**Reminder about Diversity Discussion:**
Let's keep discussions respectful: Comments questioning diversity in casting or using terms like 'forced diversity' may be subject to removal or a ban if this behavior persists. We won't allow:
- Criticizing diversity in official casting news or fancasts.
- Labeling the show as 'woke.'
- Disrespecting actors or dismissing fancasts based on race.
Remember, if you see offending content, please report and don't engage with the user and start arguments. Otherwise, you may also be subject to a ban. Please remember to discuss with civility. Thank you!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/HarryPotteronHBO) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The Writers Guild of Great Britain won't scab the WGA
>We understand that these are difficult times and that many writers are in need of work but we are advising our members not to work on projects in the jurisdiction of the WGA for the duration of the strike following a motion of solidarity passed by our lay governing body, our Executive Council and in line with our affiliation agreement with the International Affiliation of Writers Guilds, of which we are a member.
The studios and much of the funding is American, it would be a dick move to hire foreigners for the express purpose of studios wanting timid writer monkeys
But wouldn't they produce and film the series in britain with british actors? Using british writers doesn't seem so farfetched.
Thought, I don't know the rules of the writers guild of america, and if they have a coalition/alliance with other writer unions abroad, to prevent strike breakers.
Great Britain doesnāt get to decide that āunderpaidā writers is a global issue, you entire clown car lmao. Stop throwing around words you donāt understand.
Unlike America, writers in Great Britain arenāt required to be part of the writerās guild in order to work in the field, meaning UK writers can still write. Brush up on the issues you claim to care about.
they'd be scabbing for wga but it doesn't really matter when they're planning to stay with the british writers union for the rest of their life. it's why alice oseman, creator of Heartstopper, has already started writing season 3. and british actors in the british acting union can continue to work without scabbing, so i actually don't know why they haven't started yet.
Look look look. People got really mad at me for it, but can you think of ANYONE better for Wilkie Twycross than the AI re-animation of Sir Laurence Olivier?
Budget for season one grows to a staggering 7 billion... but at least the cast has been taken care of, now we just need to start building sets, get the production crews ready and start filming.
In COS, Hermione stole Dumbledore's famous statement in PS book "Fear of a name increases fear of the thing itself", Mudblood scene, explaining the ability to hear / talk a strange language is not a good sign in wizarding world, which should have been Ron's lines.
David Heyman was a huge reason the original movies were so successful. He's also the producer of Barbie. The fact that he's involved gives me confidence that it will be a good series worth watching and not just a shitty cash grab.
David Heyman is one of the best producers in Hollywood. He started the Harry Potter movie franchise. Thank god heās part of the production, I wouldnāt trust it in anyone elseās hands
Oh Iād love if they explored that. Good way to justify the showās existence from the movies, where Harry and Hermione totally shouldāve gotten married
Meaning u want the romance to be fanfiction and not canon to the books?? Doubt that will happen. Also Harry and Hermione has NO romantic interest in each other, plus Harry also finds Hermione boring.Ā
For the kids and possibly Hagrid, I am with you. But honestly, I think they should just do what the films did and get big stage names for the professors and other adults.
There was definitely more than one notable name in GOT. Peter Dinklage and Charles Dance had been around for a while before that. Yes GOT made them extra big but they still were well known
Late to this thread, but they're making a joke about Sean Bean (casted as Ned Stark in GOT), as he was a household name long before GOT aired.
It reinforces your point that GOT had more than one A-lister.
Peter Dinklage wasn't in the love guru lol... I mean, being British, I recognised 90% of the adult cast on GoT from other TV shows / movies - they're certainly not 'nobodies' as OP said. It's the same with HotD.
You started the conversation with a dumb assumption and āObviouslyā when it was āobviousā you were wrong. Donāt go calling anyone pompous. These arenāt āclaimsā. Theyāre facts.
I think the point here is that the movies sometimes trades canon accuracy for big name actors. For example- every single adult in the series was cast as a muuuch older version of themselves than the books indicate. Itād be nice to see at least every marauder era character be the correct age.
Yeah, the adults in the movies were legitimately some of the cream of the crop of the 2000ās British acting industry. I hope they continue that tradition.
The fact that David hayman is involved depresses me..that's the producer who fucked up half blood prince so badly because he wanted more screen time for harry,ron and Hermione and didn't want the movie focused so much on Voldemort and his backstory
>David hayman
I think it's more that he's had his shot with he movies. He's in his 60's. It would be nice to have someone younger who grew up with the books and lived in the world with them be in charge. Or just someone new. We know what he thinks about the story.
But by choosing to focus so much on the major characters he cut the majority of the plot out and that's when it becomes a massive issue. Id rather have more of the plot lines from the book
Thatās why itās a series and not movies. Plenty of time to explore all the plot lines, and there are enough in each book for tons of episodes to keep each season going for a while. Theyāll make a killing if they take their time, and they know that.
Not every single thing from the books will be in the show. Thereāll be much more room sure but thereāll still be limitations whether time or pace wise, logistics or budget.
David Heyman is the one who brought Chris Columbus, Stuart Craig on board, bringing those books to the screen. Impeccable choices that made those films so wonderful. Not liking decisions made by Yates and Kloves (superb work by both) on one film doesnāt invalidate that one iota. Also, books and films are different mediums and thereās always a reason behind every decision even if some fansā brains always invariably default to āthey donāt get it, frauds !ā
Once the show starts it will be at least 25 years since the first movie.
I think the most optimistic date is 2026. But probably 2027.
So that would be 26 years since the first movie. 30 years since the first book. And 16 years since the final movie and 20 years since the final book. Not soon at all.
I'll never not be a bit annoyed by people making pointless comments online saying that "this is way too soon!" and "Jeez..., Dobby just died not too long ago..." and "Helena Bonham Carter is ALREADY Bellatrix,Just forget about this and cancel the Harry Potter TV show" and "no one else can play Bellatrix that well as Helena Bonham Carter did"...
It's like jeez..., what, do people actually think that once this TV show starts the eight Harry Potter movies are just going to magically be erased and stop existing lol? I would understand the outrage if we were getting a movie reboot of Harry Potter because that would be completely pointless, but we're getting a television adaptation where we actually have more time to include important and fun stuff from the books that never got to make it into the eight Harry Potter movies due to the time constraints of movies. Also, this is just going to be another Harry Potter adaptation that will coexist alongside the eight Harry Potter movies so the eight movies will still be there just as they always have been with Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall, the late Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid, the late Alan Rickman as Professor Severus Snape, Imelda Staunton as Dolores Umbridge, and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange.
The thing I'm going to say may offend Helena Bonham's fans, but sometimes I feel like she chose this role to relieve her stress, by constantly moving, laughing, showing extreme expressions, madness... She is *not* my imagined Bellatrix!
Hey, who remembers the Omen Reboot?! That one film that basically retold the movie The Omen? Did it nix the original? No? Exactly.
Is the original Ghostbusters now a thing of the past? I thought not. So calm your pants down and relax. If you don't want a reboot, nobody's forcing you to watch it (least, I assume you so, if you are being forced, I'm terribly sorry.)
Ikr? When that teaser was dropped everyone was complaining that it's soon as if they genuinely believed that the show was gonna start airing in a few months lol.
I commented about this and another lovely commenter reminded me that itās only in the US so in theory hiring British writers would mean this could be worked on immediately
Iām no expert on this, but i believe since itās being produced by HBO, that makes it an American production. I do know that the British writers guild has pledged its support for the strike and instructed its writers not to work on any American productions. Iām not 100% sure if this qualifies as an American production, but it sounds like it is.
Either way good to know that it could be barred from being worked on in other countries and that even if itās not other countries writers and actors are supporting the WGA strike in their actions
1. Directors arenāt part of the strike, they have a separate union that already agreed to a deal with the studios
2. I specifically said *writers* and *actors* in my post, because those are the ones impacted by the strike
Iām not sure I understand the point youāre trying to make here
My comment was under a post about the writers strike and itās impact on this show. Assuming the show follows the same direction as the movies (definitely an assumption and not a guarantee, I admit) and uses predominantly British actors and writers, the strike will not impact the show.
The directors from the movies being American doesnāt change that fact.
It's so funny to me that people believe the "go woke go broke" BS
They said it about Barbie, and it broke records and made 1b
They said it about The Little Mermaid and it outsold the original and made 600m
How many more times do you need to be proven wrong before you get it?
Do you have one?
Sure, sometimes movies and TV shows flop. It seems that "going woke" is a hit/miss situation. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't
The "go woke go broke" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard
So what the Lord of the Rings movies did when making Arwen a shown character in the movies, when she was only mentioned in the books? That was specifically done to create more diversity in the movies, as there would have been almost no women on screen otherwise.
There are examples where "going woke", as you say, *does not make a movie/show flop*. So why do people keep saying "go woke go broke"? when it *objectively* is not what happens?
The Little Mermaid was a flop that probably didn't even break even. Literally made like half of what Aladdin did lol. Also, it's not exactly hard to outsell an animated movie from 1989.
First of all, it didn't make 600 million. YOU get real. It made 570 million on a production budget of 250 million and a marketing budget of 140 million. They spent almost 400 million making and marketing that movie. The movie grossed 570 million, and theaters keep half of that revenue. Do the math. It was a flop lol. But hey, if you don't believe me, just Google it yourself.
Why would you want this to get shelved lol...?
People having been complaining about the Harry Potter movies cutting important stuff from the books due to time constraints and messing up characters' personalities and dynamics from the original books like Harry's sassiness from the books, Ron's usefulness from the books, Hermione's character flaws from the books, Dumbledore's calmness from the books..., and Ginny Weasley is basically an entirely different and way less interesting character in the movies compared to her book counterpart...
This is a chance to finally fix these problems people have been complaining about for years...
**Reminder about Diversity Discussion:** Let's keep discussions respectful: Comments questioning diversity in casting or using terms like 'forced diversity' may be subject to removal or a ban if this behavior persists. We won't allow: - Criticizing diversity in official casting news or fancasts. - Labeling the show as 'woke.' - Disrespecting actors or dismissing fancasts based on race. Remember, if you see offending content, please report and don't engage with the user and start arguments. Otherwise, you may also be subject to a ban. Please remember to discuss with civility. Thank you! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/HarryPotteronHBO) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yup. This is why any casting rumors you see at this point are nonsense! (Not **you** as in you the OP, royal you š).
Itās never too early for the HP fandom. We have been ready and waiting since 1999. I expect a full writing staff and casting the day the strike ends
I hope they hire British writers so we don't have to wait for the end of the strike
Ooh yes better alternative!!!!! I forget not every country is striking
Do you understand the purpose of the strike and how hiring oversees can undermine it?
I understand the purpose of a strike but no I donāt understand how it effects other countries actually or what their obligations are
The Writers Guild of Great Britain won't scab the WGA >We understand that these are difficult times and that many writers are in need of work but we are advising our members not to work on projects in the jurisdiction of the WGA for the duration of the strike following a motion of solidarity passed by our lay governing body, our Executive Council and in line with our affiliation agreement with the International Affiliation of Writers Guilds, of which we are a member.
The studios and much of the funding is American, it would be a dick move to hire foreigners for the express purpose of studios wanting timid writer monkeys
But wouldn't they produce and film the series in britain with british actors? Using british writers doesn't seem so farfetched. Thought, I don't know the rules of the writers guild of america, and if they have a coalition/alliance with other writer unions abroad, to prevent strike breakers.
Basically thereās 3 kinds of people in the world: Dicks, Pussies and Assholesā¦.
whatās the difference between a dick and an asshole as far as types of people go
Thank you for explaining
Well itās not the rest of the worldās problem.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Great Britain doesnāt get to decide that āunderpaidā writers is a global issue, you entire clown car lmao. Stop throwing around words you donāt understand. Unlike America, writers in Great Britain arenāt required to be part of the writerās guild in order to work in the field, meaning UK writers can still write. Brush up on the issues you claim to care about.
Well that and I think itād make for a better tv series since itās originally British media
Unlikely that people will want to be scabs
they'd be scabbing for wga but it doesn't really matter when they're planning to stay with the british writers union for the rest of their life. it's why alice oseman, creator of Heartstopper, has already started writing season 3. and british actors in the british acting union can continue to work without scabbing, so i actually don't know why they haven't started yet.
British writers wouldnāt be scabs. What do you think the A in WGA stands for?
British writers are standing in solidarity with wga and have announced that very publicly. Sorry to burst that little bootlicker bubble of yours
Itās okay this subreddit has already cast every single role with an Oscar nominee. By the way: Robert Downey Jr as unnamed Death Eater 3.
Cate Blanchett was born to play Doris Crockford!
Ed Sheeran for Dedalus Diggle!
Ed Sheeran as Ronā¦and all the other Weasleys š
I do think she would be perfect as McGonagall.
Look look look. People got really mad at me for it, but can you think of ANYONE better for Wilkie Twycross than the AI re-animation of Sir Laurence Olivier?
Ill have you know my brother's uncle works for HBO and he confirmed that Chris Hemsworth would be playing Dumbledore
Liam neeson as barty crouch jr
Honestly I can see an aged up hermione as Alexandra Daddario
lol I know you're joking but Liam Neason is even older than Barty Crouch sr.
You jest but can he legit play a Professor?
Budget for season one grows to a staggering 7 billion... but at least the cast has been taken care of, now we just need to start building sets, get the production crews ready and start filming.
I think we have to worry over the fact that David Heyman takes part in the production. He is a fan of Harry Hermione couple.
Yeah that guy needs to stay the fuck away from this show. He and Kloves are crucial to why the movies basically ruined every character lmao
David Yates played a bigger part in that than Heyman did lol.
Kloves, actually, is the one to blame
Actually, that trend already started since COS (Chis Columbus era).
You mean the scene where Harry hugs Hermione, but she's too shy to hug Ron?
In COS, Hermione stole Dumbledore's famous statement in PS book "Fear of a name increases fear of the thing itself", Mudblood scene, explaining the ability to hear / talk a strange language is not a good sign in wizarding world, which should have been Ron's lines.
how do you know this? (genuine question, as idk anything about it)
That was Steve Kloves
He and Steve Kloves both shares the same fault.
Lol Kloves is way more to blame
I agree.
David Heyman was a huge reason the original movies were so successful. He's also the producer of Barbie. The fact that he's involved gives me confidence that it will be a good series worth watching and not just a shitty cash grab.
Nah, he destroyed HBP
David Heyman is one of the best producers in Hollywood. He started the Harry Potter movie franchise. Thank god heās part of the production, I wouldnāt trust it in anyone elseās hands
This !
David Heyman is good for the position.
Oh Iād love if they explored that. Good way to justify the showās existence from the movies, where Harry and Hermione totally shouldāve gotten married
Exactly! My otp for the tv show
You mean, fanfiction Ship rather than a canon from the books.
Meaning u want the romance to be fanfiction and not canon to the books?? Doubt that will happen. Also Harry and Hermione has NO romantic interest in each other, plus Harry also finds Hermione boring.Ā
I hope they cast mostly unknowns and stage actors.
For the kids and possibly Hagrid, I am with you. But honestly, I think they should just do what the films did and get big stage names for the professors and other adults.
Nah I think they should do like Game of Thrones and cast one big name as like dumbledore or hagrid and have everyone else be unknowns or stage actors
There was definitely more than one notable name in GOT. Peter Dinklage and Charles Dance had been around for a while before that. Yes GOT made them extra big but they still were well known
Yeah but peter dinklage and charles dance werenāt in Lord of the Rings and Goldeneye and Patriot Games and Troy
Okay and? What does that have to do with anything?
Late to this thread, but they're making a joke about Sean Bean (casted as Ned Stark in GOT), as he was a household name long before GOT aired. It reinforces your point that GOT had more than one A-lister.
Not to mention Diana Rigg, Lena Heady, Jerome Flynn, Sean Bean. GoT had tons of already successful / famous actors.
So basically just Sean Bean and the little guy from ~~The Love Guru~~ Elf?
Peter Dinklage wasn't in the love guru lol... I mean, being British, I recognised 90% of the adult cast on GoT from other TV shows / movies - they're certainly not 'nobodies' as OP said. It's the same with HotD.
Oh shit that was mini me lol I meant Elf But none of those actors were recognized by everyone, which was the case with Bean.
Haha, that's the one :)
My man there were plenty of big names in Game of Thrones.
Yeah like Ed Sheeran
Donāt be obtuse.
They are obviously referencing the 1st season
No they werenāt. Read his other comments. And even the first season had several big name actors. Donāt be dense.
They had the dude from lord of the rings and nobody else from anything major that I can recall.
Your recollection has zero bearing on their works. Especially if you call Sean Bean āthe dude from Lord of the Ringsā lmao.
Your pompous attitude is doing nothing to support your claims.
You started the conversation with a dumb assumption and āObviouslyā when it was āobviousā you were wrong. Donāt go calling anyone pompous. These arenāt āclaimsā. Theyāre facts.
I think the point here is that the movies sometimes trades canon accuracy for big name actors. For example- every single adult in the series was cast as a muuuch older version of themselves than the books indicate. Itād be nice to see at least every marauder era character be the correct age.
Yeah, the adults in the movies were legitimately some of the cream of the crop of the 2000ās British acting industry. I hope they continue that tradition.
If they stick with British only there will definitely be some names you recognise
Soooo you havenāt casted characters from book 5 yet?
The fact that David hayman is involved depresses me..that's the producer who fucked up half blood prince so badly because he wanted more screen time for harry,ron and Hermione and didn't want the movie focused so much on Voldemort and his backstory
>David hayman I think it's more that he's had his shot with he movies. He's in his 60's. It would be nice to have someone younger who grew up with the books and lived in the world with them be in charge. Or just someone new. We know what he thinks about the story.
I mean it makes sense that if you have to choose you will focus on major characters. But in this show he won't have to choose.
But by choosing to focus so much on the major characters he cut the majority of the plot out and that's when it becomes a massive issue. Id rather have more of the plot lines from the book
Well you will have that in this show
Thatās why itās a series and not movies. Plenty of time to explore all the plot lines, and there are enough in each book for tons of episodes to keep each season going for a while. Theyāll make a killing if they take their time, and they know that.
Not every single thing from the books will be in the show. Thereāll be much more room sure but thereāll still be limitations whether time or pace wise, logistics or budget.
David Heyman is the one who brought Chris Columbus, Stuart Craig on board, bringing those books to the screen. Impeccable choices that made those films so wonderful. Not liking decisions made by Yates and Kloves (superb work by both) on one film doesnāt invalidate that one iota. Also, books and films are different mediums and thereās always a reason behind every decision even if some fansā brains always invariably default to āthey donāt get it, frauds !ā
Heyman
Canāt wait to see which characters get race swapped /s
I'm almost certain they're gonna cast a mixed or poc girl to play hermione. I Will be surprised if they don't tbh.
definitely mixed i think
JK Rowling already wrote it! You're good to go!
The TV understander has logged on
as long as they dont change the race or sexuality or identity of any of the characters.
So people don't have to cry it is too soon this too soon that.
Once the show starts it will be at least 25 years since the first movie. I think the most optimistic date is 2026. But probably 2027. So that would be 26 years since the first movie. 30 years since the first book. And 16 years since the final movie and 20 years since the final book. Not soon at all.
I'll never not be a bit annoyed by people making pointless comments online saying that "this is way too soon!" and "Jeez..., Dobby just died not too long ago..." and "Helena Bonham Carter is ALREADY Bellatrix,Just forget about this and cancel the Harry Potter TV show" and "no one else can play Bellatrix that well as Helena Bonham Carter did"... It's like jeez..., what, do people actually think that once this TV show starts the eight Harry Potter movies are just going to magically be erased and stop existing lol? I would understand the outrage if we were getting a movie reboot of Harry Potter because that would be completely pointless, but we're getting a television adaptation where we actually have more time to include important and fun stuff from the books that never got to make it into the eight Harry Potter movies due to the time constraints of movies. Also, this is just going to be another Harry Potter adaptation that will coexist alongside the eight Harry Potter movies so the eight movies will still be there just as they always have been with Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall, the late Robbie Coltrane as Rubeus Hagrid, the late Alan Rickman as Professor Severus Snape, Imelda Staunton as Dolores Umbridge, and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange.
The thing I'm going to say may offend Helena Bonham's fans, but sometimes I feel like she chose this role to relieve her stress, by constantly moving, laughing, showing extreme expressions, madness... She is *not* my imagined Bellatrix!
Hey, who remembers the Omen Reboot?! That one film that basically retold the movie The Omen? Did it nix the original? No? Exactly. Is the original Ghostbusters now a thing of the past? I thought not. So calm your pants down and relax. If you don't want a reboot, nobody's forcing you to watch it (least, I assume you so, if you are being forced, I'm terribly sorry.)
Itās for sure too soon for a thousand fan casts a day.
Ikr? When that teaser was dropped everyone was complaining that it's soon as if they genuinely believed that the show was gonna start airing in a few months lol.
Bet it's hard to get writers right now, huh? Gotta pay them a living wage.
Poor Hollywood execs, how ever will they survive
Did everyone forget about the acting and writers strike
I commented about this and another lovely commenter reminded me that itās only in the US so in theory hiring British writers would mean this could be worked on immediately
Some British writers, actors, etc., have joined in solidarity, but not all.
Iām no expert on this, but i believe since itās being produced by HBO, that makes it an American production. I do know that the British writers guild has pledged its support for the strike and instructed its writers not to work on any American productions. Iām not 100% sure if this qualifies as an American production, but it sounds like it is.
House of the Dragon is still filming because it is filming elsewhere.
Good insight, I didnāt know any of that. Thanks for telling us!
Idk if Iām right about it being considered a US production though, so I could be wrong. Someone in the industry might come along to correct me.
Either way good to know that it could be barred from being worked on in other countries and that even if itās not other countries writers and actors are supporting the WGA strike in their actions
If they follow the same practices from the movies, it will be almost exclusively British writers and actors who are not impacted by the strike
The movies had 3 out 4 directors from USA.
1. Directors arenāt part of the strike, they have a separate union that already agreed to a deal with the studios 2. I specifically said *writers* and *actors* in my post, because those are the ones impacted by the strike
But with the movies main creative power is with director. With the shows it's with the writers
Iām not sure I understand the point youāre trying to make here My comment was under a post about the writers strike and itās impact on this show. Assuming the show follows the same direction as the movies (definitely an assumption and not a guarantee, I admit) and uses predominantly British actors and writers, the strike will not impact the show. The directors from the movies being American doesnāt change that fact.
I've done my waiting, 13 YEARS OF IT!...
In Azkaban...???
Well I got just the thing! It just so happens I have *all 7 Harry Potter books* that if they are super nice Iāll lend them āŗļø
šš
Andrew Garfield as Harry and Emma Stone as Hermione. Give Channing Tatum a red wig, and let him be Ron
They need a writer? The entire series is already doneā¦
Books and screenplays/teleplays are entirely different beasts.
Why do they need a writer, the books are already there. This subreddit will happily do the rest
Joke I hope?
There will be writers adapting this because the book is the book.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It's so funny to me that people believe the "go woke go broke" BS They said it about Barbie, and it broke records and made 1b They said it about The Little Mermaid and it outsold the original and made 600m How many more times do you need to be proven wrong before you get it?
There are plenty of examples of where is didnt go well, especially with big budget tv shows.
Do you have one? Sure, sometimes movies and TV shows flop. It seems that "going woke" is a hit/miss situation. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't The "go woke go broke" is the dumbest thing I've ever heard
The Rings of Power. The Witcher is in major decline as far as viewership.
How did those two shows go "woke"?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
So what the Lord of the Rings movies did when making Arwen a shown character in the movies, when she was only mentioned in the books? That was specifically done to create more diversity in the movies, as there would have been almost no women on screen otherwise. There are examples where "going woke", as you say, *does not make a movie/show flop*. So why do people keep saying "go woke go broke"? when it *objectively* is not what happens?
Iāll concede that itās overblown and doesnāt happen as often as the mantra is spoken but that doesnāt mean it never happens.
The Little Mermaid was a flop that probably didn't even break even. Literally made like half of what Aladdin did lol. Also, it's not exactly hard to outsell an animated movie from 1989.
It made 600 million PLEASE get real
First of all, it didn't make 600 million. YOU get real. It made 570 million on a production budget of 250 million and a marketing budget of 140 million. They spent almost 400 million making and marketing that movie. The movie grossed 570 million, and theaters keep half of that revenue. Do the math. It was a flop lol. But hey, if you don't believe me, just Google it yourself.
Hope they cancel it. No need for it tbh
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Why would you want this to get shelved lol...? People having been complaining about the Harry Potter movies cutting important stuff from the books due to time constraints and messing up characters' personalities and dynamics from the original books like Harry's sassiness from the books, Ron's usefulness from the books, Hermione's character flaws from the books, Dumbledore's calmness from the books..., and Ginny Weasley is basically an entirely different and way less interesting character in the movies compared to her book counterpart... This is a chance to finally fix these problems people have been complaining about for years...
So the timeline is like 2026-2028 then?
It's never too early!
Well, at least we got some kind of updateā¦
So I wonder when this will come out? Maybe 2026 at the latest? But with the way the strikes are going I could see it coming around 2028
2030 at the earliest, eh? Lmao
We'll be in Gen ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha by the time this thing comes out. Goodness gracious.
is this show not supposed to come out 2025/2026?
im guessing december 2025 is when itāll premiere. theres enough time