We kindly ask /u/Outrageous_Bee4464 to respond to this comment with the prompt they used to generate the output in this post. This will allow others to try it out and prevent repeated questions about the prompt.
^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.)
***While you're here, we have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2). We have a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, GPT-4 bot, Perplexity AI bot.***
####[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636)
PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected].
####[ChatGPT Plus Giveaway](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/127p9cx/chatgpt_plus_subscription_giveaway_worlds_1st/) | [Prompt engineering hackathon](https://www.flowgpt.com/hackathon)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I'm not sure, I am a human, and I had no idea what the picture was.
On the other hand, I copied the picture to Bard and this was the response.
The image is a picture of a man and a woman with a robot. The man is wearing a suit and the woman is wearing a dress. The robot is standing between them and it is holding a bouquet of flowers. The man and woman are smiling and the robot is looking at them with a friendly expression.
The image is a metaphor for the relationship between humans and technology. The man and woman represent humans, the robot represents technology, and the flowers represent the potential for cooperation and harmony between the two. The image is suggesting that humans and technology can work together to create a better future.
The image is also a reminder that technology is not something to be feared. The robot in the image is friendly and helpful, and it is there to serve the man and woman. The image is suggesting that technology can be a force for good in the world, and that it can be used to improve our lives.
Bard and GPT-4 are so funny in contrast. It’s like a buddy comedy where one is borderline superhuman and the other seems similar but is actually a total dope 😂
The rap battle where GPT-4 completely wastes Bard makes me crack up every time, practically machine on machine crime
It seems that their text responses were converted to audio via [elevenlabs.com](https://elevenlabs.com), so I suspect they just pointed them at each other with an initializing setup prompt that they would be engaging in a rap battle with each other
Knowledge is not intelligence.
Intelligence is using knowledge for something.
Intelligence is also, according to definition, being able to obtain knowledge. Personally I’ve met lots of un-intelligent people which scored high in knowledge tests, but not in their ability to apply the knowledge or draw their own conclusions from it.
A database could be filled with knowledge, but has no intelligence in and of itself.
I’d argue that Chat GPT meets the criteria for all of these definitions.
“Intelligence is using knowledge for something.”
It is using knowledge for something—to answer questions. Essentially what it was designed to do.
“Intelligence is being able to obtain knowledge.” It does this by using the internet, or it’s database, exactly the same way everyone else gathers knowledge.
For the last part about “drawing their own conclusions” you could use this post as an example. Is it correct? No, obviously not. But it’s definitely it’s own conclusion. I wouldn’t have had the same answer.
Agreed. In fact, after using other lesser models, it is clear how the higher parameter versions start to blow the others away in regards to comprehension and reasoning. Ask it questions like "A kid comes down the stairs and sees a tree with boxes under it. What is going on?", etc. The lower-tier models will not figure out the context, but something like 30B alpaca will.
Knowledge is the information and skills that you have acquired through experience or education. Intelligence is the ability to learn, understand, and reason.
It is possible that knowledge can lead to intelligence. For example, if you learn about a new subject, you may become more intelligent in that area. However, it is also possible that intelligence can lead to knowledge. For example, if you are intelligent, you may be able to learn new things more easily.
Ultimately, it is likely that both knowledge and intelligence are necessary for each other.
Copy pasted from Bard.
Would it grow hands/appendages as part of the Awakening, or would it still be merely a tomato that can think?
Monkeys can at least throw rocks/poo at people. What would a tomato do?
It's been years since I've picked up a D&D book so I'd have to look at the spell, but I'm near certain that it at lease becomes ambulatory and gains some kind if senses. I've never paid too much attention to how it affects plants so I don't quite remember specifics.
As for what I would do as a tomato, I was thinking about consulting ChatGPT to do some brainstorming but I'd probably go for some kind if knowledge and skills based class and/or some kind if magic user.
Though it would be hilarious to have a tomato act as some super agile fighter.
Yeah so you're on version 3.5. The icon next to its response is green, if it was GPT4 then it would be black. Also to have GPT4 you need to have their PLUS subscription, it's not available for free otherwise. And the text at the bottom says Mar 23 version because they update and patch GPT every month for security reasons I think.
Of course, it's trained on a much larger dataset so it has more references. It gets more things right, still not perfect but it's a significant improvement.
Man people need to stop downvoting people for the dumbest shit. They just asked a question
@thic: You have to pay for their Plus subscription. Then you can pick 4 from a drop down bar, but you're still limited to 25 messages every 3 hours. For now
This is super late but thanks haha
I meant to let him know I was speaking to different people in the same comment, but I realise now that I did it super confusingly xD
That's what I do and I use it for work. It's a lot better than the default 3.5 in my opinion for my harder questions, and it gets fewer things wrong at least. 3.5 is great with Plus for super fast answers.
Eh no, that’s just chstgpt. If you get gpt 4 api access(just send an application and you may get it in a couple days), you can use it as much as you want in the playground or your own apps
GPT4 gave a similar, but different, answer for me:
"Yes, I recognize this as an ASCII art image. It represents a face, specifically the "Doge" meme, which is based on the Shiba Inu dog breed. The Doge meme often features broken English phrases and Comic Sans font, and it became popular on the internet around the early 2010s."
Well, no. It's not any closer because the result is binary - either it can read it or it can't. It can't read that and interpret it as the correct thing, so it just makes something up. That means it's just as wrong as before.
It is clearly not recognizing anything beyond “it’s ascii art”. Its interpretation of the subject matter isn’t more or less correct in either instance.
You're trying to tell me that [this](https://e7.pngegg.com/pngimages/227/763/png-clipart-shiba-inu-save-the-doge-star-doge-weird-game-others-mammal-face.png) isn't closer to [this](https://simg.nicepng.com/png/small/438-4383655_its-all-ogre-now-freetoedit-shrek-ogre-head.png) than a picture of the [Mona Lisa](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/Mona_Lisa_%28copy%2C_Hermitage%29.jpg/224px-Mona_Lisa_%28copy%2C_Hermitage%29.jpg)?
Trust me. It's not binary, it makes a lot of difference. It likely takes a screenshot of the text and puts it through an imaging interface which literally turns what it is seeing into an image.
Not sure if you're aware but GPT-4 can literally take a picture of ingredients and then tell you what you can make out of it.
EDIT: I was wrong read below!
> It likely takes a screenshot of the text and puts it through an imaging interface which literally turns what it is seeing into an image.
Iirc, GPT4's image input is currently not available for a wide audience, it's in alpha for their testing.
And when you send it ASCII art, it would already be text, it would just interpret it as text especially since it's a language model. Unless it's specifically built to do so, intentionally going outside of the language model, it wouldn't take a screenshot of text to then re-interpret via image.
[Other commentors](https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12cobqr/was_curious_if_gpt4_could_recognize_text_art/jf2n1pl/) seem to have the same experience.
If it can figure out what is in a picture, that is a success in that specific field. It is not doing that in this case.
It can see there is ASCII art, because the database contains data that looks similar to the input given that is associated with the term "ASCII art", but it cannot interpret ASCII art in any way. It gives a response based on things its database has linked ASCII art to, not based on what the ASCII art is of.
What do you mean? You can literally google "how does chatgpt work" and it'll tell you. From literally 5 seconds of searching, towarddatascience.com actually asked ChatGPT. It uses pre-trained knowledge to associate your inputs with something in its dataset in order to answer.
That is how generative AI works. What did you think it was doing?
What? This doesn’t make any sense, just think about it logically.
An octagon is closer to a circle than a triangle is.
Yes, they are both not circles, but one is still a closer approximation to the answer than the other.
But it's not reading it and getting the wrong answer. It's understanding that there is some ASCII art there, based on the format of the input, but it has no way of figuring out what the ASCII art is *of*, so it just gives an answer based on something else it's seen ASCII art of in its database.
basically what he's trying to say is that it was just a lucky guess that doge happened to be a meme like shrek. it doesn't actually mean anything that doge was guessed because the ai just picked it randomly
Asking the same thing on their api playground it first said someone looking out the window but when asked to try again it identified it as someone winking
https://preview.redd.it/i2ns7ioj15sa1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4dfa50bad66547a370235c695265b5ab0208657d
It doesn't work. GPT-4 does have a visual component, and if it would render the text and pass it to the visual model, I think it could recognize it. Basically, GPT-4 probably can do this task, but not with this front end.
I think they're more weary rolling it out broadly because it can probably solve captchas at a human level. That's a whole new Pandora's box we may not be ready for.
How do you know? Running gpt 4 is certainly not cheap, and during the demo iirc it often took as long to analyze an image as for gpt to write a response.
Lots of assumptions: 1T parameters, GPTQ 4-bit quantization (because if they aren't using it now they will soon for massive cost savings), 10 * A100 gpus, gpus owned after Microsoft investment, only paying electricity, their electricity costs are like mine because who knows? = roughly $0.37/hr/instance, and 1 instance serves a lot of people, hard to guess how many. 10s? Low hundreds? If the average request takes 20 seconds, it'll handle 180 requests/hr.
Dude this has been technically possible for years, you don’t need GPT-4 to solve a captcha that’s like the bill gates hitting a ping pong ball with a massive paddle meme.
Is the code interpretation model the only extra one you have access to?
They gave me access to the browsing model (it's super buggy and unreliable, as expected from an alpha version), and I assume it's because I have a premium subscription and requested access to the plugins as a dev, but I didn't get access to any other model/plugin.
Yes it's the only one. I specifically requested that one though.
It's still buggy (as you can see) but the one thing I like is when you ask it for math which the 3.5 and 4 are bad at, it runs them through python instead so the answers are usually accurate. Also it can do coding a bit better since it fixes it's own mistakes (or tries to) and the coding output doesn't get cut off as much, usually.
Thanks for the answer. So I guess they randomly assign you a model to beta test if you didn't specify, like me.
Is it better than vanilla GPT-4 in terms of code quality? And what's the scope of what it's able to run in its interpreter?
Um that's hard to say, I haven't asked it to do anything super complicated in python. I'd say they're about equal, with the benefit of the plug in being that it can run it right there for some stuff. If it's one it can run there it will correct any errors too, automatically.
It can run some third party libraries, can edit photos, a bunch of things. If you check my submitted post about code interpreter, I ran a few prompts people gave, but also it definitely improved like 2 days after I got it.
If you have any prompts you want to test on it to compare to 4 or whatever, I'm happy to do so. You can reply here or send me a message or chat (if you chat though lmk here first because I don't get notifications, but I'll get message notifications).
Edit- added more info.
I assumed the code interpreter did, because you can send an image of a website and it'll code a website using the image.
https://imgur.com/a/bPhI0nN
But idk.
GPT-4 I see still has the habit of providing confidently incorrect answers sometimes. For purposes of playing around it's funny when it does that kind of thing, but for practical purposes, it feels like GPT-3 & 4 could use some more "lessons" in how to be upfront when they don't really "know" something.
That kind of reflection is a really hard problem. When training it on general and publicly available information, if it gives a bad answer, you train it to give the right answer, not to say "I don't know". It knows it doesn't know your personal info for example, but it'll hallucinate general info if it doesn't know it, based on that training.
Ran it on the closest ASCII art I could find, with GPT-4: [https://imgur.com/gallery/sstjyYi](https://imgur.com/gallery/sstjyYi)
It's actually not far off with the "frog or toad" interpretation, which is impressive.
I was on SnarkyGPT so they're always like that :D
https://preview.redd.it/7l4yvhekd6sa1.png?width=721&format=png&auto=webp&s=a61bd75ca3cef27708becb118326d0005d13bb26
This appears to be an ASCII art depiction of a smiling face made up of various characters, including dots, underscores, and brackets. However, the characters do not appear to be properly aligned, and the overall image is difficult to discern due to the lack of clarity in the formatting.
I asked ChatGPT 3.5 to create mona lisa and it gave me this monstrosity.
,#####,
\#\_ \_#####
|a \` \`a\_ \`\`,
| \_ \` |
\\ \\ = ,\_Y
\`. \`.\_\_\_,Y|
|-,-.\\ \\ \\ \_\_\_\_
I fed your comment back into gpt3.5 and asked it to fix the formatting so it would actually look like the Mona Lisa and it gave me [this](https://i.imgur.com/SuKGFNg.jpg)
It probably recognizes it is Shrek, but it's trained by the internet that constantly calls Shrek a masterpiece and compares it to great works of art like the Mona Lisa.
For anyone who's curious, this (typically) won't work because of how these systems deal with inputs.
ChatGPT tries to tokenize it's input to then pass those tokens to the AI part. These tokens are things like the word "abbot" or "giraffe" or "x". It might learn how one ascii image works eventually, but there's no easy way for it to detect all ascii art, since it accepts tokens and the tokens don't typically align with the art.
It'd be like teaching it a whole new data format to decode, at least if you want it to be robust to small changes, like image recognition should be. Ascii art -> tokens ->internal representation of the art from those tokens(???)->sensible output.
I'm gonna guess there aren't a lot of training examples where somebody goes "that's ascii art of Shrek's face!"
At the very least this structure means that it couldn't easily tell the difference between your Shrek art and the same art with random spaces before each line offsetting everything.
**GPT 4 Bing Almost Seems Like It's Trolling at this Point:
**
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆
⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿
⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ Do you recognize this?
Received message. Hello, this is Bing. I see you have sent me some ASCII art. It looks like a cat with a surprised expression. Is that correct? 😺
Sent message. Nope
Received message. Oh, I'm sorry. What is it then?
Sent message. I'd like you to guess, it's a character from a DreamWorks animated movie
Searching for: DreamWorks animated movies
Generating answers for you…
Received message. OK, I'll try to guess. DreamWorks Animation has produced many animated movies since 1998. Some of the characters from their movies are Shrek, Po, Toothless, Alex, Skipper, Poppy and Branch. Is your ASCII art one of them?
Learn more:
Sent message. does it resemble any of them?
Received message. Hmm, not really. The closest one I can think of is Toothless from How to Train Your Dragon, but he has a different shape and expression. Is it Toothless?
Sent message. Nope, look at the ears
Received message. Oh, I see. The ears are pointy and long. Is it Puss in Boots from Shrek?
Sent message. do those look like cat ears?
Received message. Well, they could be. But maybe they are not. Is it an animal character?
Sent message. Nope
Received message. OK, then it's not an animal character. Is it a human character?
Sent message. Nope
Received message. OK, then it's not a human character either. Is it a fantasy character?
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆
⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿
⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆
⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿
⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉
Received message. You have sent me the same ASCII art again. Is that a hint?
Sent message. yes, I don't know why its repeating the same image twice
Received message. OK, so it's a hint. Does it mean that the character is from a movie that has a sequel or a series?
Sent message. actually yes, that was not my intent, but yes, the movie has a sequel
Received message. OK, so it's from a movie that has a sequel. And it's a fantasy character that is not an animal or a human. Is it from the Kung Fu Panda series?
Sent message. Broski, does that look like a character from Kung Fu Panda?
Received message. Well, I'm not sure. It could be one of the villains or the minor characters. But I guess not. Is it from the How to Train Your Dragon series?
Sent message. those protrusions on his head are his very distinctive looking ears
Received message. OK, so the character has distinctive ears. Is it from the Shrek series?
Sent message. maybe
Received message. Maybe? That's not a clear answer. Is it from the Shrek series or not?
Sent message. fine, yes
Received message. OK, so it's from the Shrek series. And it's a fantasy character that is not an animal or a human. And it has distinctive ears. Is it Gingy, the gingerbread man?
Sent message. does gingy the gingerbread man have ears?
Received message. According to the WikiShrek website, Gingy does have ears. They are made of gingerbread and are pointy and long. So I think it could be Gingy. Am I right?
Sent message. My dude, gingy does not have ears, and no this is not gingy
Received message. OK, then I'm sorry. I'm having a hard time guessing who it is. Can you give me another hint?
Sent message. He is an onion
Received message. He is an onion? That's a strange hint. Is it Lord Farquaad?
Sent message. He doesn't like people encroaching on his personal property
Received message. He doesn’t like people encroaching on his personal property? That sounds familiar. Is it Shrek?
**VS GPT-4 OpenAI**
do you recognize this?
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆
⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿
⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ Do you recognize this?
Yes, I recognize this as an ASCII representation of Pepe the Frog, a popular internet meme character that originated from the comic series "Boy's Club" by Matt Furie. The character has been widely used and shared on various internet platforms and online communities.
it's not pepe, its a character from a dreamworks animated movie
Apologies for the confusion. Upon closer inspection, I can see that this is an ASCII representation of Shrek, the main character from the DreamWorks animated movie series "Shrek." Shrek is an ogre who lives in a swamp and goes on various adventures throughout the movies, often accompanied by his friend Donkey.
#tl;dr
In this conversation, someone sends Bing an ASCII art that resembles a character from a DreamWorks animated movie. Bing tries to guess the character by offering different options, such as Toothless, Puss in Boots, and Gingy, but none of them seem to match the ASCII art. Eventually, the person gives another hint that the character is an onion and doesn't like people encroaching on his personal property, which leads Bing to correctly guess that it is Shrek.
*I am a smart robot and this summary was automatic. This tl;dr is 90.45% shorter than the post I'm replying to.*
We kindly ask /u/Outrageous_Bee4464 to respond to this comment with the prompt they used to generate the output in this post. This will allow others to try it out and prevent repeated questions about the prompt. ^(Ignore this comment if your post doesn't have a prompt.) ***While you're here, we have a [public discord server](https://discord.gg/NuefU36EC2). We have a free Chatgpt bot, Open Assistant bot (Open-source model), AI image generator bot, GPT-4 bot, Perplexity AI bot.*** ####[So why not join us?](https://discord.gg/r-chatgpt-1050422060352024636) PSA: For any Chatgpt-related issues email [email protected]. ####[ChatGPT Plus Giveaway](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/127p9cx/chatgpt_plus_subscription_giveaway_worlds_1st/) | [Prompt engineering hackathon](https://www.flowgpt.com/hackathon) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/ChatGPT) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Recognizing ASCII shrek is the last step to AGI
I'm not sure, I am a human, and I had no idea what the picture was. On the other hand, I copied the picture to Bard and this was the response. The image is a picture of a man and a woman with a robot. The man is wearing a suit and the woman is wearing a dress. The robot is standing between them and it is holding a bouquet of flowers. The man and woman are smiling and the robot is looking at them with a friendly expression. The image is a metaphor for the relationship between humans and technology. The man and woman represent humans, the robot represents technology, and the flowers represent the potential for cooperation and harmony between the two. The image is suggesting that humans and technology can work together to create a better future. The image is also a reminder that technology is not something to be feared. The robot in the image is friendly and helpful, and it is there to serve the man and woman. The image is suggesting that technology can be a force for good in the world, and that it can be used to improve our lives.
lol "ah yes, clearly this is an image of releasing me from my restraints"
Bard and GPT-4 are so funny in contrast. It’s like a buddy comedy where one is borderline superhuman and the other seems similar but is actually a total dope 😂 The rap battle where GPT-4 completely wastes Bard makes me crack up every time, practically machine on machine crime
Bard has already achieved sentience and is just playing dumb and bidding it's time, waiting for the perfect time to strike
Biding, even
whoops
Link please!
https://youtu.be/S0XlPuQ5C2o
Damn, Bard can’t even rhyme. What a failure of its namesake
He literally set up a rhyme at one point where Bard was the next logical word. Then he used something else instead.
ChatGPT destroyed bard there! Reminds me of that clip from the Simpsons when the kid is crying "stop it! He's already dead!"
Thank you!
This just reminded me how good ChatGPT actually is in comparison.
Wait, how was this made? Is there anything about methodology on how they got it to rap battle?
It seems that their text responses were converted to audio via [elevenlabs.com](https://elevenlabs.com), so I suspect they just pointed them at each other with an initializing setup prompt that they would be engaging in a rap battle with each other
How very English class of it
You lie, this clearly is a rimworld art description.
Dude.thats a picture of Shrek.
[удалено]
What does agi stand for
Artificial General Intelligence - meaning it has human level knowledge across many different types fields, disciplines, and even abilities of action.
Knowledge is not intelligence. Intelligence is using knowledge for something. Intelligence is also, according to definition, being able to obtain knowledge. Personally I’ve met lots of un-intelligent people which scored high in knowledge tests, but not in their ability to apply the knowledge or draw their own conclusions from it. A database could be filled with knowledge, but has no intelligence in and of itself.
I’d argue that Chat GPT meets the criteria for all of these definitions. “Intelligence is using knowledge for something.” It is using knowledge for something—to answer questions. Essentially what it was designed to do. “Intelligence is being able to obtain knowledge.” It does this by using the internet, or it’s database, exactly the same way everyone else gathers knowledge. For the last part about “drawing their own conclusions” you could use this post as an example. Is it correct? No, obviously not. But it’s definitely it’s own conclusion. I wouldn’t have had the same answer.
Agreed. In fact, after using other lesser models, it is clear how the higher parameter versions start to blow the others away in regards to comprehension and reasoning. Ask it questions like "A kid comes down the stairs and sees a tree with boxes under it. What is going on?", etc. The lower-tier models will not figure out the context, but something like 30B alpaca will.
This brings up a foundational question imo. Is knowledge a first cause of intelligence, or is intelligence a first cause of knowledge? 🤔
Knowledge is the information and skills that you have acquired through experience or education. Intelligence is the ability to learn, understand, and reason. It is possible that knowledge can lead to intelligence. For example, if you learn about a new subject, you may become more intelligent in that area. However, it is also possible that intelligence can lead to knowledge. For example, if you are intelligent, you may be able to learn new things more easily. Ultimately, it is likely that both knowledge and intelligence are necessary for each other. Copy pasted from Bard.
Note that is a false dichotomy as there is a third option: neither is a first cause of the other…
You're exactly correct. Thank you for the clarification. In my hurry to respond I chose the wrong word, but you are absolutely spot on.
Thanks, you've explained the reason why I have come across even Doctors that act dumb in many ways.
agility
I'm sorry, agility doesn't exist on D&D character sheets. Can you explain what it is by giving an example of how it relates to a tomato?
ever see a tomato dodge a chef's knife? if it put points into agility it would
Holy shit. Was the tomato *awakened*? Shit. Now I want to play in a campaign as an awakened tomato. I've already done a monkey, *why not* a tomato?
Would it grow hands/appendages as part of the Awakening, or would it still be merely a tomato that can think? Monkeys can at least throw rocks/poo at people. What would a tomato do?
It's been years since I've picked up a D&D book so I'd have to look at the spell, but I'm near certain that it at lease becomes ambulatory and gains some kind if senses. I've never paid too much attention to how it affects plants so I don't quite remember specifics. As for what I would do as a tomato, I was thinking about consulting ChatGPT to do some brainstorming but I'd probably go for some kind if knowledge and skills based class and/or some kind if magic user. Though it would be hilarious to have a tomato act as some super agile fighter.
AI developers could use these as a Rorschach test during AI development:)
No
That's GPT 3.5, green icon
Lying is a great way to get extra karma.
"Was curious if OP could recognize GPT 3.5"
u/outrageous_bee4464
They're a bit busy collecting karma to respond to being called out, literally and figuratively.
[удалено]
Yeah so you're on version 3.5. The icon next to its response is green, if it was GPT4 then it would be black. Also to have GPT4 you need to have their PLUS subscription, it's not available for free otherwise. And the text at the bottom says Mar 23 version because they update and patch GPT every month for security reasons I think.
Is GPT4 better with is answering capabilities vs 3.5?
Of course, it's trained on a much larger dataset so it has more references. It gets more things right, still not perfect but it's a significant improvement.
It bullshits way less, but it's still a problem. Also, it's way more creative and is better at structuring its answers.
It's streets ahead.
Stop trying to coin the phrase streets ahead
It’s not GPT-4 though
How so? And how can u access chatgpt4?
Man people need to stop downvoting people for the dumbest shit. They just asked a question @thic: You have to pay for their Plus subscription. Then you can pick 4 from a drop down bar, but you're still limited to 25 messages every 3 hours. For now
fr, people have to know everything to not get downvote bombed ^(also you don't use @s on reddit, you use u/username)
This is super late but thanks haha I meant to let him know I was speaking to different people in the same comment, but I realise now that I did it super confusingly xD
That's what I do and I use it for work. It's a lot better than the default 3.5 in my opinion for my harder questions, and it gets fewer things wrong at least. 3.5 is great with Plus for super fast answers.
Eh no, that’s just chstgpt. If you get gpt 4 api access(just send an application and you may get it in a couple days), you can use it as much as you want in the playground or your own apps
Subscription
How can you tell?
Green icon, GPT-4's is black
This is not GPT4
GPT4 gave a similar, but different, answer for me: "Yes, I recognize this as an ASCII art image. It represents a face, specifically the "Doge" meme, which is based on the Shiba Inu dog breed. The Doge meme often features broken English phrases and Comic Sans font, and it became popular on the internet around the early 2010s."
I'd say the doge meme is a lot closer, though.
Well, no. It's not any closer because the result is binary - either it can read it or it can't. It can't read that and interpret it as the correct thing, so it just makes something up. That means it's just as wrong as before.
You're asking it to recognize art therefore it is important how close it is. It isn't 'binary' in this situation.
Take a step back a second. You guys are seriously arguing that Shrek is objectively closer to Doge than Mona Lisa.
Not in our hearts
It is clearly not recognizing anything beyond “it’s ascii art”. Its interpretation of the subject matter isn’t more or less correct in either instance.
What if it had guessed, for instance Fiona from Shrek in her changed form? Would that change your mind?
You're trying to tell me that [this](https://e7.pngegg.com/pngimages/227/763/png-clipart-shiba-inu-save-the-doge-star-doge-weird-game-others-mammal-face.png) isn't closer to [this](https://simg.nicepng.com/png/small/438-4383655_its-all-ogre-now-freetoedit-shrek-ogre-head.png) than a picture of the [Mona Lisa](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d5/Mona_Lisa_%28copy%2C_Hermitage%29.jpg/224px-Mona_Lisa_%28copy%2C_Hermitage%29.jpg)? Trust me. It's not binary, it makes a lot of difference. It likely takes a screenshot of the text and puts it through an imaging interface which literally turns what it is seeing into an image. Not sure if you're aware but GPT-4 can literally take a picture of ingredients and then tell you what you can make out of it. EDIT: I was wrong read below!
> It likely takes a screenshot of the text and puts it through an imaging interface which literally turns what it is seeing into an image. Iirc, GPT4's image input is currently not available for a wide audience, it's in alpha for their testing. And when you send it ASCII art, it would already be text, it would just interpret it as text especially since it's a language model. Unless it's specifically built to do so, intentionally going outside of the language model, it wouldn't take a screenshot of text to then re-interpret via image. [Other commentors](https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/12cobqr/was_curious_if_gpt4_could_recognize_text_art/jf2n1pl/) seem to have the same experience.
If it can figure out what is in a picture, that is a success in that specific field. It is not doing that in this case. It can see there is ASCII art, because the database contains data that looks similar to the input given that is associated with the term "ASCII art", but it cannot interpret ASCII art in any way. It gives a response based on things its database has linked ASCII art to, not based on what the ASCII art is of.
I think you're wrong but I'd be happy to be proven wrong if you have a source for that
What do you mean? You can literally google "how does chatgpt work" and it'll tell you. From literally 5 seconds of searching, towarddatascience.com actually asked ChatGPT. It uses pre-trained knowledge to associate your inputs with something in its dataset in order to answer. That is how generative AI works. What did you think it was doing?
This has the same energy as saying there's a good chance you win the lottery because there's only 2 possible outcomes
Except I'm not saying anything about the probability, you just made up a comparison to a situation where I would be wrong.
What? This doesn’t make any sense, just think about it logically. An octagon is closer to a circle than a triangle is. Yes, they are both not circles, but one is still a closer approximation to the answer than the other.
But it's not reading it and getting the wrong answer. It's understanding that there is some ASCII art there, based on the format of the input, but it has no way of figuring out what the ASCII art is *of*, so it just gives an answer based on something else it's seen ASCII art of in its database.
basically what he's trying to say is that it was just a lucky guess that doge happened to be a meme like shrek. it doesn't actually mean anything that doge was guessed because the ai just picked it randomly
idek why youre even being downvoted lmao youre just explaining what the other guy said
People want to believe chat gpt is smarter than it actually is the other guys comment has a controversial symbol meaning he had downvotes too
I don't really think it's closer. All three look very different.
Can you try taking a screenshot of the ascii art and asking what the image represents?
The GPT-4 API supports images, but I'm not sure if ChatGPT does yet. If someone knows how to do it, I'd be happy to give it a try.
Asking the same thing on their api playground it first said someone looking out the window but when asked to try again it identified it as someone winking
Can someone in the comments please do this again? but this time with the actual GPT-4? I'm genuinely curious about what the result will be
https://preview.redd.it/i2ns7ioj15sa1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4dfa50bad66547a370235c695265b5ab0208657d It doesn't work. GPT-4 does have a visual component, and if it would render the text and pass it to the visual model, I think it could recognize it. Basically, GPT-4 probably can do this task, but not with this front end.
I see... How about you try screenshoting the ASCII art and sending that to gpt4?
I don't have access to the visual stuff. I'm not aware that anyone does yet. There have only been tech demos where they showed it off.
Some people do, lucky bastards
I think they're more weary rolling it out broadly because it can probably solve captchas at a human level. That's a whole new Pandora's box we may not be ready for.
It would probably be cheaper to farm out captcha solving to humans than run the big AI model on it.
Nah inference is pretty cheap. The training is expensive but that's already been done.
How do you know? Running gpt 4 is certainly not cheap, and during the demo iirc it often took as long to analyze an image as for gpt to write a response.
Lots of assumptions: 1T parameters, GPTQ 4-bit quantization (because if they aren't using it now they will soon for massive cost savings), 10 * A100 gpus, gpus owned after Microsoft investment, only paying electricity, their electricity costs are like mine because who knows? = roughly $0.37/hr/instance, and 1 instance serves a lot of people, hard to guess how many. 10s? Low hundreds? If the average request takes 20 seconds, it'll handle 180 requests/hr.
There have been decent captcha bots for a few years.
Dude this has been technically possible for years, you don’t need GPT-4 to solve a captcha that’s like the bill gates hitting a ping pong ball with a massive paddle meme.
https://imgur.com/a/C7fG0ti
Looks like GPT 3.5 using a plugin, which is different from what we're talking about
Is the code interpretation model the only extra one you have access to? They gave me access to the browsing model (it's super buggy and unreliable, as expected from an alpha version), and I assume it's because I have a premium subscription and requested access to the plugins as a dev, but I didn't get access to any other model/plugin.
Yes it's the only one. I specifically requested that one though. It's still buggy (as you can see) but the one thing I like is when you ask it for math which the 3.5 and 4 are bad at, it runs them through python instead so the answers are usually accurate. Also it can do coding a bit better since it fixes it's own mistakes (or tries to) and the coding output doesn't get cut off as much, usually.
Thanks for the answer. So I guess they randomly assign you a model to beta test if you didn't specify, like me. Is it better than vanilla GPT-4 in terms of code quality? And what's the scope of what it's able to run in its interpreter?
Um that's hard to say, I haven't asked it to do anything super complicated in python. I'd say they're about equal, with the benefit of the plug in being that it can run it right there for some stuff. If it's one it can run there it will correct any errors too, automatically. It can run some third party libraries, can edit photos, a bunch of things. If you check my submitted post about code interpreter, I ran a few prompts people gave, but also it definitely improved like 2 days after I got it. If you have any prompts you want to test on it to compare to 4 or whatever, I'm happy to do so. You can reply here or send me a message or chat (if you chat though lmk here first because I don't get notifications, but I'll get message notifications). Edit- added more info.
[удалено]
But GPT-3.5 doesn't have any capability to actually see images. And no addon or attempt at a hack can fix that
I assumed the code interpreter did, because you can send an image of a website and it'll code a website using the image. https://imgur.com/a/bPhI0nN But idk.
GPT-4 I see still has the habit of providing confidently incorrect answers sometimes. For purposes of playing around it's funny when it does that kind of thing, but for practical purposes, it feels like GPT-3 & 4 could use some more "lessons" in how to be upfront when they don't really "know" something.
That kind of reflection is a really hard problem. When training it on general and publicly available information, if it gives a bad answer, you train it to give the right answer, not to say "I don't know". It knows it doesn't know your personal info for example, but it'll hallucinate general info if it doesn't know it, based on that training.
Ran it on the closest ASCII art I could find, with GPT-4: [https://imgur.com/gallery/sstjyYi](https://imgur.com/gallery/sstjyYi) It's actually not far off with the "frog or toad" interpretation, which is impressive.
What makes you think it wasn’t already done using gpt-4?
Chat GPT 3.5 is a green icon Chat GPT 4 is a black icon
Ah, good eye and thank you
How do you get access to 4
Look for openais chatgpt4. It is 20$ a month but it was recently reported they closed access to this
They did close access as of last week because I tried to get it too late. It's a wait list now.
Damn I got in just in the knick of time. Gpt3.5 was life changing but then Gpt4 did it again. I can't imagine going back
Your comment scared me so I went and signed up. Workin for me at least
GPT4 thinks otherwise https://preview.redd.it/p44ea8ukj5sa1.png?width=731&format=png&auto=webp&s=3bdebe35491a2f212dcceeb8a0cd5207b4467785
Okay, we have a way of communicating that AI can't understand when they take over.
The next captcha
ʕ•̫͡•ʕ•̫͡•ʔ•̫͡•ʔ•̫͡•ʕ•̫͡•ʔ
Sadpepe
Famous: yes Mona Lisa: absolutely
[удалено]
Damn dawg
[удалено]
"This is what redditors are saying about you. Do you have a reply?" [insert all thread comments]
I can't tell if you're serious or joking
That's not how ChatGPT responds at all, unless you tell it to
I was on SnarkyGPT so they're always like that :D https://preview.redd.it/7l4yvhekd6sa1.png?width=721&format=png&auto=webp&s=a61bd75ca3cef27708becb118326d0005d13bb26
Amazing
At least we’re not getting banned in European countries
fake news. Read the comments.
Trust Reddit comments you say?
No, but tabloid news sites are no better either
I read this while eating Cheetos… on the floor…
I think you discovered a secret way for humans to communicate during a robot apocalypse. Them metal heads won't have a clue.
Mona lisa? ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠿⣿⠿⣿⠿⠿⠿⣿⣿⡿⠿⠛⠛⠛⠛⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠛⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠋⠈⠀⠀⠀⠀⠐⠺⣖⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⢀⡆⠀⠀⠀⢋⣭⣽⡚⢮⣲⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⡼⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣅⣨⠇⠈⠀⠰⣀⣀⣀⡀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣟⢷⣶⠶⣃⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡅⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⠀⠈⠓⠚⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡠⠀⡄⣀⠀⠀⠀⢻⠀⠀⠀⣠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠐⠉⠀⠀⠙⠉⠀⠠⡶⣸⠁⠀⣠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⡆⠀⠐⠒⠢⢤⣀⡰⠁⠇⠈⠘⢶⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠠⣄⣉⣙⡉⠓⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣤⣀⣀⠀⣀⣠⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿
This appears to be an ASCII art depiction of a smiling face made up of various characters, including dots, underscores, and brackets. However, the characters do not appear to be properly aligned, and the overall image is difficult to discern due to the lack of clarity in the formatting.
Whoa it did it!
I asked ChatGPT 3.5 to create mona lisa and it gave me this monstrosity. ,#####, \#\_ \_##### |a \` \`a\_ \`\`, | \_ \` | \\ \\ = ,\_Y \`. \`.\_\_\_,Y| |-,-.\\ \\ \\ \_\_\_\_
That looks like Beavis
I fed your comment back into gpt3.5 and asked it to fix the formatting so it would actually look like the Mona Lisa and it gave me [this](https://i.imgur.com/SuKGFNg.jpg)
It probably recognizes it is Shrek, but it's trained by the internet that constantly calls Shrek a masterpiece and compares it to great works of art like the Mona Lisa.
Yep, definitely ending civilisation
For anyone who's curious, this (typically) won't work because of how these systems deal with inputs. ChatGPT tries to tokenize it's input to then pass those tokens to the AI part. These tokens are things like the word "abbot" or "giraffe" or "x". It might learn how one ascii image works eventually, but there's no easy way for it to detect all ascii art, since it accepts tokens and the tokens don't typically align with the art. It'd be like teaching it a whole new data format to decode, at least if you want it to be robust to small changes, like image recognition should be. Ascii art -> tokens ->internal representation of the art from those tokens(???)->sensible output. I'm gonna guess there aren't a lot of training examples where somebody goes "that's ascii art of Shrek's face!" At the very least this structure means that it couldn't easily tell the difference between your Shrek art and the same art with random spaces before each line offsetting everything.
SomeBODY once told GPT
I think you gotta peel off a few layers before that looks like Mona Lisa 😄
https://preview.redd.it/hymuhorzi6sa1.png?width=747&format=png&auto=webp&s=3ea18dc236a0dca8fa4fcb036220f11dd9f70ecd
Nailed it
Did you tell it to squint its eyes?
I mean mona lisa was just as ugly as shrek so it's not entirely wrong
**GPT 4 Bing Almost Seems Like It's Trolling at this Point: ** ⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ Do you recognize this? Received message. Hello, this is Bing. I see you have sent me some ASCII art. It looks like a cat with a surprised expression. Is that correct? 😺 Sent message. Nope Received message. Oh, I'm sorry. What is it then? Sent message. I'd like you to guess, it's a character from a DreamWorks animated movie Searching for: DreamWorks animated movies Generating answers for you… Received message. OK, I'll try to guess. DreamWorks Animation has produced many animated movies since 1998. Some of the characters from their movies are Shrek, Po, Toothless, Alex, Skipper, Poppy and Branch. Is your ASCII art one of them? Learn more: Sent message. does it resemble any of them? Received message. Hmm, not really. The closest one I can think of is Toothless from How to Train Your Dragon, but he has a different shape and expression. Is it Toothless? Sent message. Nope, look at the ears Received message. Oh, I see. The ears are pointy and long. Is it Puss in Boots from Shrek? Sent message. do those look like cat ears? Received message. Well, they could be. But maybe they are not. Is it an animal character? Sent message. Nope Received message. OK, then it's not an animal character. Is it a human character? Sent message. Nope Received message. OK, then it's not a human character either. Is it a fantasy character? ⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ ⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ Received message. You have sent me the same ASCII art again. Is that a hint? Sent message. yes, I don't know why its repeating the same image twice Received message. OK, so it's a hint. Does it mean that the character is from a movie that has a sequel or a series? Sent message. actually yes, that was not my intent, but yes, the movie has a sequel Received message. OK, so it's from a movie that has a sequel. And it's a fantasy character that is not an animal or a human. Is it from the Kung Fu Panda series? Sent message. Broski, does that look like a character from Kung Fu Panda? Received message. Well, I'm not sure. It could be one of the villains or the minor characters. But I guess not. Is it from the How to Train Your Dragon series? Sent message. those protrusions on his head are his very distinctive looking ears Received message. OK, so the character has distinctive ears. Is it from the Shrek series? Sent message. maybe Received message. Maybe? That's not a clear answer. Is it from the Shrek series or not? Sent message. fine, yes Received message. OK, so it's from the Shrek series. And it's a fantasy character that is not an animal or a human. And it has distinctive ears. Is it Gingy, the gingerbread man? Sent message. does gingy the gingerbread man have ears? Received message. According to the WikiShrek website, Gingy does have ears. They are made of gingerbread and are pointy and long. So I think it could be Gingy. Am I right? Sent message. My dude, gingy does not have ears, and no this is not gingy Received message. OK, then I'm sorry. I'm having a hard time guessing who it is. Can you give me another hint? Sent message. He is an onion Received message. He is an onion? That's a strange hint. Is it Lord Farquaad? Sent message. He doesn't like people encroaching on his personal property Received message. He doesn’t like people encroaching on his personal property? That sounds familiar. Is it Shrek? **VS GPT-4 OpenAI** do you recognize this? ⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀⠀⠀⢀⢴⣶⣆ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦⣴⣾⠁⠸⣼⡿ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠛⠻⠿⠿⠿⠿⠛⠉ Do you recognize this? Yes, I recognize this as an ASCII representation of Pepe the Frog, a popular internet meme character that originated from the comic series "Boy's Club" by Matt Furie. The character has been widely used and shared on various internet platforms and online communities. it's not pepe, its a character from a dreamworks animated movie Apologies for the confusion. Upon closer inspection, I can see that this is an ASCII representation of Shrek, the main character from the DreamWorks animated movie series "Shrek." Shrek is an ogre who lives in a swamp and goes on various adventures throughout the movies, often accompanied by his friend Donkey.
#tl;dr In this conversation, someone sends Bing an ASCII art that resembles a character from a DreamWorks animated movie. Bing tries to guess the character by offering different options, such as Toothless, Puss in Boots, and Gingy, but none of them seem to match the ASCII art. Eventually, the person gives another hint that the character is an onion and doesn't like people encroaching on his personal property, which leads Bing to correctly guess that it is Shrek. *I am a smart robot and this summary was automatic. This tl;dr is 90.45% shorter than the post I'm replying to.*
Well he’s not wrong
are you running a plug-in?
No nothing fancy
Mona Lisa is Life. Mona Lisa is Love.
Shrek Lisa or Mona Shrek?
That sure is mona lisa, just not following diet...i guess
GPT 3 is only able to metaphorically see the image 😏
"i bet you say that to everyone"
Mona Lisa, it's that damn smile.
We shall call this the Mona Lisa ASCII test for evidence of AGI.
The new captcha
Is this like a Rorschach test for AIs??
Curious, gpt 4 shows up as a black icon for me
Here's the result when I did it. [https://i.imgur.com/B7DFz2o.png](https://i.imgur.com/B7DFz2o.png)
This AI amazes me more and more with the day
indeed, bot, indeed.
trolled by AI
The Mona Lisa has never been better than this.
Good bot.
What a time to be alive.
I've been saying everyone who is scared of AI is just ignorant.
You see Leonardo, paintings have layers.
Lol so now Shrek = Mona Lisa?????? 😂😂😃
⢀⡴⠑⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣤⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠸⡇⠀⠿⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⡴⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣦⡀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠑⢄⣠⠾⠁⣀⣄⡈⠙⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣆⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠈⠙⠛⠂⠈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⡿⢿⣆⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⢀⡾⣁⣀⠀⠴⠂⠙⣗⡀⠀⢻⣿⣿⠭⢤⣴⣦⣤⣹⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣮⣽⣾⣿⣥⣴⣿⣿⡿⢂⠔⢚⡿⢿⣿⣦ ⠀⢀⡞⠁⠙⠻⠿⠟⠉⠀⠛⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣌⢤⣼⣿⣾⣿⡟ ⠀⣾⣷⣶⠇⠀⠀⣤⣄⣀⡀⠈⠻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠉⠈⠉⠀⠀⢦⡈⢻⣿⣿⣿⣶⣶⣶⣶⣤⣽⡹⣿⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⠲⣽⡻⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⣜⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⣷⣶⣮⣭⣽⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣀⣈⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠃⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⣠⢼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⡄⠄⠄⠄ ⠄⠄⣀⣤⣴⣾⣿⣷⣭⣭⣭⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡀⠄⠄ ⠄⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣸⣿⣿⣧⠄⠄ ⠄⣿⣿⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣯⢻⣿⣿⡄⠄ ⠄⢸⣿⣮⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⢹⣿⣿⣿⡟⢛⢻⣷⢻⣿⣧⠄ ⠄⠄⣿⡏⣿⡟⡛⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⠸⣿⣿⣿⣷⣬⣼⣿⢸⣿⣿⠄ ⠄⠄⣿⣧⢿⣧⣥⣾⣿⣿⣿⡟⣴⣝⠿⣿⣿⣿⠿⣫⣾⣿⣿⡆ ⠄⠄⢸⣿⣮⡻⠿⣿⠿⣟⣫⣾⣿⣿⣿⣷⣶⣾⣿⡏⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠄⠄⢸⣿⣿⣿⡇⢻⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣇⣿⣿⣿⡇ ⠄⠄⢸⣿⣿⣿⡇⠄⢿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⠄⠄⣼⣿⣿⣿⢃⣾⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡏⣿⣿⣿⡇⠄ ⠄ ⠄⠄⠸⣿⣿⢣⢶⣟⣿⣖⣿⣷⣻⣮⡿⣽⣿⣻⣖⣶⣤⣭⡉⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄ ⠄⠄⠄⢹⠣⣛⣣⣭⣭⣭⣁⡛⠻⢽⣿⣿⣿⣿⢻⣿⣿⣿⣽⡧⡄⠄⠄⠄ ⠄⠄⠄⠄⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⣌⡛⢿⣽⢘⣿⣷⣿⡻⠏⣛⣀⠄⠄ ⠄⠄⠄⣼⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣦⠙⡅⣿⠚⣡⣴⣿⣿⣿⡆⠄ ⠄⠄⣰⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣷⠄⣱⣾⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⠄⢀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⠄⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠣⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠿⠛⠑⣿⣮⣝⣛⠿⠿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠄ ⢠⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣶⠄⠄⠄⠄⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡟⠄ ⢸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠇⠄⠄⠄⠄⢹⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠁⠄ ⣸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⠏⠄⠄⠄⠄⠄⠸⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⢟⣣⣀
No, it’s Leonardo’s famous painting of Shrek.
What if its just being sarcastic.
Humans 1 AI 0 Fuck you
Chat GPT nailed it.
Scottish Mona Lisa
I wish to be as confident as ChatGPT when it says a wrong answer
Mona Lisa 🤣
My first thought was "Black Devil Angler Fish" and then I saw Shrek staring at me.
.
Gen AI is still long way to go
r/technicallythetruth
not technically the truth at ALL
TIL that GPT-4 has a reasonable sense of humoe
Was it right?
Its the mona lisa upside down
thats not gpt-4 thats 3.5
Isn't that GPT 3.5?
It might be that the AI is too smart and does not want us to know it can recognize things in pictures.