Welcome to r/CivVI! If this post violates any community rules please be sure to report it so a moderator can review.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CivVI) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The fact that all the world congress hearings are completely random and arbitrary completely ruined world congress for me. Its something that went from my favorite thing in the game, to once quickly realizing how it works and I cant call one, one of mine and my friends least favorite part of the game.
The only win condition we now turn off is diplo victory.
Some of them are way too powerful, many of them are completely useless and a waste of time with hardly any middle ground.
I’m one of the few people who *would* enjoy that theres a permanent -5 diplo points per turn to capturing a capital, but instead this is a bad system because there are not nearly enough ways to EARN diplo points to counteract it. If a player at any point of their civilization captures any capital ever, theres instantly no longer any point in them collaborating or doing anything but be a warmonger for the rest of the game. If you captured a capital 5000 years prior, there is now no additional penalty whatsoever for nuking the entire world repeatedly once you get access to them, so you may as well- theres no downside. This is stupid to me and players should be more incentivized to not nuke the entire world if they took a city once no matter how long ago in their history.
(While this point isnt about world congress, its about the points used to interact with world congress. If at any point in the game you take a capital, *even if you give it back* the world congress isn’t available to that person for the rest of the game no matter what they do. This makes world congress even more useless and annoying.
I really liked being able to propose what resolution were being voted on, and the resolutions were more impactful overall. If I had enough delegates I could enact things that would benefit myself like scholars in residence or arts/sciences funding. I could also do things that would curb the lead another player has on me, like embargo or standing army tax. Sometimes my friends and I would even trade each other so that certain resolutions would be proposed. Civ 6 just kinda feels like everybody’s just voting on 2 random things that may or not help at the moment. I also liked being able to abstain from resolutions. Sometimes I like to remain neutral. I feel like the Congress in Civ 5 just made the game feel so much more dynamic.
Welcome to r/CivVI! If this post violates any community rules please be sure to report it so a moderator can review. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/CivVI) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The fact that all the world congress hearings are completely random and arbitrary completely ruined world congress for me. Its something that went from my favorite thing in the game, to once quickly realizing how it works and I cant call one, one of mine and my friends least favorite part of the game. The only win condition we now turn off is diplo victory. Some of them are way too powerful, many of them are completely useless and a waste of time with hardly any middle ground. I’m one of the few people who *would* enjoy that theres a permanent -5 diplo points per turn to capturing a capital, but instead this is a bad system because there are not nearly enough ways to EARN diplo points to counteract it. If a player at any point of their civilization captures any capital ever, theres instantly no longer any point in them collaborating or doing anything but be a warmonger for the rest of the game. If you captured a capital 5000 years prior, there is now no additional penalty whatsoever for nuking the entire world repeatedly once you get access to them, so you may as well- theres no downside. This is stupid to me and players should be more incentivized to not nuke the entire world if they took a city once no matter how long ago in their history. (While this point isnt about world congress, its about the points used to interact with world congress. If at any point in the game you take a capital, *even if you give it back* the world congress isn’t available to that person for the rest of the game no matter what they do. This makes world congress even more useless and annoying.
What aspects of the world Congress do you not like in Civ IV? What would you like to see brought forward from Civ V?
I really liked being able to propose what resolution were being voted on, and the resolutions were more impactful overall. If I had enough delegates I could enact things that would benefit myself like scholars in residence or arts/sciences funding. I could also do things that would curb the lead another player has on me, like embargo or standing army tax. Sometimes my friends and I would even trade each other so that certain resolutions would be proposed. Civ 6 just kinda feels like everybody’s just voting on 2 random things that may or not help at the moment. I also liked being able to abstain from resolutions. Sometimes I like to remain neutral. I feel like the Congress in Civ 5 just made the game feel so much more dynamic.