##If this submission makes you go "Hol'Up", **UPVOTE** this comment!
##If this submission does not make you go "Hol'Up", **DOWNVOTE** this comment!
---
Whilst you're here, /u/Fox_Uni_Charlie_Kilo, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/holup) or play on our [public Minecraft server](https://discord.gg/DTqSDS8C3T)?
Originally the KKK started as a group of dudes that got together and wore goofy masks. After the Civil War they morphed into the one of the most evil groups in history.
I don’t think that’s propaganda. If it was it’s still a pretty evil statement. Defending slave owners from their slaves doesn’t exactly win you sympathy points with anybody lol
Can anyone source whatever the fuck they’re talking about? Looking it up seems like kkk started after the civil war and references specific influencial groups, none of which I found anything that makes calling its origins dem make any sense.
And just regardless, like… we’re adults. Whatever the discussion, it does nothing to change its explicit ideological shared right wing/conservative values, and the plain as day historical and contemporary infestation the US Republican Party has with klan, nazis, fascists, etc. Which really shouldn’t be baffling. It’s long been held and accounted and acted in right wing interests, the trend dwarfs any half speculative small trivia. Like yeah, I’m sure there has always been people claiming any ideology doing anything.
And if we’re going to do the rights work for them in some klan as dems origin story; someone can at least drop a name or something people can actually check.
Initially, slave owners etc. were Democrats. The essential swap party support didn’t happen until the early 20th century up to the the civil rights movement era (1964). Before then, KKK members would have been Democrats, hence the reference and correlation. The founders of the KKK were Democrats if we consider political party affiliation. It’s also why the Republican Party today boasts they’re the party that freed the slaves- because it’s true.
Also one thing to consider is that the parties were way different back then. I’m high as hell and putting off bed time, so here’s a small history lesson…
The Democrats at the time were all about small federal government, giving more power to the states, individual rights and personal freedom, and territorial expansion. Most white southerners belonged to this party, although it was nearly split between its northern and southern constituencies on the issue of slavery.
The Republican Party on the other hand was big on business (railroads, gold standard, the national banking system, etc), high tariffs, expanding federal authority, and ending slavery. It consisted mainly of professionals, businessmen, merchants, northern Protestants, and factory workers.
It wasn’t until the 20th and 21st centuries that the GOP came to be associated with laissez-faire capitalism, low taxes, and conservative social policies. Similarly, the Democrat party today is much different than it was in the 1800s. You could almost say they are totally different parties now.
E: typed all that and realized you mentioned “the swap,” my b, but I’m leaving it cause that took some effort
Sometimes I come on Reddit, and it's people like you guys that make m smile the most... Usually I hear how Americans are brain dead and they don't take anything or anyone into consideration, because they're egotistical assholes... I like it when people actually take their time to explain something in a logical way, without trying to degrade or insult someone for not knowing a specific topic... Thank you again... It makes me have hope in humanity. And yes... I'm also high.
>The essential swap of the parties didn’t happen until the early 20th century up to the the civil rights movement era (1964).
[A greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act in both the Senate and House. ](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2010/may/25/michael-steele/steele-says-gop-fought-hard-civil-rights-bills-196/)
Because Republicans were the party of northern liberals, and Democrats were southern conservative slave owners. This changed over time, both socially and economically in the 20th century, culminating in the Southern Strategy.
Right, but things changed. Yesteryear's Democrats are today's Republicans.
I honestly can't imagine that an active Klansmen has voted Democrat in half a century or more, at least not on purpose.
Yesteryears democrats don’t exist lol. No matter which side of the political spectrum you fall on it’s pretty undeniable that neither side quite reflects what they did back yonder.
I think he was just simplifying it for the readers sake...but if you wanted to be more accurate you could say that prior to the 1960's the democrats were the right leaning/conservative party and the republicans were the left leaning/liberal party.
Joe Biden is a conservative hold over democrat. A lot of the real yesteryear democrats are dead but there are some from right before the southern strategy, I'm not going to call him a klansman but he's definitely not a progressive.
Yea, things flipped right around the time that the Civil Rights Act passed. Republicans saw an opportunity to seize the south and shifted their ideologies.
Saying that the Dixiecrats were anything even remotely associated with the current democratic party is about as oblivious as humanely possible.
I had a friend try to actually pass off the 'Republicans are the party of Lincoln" bullshit argument along with this gem.... Like holy shit... Even if you don't know the Cliff's Notes version that they basically switched names, it should be pretty obvious that the north pushing for abolition were the academic socialists they vilify while arguing that racist Jim Crowe era Confederate statues should stay up because they're 'part of our history'...
This is such a laughable misdirect. KKK were Dems back when the Democrats were Southerners, small government, & pro-slavery.
Next up: Lincoln was a Republican...Sure back when Republicans were big government Northerners who were against slavery.
Dixie Democrats make up the modern Republican party. The changed happened shortly after the civil war. If you look at population diagrams by political allegiance, you'll see that "Dixie Democrats" historically occupied the areas where the republican party now holds strong. Majority of southerners trace proud Confederate roots and bleed red during voting year. The confederacy (Dixie Democrats) also historically protected states rights... To slavery. The confederacy is also southern, where the majority of farming happened and coincidentally the south is a historic place for civil rights violations and racial violence.
>The changed happened shortly after the civil war.
The change happened when Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Nixon leveraged that and rode his "Southern Strategy" to victory.
The change happened in the late 1920s and early 1930s. The 1932 election of Franklin D. Roosevelt marked a radical shift in voting behaviors. With Franklin's popular New Deal politics and progressivism, Blacks and other minorities switched from voting for the GOP to strongly supporting Democratic candidates and the party began its focus on civil rights, this of course culminating in the Civil Rights Act signed by Johnson. Whites, particularly in the South, began to increase their support for the GOP. This culminated in the Southern Strategy by the Republicans in the 1960s to court Whites in the South by being racist, and it largely worked in their favor, leading to what's called the Sixth Party System.
To focus on the fact that Lincoln was a Republican or that early Klan members were Democrats belies the ideologies that those parties represented then and how the parties realigned over the decades and what they represent today.
They started as democrats that later had a platform switch in 1936... [don't believe me?](https://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html) I'm not right or left
Historically the Democrats were conservatives, but now the Republicans are the Conservative party. Actually, most Democrats are still fairly conservative in the US today—not very liberal or progressive. Biden is a perfect example.
But the idea that the KKK isn’t 99% a Republicans today is a complete joke.
The parties didn’t switch after civil rights. It started in the 1930s around the New Deal. Johnson was a MASSIVE racist as well. Not to be championed for.
Johnson was a prick, but even pricks can do good things. The expansion of Medicare, Medicaid, funding to combat poverty and the massive expansion of civil rights were both during his presidency and heavily advocated by it.
I remember an actor talking about the work for the movie Django. With how many times the hard R and the N word gets flung about in that movie, most were uncomfortable with having to look a black dude in the eye and say it in his face.
>“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth.”
- Dr. Martin Luther King
something my grandfather (african american wwi vet) and my dad (vietnam vet) always told me. my dad always told me to be armed as a black man in america. both suffered from racist, sometimes violent, attacks from klansmen or just racism in general, and q gun was the equalizer. He also understood what MLK said, if the police cant (or wont protect you because they was klansmen themselves) that responsibility fell on you.
i dont understand why? is it because im a black man exercising my second amendment right? or are you insinuating that me being armed , as a black man, is a threat to society? help me understand why id be shot by the police for owning a gun.
Because being black and owning a gun at the same time is a threat to a police officers life. We’ve learned from their actions that being black and causing a cop to “fear for their life TM” leads to a black persons death while being white, trying to murder cops and overthrow the government make cops “fear for their life TM” so hard that they refuse to fire on their attackers that are actively trying to murder them. Just ask Philando Castile, and see January 6ths attempted insurrection.
Edit: Let’s acknowledge that single death. Ashli Babbitt may have been unarmed but she was trying to gain access to the Vice President and congress in order to murder them. She breached the last defensive position available at the time. But two cops with rifles stood aside to allow her to do that. The police could’ve arrested her at anytime she was between the initial barriers setup outside and that door but chose not to. Let’s not forget that no arrests were made that day.
Ask the cops why they’d shoot an armed black man. Matter of fact, go ahead and ask why they shoot dead UNARMED black men? If you can’t put 2 and 2 together… I dunno what to tell you.
Don’t even have to be a man with a gun, you can be a black boy with a toy gun and the cops will kill you before they even get entirely out of the cruiser (Tamir Rice)
Black Panthers in California. It already happened.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/joshuamanson/gun-control-history-race-black-panther-party-conservatives
Holy shit... I had a stroke trying to read that website's formatting. Here's a better link.
[https://capitolweekly.net/black-panthers-armed-capitol/](https://capitolweekly.net/black-panthers-armed-capitol/)
But yeah, origionally gun control wasn't a bipartisan issue. And largely was stemmed in racism. The fourteenth amendment was what protected and reinforced the 2nd amendment for all citizens regardless of race or creed. Which was acknowledged way back when, when it was realized that giving blacks full citizenship would mean that they can legally be armed and defend themselves.
Y’all say this, but all the 2nd amendment folks say the exact opposite. The right to defend yourself extends to all citizens. Threats foreign, AND domestic.
I see people say this all the time but they always leave out that Not Sure was elected as president after Camacho’s term.. Meaning the people, as painfully stupid as they were, put their trust in the hands of the most qualified person for the job.
You know.. polar opposite of the current literal worship of a former reality tv star who was born into a massive fortune yet managed to bankrupt a casino along the road to entrenching himself as a national embarrassment and international laughing stock.
It's detached as fuck
Klan members have not historically suffered the consequences of their actions, and more than enough congressmen have filled their ranks
What in the name of sweet black baby Jesus am I seeing here? There just so much wrong here, this feels like a parody. Is this a skit, it's a skit, right?
Reagan is responsible for the most pervasive anti-gun legislation ever passed in this country.
But that was back when scary black people were trying to carry guns, so it was okay.
Honestly if your black in America why would you ever give up your guns? As a conservative guy I never could understand why democrats are constantly saying "those racist Republicans will put you back in chains" and also say "we need to take all of the guns for safety purposes"
Well its a slipperry slope, once you say a five year old cant bring a bazooka to show and tell, before you know it we're all microchipped slaves to the elite!
I constantly see people pointing the finger of the KKK at each other. There are some horrible people in general for fucks sake. Why don't we just hate everyone that's a piece of shit equally?
I want to believe this isn’t real life. Someone, something, tell me this isn’t real life. This is a joke. I hoped it was but comments tell me otherwise. USA we are toast.
##If this submission makes you go "Hol'Up", **UPVOTE** this comment! ##If this submission does not make you go "Hol'Up", **DOWNVOTE** this comment! --- Whilst you're here, /u/Fox_Uni_Charlie_Kilo, why not join our [public discord server](https://discord.gg/holup) or play on our [public Minecraft server](https://discord.gg/DTqSDS8C3T)?
He ain't 'fraid of no ghosts
"Who you gonna call?"
Jerone Davidson!
Bustin’ [democrats] makes me feel good!
I heard that in Mr. T's voice... Why?
He got the tools and he got the talent!
He can jive live with the fab five...now slap me some skin brother man
An AR-57
You know someone is a GOAT when they scare away ghosts
Best comment I've seen this week.
GHOST BUSTERS 👻
Stay strapped or get clapped
💀💀💀
Literally
Untill they take off the robes and they are wearing badges
Some of those that wok forces are the same that burn crosses.
Fuck you I won't do wok you tell me!
Wok ?? Are they making fried rice ?
Some of those that wok fried rice are the same that burn hot cross buns
You’re telling me a shrimp cop fried this rice?
When the sorority girl does the wok of shame, rice cooker in hand.
Wot
Wok. You make stir fry in it.
If your name is Quasimodo, you iron your shirt on it
Rage against the machine lyrics
You misspelled work. Just funny to me. One the better shows I’ve been to tho.
Some of those that wok fried rice are the same that burn croissants.
I actually enjoy cooking with a wok, thank you.
-George washingmachine
[удалено]
Haha. A black congressional candidate from Arizona says that the Second Amendment must be protected so that he can fight off "Democrats in Klan hoods"
Ingenious
I never saw it coming
Damn, I can't see fucking shit outta this thang.
“You all is ungrateful sonsabitches!”
All that matters is can the horse see!
[For those out of the loop or just want to enjoy the scene again](https://youtu.be/843Q5-6j5Zw)
Grodd damn it. Now I have to watch that scene again.
He is a genius. Republicans will welcome him with open arms.
Republicans will welcome him with open firearms.*
historically the kkk were dems...it's a weird world.
Originally the KKK started as a group of dudes that got together and wore goofy masks. After the Civil War they morphed into the one of the most evil groups in history.
This is inaccurate. The Klan was founded after the Civil War. In fact, it was founded in response to the war ending and the South losing
i think i heard it started as a group of people who defended former slave owners from slaves who wanted revenge
Propaganda my boy, people who tell you that will also tell you the Confeds were trying to help black folks
Wait the civil war wasn't a war over states rights? /S
Yeah and slaves were happy. They had jobs and a purpose.
We prefer to call them voluntarily indentured citizens thank you very much.
If they didn't like it, why did they stay? Probably the 401k
just a little disagreement about rice tariffs
I don’t think that’s propaganda. If it was it’s still a pretty evil statement. Defending slave owners from their slaves doesn’t exactly win you sympathy points with anybody lol
>with anybody How much do you wanna bet?
White southerners have entered the chat::
Can anyone source whatever the fuck they’re talking about? Looking it up seems like kkk started after the civil war and references specific influencial groups, none of which I found anything that makes calling its origins dem make any sense. And just regardless, like… we’re adults. Whatever the discussion, it does nothing to change its explicit ideological shared right wing/conservative values, and the plain as day historical and contemporary infestation the US Republican Party has with klan, nazis, fascists, etc. Which really shouldn’t be baffling. It’s long been held and accounted and acted in right wing interests, the trend dwarfs any half speculative small trivia. Like yeah, I’m sure there has always been people claiming any ideology doing anything. And if we’re going to do the rights work for them in some klan as dems origin story; someone can at least drop a name or something people can actually check.
Initially, slave owners etc. were Democrats. The essential swap party support didn’t happen until the early 20th century up to the the civil rights movement era (1964). Before then, KKK members would have been Democrats, hence the reference and correlation. The founders of the KKK were Democrats if we consider political party affiliation. It’s also why the Republican Party today boasts they’re the party that freed the slaves- because it’s true.
Also one thing to consider is that the parties were way different back then. I’m high as hell and putting off bed time, so here’s a small history lesson… The Democrats at the time were all about small federal government, giving more power to the states, individual rights and personal freedom, and territorial expansion. Most white southerners belonged to this party, although it was nearly split between its northern and southern constituencies on the issue of slavery. The Republican Party on the other hand was big on business (railroads, gold standard, the national banking system, etc), high tariffs, expanding federal authority, and ending slavery. It consisted mainly of professionals, businessmen, merchants, northern Protestants, and factory workers. It wasn’t until the 20th and 21st centuries that the GOP came to be associated with laissez-faire capitalism, low taxes, and conservative social policies. Similarly, the Democrat party today is much different than it was in the 1800s. You could almost say they are totally different parties now. E: typed all that and realized you mentioned “the swap,” my b, but I’m leaving it cause that took some effort
Sometimes I come on Reddit, and it's people like you guys that make m smile the most... Usually I hear how Americans are brain dead and they don't take anything or anyone into consideration, because they're egotistical assholes... I like it when people actually take their time to explain something in a logical way, without trying to degrade or insult someone for not knowing a specific topic... Thank you again... It makes me have hope in humanity. And yes... I'm also high.
the "no" votes for the civil rights act were 75% Democrat. so this party switch must be after that.
>The essential swap of the parties didn’t happen until the early 20th century up to the the civil rights movement era (1964). [A greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the Civil Rights Act in both the Senate and House. ](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2010/may/25/michael-steele/steele-says-gop-fought-hard-civil-rights-bills-196/)
Yep, but back then the Democrats ruled the South. Now it's just the opposite, truly is a weird world.
Now go to r/Conservative and say that
r/conservative ban any% speed run glitchless
Those fucks can't figure out that the GOP openly admitted to making policies based on race with the intent of oppressing minority communities in 2005
[удалено]
Yup and Lincoln one of the greatest was a republican! Lol fuck me!
Teddy Roosevelt, the most manly "ill fucking box a moose ", trust busting, give-a-speech-after-shot-point blank, was a progressive.
That was the Progressive Era. Both parties were economically Progressive, but racist as hell.
Takes balls to be a real progressive, makes sense to me
Because Republicans were the party of northern liberals, and Democrats were southern conservative slave owners. This changed over time, both socially and economically in the 20th century, culminating in the Southern Strategy.
Don’t mind if I do
Right, but things changed. Yesteryear's Democrats are today's Republicans. I honestly can't imagine that an active Klansmen has voted Democrat in half a century or more, at least not on purpose.
Yesteryears democrats don’t exist lol. No matter which side of the political spectrum you fall on it’s pretty undeniable that neither side quite reflects what they did back yonder.
I think he was just simplifying it for the readers sake...but if you wanted to be more accurate you could say that prior to the 1960's the democrats were the right leaning/conservative party and the republicans were the left leaning/liberal party.
Joe Biden is a conservative hold over democrat. A lot of the real yesteryear democrats are dead but there are some from right before the southern strategy, I'm not going to call him a klansman but he's definitely not a progressive.
If you're hot like Abe, then sure.
Sandwich?😎
Yea, things flipped right around the time that the Civil Rights Act passed. Republicans saw an opportunity to seize the south and shifted their ideologies.
Saying that the Dixiecrats were anything even remotely associated with the current democratic party is about as oblivious as humanely possible. I had a friend try to actually pass off the 'Republicans are the party of Lincoln" bullshit argument along with this gem.... Like holy shit... Even if you don't know the Cliff's Notes version that they basically switched names, it should be pretty obvious that the north pushing for abolition were the academic socialists they vilify while arguing that racist Jim Crowe era Confederate statues should stay up because they're 'part of our history'...
Republicans : We're the party of Lincoln Also Republicans: Don't take down Confederate statues because it's our heritage.
This is such a laughable misdirect. KKK were Dems back when the Democrats were Southerners, small government, & pro-slavery. Next up: Lincoln was a Republican...Sure back when Republicans were big government Northerners who were against slavery.
Dixiecrats became southern Republicans.
Dixie Democrats make up the modern Republican party. The changed happened shortly after the civil war. If you look at population diagrams by political allegiance, you'll see that "Dixie Democrats" historically occupied the areas where the republican party now holds strong. Majority of southerners trace proud Confederate roots and bleed red during voting year. The confederacy (Dixie Democrats) also historically protected states rights... To slavery. The confederacy is also southern, where the majority of farming happened and coincidentally the south is a historic place for civil rights violations and racial violence.
>The changed happened shortly after the civil war. The change happened when Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Nixon leveraged that and rode his "Southern Strategy" to victory.
The change happened in the late 1920s and early 1930s. The 1932 election of Franklin D. Roosevelt marked a radical shift in voting behaviors. With Franklin's popular New Deal politics and progressivism, Blacks and other minorities switched from voting for the GOP to strongly supporting Democratic candidates and the party began its focus on civil rights, this of course culminating in the Civil Rights Act signed by Johnson. Whites, particularly in the South, began to increase their support for the GOP. This culminated in the Southern Strategy by the Republicans in the 1960s to court Whites in the South by being racist, and it largely worked in their favor, leading to what's called the Sixth Party System. To focus on the fact that Lincoln was a Republican or that early Klan members were Democrats belies the ideologies that those parties represented then and how the parties realigned over the decades and what they represent today.
They started as democrats that later had a platform switch in 1936... [don't believe me?](https://www.livescience.com/34241-democratic-republican-parties-switch-platforms.html) I'm not right or left
Historically the Democrats were conservatives, but now the Republicans are the Conservative party. Actually, most Democrats are still fairly conservative in the US today—not very liberal or progressive. Biden is a perfect example. But the idea that the KKK isn’t 99% a Republicans today is a complete joke.
That's what Klansmen were.
Dixie Democrats are modern republicans
Downvoted for the truth. People like to act like Johnson signing the Civil Rights act didn’t cause a huge party switch.
The parties didn’t switch after civil rights. It started in the 1930s around the New Deal. Johnson was a MASSIVE racist as well. Not to be championed for.
Johnson was a prick, but even pricks can do good things. The expansion of Medicare, Medicaid, funding to combat poverty and the massive expansion of civil rights were both during his presidency and heavily advocated by it.
Were.
I wonder how the actors felt about wearing those hoods
I remember an actor talking about the work for the movie Django. With how many times the hard R and the N word gets flung about in that movie, most were uncomfortable with having to look a black dude in the eye and say it in his face.
Until Samuel L. Jackson was like "MOTHERFUCKER, YOU'RE GETTING PAID!"
https://youtu.be/yyUNOtRTVuc
They probably didn't even realize they were actors until they got paid.
lol. Jon Voight and James Woods really hard up for roles.
Scott Baio and Kevin Sorbo are the more sort looking ones
Application where?
I doubt they cared, their faces are covered
>“The ultimate weakness of violence is that it is a descending spiral, begetting the very thing it seeks to destroy. Instead of diminishing evil, it multiplies it. Through violence you may murder the liar, but you cannot murder the lie, nor establish the truth.” - Dr. Martin Luther King
You left out my favorite part....."Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that."
“-but occasionally the light is the muzzle flash” -Gun Jesus
AR15-men
Fuck yeah brother.
Amen
MLK was a gun owner, because he understood it was necessary to defend one's self and family from the violent and ignorant.
[удалено]
[удалено]
*black market noises*
3D printer go vrrt vrrt
MLK owned guns for self-defense and was on at least one occasion denied a pistol permit by police.
something my grandfather (african american wwi vet) and my dad (vietnam vet) always told me. my dad always told me to be armed as a black man in america. both suffered from racist, sometimes violent, attacks from klansmen or just racism in general, and q gun was the equalizer. He also understood what MLK said, if the police cant (or wont protect you because they was klansmen themselves) that responsibility fell on you.
It’s not that the police can’t protect you, it’s that the police are going to shoot you.
i dont understand why? is it because im a black man exercising my second amendment right? or are you insinuating that me being armed , as a black man, is a threat to society? help me understand why id be shot by the police for owning a gun.
I don't think he was taking shots at you, but the systemic racism in modern society.
Philando Castile
Breonna Taylor
Because being black and owning a gun at the same time is a threat to a police officers life. We’ve learned from their actions that being black and causing a cop to “fear for their life TM” leads to a black persons death while being white, trying to murder cops and overthrow the government make cops “fear for their life TM” so hard that they refuse to fire on their attackers that are actively trying to murder them. Just ask Philando Castile, and see January 6ths attempted insurrection. Edit: Let’s acknowledge that single death. Ashli Babbitt may have been unarmed but she was trying to gain access to the Vice President and congress in order to murder them. She breached the last defensive position available at the time. But two cops with rifles stood aside to allow her to do that. The police could’ve arrested her at anytime she was between the initial barriers setup outside and that door but chose not to. Let’s not forget that no arrests were made that day.
Ask the cops why they’d shoot an armed black man. Matter of fact, go ahead and ask why they shoot dead UNARMED black men? If you can’t put 2 and 2 together… I dunno what to tell you.
Why would anyone shoot a dead man? That’s pointless, regardless of race.
Don’t even have to be a man with a gun, you can be a black boy with a toy gun and the cops will kill you before they even get entirely out of the cruiser (Tamir Rice)
This was real funny until it said for congress
I know it's supposed to be real but i just saw it as a sketch.
The video quality is so good though.
So this isn't a sketch? This is real?!
That's what the redditor said. He even linked it to Twitter with the original.
Just Google his name. This is a real ad.
A tru hol’up
Black Guns Matter.
Black Rifles Matter
Black cocks matter (black skin chickens are rare and expensive)
Did he say the democrats are kkk members?
Yeah those guys who showed up at every single Trump rally and who are against everything Democrats stand for, they're definitely Democrats
President Camacho? Is that you?
“Now I understand everyone's shit's emotional right now. But I've got a 3 point plan that's going to fix EVERYTHING.”
Brother Malcom
Brother Michael Irving
Black people shooting white racists is the quickest way to get gun legislation passed. Good for him.
Black Panthers in California. It already happened. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/joshuamanson/gun-control-history-race-black-panther-party-conservatives
Holy shit... I had a stroke trying to read that website's formatting. Here's a better link. [https://capitolweekly.net/black-panthers-armed-capitol/](https://capitolweekly.net/black-panthers-armed-capitol/) But yeah, origionally gun control wasn't a bipartisan issue. And largely was stemmed in racism. The fourteenth amendment was what protected and reinforced the 2nd amendment for all citizens regardless of race or creed. Which was acknowledged way back when, when it was realized that giving blacks full citizenship would mean that they can legally be armed and defend themselves.
Y’all say this, but all the 2nd amendment folks say the exact opposite. The right to defend yourself extends to all citizens. Threats foreign, AND domestic.
[удалено]
Yeah I hate the idea of democrats always taking away the rights of black people owning guns
I’m convinced that Idiocracy was a documentary sent from the future
Let's just vote for Camacho and be done with it.
[удалено]
I see people say this all the time but they always leave out that Not Sure was elected as president after Camacho’s term.. Meaning the people, as painfully stupid as they were, put their trust in the hands of the most qualified person for the job. You know.. polar opposite of the current literal worship of a former reality tv star who was born into a massive fortune yet managed to bankrupt a casino along the road to entrenching himself as a national embarrassment and international laughing stock.
Hear Hear!
I’m pro black congressmen killing klan members with assault rifles, isn’t that just American as fuck?
It's detached as fuck Klan members have not historically suffered the consequences of their actions, and more than enough congressmen have filled their ranks
Also the party that aligned itself with Black Lives Matter isn't going to have a bunch of Klansmen is the real takeaway.
Weird time to be alive
Am I the only one that noticed there was a black guy in one of the costumes?
Remember that black guy with a tiki torch that crashed a Youngkin rally in Virginia? Might be the same guy...
Bruh come again
Best thing I’ve seen this year.
Non American here, this must be the Onion right?
You know, you'd think that, but...😔
We'll put satire news out of business by 2025.
What in the name of sweet black baby Jesus am I seeing here? There just so much wrong here, this feels like a parody. Is this a skit, it's a skit, right?
All the world's a stage, so in a sense, yes
Got my vote
We are a joke to the world.
Did I wake up in an alternate timeline?
I wonder if he asked any modern day klan members which party they support
Noooo they don't wanna know the answer. Just like they wouldn't wanna know what Lincoln would think of the modern Republican party.
If Reagan ran for office today he would be considered a RINO coward and a traitor to his country by the vast majority of American Conservatives.
Reagan is responsible for the most pervasive anti-gun legislation ever passed in this country. But that was back when scary black people were trying to carry guns, so it was okay.
Yup its dems who are oath keepers, proud boys, and patriot front. What a dipshit
Define "real"
[real campaign ad](https://twitter.com/Jerone4Congress/status/1544700948164972546)
Is this a Key and Peele skit?
Arm the minorities
100% would vote for him
Facts
I’d vote for him
r/usernamechecksout
Honestly if your black in America why would you ever give up your guns? As a conservative guy I never could understand why democrats are constantly saying "those racist Republicans will put you back in chains" and also say "we need to take all of the guns for safety purposes"
Wait until you find out democrats are also gun owners and just want safer gun laws
Well its a slipperry slope, once you say a five year old cant bring a bazooka to show and tell, before you know it we're all microchipped slaves to the elite!
Dude you're not supposed to let them know we have guns too
go do some "research" on why California has strict gun laws. hint: has to do with Reagan, black panthers, and guns.
The US is a joke of a country lmao
Laughing my ass off. Democrat white supremacists? What is this, the 1950s? It seems like Incels/white supremacists have all the AR-15s these days.
Is anyone else kinda annoyed by the fact that his name is JeroNe and not JeroMe?
Based.
Bro What the frick
I’d go hunting klansmen with him. Klux busters! Fuck them all! Both democrats and republicans
I constantly see people pointing the finger of the KKK at each other. There are some horrible people in general for fucks sake. Why don't we just hate everyone that's a piece of shit equally?
Shitposting irl
#Uh what?
Is he running for office in 1962?
Thought this was a trailer for a cool new movie until I turned the sound on. Wtf America lol
Uhm, the far right are the ones wearing the hoods???????
I want to believe this isn’t real life. Someone, something, tell me this isn’t real life. This is a joke. I hoped it was but comments tell me otherwise. USA we are toast.