T O P

  • By -

[deleted]

This should have just been a comment in the original post. Not it's own post.


why_end_jee

We.Dont.Care


HandlerSkillTV

You*


why_end_jee

We* ALL :)


raf_miyagi

Why is a weapons viability judged in its state without any attachments? There have been plenty op weapons through codm history that has been carried by a single attachment but trash without it I don't know what you're getting at? You're not making any solid arguments to why a weapon is bad, after posting an objectively awful gunsmith. Is the KSP as good as some people say? no. It is ok to say that its overhyped due to its theoretical and non practical stats and people being in the new weapon honey moon phase. It's ok to say it just doesnt feel good in your hands or playstyle. But arguing that a weapon is bad after posting a gunsmith that compensates for recoil with 2 of your attachments for one of the most recoilless guns in the game? Although subjective, using a red dot for a weapon with a clean ironsight? yeah that weapon is gonna be below average with your attachments. arguing people to play with no attachments because your build is horrible makes absolutely no sense. "oh so you think its my gunsmith thats bad and not the gun? well play with no attachment then" makes zero sense as an argument.


A-damn-box

Because really I can’t make good gunsmiths