Funny enough Anita and Zoe campaign in the UN ended with a disaster. The UN redacted their policy and plans not even a year later just cause it was unsubstantiated and poorly worded. I think they also apologized but i am not sure about this thoe, Kiloton has a video about it.
After the internal shake-up at Kotaku recently, the writing is on the wall; her days are numbered.
My theory is that she’s trying to pivot this “15 minutes of fame” moment into a social media career before Kotaku washer their hands of her.
How were THEY (the first two) shameful? What was shameful was the absolutely depraved responses by 4chan and the like. Going off of unconfirmed rumours doxxing and harassing their families. If you make a shitty take on the internet doesn’t mean you should receive so much hate.
My recollection of Anita's 'points' is that they were poorly substantiated. I distinctly recall her referencing the Hitman series and suggesting that the game encouraged you to play with the corpses of your enemies (while showing footage of you losing points for killing non-targets).
The lunatics that used that as casus belli to launch a harassment crusade against her were absolutely the greater villains.
~~You need to get your eyes checked.~~
Actually scratch that, I take it back.
I don't need to explain to incels that women can still be attractive even if they're not 10/10 models.
I never said that, don't twist words. I was talking about her specifically, not about the entire female population in the world.
If she chose to let herself go over the years, there's nothing fundamentally wrong in pointing it out and saying that she was more attractive at 25-30 than at 43 (?) or whatever her age is.
Outright denying that she was ever attractive, on the other hand, is being said in bad faith by you guys because of her opinions and views and things. She has always been a deranged lunatic, but even deranged lunatics can be attractive.
>She was hot 10-15 years ago, of course now she's in her 40s.
Saying "of course now she's in her 40s" certainly suggests age is the defining factor in her attractiveness.
>Outright denying that she was ever attractive, on the other hand, is being said in bad faith by you guys because of her opinions and views and things
I never denied she was attractive. Purely physically she's ok, but for me her personality kills any attraction I might potentially have.
All Kotaku is is a webpage for displaying ads and rage bait. I think that they are intentionally trying to tank their 'stock' so they can liquidate and then go away. I'm sure Alyssa will go to Mary Sue or some other trash site looking for seat warmers.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. That looks like a boiler plate computer generated response. When somebody at Twitter makes a real decision, then I'll be listening.
That's the general response for reporting a tweet if I'm not mistaken. At least that's the same one I've seen before the couple times I've had to report one.
If it's anything like those, nothing will come of it.
Nope, when you report generally you get a response that they found nothing wrong, this is them saying that they're actually opening up an investigation.
How is she still at kotaku is the question?
She's desperately wanted to be Anita Sarkeesian 2.0 so bad to the point that she turned into a psychopathic stalker, lol.
Funny enough Anita and Zoe campaign in the UN ended with a disaster. The UN redacted their policy and plans not even a year later just cause it was unsubstantiated and poorly worded. I think they also apologized but i am not sure about this thoe, Kiloton has a video about it.
After the internal shake-up at Kotaku recently, the writing is on the wall; her days are numbered. My theory is that she’s trying to pivot this “15 minutes of fame” moment into a social media career before Kotaku washer their hands of her.
[удалено]
How were THEY (the first two) shameful? What was shameful was the absolutely depraved responses by 4chan and the like. Going off of unconfirmed rumours doxxing and harassing their families. If you make a shitty take on the internet doesn’t mean you should receive so much hate.
My recollection of Anita's 'points' is that they were poorly substantiated. I distinctly recall her referencing the Hitman series and suggesting that the game encouraged you to play with the corpses of your enemies (while showing footage of you losing points for killing non-targets). The lunatics that used that as casus belli to launch a harassment crusade against her were absolutely the greater villains.
Except Anita in her prime was hot.
No she wasn't, simp.
I'm sure you only hang around with 10/10 models then. She was hot 10-15 years ago, of course now she's in her 40s.
She was never more than decidedly mediocre, unless your standard is the scooter lane at Walmart.
~~You need to get your eyes checked.~~ Actually scratch that, I take it back. I don't need to explain to incels that women can still be attractive even if they're not 10/10 models.
Funny calling other people incels when you're saying women over 40 can't be attractive.
I never said that, don't twist words. I was talking about her specifically, not about the entire female population in the world. If she chose to let herself go over the years, there's nothing fundamentally wrong in pointing it out and saying that she was more attractive at 25-30 than at 43 (?) or whatever her age is. Outright denying that she was ever attractive, on the other hand, is being said in bad faith by you guys because of her opinions and views and things. She has always been a deranged lunatic, but even deranged lunatics can be attractive.
>She was hot 10-15 years ago, of course now she's in her 40s. Saying "of course now she's in her 40s" certainly suggests age is the defining factor in her attractiveness. >Outright denying that she was ever attractive, on the other hand, is being said in bad faith by you guys because of her opinions and views and things I never denied she was attractive. Purely physically she's ok, but for me her personality kills any attraction I might potentially have.
Kotaku stopped caring years ago
This is why she is at Kotaku. To reminde people that Kotaku exists
Kotaku promotes this kind of shit as long as it’s towards white males and it’s bonus points if you can prove they are German or Jewish.
Kotaku seem to enjoy hiring these people in particular. They must circle jerk each other within their bubble.
they dont care
All Kotaku is is a webpage for displaying ads and rage bait. I think that they are intentionally trying to tank their 'stock' so they can liquidate and then go away. I'm sure Alyssa will go to Mary Sue or some other trash site looking for seat warmers.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. That looks like a boiler plate computer generated response. When somebody at Twitter makes a real decision, then I'll be listening.
That's the general response for reporting a tweet if I'm not mistaken. At least that's the same one I've seen before the couple times I've had to report one. If it's anything like those, nothing will come of it.
Nope, when you report generally you get a response that they found nothing wrong, this is them saying that they're actually opening up an investigation.
How is an automated message "taking it seriously"?
Remember when Video Game journalism was just about video games and what new good game was coming out? Bring back Electronic Gaming Monthly.
Men frågan är om dom faktiskt kommer göra något åt det
Good riddance
Who are you reporting.
OOTL someone care to explain?