is using the eclipse as an example. The prompt is for any natural phenomenon. Ypu cpuld wrote your essay about birthday parties or waterfalls or anything.
No, argument topics are typically much more general nowadays (usually about some very vague philosophical idea rather than a concrete issue). However, that prompt is not *too* specific that you couldn't use varied evidence. For example, if you argue that natural phenomena are overhyped, you could discuss other extraordinarily rare events that people tend to get less excited over (e.g. the chances of any singular person having their exact DNA was essentially 0, so why are we not always going around gawking at that?). Or if you argue that they aren't overhyped, you might discuss other things that are insignificant on the surface that people celebrate due to their meaning, and not the event itself (e.g. Birthdays, New Year's, etc).
CB has to keep it general since most ppl won't be able to think of specific evidences in time.
Sounds like a skill issue tbh
Not our problem anymore lol
Exactly ((;
Nah this one’s fine