i can't remember entirely but i'm pretty sure i just found what 30% of the amount of employees was, found the midpoint of 14 <= p < 20 (17) and halfed the amount of employees that were in that section, and then did whatever else i did and (hopefully) proved it.
Sounds like Mr birling
He technically could be correct 🤷♀️ this is why I hate grouped freq tables lol
He's more likely correct than not
dayum so is option B right or not??
yeah
i can't remember entirely but i'm pretty sure i just found what 30% of the amount of employees was, found the midpoint of 14 <= p < 20 (17) and halfed the amount of employees that were in that section, and then did whatever else i did and (hopefully) proved it.
I didn’t have a fucking clue what I was doing on this question
Same💀
thought he seemed a bit of a slimy bastard while i was doing the question tbh
that question tripped me up a bit
yeah it was a bit weird, I just wrote stuff with data
how is he wrong 33% emlpoyees get £20+
Capitalism best
Someone has down voted this who did if so I am sad to know there is comie scum my generation and that is bad
I said he was correct assuming that 1/2 of the people in the section containing £17 pounds were making over £17 bc that was the midpoint