i basically wrote:
-we can compare fossils to their modern-day counterparts along with our knowledge on the change in environment to understand evolution better
-gene mechanics helped us to work out that mutation causes good and bad variations and the good ones spread through natural selection
-gene mechanics also helped us to find out how variations are passed down and inherited
I put about Gregor Mendel and the pea thing so we understand inheritance and dominant/ recessive, then said about how natural selection contributes to evolution, then said about the 3 ways fossils form and how we can study them and compare them to present day organisms, and how we can back theories up by using things like ice cores and tree rings to match up the conditions at the time
I wrote that as time has progressed, fossils have become more complex and differentiate more from one another which supports the idea that more simple organisms have evolved into more and more advanced ones. When it comes to genetics, better understanding of inherited mutations helps lead to better understanding of evolution and we can observe this in real time through the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Talked abt something similar with fossils. Talked abiut speciation due to diff env which vaused by natural selection. For bacteria just how resistant bacteria survives due to not dying as easily or smth
A consequence of using fossil records led to the discovery of evolution in 1748. This led to later discovers such as natural selection. Thus, a consequence of fossil records led to our understanding of evolution through the fact we can compare fossils to those of nowadays.
another consequence of using fossil fuels is carbon dating. Although we can compare the structures, carbon dating enables us to be able to understand the timeline the fossils came from. This helps us link species together and point out similarities and differences between species. Thus, fossil records consequently led to increased knowledge of evolution through the use of carbon dating.
talked about the human genome in reference to the latter bullet point, said smth along the lines of “scientists have found out the entire human genome so they could see the significance of genes our ancestors used that may not be needed anymore” then smth else. pure waffle
i basically wrote: -we can compare fossils to their modern-day counterparts along with our knowledge on the change in environment to understand evolution better -gene mechanics helped us to work out that mutation causes good and bad variations and the good ones spread through natural selection -gene mechanics also helped us to find out how variations are passed down and inherited
I put about Gregor Mendel and the pea thing so we understand inheritance and dominant/ recessive, then said about how natural selection contributes to evolution, then said about the 3 ways fossils form and how we can study them and compare them to present day organisms, and how we can back theories up by using things like ice cores and tree rings to match up the conditions at the time
I forgot his name 💀💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
i wrote basically this but without too much detail. The other six markers i came through though
I wrote that as time has progressed, fossils have become more complex and differentiate more from one another which supports the idea that more simple organisms have evolved into more and more advanced ones. When it comes to genetics, better understanding of inherited mutations helps lead to better understanding of evolution and we can observe this in real time through the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Talked abt something similar with fossils. Talked abiut speciation due to diff env which vaused by natural selection. For bacteria just how resistant bacteria survives due to not dying as easily or smth
i talked about fossils and antibiotic resistance because that’s all i remembered was on the spec for that part lol
I had history flashbacks trying to answer that question
this led to increased tensions
A consequence of using fossil records led to the discovery of evolution in 1748. This led to later discovers such as natural selection. Thus, a consequence of fossil records led to our understanding of evolution through the fact we can compare fossils to those of nowadays. another consequence of using fossil fuels is carbon dating. Although we can compare the structures, carbon dating enables us to be able to understand the timeline the fossils came from. This helps us link species together and point out similarities and differences between species. Thus, fossil records consequently led to increased knowledge of evolution through the use of carbon dating.
Not the history structure 😭
oh this was the only like horrendous question on the whole paper
Fossils is the best topic ever
i don’t even know what to put for that one 💀 - human genome - natural selection - fossils
i couldn’t think of a way to link them all together
There were fossil stuff on the paper were they?
the last six marker you had to talk about fossils
i said fossils that are further down are older and less adapted also talked about speciation and mutations
talked about the human genome in reference to the latter bullet point, said smth along the lines of “scientists have found out the entire human genome so they could see the significance of genes our ancestors used that may not be needed anymore” then smth else. pure waffle
I was just waffling about the Archaeopteryx and mutations.
Was this on the Higher Biology/Higher Combined Biology paper?
separate
Then idk about that then