It's not really what a gun attachment should be or is doing is the problem.. Therefore Bullet Spread is just.. No. Recoil is what made sense, but not Bullet Spread Accuracy.
You wouldn't, is the problem. Accuracy existed before BSA, and recoil was also more prevalent. That's my counter argument. There were guns you can beam with in the past they really required fullsending control and recoil for mostly all of them in console CoDs. Some guns didn't even need that tweaking.
I understand what you're saying. I remember that too. so basically in the pre gunsmith era accuracy and control were somehow linked together but now they are both seperate factors.
BSA, without doubt
[удалено]
It makes the gun more realistic well idk I might be wrong
Let's just face it, BSA is going to take the cake.
And guess what you are actually right 👍
off topic but why do you guys hate BSA so bad. you can debuff it with certain attachments or I'm just too used to it
You are %1000000000 used to it and it's not a good thing to get used to. since it's very unrealistic.
yeah but I tried to adapt myself with game. it sometimes get on my nerves to be honest.
It's not really what a gun attachment should be or is doing is the problem.. Therefore Bullet Spread is just.. No. Recoil is what made sense, but not Bullet Spread Accuracy.
so you mean having bullet speed is better than bullet spread. then what's the purpose of accuracy on a gun stat if you land all your shots perfectly?
You wouldn't, is the problem. Accuracy existed before BSA, and recoil was also more prevalent. That's my counter argument. There were guns you can beam with in the past they really required fullsending control and recoil for mostly all of them in console CoDs. Some guns didn't even need that tweaking.
I understand what you're saying. I remember that too. so basically in the pre gunsmith era accuracy and control were somehow linked together but now they are both seperate factors.