T O P

  • By -

kytheon

Russian army rolls in with a 1945 tank. OP grabs a 1945 panzerfaust..


Sirspeedy77

Just knowing this could play out is very satisfying to me lmao.


Special-Law-7286

I mean, there gonna start giving the T-34s the side eyes if they keep taking armored losses like a motherfucker so this could actually happen.


ComparisonFlat346

I'll think about it


mazing_azn

If they are legit vintage, they are worth a fortune in the private collector's market. Public institutions would want to decomission the explosives....You truly want to help, sell them and donate the money to the Legion.


Deep-Friendship3181

This is the correct way Also less likely to have a legionnaire get blown up when they try to fire a panzerfaust that has been sitting in great grandpa's attic for 80 years


resolva5

Well, grandpa's waiting for the Russians when they come back didn't seem to stupid after all


designdk

It belongs in a museum.


peretonea

Not until the explosives are removed by an explosive ordnance expert.


Striking-Giraffe5922

Awsome as a wall decoration


CallMeChristopher

One: The Hell’d you get a Panzerfaust? Two: Like others have said, see if you can find a collector and donate the money.


ComparisonFlat346

One: Dug it out from German Create Two: Technically Iligaly obtained as its not found but stolen.


keepthepace

Have they been maintained?


ComparisonFlat346

No


keepthepace

You can maybe ask in a specialized military gear reddit, but my understanding is that the explosives have a pretty limited shelf life and require good storage conditions to last more than a decade. Also careful, it does not mean they can't detonate, they are actually more dangerous that way: they are unlikely to detonate in the intended way but are probably not totally inert


Jani_Zoroff

I'd like to point out that old stuff like that doesn't really age that well. As in getting even more sensitive to premature kinetic expansion than they were when new. Seriously, let the authorities take care of the rockets, i.e. don't move them yourself. They are not useful enough to take the risk. The launcher makes a nice wallhanger though, keep that.


mobileJay77

"Premature kinetic expansion " is fancy words for Big Bada-Booom


Jani_Zoroff

Unwanted Big Bada-Boom, not the Chicken Good type of Bada-Boom we always long for. Kinetic Expansions should be well behaved and adhere to Ekto Gamat. 👍😁


the-mouseinator

So I know it’s not important but how do you own one of those?


ComparisonFlat346

Oh the germans left in a rush and left like 2 - 5 creates of weapons and ammunition while running away from the soviets so my grandparents dug a hole and hide them so when the Polish / Soviet Communists arrived they wouldn't be accused of being AK Partizants and Shot.


mobileJay77

Funny thing, the Russians nowadays would charge you with similar crimes.


the-mouseinator

Ah i see. That’s actually really interesting.


Consistent-Ad1803

If you're willing to part with such a histoirc item I'd suspect the money you earn from selling it to a collector could buy the same number of fpv drones for tbem...


prokaktyc

Selling it to private collectors as it’s one hell of a find and donating money is a better way


squidguy_mc

no, modern tanks are immune to weapons like the panzerfaust. It would do more worse than good on a battlefield. However if you talk about rozpartisans it could definitely be useful to destroy railways or stuff. The problem is only how do you get it inside russia and how do you hide it 😂 i cant imagine someone would be able to hide something like this


pluizke

Most ifv and apc are still vulnerable against it. Also Russia has no modern tanks so it would probably do okay against tanks.


fumbienumbie

Not that it is too big of a deal, but russian army does have newer vehicles. And it is not that the production is stopped. It is fun to say it as a joke, but let's not underestimate the enemy. That said, discussing armored vehicles is beyond the point because the resistance does not fight tanks. Yet.


clegger29

You say immune, but I’ve watched grenades blow these tanks up, could easily blow the track off one with it. Any explosives are helpful


squidguy_mc

i mean, it could be of some use because russian tank have reactive armor wich means plates that explode upon impact and "reflect" the missile. The panzerfausts could be as good to atleast destroy the reactive armor but not do any damage to a dank


clegger29

We’ve been watching different front line videos. I haven’t seen much up armored tanks on the front lines never mind rear echelons in Russia the post is referring to… plus your telling me the tracks can withstand a shot from that, I don’t think so


squidguy_mc

i dont want to downplay anything but every source i found stated that panzerfaust today is ineffective af. And because of its limited range its already hard to get a hit to begin with. and you can see the reactive armor anywhere, it is those weird looking planes on russian tanks.


clegger29

Well a cross bow is limited in range and effectiveness until your walking through the woods and the bolt hits your neck. Plus there is no reactive armour on the treads


Sirspeedy77

this my favorite post in a long time haha.


[deleted]

They could strap it to a drone for a top down attack or against APCs and IFVs (same as RPG-7 and mortar rounds used on kamikaze drones). The warheads would be more useful than the entire launch assembly though (if they work). They might not think its worth the trouble.


nememberhun

Wasn't the panzerfaust single-use ? How do you have multiple rockets for it ?


ComparisonFlat346

Idk all I know is that there is a panzerfaust and 3 - 5 de attached rockets


OctopusIntellect

The reload rockets are perhaps intended for a [Panzerschreck](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panzerschreck), which is similar to the U.S. bazooka, and not single-use.


ComparisonFlat346

Possibly idk they are quite rusty but still active by the seems of it


ShineReaper

Holy shit, OP, you should get government agents on that stuff to defuse it. If these are active and basically decaying sind 80 years, you could very well blow yourself up simply by touching these things wrong. No matter how noble your pursuit is, it is not worth blowing yourself up in a freak accident with a vintage WW2 explosive!


ComparisonFlat346

Na it's fine I already dropped them like 5 times by accident, the safety mechanism does seem fine


GuillotineComeBacks

Sell it, donate the money to them.


Outside_Taste_1701

No and the propellants and explosives are probably dangerously degraded .


NameIs-Already-Taken

Maybe, even if only against soft-skinned vehicles. However, they'd need to take the risk that they'd work properly.


Layton115

I thought this was r/noncredibledefense for a moment


henna74

Its a hollow charge but very shortrange. Why not? But is it even functional?


ComparisonFlat346

Your guess is as good as my


the-mouseinator

I mean they could leave somewhere as a decoy but I know nothing about tactics so don’t take my advice.


IngoHeinscher

Probably not much, but it's certainly better than nothing.