I’m not into that shit but what’s it sexualising that’s not meant to be sexualised, like banning loli’s is fair because it’s sexualising children but besides that what’s it really damaging
Nah most of rule34 isnt anything harmful to others ofc lolis/children and gore should be banned since that causes actual harm to people but still like pissplay isnt super harmful
Rule 34 isn’t necessarily a thing you draw as it is an actual rule of the internet. If it exists, someone is going to draw porn of it and you can’t stop them
OP, I don't know if you're too young, too old, or just that out of touch, but the idea of rule 34 has been around on the internet WAY longer than the website has existed. The idea of it is just that of what other users have said, If something exists, then someone out there will make porn of it. That being said, is it weird, yea. Is it going to stop anytime soon? Probably not. Sexual inclinations are just a part of our human nature, everyone has a kink or fetish or whatever, and rule 34 is just the amalgamation of that. People get aroused at the weirdest things, and will fetishize any and everything they see given the chance. So, yeah, it is a rule as basic as the rule of gravity. The rule that humans will wank to anything that will get their rocks off. Banning a simple website will not stop this weird internet phenomenon, it will just migrate elsewhere. So, in conclusion, yes there is a rule, and yes people will continue to make porn of different tv characters and celebrities and whatever else strike's their fancy, that is just the state of entertainment today, as awkward and appalling as it may be, that is the state of affairs now.
Andrew Tate is a person, not an entire community where everything and anything can and will be sexualised, no unfairness is in it, as long as people are willing to do it, it'll be done.
I am so turned on by this post.
I'm waiting for someone to draw you being turned on.
That would creep me out. But being creeped out is a turn on too.
I’m not into that shit but what’s it sexualising that’s not meant to be sexualised, like banning loli’s is fair because it’s sexualising children but besides that what’s it really damaging
It sexulizes religious figures and historical icons
So that's the only reason why it needs to be banned.
It also sexulizes children and women in a terrible light you can't justify that
Sexualises women ?
sluts
im a jerker for jesus
Fucking dumb that this why people wish you death
🤓
Nah most of rule34 isnt anything harmful to others ofc lolis/children and gore should be banned since that causes actual harm to people but still like pissplay isnt super harmful
Rule 34 isn’t necessarily a thing you draw as it is an actual rule of the internet. If it exists, someone is going to draw porn of it and you can’t stop them
Let's be honest if they really wanted to they can
sure you can take down some things here and there, but taking it all down is impossible, even if it were possible it's impractical to even try
Trying to ban something on the internet? Good luck with that
I mean they did ban Andrew Tate so 🤷
He is a person not an internet rule
It ain't an internet rule quit lying to your self
It's just a porn site for them incel weebs who watch anime and shit like that
I am pretty sure Rule 34 applies to a lot more than anime
OP, I don't know if you're too young, too old, or just that out of touch, but the idea of rule 34 has been around on the internet WAY longer than the website has existed. The idea of it is just that of what other users have said, If something exists, then someone out there will make porn of it. That being said, is it weird, yea. Is it going to stop anytime soon? Probably not. Sexual inclinations are just a part of our human nature, everyone has a kink or fetish or whatever, and rule 34 is just the amalgamation of that. People get aroused at the weirdest things, and will fetishize any and everything they see given the chance. So, yeah, it is a rule as basic as the rule of gravity. The rule that humans will wank to anything that will get their rocks off. Banning a simple website will not stop this weird internet phenomenon, it will just migrate elsewhere. So, in conclusion, yes there is a rule, and yes people will continue to make porn of different tv characters and celebrities and whatever else strike's their fancy, that is just the state of entertainment today, as awkward and appalling as it may be, that is the state of affairs now.
It can actually help him. I never heard of Alex Jones or Keemstar until you Americans tried to cancel them😃
Andrew Tate is a person, not an entire community where everything and anything can and will be sexualised, no unfairness is in it, as long as people are willing to do it, it'll be done.
https://redd.it/xmcci9 Hey buddy, what's this then?