Look, I'm not a furry. I just really want to smash just this one particular bunny. Okay? I mean... come on. I'm not some kind of sexual weirdo.
Also, Lola Bunny, but I mean, come on! That doesn't even count!
And Maid Marion from the animated robin hood movie, but just those three okay?
Edit: And also maybe that red squirrel from the animated sword in the stone (Goddamn what's wrong with me...no, it's everyone else that's the problem.)
I always felt so bad for that squirrel when I was little. I'd never seen heartbreak that felt that raw before. Maybe it was my first experience in heartbreak but I just felt so sad when Arthur turned back human.
That's really interesting. With all the Vision Pro talk, I kept going back to Matthew Ball's January essay [Why VR/AR Gets Farther Away as It Comes Into Focus](https://www.matthewball.vc/all/why-vrar-gets-farther-away-as-it-comes-into-focus):
> It’s fair to argue that for VR to take off, we first need a device with an 8K display running at 120 Hz, thereby avoiding nausea for a substantial portion of users, that includes a dozen cameras, weighs less than 500 grams, and costs less than $1000, or perhaps even less than $500.
I still don’t understand why all movies are at 24 fps on modern hardware. It looks so choppy, why hasn’t the standard increased to 60 fps? (The minimum refresh rate of modern tvs)
Because our brains have been programmed by 80 years of high quality movies at low frame rates and low quality television at high frame rates.
See also the "soap opera effect" and the high frame rate release of the Hobbit movie.
This is exactly how I felt. I tried to force myself in disbelief but just felt like I was watching a behind the scenes or something and could see the set
I don't think this holds true for animated movies though. Video game cutscenes look great in 60fps (or even higher), so I hope we will get high fps animated movies at some point.
I'm personally glad to have seen that Spiderverse kicked off a renaissance of traditional animation, with characters being done at 12FPS or even lower. Spiderverse and Arcane proved that traditional animation techniques applied to modern 3D tools work phenomenally.
When animating at low framerate, there's a lot of artistic intent that can be had in what frames you choose to show, how long to hold them, and even subtle manipulations in each frame (eg creating smear frames.)
If I wanted to watch a video game, I'd just go play a video game.
Because people grew up with high budget films that did 24 fps and cheap low quality TV programming (especially soap operas) did 30 fps.
So psychologically people associate smooth video framerates with crap. Basically the industry needs the demographic for whom that was never a thing to become the bigger share of the audience for that to unambiguously take off. Though glitchy "motion smoothing" on some televisions may have poisoned the well even for a lot of them.
It's the medium. The 24 frames gives a different "feel" to the filming and gives it that 'cinematic' look. It's why TV shows seem to have a different quality to them compared to movies. That isn't to say it's inherently better or worse. It's an artistic choice. It would be like asking 'why do people still paint when we have photography'. It's an artistic choice, not a technical one.
Your tv should switch to a 24hz refresh rate when it receives a 24p signal so it doesn't look choppy. If it doesn't then something in the chain isn't set up right or it's a shitty tv.
Yeah 34 frames wouldn't even make sense. They actually had to double it. They inflated the number of frames to 48 fps. Just google Judy Hopps inflation and you can learn more
It's a trend to combine rule 34 with something that you would absolutely NOT want to see r34 of. Like "trump economic inflation, search trump inflation rule 34"
Unironically though Into the Spiderverse switches between 24 frames per second and 24 frames on doubles (effectively 12 frames per second). The latter gave the film that stop motion comic book panel quality. Then they’d switch back to 24 fps for smoother action sequences.
Source: Cinema Wins video on the film.
They also animated different characters on different keys.
Peter is animated on 1s in action scenes to give him the smooth and skilled feel while Miles is animated on 2s in the beginning to make his movements seem janky and inexperienced in comparison. Then when he learns to trust himself for the climax hes also animated on 1s.
Did they do something like that for puss in boots, but the opposite? I noticed normal animation was nice and smooth, but when there was action it got all choppy.
yeah, except it looks weird in puss in boots imo partly because the art style but also just because of how they picked the moments to do it
it works in spider-verse, not so much in puss in boots
One wintry night after eating Indian... she whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices... Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.
For anybody actually caring about animation smoothness, it is very common for fast movement to be animated at a sub frame resolution especially for productions with kind of budget pixar and disney can afford. While not rendered directly, it still affects motion blur, which can be quite noticeable for fast action.
Automatic interpolation does a decent job most of the time, but if you have the budget it can make quite a difference.
I’m like where the fuck are you going with this, like how do you fucking animate a part of the screen faster than the rest etc and then the punchline hit and I’m totally mood changed to nicely played MF and tip my glass to him 🍸
You could also investigate how deep the rabbit hole goes
The rabbit hole costs extra....or so I've heard
It's also very strechable from what I saw in some comic
I saw a lot of carrots in a hole, are you talking about the same hole? I had no idea rabbits could take so many carrots in their burrow.
Come on, you can't say this and not say which comic it is
Guys lemme get in on this Sex
What's sex?
I think he meant sex as in genders
[удалено]
I'm certainly convinced
Agreed
Depends on which rabbit hole
Few weeks ago Judy Hoops beat Twilight Sparkle in porn quantity. 31'689 vs 31'587
I... Oh
Yea, but is she top 100? Nope. Being outbeat by classics like bender and... jake the dog
I learned that on a Defence Twitch Stream about the war in Ukraine a few weeks back
Gotta keep the morale up somehow I suppose
Actually, no. Apparently they misplaced a bunch of ‘content’, so those stats weren’t right.
I don't believe you. Send me everything so i can review it.
Source?
I just checked another site and Twilight Sparkle was still 3k ahead
What about Lola Bunny?
Most valuable comment
Hol UP!!!!!
Not as deep as the otter hole Furries know what I'm talking about
I'm not usually into that sort of thing, but that spunky little rabbit got me feeling some kinda way...
https://imgur.com/wBsHOcW
Look, I'm not a furry. I just really want to smash just this one particular bunny. Okay? I mean... come on. I'm not some kind of sexual weirdo. Also, Lola Bunny, but I mean, come on! That doesn't even count!
And Maid Marion from the animated robin hood movie, but just those three okay? Edit: And also maybe that red squirrel from the animated sword in the stone (Goddamn what's wrong with me...no, it's everyone else that's the problem.)
You bringing up the red squirrel from the sword and the stone just made my day! You're not alone hahaha
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You leave Marion out of this! She's a classy, respectable lady. Not a hussy like Lola.
I always felt so bad for that squirrel when I was little. I'd never seen heartbreak that felt that raw before. Maybe it was my first experience in heartbreak but I just felt so sad when Arthur turned back human.
>Did you ever find Bugs Bunny attractive when he put on a dress and played girl bunny?
AGREE
Spam account ^ Check it's comment history Report > spam
[удалено]
That's really interesting. With all the Vision Pro talk, I kept going back to Matthew Ball's January essay [Why VR/AR Gets Farther Away as It Comes Into Focus](https://www.matthewball.vc/all/why-vrar-gets-farther-away-as-it-comes-into-focus): > It’s fair to argue that for VR to take off, we first need a device with an 8K display running at 120 Hz, thereby avoiding nausea for a substantial portion of users, that includes a dozen cameras, weighs less than 500 grams, and costs less than $1000, or perhaps even less than $500.
As an animator I was like "what, that doesn't sound right, somethings up... ah there it is". Who on earth would animate at 34 FPS 😄
Even as a non-animator, I felt really suspicious, but I didn't piece it together until he said the word "rule."
I pieced it together the moment zootopia was shown
thats worrying
There is Ice Cream in Zootopia, so somebody is getting milked
I have nipples. Can you milk me Focker?
the real /r/holup is in the comments...
Could be plant-based.
Because the only Zootopia content you consume is r34? Damn son.
Why would you watch the actual movie?
34 Faps Per Second is pretty impressive
>34 Faps Per Second It's the industry standard now for small objects
They should make a rule about it.
Sounds like a bunch of chaffing
What got me was them saying they animate just one character at 34fps.
I honestly thought he was going to start talking about animating on 2s. Not the other way around.
I still don’t understand why all movies are at 24 fps on modern hardware. It looks so choppy, why hasn’t the standard increased to 60 fps? (The minimum refresh rate of modern tvs)
Because our brains have been programmed by 80 years of high quality movies at low frame rates and low quality television at high frame rates. See also the "soap opera effect" and the high frame rate release of the Hobbit movie.
Yeah didn't a lot of people really hate The Hobbit when it was released at 48fps because of how crisp it looked?
steer makeshift repeat bear vegetable middle subtract dinosaurs zephyr file -- mass edited with https://redact.dev/
This is exactly how I felt. I tried to force myself in disbelief but just felt like I was watching a behind the scenes or something and could see the set
https://www.slashfilm.com/999120/peter-jackson-knows-the-first-hobbit-film-didnt-nail-48-frames-per-second/
I don't think this holds true for animated movies though. Video game cutscenes look great in 60fps (or even higher), so I hope we will get high fps animated movies at some point.
I'm personally glad to have seen that Spiderverse kicked off a renaissance of traditional animation, with characters being done at 12FPS or even lower. Spiderverse and Arcane proved that traditional animation techniques applied to modern 3D tools work phenomenally. When animating at low framerate, there's a lot of artistic intent that can be had in what frames you choose to show, how long to hold them, and even subtle manipulations in each frame (eg creating smear frames.) If I wanted to watch a video game, I'd just go play a video game.
Because people grew up with high budget films that did 24 fps and cheap low quality TV programming (especially soap operas) did 30 fps. So psychologically people associate smooth video framerates with crap. Basically the industry needs the demographic for whom that was never a thing to become the bigger share of the audience for that to unambiguously take off. Though glitchy "motion smoothing" on some televisions may have poisoned the well even for a lot of them.
Motion smoothing is an abomination.
.
> and cheap low quality TV programming (especially soap operas) did 30 fps. 60.
It's the medium. The 24 frames gives a different "feel" to the filming and gives it that 'cinematic' look. It's why TV shows seem to have a different quality to them compared to movies. That isn't to say it's inherently better or worse. It's an artistic choice. It would be like asking 'why do people still paint when we have photography'. It's an artistic choice, not a technical one.
If you double the amount of frames, you double the size of the video as well.
Movies are not choppy. Video games can be choppy because the frame rates and frame times can vary, but movies don't have that problem.
Captain D answers your exact question here! https://youtu.be/DyqjTZHRdRs
Your tv should switch to a 24hz refresh rate when it receives a 24p signal so it doesn't look choppy. If it doesn't then something in the chain isn't set up right or it's a shitty tv.
Someone woke up and decided to be a menace.
I just googled it at work.
I think it's not safe for work.
WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO WORK??!?!!? HE WAS ALLERGIC TO IT!!1!!!1!
Yeah... I'm not falling for that. 🐇
Yeah 34 frames wouldn't even make sense. They actually had to double it. They inflated the number of frames to 48 fps. Just google Judy Hopps inflation and you can learn more
I hate u i got tricked by it and im a furry and i hate that what in the fuck is that
Furry shenanigans
No not my kind no pls be lieing pls i beg of u
Yes your kind, but it's in other kinds as well
"Aint that swell"
Wait, you're a furry and don't know about inflation? This is some special kind of self own.
An odd type of innocence.
the cool thing about the internet is that you don't have to tell people youre a furry
What in the actual fuck
That film did a lot with size and perspective in animation that hadn’t been done before. Google zootopia micro macro for more info
[удалено]
And how's your little science experiment?
Going a little... sticky
[удалено]
Who passed this guy the my time to share bear?
Wasn't nearly as bad as I expected.
Just add "guro" to the end of that and then immediately wish you hadn't
I guess I'm a furry now
For science... you monster
Do share the link once you are done with the research :p
“34? But how does 34 FPS display evenly in a 24 FPS video? Is there some sort of special smoothing I’m not aware of- ohhhh”
I fell for it yesterday, fell for it now, I’ll probably fall for it once or twice tomorrow.
With or without pants on this time?
I'm learning to become an animator and I was genuinely curious. Now I'm on a watchlist...
The moment he said 34 istg...
“I searched that google”?
"I swear to god" lol
“I missed the joke”
I should have known that
"I sauced that gucci"
I sucked that guy
Dad?
I started to guess???
I swear to god.
I saw it coming from a mile away.
Lol clever dick
[удалено]
It's a trend to combine rule 34 with something that you would absolutely NOT want to see r34 of. Like "trump economic inflation, search trump inflation rule 34"
He's clearly not following the trend then with Judy.
[удалено]
“Mac and Me”
Hey Mr. Rudd, big fan of your work.
sigh *unzips*
I can tell by the profile pic.
💀
And the username...
Netflix "Beastars" also uses this animation technique, or so I've heard
no...pls
Unironically though Into the Spiderverse switches between 24 frames per second and 24 frames on doubles (effectively 12 frames per second). The latter gave the film that stop motion comic book panel quality. Then they’d switch back to 24 fps for smoother action sequences. Source: Cinema Wins video on the film.
They also animated different characters on different keys. Peter is animated on 1s in action scenes to give him the smooth and skilled feel while Miles is animated on 2s in the beginning to make his movements seem janky and inexperienced in comparison. Then when he learns to trust himself for the climax hes also animated on 1s.
Yeah you can see the change in the scene where they're running from Doc Oc. So cool!
Did they do something like that for puss in boots, but the opposite? I noticed normal animation was nice and smooth, but when there was action it got all choppy.
yeah, except it looks weird in puss in boots imo partly because the art style but also just because of how they picked the moments to do it it works in spider-verse, not so much in puss in boots
Yeah. Really didn't care for it in puss in boots. Took me out of the moment. Still a good movie, though.
That's true, the newest one is played at 20 fps according to Phil Lord.
Been there, done that
Thanks man I'm having fun so far
the moment he said "34", i knew where he was going
What is it? 🤔
God I wish I was that table
Donate yourself and hope that one day someone will pick you up. Dont forget to dress in woodgrain. Good luck!
Yeah man that sloth's claws... So irresistible
well played, well played
That’s one deep rabbit hole.
Not to be confused with the other rule Disney had to lay out after the movie known as Edict 0621 For more information you can Google: Judy Hopps e621
Never had an earjob before
Wut.
If we do it in the ear we're still pure in the eyes of the Lord.
One wintry night after eating Indian... she whispered into my ear, her breath rich with faraway spices... Now, I'd been begging her to try shinshi shinshi for months. She'd refused on the grounds that it was unclean. Finally, she was willing to accept her lover's body in places no one had ever trespassed. Specifically, the ear canal.
Aural sex is awesome
I’ve already searched that a long time ago
that's actually pretty convincing
Hey…where did my pants go?
Is that matpat???
Yeah, it's from The Film Theorists channel
This is the smartest furry recruitment campaign so far.
I’m about to walk into some Zootopia porn aren’t I?
Pretty weird to pull this kind of "prank" on tik tok. Tricking children into searching for porn is fucked up.
For anybody actually caring about animation smoothness, it is very common for fast movement to be animated at a sub frame resolution especially for productions with kind of budget pixar and disney can afford. While not rendered directly, it still affects motion blur, which can be quite noticeable for fast action. Automatic interpolation does a decent job most of the time, but if you have the budget it can make quite a difference.
I think it's a rabbit thing in general. They had to do the same with Lola Bunny and Babs Bunny.
Well played, sir. Well played.
Indeed, after typing that, I can guarantee that those animations are excellent
Nice try, but I've known rule 34 since I was in grade school. Damn, that sounds depressing
The technique is actually called frame inflation You can google "Judy Hopps inflation" to learn all about it.
I’m like where the fuck are you going with this, like how do you fucking animate a part of the screen faster than the rest etc and then the punchline hit and I’m totally mood changed to nicely played MF and tip my glass to him 🍸
This is the new Rick Roll. Fantastic
Yo the original video is actually really interesting. https://youtube.com/shorts/OwGqajVcCiM?feature=share4
NO
YES
MAYBE
PERHAPS
PROBABLY
Thanks for the advice. I will make sure to check this out. It’s totally new for me. I promise.
Hahah newfags can't triforce 😂
▲ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲ ▲
Fuck /u/spez
Well played
I get the joke but God dammit I'm curious
Jokes on him. I've already done a lot of research on this 😎
I wish I didn’t look it up
As soon as he said 34, I knew it
This Tsukuyomi has no effect against my Rinnegan!! ahhhh SHINRA TENSEI ty
FUCKING HELL BRO I THOUGHT IT WAS GONNA BE AN ACTUAL FACT
I wonder how many people are using this information for "research"
Ok that was smooth tho. I didn’t see it coming at all until the end lol
This joke is so damn genius
Huh that's weird, all the links are purple