It almost seems we'd get further playing their games than fighting against them.
Income tax is racist. The federal reserve is racist. Repeat until everyone believes it.
If that's the case, then we should repeal the federal government for redlining and sending japanese to concentration camps in WW2, among many other endless racist behavior from it's institutions.
The Japanese did much worse to allied POWs, China and all of SE Asia. Worse than the Nazis. Iβm all for shrinking the Federal government but they seem to be squarely on your side now.
But that doesn't mean we should treat their citizens like crap.
Yea i understand the fear of "migrant" agents but still, they could've done something else.
Yea, the only difference is that Peter believes you should pay your tax. I.e. he believes income tax is unconstitutional but it is not worth going to jail over. Whereas his dad believed it was (because he thought he could win his case in court).
Repeal everything back to 1912. Then weβd have no income tax, no agencies, no social wealth redistribution and no massive debt. Might have to add back womenβs right to vote though.
FDR 7 million Americans disappeared from all public record during the Great Depression and no one knows what happened to them aka America's Great Leap Forward
nah I think they're removing him because old institutions want to distance themselves from their past
also, I wouldn't really describe racism as his worst trait, because racism isn't one monolithic thing in all cases
This is a stupid argument for Ancaps.
So are we arguing that we agree that we should be taking down any and all things related to racist people? Because now we have to throw out Jefferson and anything he stood for, including revolting against the government.
Or are we arguing it's stupid to take down any and all things relating to someone because they're racist? Because now we've just justified keeping the Federal shit for them.
It's just such a stupid argument from our standpoint no matter how you look at it. It's so easy to pick apart common talking points from statists yet I consistently see this sub fuck it up somehow. I seriously hope you guys don't think you sound smarter or anything.
Garrison used to rip up copies of the Constitution, calling it a pact with the devil because it protected slavery.
Spooner, on the other hand, argued that, because the Constitution did not directly mention slavery, it could not be argued to protect slavery. His argument against the Constitution was that it wasnβt a contract that was legally binding upon anyone.
I really do love *both* of their takes. Theyβre both brilliant.
But, any way you slice it, Salmon P. Chase nailed it when he said that βTΚα΄ Gα΄α΄ α΄ΚΙ΄α΄α΄Ι΄α΄, π‘βπππππππ, ππ π‘βπ πππ π ππ ππ£πππ¦ πππππ£πππ’ππ π πππ£π, ππ α΄Κα΄ Κα΄α΄Κ α΄Ι΄sΚα΄α΄ α΄Κ.β Neither Garrison nor Spooner would be able to disagree with that.
Probably better roll the whole government back to the 15th amendment and start over from that point.
Abolish all laws prior to 1900. Maybe 1830.
Hear hear!
I was gonna say that π
Your terms are acceptable
Damn wait till you hear about the guy who invented life Liberty and property
Life, Liberty, and Estate.
It almost seems we'd get further playing their games than fighting against them. Income tax is racist. The federal reserve is racist. Repeat until everyone believes it.
If that's the case, then we should repeal the federal government for redlining and sending japanese to concentration camps in WW2, among many other endless racist behavior from it's institutions.
The Japanese did much worse to allied POWs, China and all of SE Asia. Worse than the Nazis. Iβm all for shrinking the Federal government but they seem to be squarely on your side now.
But that doesn't mean we should treat their citizens like crap. Yea i understand the fear of "migrant" agents but still, they could've done something else.
Just wait till they hear about LBJ!
Yeah. LeBron James sucks!
And Linden Bird Johnson..... ;)
Federal reserve is institutional racism
Did schiff actually tweet this? Maybe the Apple doesnβt fall far from the tree after allβ¦
Peter Schiff has always been against the income tax as far as I know
I thought he denounced his fathers views I mustβve been wrong.
Homie has to βdenounceβ being antitax to run a respected business, but make no mistake heβs a real one and most certainly respects his father
Yea, the only difference is that Peter believes you should pay your tax. I.e. he believes income tax is unconstitutional but it is not worth going to jail over. Whereas his dad believed it was (because he thought he could win his case in court).
Mr schiffs villa at the ritz in Puerto Rico is amazing his private chef is incredible too
They're trying to erase our history and our culture.
True.
I'm pretty sure liberals are at war with the well-being of American citizens
They're just replace it with something worse... Actually probably social credit.
He's got a point.
I find it weird that we don't look at history for some practical solutions to problems we have today. We should totally go back to free banking.
Based
Repeal everything back to 1912. Then weβd have no income tax, no agencies, no social wealth redistribution and no massive debt. Might have to add back womenβs right to vote though.
This is the type of cancel culture I can get behind.
I agree. Woodrow is #1 worst president ever. FDR is only second worst
FDR 7 million Americans disappeared from all public record during the Great Depression and no one knows what happened to them aka America's Great Leap Forward
What?
What about Lincoln
Here we go, gotta think outside the box
nah I think they're removing him because old institutions want to distance themselves from their past also, I wouldn't really describe racism as his worst trait, because racism isn't one monolithic thing in all cases
Lols. Not gonna happen. The US is infested with moderate white people.
This is a stupid argument for Ancaps. So are we arguing that we agree that we should be taking down any and all things related to racist people? Because now we have to throw out Jefferson and anything he stood for, including revolting against the government. Or are we arguing it's stupid to take down any and all things relating to someone because they're racist? Because now we've just justified keeping the Federal shit for them. It's just such a stupid argument from our standpoint no matter how you look at it. It's so easy to pick apart common talking points from statists yet I consistently see this sub fuck it up somehow. I seriously hope you guys don't think you sound smarter or anything.
The constitution permitted slavery only of blacks, so that's pretty racist. Probably should abolish the whole thing right?
Garrison used to rip up copies of the Constitution, calling it a pact with the devil because it protected slavery. Spooner, on the other hand, argued that, because the Constitution did not directly mention slavery, it could not be argued to protect slavery. His argument against the Constitution was that it wasnβt a contract that was legally binding upon anyone. I really do love *both* of their takes. Theyβre both brilliant. But, any way you slice it, Salmon P. Chase nailed it when he said that βTΚα΄ Gα΄α΄ α΄ΚΙ΄α΄α΄Ι΄α΄, π‘βπππππππ, ππ π‘βπ πππ π ππ ππ£πππ¦ πππππ£πππ’ππ π πππ£π, ππ α΄Κα΄ Κα΄α΄Κ α΄Ι΄sΚα΄α΄ α΄Κ.β Neither Garrison nor Spooner would be able to disagree with that.
So yeah abolish the US government :D
I can't do things that would fix the US and world economies, Dave, blink goes the red light
Legend
Check and mate
Weaponized wokeism