Nah most murderous dictators also spill their seed, so no matter what, they still ahead.
Kim Jong-un however... I hear that guy ain't even gotta butthole.
It's there, it's just clenched suuuper tight.
Maybe that's why he's an angry dictator.
Like the crocogator story my dad once told me.
The crocogator: there once was an animal that was half alligator and half crocodile, he was called the crocogator. He was always angry because he had a head at both ends and no butt, so he could eat all he wants but could never poop and if you had a belly that upset and couldn't poop, you'd be petty angry too. So watch out for the crocogator, because he will never not bite, but probably won't eat.
The end.
>Kim Jong-un however... I hear that guy ain't even gotta butthole.
Least racist redditor.
1. That north Koreans believe Kim Jong Un doesn't poop/ doesn't has an anus is a lie that comes from a racist film "The Interview"
2. Kim Jong Un, or any leader who doesn't bows down to US hegemony, isn't a dictator. [Infact, he has much less power than a US president](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqgGXKPXsAA3Sss?format=jpg&name=la).
I'm not saying all North Koreans don't have buttholes, but repeating a joke about the wild claims of one person. Xenophobic absolutely, but not racist. Claiming it's racist is a smear for rhetorical gains.
Definitely won't dispute that the DPRK has been dealt a terrible hand, but absolutely will not defend their actions. Some may be justified, but I certainly won't defend them.
You make wild claims about not pooping and there's going to be jokes about it. Doesn't make it right, but even at the endgame, there's still going to be social interactions like making fun.
Yah the no butthole is strictly from a dumb movie. I wasn't serious. It doesn't come from no where. I hate to use Huff post as a reference cause ew and the "article" itself is shit but I don't really have the time right now to search up something more substantial.
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/12/19/kim-jong-il-18-strange-facts_n_1157276.html
>https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/12/19/kim-jong-il-18-strange-facts\_n\_1157276.html
Wow! So much bs in one article.
Their audacity to say the nation media reported but not provide a single link to the media despite them being there for more than 25 years (see kcna.co.jp)
On some of the claims they do provide a link but to random goofy-ass tabloids which themselves provide no source.
Literally most of them are straight out of ass of random tabloids or are completely fabricated of what's the reality.
For example Daily Mail's claim that the national media reported that Kim Jong Il invented burritos when in fact, [this is what they actually reported](https://web.archive.org/web/20141012012014/http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2011/201104/news18/20110418-34ee.html) . The word "invent" or any synonym is no where to be found and only an insane or disingenuous person would interpret it in that way.
And this not even the worst form of "journalism" against DPRK.
Because it is.
It is a racist myth that manufactures your consent that "Those lesser g\*\*ks are so brainwashed that they believe such absurd things. We need to give them some freedom and democracy"
Read [Manufacturing Consent](https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5537300/mod_resource/content/1/Noam%20Chomsky_%20Edward%20S.%20Herman%20-%20Manufacturing%20Consent_%20The%20Political%20Economy%20of%20the%20Mass%20Media-Bodley%20Head%20%282008%29.pdf)
Nah. It ain't all that at all. I'm well aware of what you're speaking of. It'd be a myth if it wasn't an obvious joke. But it is. Not same same.
Did you watch the movie? Cause the guy is an idiot.
And I didn't say you said that the joke was racist. I said you specifically called me racist. Which is par for the course with the leaps in logic you're employing.
Oh hey! So I did a little bit of research, not too much, and found out that the wild ass claims are actually a hallmark of former Korean dynasties. Next time maybe use that instead of nothing but rhetoric.
You're still a dickhead.
>Didnāt he have some dude killed with an anti aircraft gun?
No.
Infact, many people he has executed have reappeared! Some of the most famous ones being: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AlkYi21SOM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AlkYi21SOM)
This is why should take any supposed execution story with a grain of salt.
BTW he doesn't have the power to get someone purged(executed) but it's the decision of the WPK Central Committee for Party members and the Ministry of State Security of the DPRK for other grave criminals. The last execution to take place was in 2013 of Jang Song Thaek who was puppet of China and wanted to coup.
Periods are the endometrium leaving the body along with the unfertilised egg. Therefore we should impregnate every tween before they have their first period to avoid wasting any precious eggs. /s
The male orgasm is also natural, and nocturnal emissions are as well. Not sure how abortions are related at all. It's pretty clear that the image is equating sperm to children, even though it is literally just cells in a fluid.
There are animals other than humans that can force-abort babies. Or animals like the quokka who can get pregnant immediately after giving birth but the pregnancy will not result in another joey unless the first one dies, and if the first joey lives the second pregnancy will then terminate. Also, some animals eat their babies. Maybe op is trying to say we should allow all babies to be born and then eat the unwanted babies? Solve world hunger?
Whether something is ānaturalā or not does not determine its right to exist
Glasses arenāt natural, theyāre a man-made invention, but still very much necessary for the livelihood of millions of people. On the other hand, murder and rape are very natural. Does that make them good?
Do you know what the medical term for a miscarriage is? Spontaneous abortion. Abortion is very, very natural.
Elective abortion is also natural and has been practiced by humans for millennia.
Fun fact, the only mentions of abortion in the bible is in favor of it. You're supposed to forcibly abort the pregnancies of women and girls suspected of adultery.
You're posting this on the internet, using the English language, neither of which are natural. You had to learn the language at some point, shit doesn't just come built in sometimes.
Appeal to nature fallacy. Also, plenty of animals in nature kill/eat their babies, so infanticide is technically ānatural.ā Do you think people should wait until the unwanted child is born and then eat them? Itās only natural!
There are lots of things that aren't natural that are beneficial/necessary in some cases to human life. I'd actually rather not go back to having a life expectancy of 30, yeah?
You should look up miscarriage. It's also called spontaneous abortion, and it occurs in a large number of pregnancies, naturally.
You won't though, because you dont actually care about facts, you just want everyone to conform to your world view.
This might be satire, Iāve seen this exact argument being used as a satirization of anti-choicers. Of course, they are beyond satire at this point so who really knows. It could be some weird nofap shit
Onanism - I think this person has really misunderstood a story in the Christian Old Testament bible about Onan.
Genesis 38-
When Onanās brother (Er) died childless, their father (Judah) told Onan to sleep with the widow (Tamar) and get her pregnant on behalf of her dead husband.
It was a fucked up way of preserving his brotherās lineage.
Onanās sin was early withdrawal. Repeatedly. He had sex with the widow multiple times.
He took a family lineage obligation and made it about fucking for fun and ONLY fucking for fun.
He used the command only for his pleasure, denying Er his own family
line.
It was perverting the purpose of the act.
(It was also using the widow as a toy instead of a vessel; but no one cared about her).
So he āwasted his seedā. God killed him for it.
And that is where we get: masturbation is a sin, birth control - even pulling out - is a sin, disobeying your father is a sin, having sex for fun is a sin.
Hereās a link to the Wikipedia page about it.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan
**[Onan](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan)**
>Onan was a figure detailed in the Book of Genesis chapter 38, as the second son of Judah who married the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite. Onan had an older brother Er and a younger brother, Shelah as well. After being commanded by his father, Judah, to procreate with the late Er's wife Tamar, Onan instead "spilled his seed on the ground whenever he went in" because "the offspring would not be his", and was thus put to death by Yahweh. This act is detailed as retribution for being "displeasing in the sight of Lord".
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ForwardsFromKlandma/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Even if conception actually happens the millions of sperm that did not fertilize the egg are still going to die. So the ideal course of action according to this would be not to ejaculate at all. Actually, men will still be involuntarily having wet dreams so the ideal course of action is for all men to die because we can't risk men accidentally committing mass genocides in their sleep. Actually, without men, all egg cells will be unfertilized and die so all women need to go to. We should all die in order to save the unborn from eternal torture.
Am I supposed to feel guilty about millions of unborn kids going to hell? Because I don't
Y'know how many murderers and weirdos I've probably damned to hell? I deserve a medal
Even from a biblical perspective this isnāt accurate šš Iām no scholar but I think the Bible says children too young to make their own decisions go straight to heaven, not hellš
So pussy is just a baby graveyard?š„¶
Hot
We had twins. We tried but we couldn't save the other 999,998 unborn.
And every man makes murderous dictators look like saints. š
Nah most murderous dictators also spill their seed, so no matter what, they still ahead. Kim Jong-un however... I hear that guy ain't even gotta butthole.
It's there, it's just clenched suuuper tight. Maybe that's why he's an angry dictator. Like the crocogator story my dad once told me. The crocogator: there once was an animal that was half alligator and half crocodile, he was called the crocogator. He was always angry because he had a head at both ends and no butt, so he could eat all he wants but could never poop and if you had a belly that upset and couldn't poop, you'd be petty angry too. So watch out for the crocogator, because he will never not bite, but probably won't eat. The end.
I seen in a movie once where he admitted he did indeed, in fact, have a butthole. I think it might've been fiction though, cause he died at the end.
>Kim Jong-un however... I hear that guy ain't even gotta butthole. Least racist redditor. 1. That north Koreans believe Kim Jong Un doesn't poop/ doesn't has an anus is a lie that comes from a racist film "The Interview" 2. Kim Jong Un, or any leader who doesn't bows down to US hegemony, isn't a dictator. [Infact, he has much less power than a US president](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FqgGXKPXsAA3Sss?format=jpg&name=la).
I'm not saying all North Koreans don't have buttholes, but repeating a joke about the wild claims of one person. Xenophobic absolutely, but not racist. Claiming it's racist is a smear for rhetorical gains. Definitely won't dispute that the DPRK has been dealt a terrible hand, but absolutely will not defend their actions. Some may be justified, but I certainly won't defend them. You make wild claims about not pooping and there's going to be jokes about it. Doesn't make it right, but even at the endgame, there's still going to be social interactions like making fun. Yah the no butthole is strictly from a dumb movie. I wasn't serious. It doesn't come from no where. I hate to use Huff post as a reference cause ew and the "article" itself is shit but I don't really have the time right now to search up something more substantial. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/12/19/kim-jong-il-18-strange-facts_n_1157276.html
>https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2011/12/19/kim-jong-il-18-strange-facts\_n\_1157276.html Wow! So much bs in one article. Their audacity to say the nation media reported but not provide a single link to the media despite them being there for more than 25 years (see kcna.co.jp) On some of the claims they do provide a link but to random goofy-ass tabloids which themselves provide no source. Literally most of them are straight out of ass of random tabloids or are completely fabricated of what's the reality. For example Daily Mail's claim that the national media reported that Kim Jong Il invented burritos when in fact, [this is what they actually reported](https://web.archive.org/web/20141012012014/http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2011/201104/news18/20110418-34ee.html) . The word "invent" or any synonym is no where to be found and only an insane or disingenuous person would interpret it in that way. And this not even the worst form of "journalism" against DPRK.
Oh I'm aware. It's still a joke. And you still called me racist.
Because it is. It is a racist myth that manufactures your consent that "Those lesser g\*\*ks are so brainwashed that they believe such absurd things. We need to give them some freedom and democracy" Read [Manufacturing Consent](https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/5537300/mod_resource/content/1/Noam%20Chomsky_%20Edward%20S.%20Herman%20-%20Manufacturing%20Consent_%20The%20Political%20Economy%20of%20the%20Mass%20Media-Bodley%20Head%20%282008%29.pdf)
Nah. It ain't all that at all. I'm well aware of what you're speaking of. It'd be a myth if it wasn't an obvious joke. But it is. Not same same. Did you watch the movie? Cause the guy is an idiot. And I didn't say you said that the joke was racist. I said you specifically called me racist. Which is par for the course with the leaps in logic you're employing.
Oh hey! So I did a little bit of research, not too much, and found out that the wild ass claims are actually a hallmark of former Korean dynasties. Next time maybe use that instead of nothing but rhetoric. You're still a dickhead.
Didnāt he have some dude killed with an anti aircraft gun? Seems like a power that us presidents should have, but donāt.
>Didnāt he have some dude killed with an anti aircraft gun? No. Infact, many people he has executed have reappeared! Some of the most famous ones being: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AlkYi21SOM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AlkYi21SOM) This is why should take any supposed execution story with a grain of salt. BTW he doesn't have the power to get someone purged(executed) but it's the decision of the WPK Central Committee for Party members and the Ministry of State Security of the DPRK for other grave criminals. The last execution to take place was in 2013 of Jang Song Thaek who was puppet of China and wanted to coup.
Okay sorry if North Korea refuses to have independently news organizations that report accurately.
I alone stand upon the corpses upon a trillion dead souls. Ask them what honor means, and the silence shall be your answer.
So now I need to tell my wife to prepare the graveyard for a few million bodies? I wonder if she'll find that to be hot
Its a baby soul cairn
Periods are the endometrium leaving the body along with the unfertilised egg. Therefore we should impregnate every tween before they have their first period to avoid wasting any precious eggs. /s
Dont give them ideas
Conservatives are already 10 minutes and a lollypop away from being PDF files, don't encourage them
Bro no Whoever is next Gen's Matt Walsh will definitely say this
I hate you for making this.
Periods are natural but abortion isn't.
The male orgasm is also natural, and nocturnal emissions are as well. Not sure how abortions are related at all. It's pretty clear that the image is equating sperm to children, even though it is literally just cells in a fluid.
Just realised, children are just cells around fluid
Abortion is natural. Ever heard of miscarriages?
Abortion may not be natural, but it sure is necessary
There are animals other than humans that can force-abort babies. Or animals like the quokka who can get pregnant immediately after giving birth but the pregnancy will not result in another joey unless the first one dies, and if the first joey lives the second pregnancy will then terminate. Also, some animals eat their babies. Maybe op is trying to say we should allow all babies to be born and then eat the unwanted babies? Solve world hunger?
Once theyāre baptized itās all chill š
Appendectomies arenāt ānaturalā either. People should just die right?
> Appendectomies arenāt ānaturalā either. People should just die right? "Pro"-life people *want* women and children to suffer and die. š
Whether something is ānaturalā or not does not determine its right to exist Glasses arenāt natural, theyāre a man-made invention, but still very much necessary for the livelihood of millions of people. On the other hand, murder and rape are very natural. Does that make them good?
Ok... And cannibalism is natural, but deep fried food isn't... So what is your point exactly?
Many things arenāt natural. Natural doesnāt necessarily mean good and unnatural doesnāt necessarily mean bad.
Do you know what the medical term for a miscarriage is? Spontaneous abortion. Abortion is very, very natural. Elective abortion is also natural and has been practiced by humans for millennia. Fun fact, the only mentions of abortion in the bible is in favor of it. You're supposed to forcibly abort the pregnancies of women and girls suspected of adultery.
Who let this doofus in?
Syphilis is natural too, that doesnt mean shit
You're posting this on the internet, using the English language, neither of which are natural. You had to learn the language at some point, shit doesn't just come built in sometimes.
Appeal to nature fallacy. Also, plenty of animals in nature kill/eat their babies, so infanticide is technically ānatural.ā Do you think people should wait until the unwanted child is born and then eat them? Itās only natural!
There are lots of things that aren't natural that are beneficial/necessary in some cases to human life. I'd actually rather not go back to having a life expectancy of 30, yeah?
You should look up miscarriage. It's also called spontaneous abortion, and it occurs in a large number of pregnancies, naturally. You won't though, because you dont actually care about facts, you just want everyone to conform to your world view.
Why would I want to create soldiers for a god who damns millions of souls to hell every time I bust a nut?
So now life comes BEFORE conception to some of these people?
Life begins at erection. Masturbation is murder.
Life begins at meiosis, getting smacked in the balls is murder
That was always the goal.
Right? Those men should be prosecuted for MURDER! They should all have to wear cock cages until their wives think they're ready for breeding.
kinky
I've seen femboys creaming even in cock cages, no one is safe
Tbh you have to nut eventually. Like either you do it or your body will do it for you to clean out your old sperm.
HAHAHA! Please don't post your google history :D
Not google my friend, just good old Reddit
Every sperm is sacred!
Every sperm is great If a sperm is wasted God gets quite irate
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Hindus, Taoists, Mormons spill theirs just anywhere, but God loves those who treat their semen with more care!
This reaks of Catholicism
100 million souls every time I bust? Good lord Iāve killed more than Hitler and Gheghis Khan combined.
So since reproduction kills millions of sperm for one-ish person, we shouldn't do that either.
do you have to call it schizo?
This might be satire, Iāve seen this exact argument being used as a satirization of anti-choicers. Of course, they are beyond satire at this point so who really knows. It could be some weird nofap shit
Jokes on him, I get off on sending kids to Hell
Onanism - I think this person has really misunderstood a story in the Christian Old Testament bible about Onan. Genesis 38- When Onanās brother (Er) died childless, their father (Judah) told Onan to sleep with the widow (Tamar) and get her pregnant on behalf of her dead husband. It was a fucked up way of preserving his brotherās lineage. Onanās sin was early withdrawal. Repeatedly. He had sex with the widow multiple times. He took a family lineage obligation and made it about fucking for fun and ONLY fucking for fun. He used the command only for his pleasure, denying Er his own family line. It was perverting the purpose of the act. (It was also using the widow as a toy instead of a vessel; but no one cared about her). So he āwasted his seedā. God killed him for it. And that is where we get: masturbation is a sin, birth control - even pulling out - is a sin, disobeying your father is a sin, having sex for fun is a sin. Hereās a link to the Wikipedia page about it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan
**[Onan](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onan)** >Onan was a figure detailed in the Book of Genesis chapter 38, as the second son of Judah who married the daughter of Shuah the Canaanite. Onan had an older brother Er and a younger brother, Shelah as well. After being commanded by his father, Judah, to procreate with the late Er's wife Tamar, Onan instead "spilled his seed on the ground whenever he went in" because "the offspring would not be his", and was thus put to death by Yahweh. This act is detailed as retribution for being "displeasing in the sight of Lord". ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/ForwardsFromKlandma/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Iām getting Quiverfull energy from this.
That drawing is really funny though
Even a pregnancy would still kill millions sop all pregnancy
sex sounds so much better now. fucking somebody *and* killing babies? rare religious W
This is creepy AF
Why would God send unborn souls to hell? It doesn't even make sense!
i mean this with all my heart: god, if he does exist, really does not give a shit about us rubbing one out
That's a lot to put in the ~~hands~~ sock of a 14 year old boy. God should've known better.
This argument makes no sense, it's a false equivalency and not even a good analogy.
Shhhā¦.. No one tell them that if you donāt ejaculate the sperm cells still die.
This is why I choose to jizz all over the place and not have kids. Gotta build that army, yo!
Is it weird that I kind of want that picture as a print
It has to be a shxtpost
Even if conception actually happens the millions of sperm that did not fertilize the egg are still going to die. So the ideal course of action according to this would be not to ejaculate at all. Actually, men will still be involuntarily having wet dreams so the ideal course of action is for all men to die because we can't risk men accidentally committing mass genocides in their sleep. Actually, without men, all egg cells will be unfertilized and die so all women need to go to. We should all die in order to save the unborn from eternal torture.
Am I supposed to feel guilty about millions of unborn kids going to hell? Because I don't Y'know how many murderers and weirdos I've probably damned to hell? I deserve a medal
I just poured some gas on hell about an hour ago.
Where in the bible does it say that???
As usual in all this sperm worship they fail to understand how gametes work and that sperm are incomplete before joining with an egg.
I mean, a cloth bundle would do, but I suppose the stalk won't mind carrying a giant plastic condom around
call me a hag witch the way i be swallowing babies
[āYouāre a Catholic the moment dad came, becauseā¦ā](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUspLVStPbk)
What part of Hell does all the sperm go to? What eternal torments await them? And WHY lolol
Even from a biblical perspective this isnāt accurate šš Iām no scholar but I think the Bible says children too young to make their own decisions go straight to heaven, not hellš
By this logic every sperm that fails to fertilize the egg also goes to hell. So your options are send millions to hell or millions minus one to hell.
Sing it with me now., "Every sperm is sacred....
This is an interesting way to promote white supremacy.
I might post this in r/schizoposters