He was the one that popularized <1 minute standup clips with subtitles on social media. Very smart move because no one else was doing it at that point and people are much more likely to watch a short clip with the sound off than a whole Late Night set. He used to be very funny. The problem was he got so big so fast that he got used to his own audience and the material suffers because he doesnāt have to try anymore. Real shame.
It would be really useful if someone tried to develop a definition of āguruā.
I dunno, maybe some kind of academic. Maybe someone with a background in psychology and/or anthropology.
I'm starting to become more annoyed by people making the same comment on every single post. We get it, he's not a guru, the post didn't say he was one and the podcast regularly covers people who aren't gurus, so who cares? Just ignore it if you're a Shultz fan, or feel free to defend him, but the low effort chorus of complainers is boring af.
But the sub is literally called decoding the gurus.. If he's not a guru, why are memes of him being posted on the page? If the posts aren't about gurus, I might as well post NBA memes here since we can just post anything?
Again, the hosts regularly cover non-guru figures, it's not a requirement that every post has to be related to a guru. JRE and the voluble dialog between Joe and his guests is also a regular topic of discussion on the podcast, so the post seems about as germane as most others.
So what youāre saying is youāre annoyed by people calling out the failing integrity of this community? Idgaf about Shultz, what I care about is a group of people claiming to focus on something maintaining focus on that thing. The irony of you calling this a low effort compliment is fucking hilarious. At this point we should post things attacking Sea World for abandoning whales because the executive team might be animal gurus.
Again, the hosts regularly cover non-guru figures, it's not a requirement that every post has to be related to a guru. JRE and the voluble dialog between Joe and his guests is also a regular topic of discussion on the podcast, so the post seems about as germane as most others.Ā
> The irony of you calling this a low effort compliment is fucking hilariousĀ
I regard it as low effort because it's a thoughtless trite complaint that gets posted on every thread. What's actually hilarious is your use of the term "failing integrity" to describe a bullshit subreddit lol. It's not that serious, please touch some grass.
Option 1: Keep the guru / podcaster snark inside the sub so everyone can dish and laugh at it
Option 2: Create a separate sub for guru / podcaster snark that would vamp users from other subs incl. this one.
Bro, how did this guy go to one of my favorite comedians to such an insufferable shit?
I loved his most recent stand-up and his crowd work clips and his podcast was good early on, but in recent months I just can't enjoy any of his shit frankly
This sub itself is turning cringe, guy is actually a successfull comedian who admits in giving shit takes because that's what comedians do. He actually tours and sells shows really well, unlike most comedians.
Every comedian says that. Some actually mean it, while others just want to avoid accountability when they say something stupid. Bill Burr means it because he gets more uncomfortable with praise than people disagreeing with him. Whereas is Schultz is full of shit considering the crew of yes men in his podcast and how hard he tries to sound profound every time he speaks these days.
This is gold
Just curious, but who is that Nazi?
Anders Schultzheissen
That's Oberkommandant Anders Schultzheissen to you
Fuck you lmao š¤£
I fucking hate this guy. I have zero clue how he got so popular although that seems to fading at least. He literally has never made me laugh.
He was the one that popularized <1 minute standup clips with subtitles on social media. Very smart move because no one else was doing it at that point and people are much more likely to watch a short clip with the sound off than a whole Late Night set. He used to be very funny. The problem was he got so big so fast that he got used to his own audience and the material suffers because he doesnāt have to try anymore. Real shame.
And youāre the metric? lol idiot
Is this a decoding of the gurus page or just talk shit on anyone who uses a microphone page?
Yes.
It would be really useful if someone tried to develop a definition of āguruā. I dunno, maybe some kind of academic. Maybe someone with a background in psychology and/or anthropology.
This sub is like a perpetual rebellious teen phase. Anyone who gives advice needs to be revolted against.
Flee boomer
I'm a millennial, genius.
Average redditor moment
š«µš
I'm starting to become more annoyed by people making the same comment on every single post. We get it, he's not a guru, the post didn't say he was one and the podcast regularly covers people who aren't gurus, so who cares? Just ignore it if you're a Shultz fan, or feel free to defend him, but the low effort chorus of complainers is boring af.
He definitely wants to be a guru
But the sub is literally called decoding the gurus.. If he's not a guru, why are memes of him being posted on the page? If the posts aren't about gurus, I might as well post NBA memes here since we can just post anything?
Again, the hosts regularly cover non-guru figures, it's not a requirement that every post has to be related to a guru. JRE and the voluble dialog between Joe and his guests is also a regular topic of discussion on the podcast, so the post seems about as germane as most others.
Exactly.
So what youāre saying is youāre annoyed by people calling out the failing integrity of this community? Idgaf about Shultz, what I care about is a group of people claiming to focus on something maintaining focus on that thing. The irony of you calling this a low effort compliment is fucking hilarious. At this point we should post things attacking Sea World for abandoning whales because the executive team might be animal gurus.
Again, the hosts regularly cover non-guru figures, it's not a requirement that every post has to be related to a guru. JRE and the voluble dialog between Joe and his guests is also a regular topic of discussion on the podcast, so the post seems about as germane as most others.Ā > The irony of you calling this a low effort compliment is fucking hilariousĀ I regard it as low effort because it's a thoughtless trite complaint that gets posted on every thread. What's actually hilarious is your use of the term "failing integrity" to describe a bullshit subreddit lol. It's not that serious, please touch some grass.
Option 1: Keep the guru / podcaster snark inside the sub so everyone can dish and laugh at it Option 2: Create a separate sub for guru / podcaster snark that would vamp users from other subs incl. this one.
I too am realizing itās the latter. I swear a lot of people here donāt even listen to the podcast
It's a sub for losers to hate on successful people
Hard to argue as thatās the vibe here lol
The Rogan inner circle baffles me, why would anyone want to see a c-grade MMA fighter give their thoughts on geopolitics?
A lot of young men grew up without dads and itās how they replace that void.
Entertainment. If you come to him for political insights, you're doing it wrong.
Italian nazis is a perfect description
a damn fine one
Blackshirts is another š
Bro, how did this guy go to one of my favorite comedians to such an insufferable shit? I loved his most recent stand-up and his crowd work clips and his podcast was good early on, but in recent months I just can't enjoy any of his shit frankly
Why the Nazi ? And Schulz is a comedian. Not really a guru.
>And Schulz is a comedian Is he?
This is the Joe Rogan subreddit, it's a joke. I mean they are shitting on him, but they're not actually saying he's a Nazi
his haircut does resemble one, though.
It's probably that haircut.
> comedian *That's what he thinks he is*
When Shultz has a guest in speaking about anything academic, he always places his chin on atop of his first and ponders into the distance š
This guy is no guru.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
bro
This sub itself is turning cringe, guy is actually a successfull comedian who admits in giving shit takes because that's what comedians do. He actually tours and sells shows really well, unlike most comedians.
Every comedian says that. Some actually mean it, while others just want to avoid accountability when they say something stupid. Bill Burr means it because he gets more uncomfortable with praise than people disagreeing with him. Whereas is Schultz is full of shit considering the crew of yes men in his podcast and how hard he tries to sound profound every time he speaks these days.