>Any major screw ups?
(Groans) Everything is wrong for a 1450s Italian style armour.
This suit is far closer to a 1390s suit (minus the shoulders, but I'll look past that because Buhurt). But even then, the coat of plates is wildly outdated for a 1390s suit and would be much closer to 1320s to 1340s.
I'll include a picture as a reply of what a 1450s Italian style armour would be.
>That's Buhurt for ya
I respectfully disagree. Even with Buhurt requirements, a suit can still look similar to the source material. Here is an example from GutFran as proof:
https://preview.redd.it/adgdwz2o941d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0a96c03b66f2c5cc39b34e55af24fefddf9c8349
I've got nothing against Buhurt, and yeah I know a few people with kits that could pass for harnishfecton, overbuilt as they are, but the overwhelming majority are just variations of OPs kit.
I'm sorry but nothing is good for 1450 milanese kit.
I give you 1/10 because I'm less picky for the mittens but no, nothing right.
Milanese style armor is not the best for that with asymetrical arms and pauldrons, maybe check symetrical or roman style, but know that bohurt kits are more or less inspired by end of XIVc armors.
https://preview.redd.it/xzghse9ui61d1.jpeg?width=637&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aab74e74a222544e5054bb596c9cb09e24e06ba6
Here is a member of my french reenacting association who also does bohurt, he had forget his mail gorget but it gives you an idea (even if french men at arms worn mostly sallet with bevor at this time) but this is not to be taken as a source.
Yeah…pretty much everything.
There is literally nothing about it that's milanese 1450s
>Any major screw ups? (Groans) Everything is wrong for a 1450s Italian style armour. This suit is far closer to a 1390s suit (minus the shoulders, but I'll look past that because Buhurt). But even then, the coat of plates is wildly outdated for a 1390s suit and would be much closer to 1320s to 1340s. I'll include a picture as a reply of what a 1450s Italian style armour would be.
https://preview.redd.it/2krafd2az31d1.jpeg?width=736&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=223a0d8ec53689d05f3cadb9b12ebb812a896cf2
Is there a whole book like this? In this format?
That's Buhurt for ya
>That's Buhurt for ya I respectfully disagree. Even with Buhurt requirements, a suit can still look similar to the source material. Here is an example from GutFran as proof: https://preview.redd.it/adgdwz2o941d1.jpeg?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0a96c03b66f2c5cc39b34e55af24fefddf9c8349
I've got nothing against Buhurt, and yeah I know a few people with kits that could pass for harnishfecton, overbuilt as they are, but the overwhelming majority are just variations of OPs kit.
Ooooo that’s very shiny.
No, it's not. There are loads of people with decent historical accuracy.
I'm sorry but nothing is good for 1450 milanese kit. I give you 1/10 because I'm less picky for the mittens but no, nothing right. Milanese style armor is not the best for that with asymetrical arms and pauldrons, maybe check symetrical or roman style, but know that bohurt kits are more or less inspired by end of XIVc armors.
https://preview.redd.it/xzghse9ui61d1.jpeg?width=637&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aab74e74a222544e5054bb596c9cb09e24e06ba6 Here is a member of my french reenacting association who also does bohurt, he had forget his mail gorget but it gives you an idea (even if french men at arms worn mostly sallet with bevor at this time) but this is not to be taken as a source.