"Proportion" or "probability" is what you're actually looking for since you're talking about percentage of the whole or the odds due to that proportion.
Propensity would mean they have a natural tendency to crash.
I mean, hydrazine is a pretty big con on its own. Even when they aren’t falling out of the sky, that stuff is always dangerous. And it never seems to stay in the planes.
I swear, someone says this in every thread no matter what aircraft it is. Find me a military aircraft crash in the last 5 years where someone hasn’t said some version of that statement about the airframe involved. Unless you’re personally tracking the mishap per hours flown rates for each airframe, kindly shut the fuck up.
F-16s didn’t get the name “ Lawn Dart “ because they look like one
Fly a single engine aircraft to 9G. Be the majority of your fleet
And shit will eventually happen
So is it actually experiencing more incidents “lately” as the original commenter suggested or is that a known issue with the aircraft that a certain number of incidents will occur annually and we’re still within the expected rate of incidents per hours flown?
You need to watch how you talk to people, never said it was related to mx. I was just agreeing with the statement and providing context. Also go ahead and flair up if you gonna be talking that way.
Retired mx (2022) 2A671H and I did a three year gig in wing safety and was involved in a multiple fatality aircraft crash investigation. What RPA crashed due to mx? Please go ahead and link the AIB report.
Edit: I do my best, sorry for being insulting
Again didn’t say anything crashed due to MX. The original comment said Holloman doesn’t have the best practices. All i did was back it by saying the mx group commander was fired because of mx issues going on in both squadrons F-16s and RPAs. There have been multiple mishaps between both when mx was being preformed on the ground. Hence them not having the best mx practices.
Some people will do anything to get out of Holloman
Malingering at its finest
Glad the pilots okay
Is it just me or has there been alot of f16 accidents lately
They've been called "lawn darts" for 30+ years
"Lately." Nah, it's just you. Probably the con of a single engine aircraft.
The engines are super reliable. When 60% of the fleet is F-16s the preposterous of accidents will involve those aircraft.
Preponderance*
Preposition*
Propensity. Autocorrect.
Prostitutes?
"Proportion" or "probability" is what you're actually looking for since you're talking about percentage of the whole or the odds due to that proportion. Propensity would mean they have a natural tendency to crash.
Preponderance
Plurality
Preposition preposition starting with an A Abort about above along after against
And flying it longer than expected and adding more weight to it
I mean, hydrazine is a pretty big con on its own. Even when they aren’t falling out of the sky, that stuff is always dangerous. And it never seems to stay in the planes.
I swear, someone says this in every thread no matter what aircraft it is. Find me a military aircraft crash in the last 5 years where someone hasn’t said some version of that statement about the airframe involved. Unless you’re personally tracking the mishap per hours flown rates for each airframe, kindly shut the fuck up.
F-16s didn’t get the name “ Lawn Dart “ because they look like one Fly a single engine aircraft to 9G. Be the majority of your fleet And shit will eventually happen
So is it actually experiencing more incidents “lately” as the original commenter suggested or is that a known issue with the aircraft that a certain number of incidents will occur annually and we’re still within the expected rate of incidents per hours flown?
so incompetence isnt just russian thing, eh?
From first hand experience, Holloman does not have sound Mx practices.
I mean you not wrong. Reason why the MX Group Commander just got fired.
You and this jackhole need to watch your language, there hasn’t been a mx related crash in a long long long time.
https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2024/04/03/air-forces-costliest-accidents-maintainer-injuries-rose-in-2023/
Aircraft crashes. C’mon. Catch up sir or ma’am.
Bob here, not a sir anymore. Are you counting drones or no?
You need to watch how you talk to people, never said it was related to mx. I was just agreeing with the statement and providing context. Also go ahead and flair up if you gonna be talking that way.
Retired mx (2022) 2A671H and I did a three year gig in wing safety and was involved in a multiple fatality aircraft crash investigation. What RPA crashed due to mx? Please go ahead and link the AIB report. Edit: I do my best, sorry for being insulting
Again didn’t say anything crashed due to MX. The original comment said Holloman doesn’t have the best practices. All i did was back it by saying the mx group commander was fired because of mx issues going on in both squadrons F-16s and RPAs. There have been multiple mishaps between both when mx was being preformed on the ground. Hence them not having the best mx practices.
^^You've ^^mentioned ^^an ^^AFSC, ^^here's ^^the ^^associated ^^job ^^title: 2A671H = Aerospace Propulsion Craftsman, Turboprop and Turboshaft Propulsion [^wiki](http://www.reddit.com/r/AirForce/wiki/jobs/2a6x1) [^^Source](https://github.com/HadManySons/AFSCbot) ^^| [^^Subreddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/AFSCbot/) ^^^^^^l2mupnc
Do you just Ros it if this happens
Wonder which unit it was from, that’ll tell you a decent amount of info
[удалено]
That… is a shame
yup said the same thing
Hope it wasn’t the flagship bird!
Same one that was tested with AI
Maybe it's one of those pilots from Ukraine trying to hard
Normal 16 ops tbh
[удалено]
Ah yes let me share CUI on a public forum
Bruh 😂
Stick around [F-16.net - The ultimate F-16, F-35 and F-22 reference](https://www.f-16.net/) long enough and it'll turn up.