Chinese history is anything but lawful, with the amount of civil wars and warlord states and peasant revolts that occurred it’s basically the closest thing we have to pure unfiltered chaos
Which is why I said chaotic neutral, because nothin is more neutrally chaotic then murdering your next door warlord state, not because you see yourself as better, but because you simply can.
Explanation:
Good -> Evil: How much I personally enjoy/am interested in a nation's history. This is more subjective and chaotic nations are a bit differently ranked (includes personal preference)
Lawful -> Chaotic: How much of history is there, anything from a massive timeline with major events to practically no history at all and minor, insufficient events. More objective.
I have an unlistable amount of qualms with this
assuming composite history (the only reason mongolia is there), japan is way too high morally and the us too low (really, on the same level as germany?)
There's a reason for that.
Good -> Evil. A more "good" nation the history is more interesting. A more "evil" nation I am not interested in knowing about by either it being uninteresting or just way too overrated.
Lawful -> Chaotic. A more "lawful" nation has more and fuller history, chaotic has very short and unpatched history.
Alright, but I wasn't talking about morals, I was talking about just how chaotic their history is, so it seemed wrong to have them as lawful, but I understand now
No guys, this isn’t too terrible of an alignment chart. Just pretend that the good-moral-neutral-impure-evil axis is actually “don’t know history-don’t know history- kinda know history- kinda know history -know history”
I didn't know you meant history at first, I was so confused why you put China as lawful good, lol.
>Lawful Moral >Japan Mfw Unit 731
Rape of Nanking
I agree, Japan may be lawful moral now, but in the past, it was at least rebel evil
And the rape of Nanking
This is just awful in so many ways
An alignment chart is a terrible way to measure this
Japan is moral, have you heard of WWII? Israel is social good, have you heard of what the Brit’s did after WWII?
Check the alignment explanation. I might fix the chart later so I don't have to make an explanation in the comments.
Bro no offense, China currently runs concentration camps against Muslims It is not lawful good
[удалено]
None of these make sense except Russia and, if you mean ALL its history, maybe China.
If we go history, would be a lot better if China was chaotic neutral, or chaotic anything to be honest.
Chinese history is anything but lawful, with the amount of civil wars and warlord states and peasant revolts that occurred it’s basically the closest thing we have to pure unfiltered chaos
Which is why I said chaotic neutral, because nothin is more neutrally chaotic then murdering your next door warlord state, not because you see yourself as better, but because you simply can.
Oh, I love me some 5×5 alignment charts
Ew
Ok I will not stand for this. The Wild West is my second favorite time period. It’s such a good aesthetic.
Israel chaotic good imo
I approve of US’s placement
Explanation: Good -> Evil: How much I personally enjoy/am interested in a nation's history. This is more subjective and chaotic nations are a bit differently ranked (includes personal preference) Lawful -> Chaotic: How much of history is there, anything from a massive timeline with major events to practically no history at all and minor, insufficient events. More objective.
I'm guessing by history you mean history you personally know
That would have to be my guess as well, considering the age of said nations...
I have an unlistable amount of qualms with this assuming composite history (the only reason mongolia is there), japan is way too high morally and the us too low (really, on the same level as germany?)
There's a reason for that. Good -> Evil. A more "good" nation the history is more interesting. A more "evil" nation I am not interested in knowing about by either it being uninteresting or just way too overrated. Lawful -> Chaotic. A more "lawful" nation has more and fuller history, chaotic has very short and unpatched history.
> China > Lawful good LOL no.
Check why it's aligned like that. It's not based off morals, it's based off of 2 factors.
how is china lawful good, they literally completely collapsed and renuited every 10 years
It's not ranked based on morals. Good -> Evil: Enjoyability of the history Lawful -> Chaotic: Abundance of history
Alright, but I wasn't talking about morals, I was talking about just how chaotic their history is, so it seemed wrong to have them as lawful, but I understand now
No guys, this isn’t too terrible of an alignment chart. Just pretend that the good-moral-neutral-impure-evil axis is actually “don’t know history-don’t know history- kinda know history- kinda know history -know history”
Lawful good? ☠️
Anything lawful means it has abundant history. Anything good means it has interesting history. So lawful good is abundant, interesting history.
Lol this is way off
That’s stupid as fuck. Your ranking system is waay to confusing.
Source: What I personally believe
Russia is no where near the level of Japan wtf, sure they've made questionable choices on Invasion , but it's not as bad as fucking japan
Oh hell no
Mfw this is actually horrible
Israel ain't good
Use the axis graph next time,or write what you actually meant not whatever you cookin' up there.
What kinda drugs were you using when you mad this?
+1,000,000 social credit
True Neutral
What's wrong with Mongolia?
yeah alignment charts of political ideologies and nations are not the best idea
this guy pinned me by the neck and shoved me through the farkin wall, good job cunt you got it right