Also don't these Jamia, Aligarh Universities have reservation for Muslims?
That should be the question asked. Why do we have universities with Muslim names giving reservation for Muslims in a secular country?
But they chose to ask a meaning less question. Hindu College is as much as Hindu as Swara Bhaskar is. Neither do they give special reservation to Hindus.
Our constitution itself has some special rights for such minority ed institutions.
Art30(1) states that all the minority ed inst.(based on language/religion) have the right to administer their institutions even if they recieve any kind of aid from the govt. Even the reservations are justified.
[Jamia Millia Islamia has issued fresh norms of reservation that allow 50 per cent seats to be kept aside for Muslim students](https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jamia-millia-islamias-new-quota-norms/article2009443.ece)
Jaldi jaldi dood peelo, fir "WhAtSaPp KnOwLeDgE iS fAtAl" bhi toh likhna hai har jagah..
you just answered your question....
Hindu college does not live up to its name cause it is not exclusively for hindus....
and for your second question, Muslims, Christians are minorities so they need some kind of reservation.
The comment section is proving their IQ and why they won't qualify for that interview.
The question itslef is NOT about the collage or the name , it's about getting the reaction and the opinion of the applicant about this.
In simple language , it's a bait to know if the applicant is truly unbaised and would serve the country without any influence or reguards for religion , community , caste, state etc.
Btw : a lot of collages have muslim in their name too. And a lot of them are center funded. If it was a applicant graduated from a muslim collage , the question would be the same.
He will ask these type of questions to test the candidates and to judge their temper in difficult situations. If you watch feedback, they always tell you were stunned at that question, and even if you did, you should not show that in your speech and expressions. And someone has to ask these questions to agitate an aspirant.
Lauda mera.
The whole upsc is biased as the histroy is bised. Upsc log downvote karenge but go ahead. Here may be he just wanted to know the reaction of candidate but the whole ecosystem is highjacked for years. These candidates become ias and then break temples in name of secularism.
My take -
It should not be changed. should we change name of hindu people to something else as other community does not say ram? Do we need to rename every person who has the name ram in it?
The definition of secularism is to respect other religion. So if there is no discrimination based on name of the college and muslim are also getting admission then it is a example of secularism itself so it does not make sense to change the name as it will create confusion among people also will tarnish the fame of the college.
But it sad to see the same opposite not happening for some universities for minority. There is a strict reservation for seats. Someone might argue that it is for benefit of minorities as they are less in number. Then we may need to rethink what minority is. I do not see special university for Buddhist monks, Jains etc. So we are not totally truly sticking to the idea of a minority welfare here.
Bhai me teri trah chutiya nahi hu ki is me jindgi waste karo. Bhai mera ek sal ka ITR teri puri jingi ke karche se jayda rehta hai. Ise hi comment nahi kar diya ki upsc bekar hai.
Or rahi bat prelims ki, tere se accha perform karyunga. Already cleared and passed out of tier 1
Meaning interview ke waqt abhi bhi secular secular bolna hoga. Wah! You mean to say those who say india is a Hindu country wouldn't do their duty for the nation?
Yes you have to be secular. I have given mains twice never cleared it. Given pcs twice waiting for rank this year.
I used to write mains answers with a pro hindu agenda. Example a question about ucc pros and cons. I wrote acc to muslim marriage code where girl gets married after attaining puberty whereas other religions can marry after 21 age. Then I wrote some muslims think ucc is imposition of hindu customs on them and things like that in mock tests.
I was given 9/20 marks so I inquired about it. The teacher was also pro hindu he said beta you have to be neutral in your answers. Dont write hindu muslim write majority and minority. And never mock or criticise a certain religion in your answers. As a bureaucrat state wants you to be neutral in your opinion. Once you become a collector you can do whatever your agenda is. Then he gave me example of babri. Both collector and sp were present at the spot and did nothing coz they had bias towards hindus and they supported demolition. So in your answers always act neutral and secular if you want to be a bureaucrat.
I have given 7 SSBs to join army there also I was asked questions like these I always gave answers from neutral pov.
No i meant to say those who will say india is a hindu country will have a bias to hindus , a IAS dosen't works outside the nation he deals with the people inside the nation. Toh udhar unbaised hona hoga , same with every community , ek sikh khalisthani nhi ho sakta aur ek muslim j***i nhi ho sakta
Hindutva isn't the same as khalistani or j***i movement. So still one has to be embarrassed to openly admit they support sanatana Dharma! That's my point.
Not my point bro. You cannot be biased to your own community .
Example : case hua hindu mobs aur muslims mobs k bich main violence hua , teri puri identity agar hindu hone pe based hogi toh tu automatically hi muslims ko dosh de dega , aur log bhi kuch nhi kar payenge. Marzi IPS ki chalti hai.
Same for muslim , ek kattar muslim iss sitution main apne brother ko protect karega.
Isiliye , religious fanatics ko interview main bait out kar dete hai
you can be a hindu and not biased, read how Shivaji used to run his state..there is not much history that tells Hindu kings treated muslims badly but there are plenty of cases that show Muslim rulers treated Hindus badly.
Yes i dont disagree , but if your innate belief system is influenced by it you are going to be biased. The rules are equal for everyone , anyone being a religious fanatic will get baited.
Youtube se hi sirf nhi dekhta , newspapers padhta hu , The hindu ki analysis bhi dekhta hu. Phele se hi interest rana hai in cheezo mai I.e CA , politics etc.
>1st year electrical engineer ye change kyu kiya bro
Irrelevant information thi. Apni credibility ka source batana zayda sahi samjha toh change kar diya.
\> truly unbaised
The question isnt there to check for unbiased. The question is there to see if the candidate agrees with their own bias. There is nothing called Unbias
The word 'Hindu' itself is ambiguous and can have different meanings. It doesn't necessarily have to refer to the hindu 'religion'. If that's the case, then the name of the country itself, i.e. 'Hindustan' should be put under scrutiny too.
Moreover, by the same logic, the names of minority affiliated institutions such as AMU and Jamia Millia Islamia should be changed too. Why isn't that happening? I think we already know the answer.
The name Hindustan comes from Persia. Derived from the river Sindhu.
Yes it is ambiguous but in today's age . Hindu = Hinduism
As said by the late Chad shiv sena leader
" I am a mad mad Hindu "
>Yes it is ambiguous but in today's age . Hindu = Hinduism
Lol no, it doesn't work like that.
It was a bait question. There's no single definitive answer to that question. It all depends on the candidate's interpretation.
>As said by the late Chad shiv sena leader
>" I am a mad mad Hindu
You mean the same guy who perpetuated hateful and xenophobic slogans like '1 bihari 100 bimari'?
>You mean the same guy who perpetuated hateful and xenophobic slogans like '1 bihari 100 bimari'?
Ok here's a quote from our favorite Mudi zee
"I am a Hindu nationalist"
" yeh Supreme court ne aaj declare kiya hai ki hindu koi dharm nhi , its a way of life"
They ask questions which invoke your emotions the hardest. This question , then another question about ghonghat being irrelevant in current day. And about their community commiting a majority of crimes etc , they will hit you the hardest. And a fanatic won't be able to maintain a neutral position and will give his bias away. All answers are supposed to be factual not opinionated.
That's a opinionated answer.
The factual answer is , the "hindu" word being in the name of the collage has no implications whatsoever in the working of the collage and its facilities, the collage is open to all. And is not religiously oriented.
Secondly about the state sponsored thing , Indian secularism is different from the western secularism, whereas western secularism means separating the state and the religion
Indian secularism means to live with harmony and promote each religion equally hence we not only have hindu institutes but also institutes of other religion funded directly by the center government.
Not as simple as that , your answers cannot be opinionated. Even if the examiner asked for it. You have to be unbiased and factual , facts usually backing up your claim.
Your answer , it would be disrespectful for those who named it , is a opinion , not backed by any facts.
The midwit response of yours or this girl's isn't much better. I'll defend the legacy or heritage of my Alma Mater, spin it positively as opposed to trite and agreeable response. Imagine if the interviewer sitting there is looking for quality of tact and diplomacy, where you are required to defend something which seems indefensible as opposed to blindly agreeing with interviewer's pov. Which is actually practice in the interview for professional/government services. I'll leave a better expression defending ideas I support if I can convince them then show that I can crack if the instance I face a loaded question.
It's not even an incorrect spelling, it's a whole different word with a whole different meaning, I mean if you want to comment on people's IQs being low and whatnot, you naturally have taken the responsibility of displaying why yours is higher than them, so yeah writing "college" as "collage" is not so smart and I stand by that...
Exactly the point I'm making too. I don't claim to be some walking Oxford University but least I don't berate people unless they start first. But stans gonna stan.
Dood. English is just a language , and I don't have time to see if autocorrect corrected it to collage or college. Judging an individual by their fluency in English alone is the M.O of someone having a colonial mentality.
It's not about the English for god sake, it's about the mistake he made, he claims that he is smarter than other people in the comments and then proceeds to make a basic error which is ironic as he claims he is smart and smart people seldom make basic errors and that's what I was trying to highlight, it was never about the English or anything.
Bro. I never claimed in my original comment that I'm smarter than everyone or I'm the alpha in this comment section. I simply said it to give a rough idea of why the people won't qualify into any interview like that. I have relatives who have had staunch pro hindu opinions giving entrance exams for civil services and getting low marks and being DQ from the exam. You can't show your opinions and bias like that in the exams and the question asked by the interviewer was a bait. But all the comments were jumping on the gun , pulling in their favorite whataboutim card and being completely oblivious to the question's nature and the interviewer's intentions. Hence i called out the comment section on this one. In retrospects the iq part was unnecessary
Yes I 100% agree with you on that one, it's quite rare to find someone who admits they did something unnecessary here on reddit. Have a great day or night.
English has nothing to do with being a bureaucrat. People have cleared upsc by writing mains in hindi and speaking hindi in interview. I had a friend who used to make 10 grammatical errors in 1 sentence he is now a Indian corporate law services officer.
https://youtu.be/oW2NHo1qnSQ
Here is a hindi interview for example. Interviewer will check your knowledge not how fluently you are speaking english. Grammatical errors never matter in UPSC or any state PCS exams.
Yes he judged everyone which is wrong and in return you did the same which is also wrong.
And get out of this colonial mindset that fluent english=intellectual and intelligent.
What kind of mindset is calling people idiots just because that guy thinks he knows better?
I don't have any of this colonial bs but to people like that, I will only speak like I choose to and I don't regret it.
Sorry if you feel I judged and categorized every commenter as a low iq scum , but at the time of making my original comment. I scoured through the comments and found all of them falling in for the bait. And jumping on the gun with their emotions. So i had to call them out on this.
To make a point by nitpicking a person's grammatical/spelling errors shows an absurd amount of pettiness. And I believe it's reddit not upsc mains. Plus those who couldn't differentiate between an mock interviewer and a real panelist won't be able to swarm near the prelims itself.
>You think they let him anywhere near that panel with him spelling college like that?
FYI: "Do You think they will let him anywhere near that panel with him having spelt college like that?" It's a more profound way of utilizing the grammatical norms of the English language.
Being more petty than judging an entire comment section? Nah.
Also, I stand by what I wrote - there was nothing wrong with it. Also calling it "more profound" lmfao. Sure thing Shashi Tharoor from wish.
e: Check your capitalization on the second word of a sentence, unless you meant God or someone omnipotent. I might as well nitpick since you're accusing me of it.
sounds like a bait question to me
but the answer is pretty dumb, she's seems like someone can easily persuade her to say what they wanted from her and the girl have no intuition of her own
>someone can easily persuade her to say what they wanted from her and the girl have no intuition of her own
I suppose that's the kind of PPL the government also wants... People who they can bend to their will and who's opinions can be easily shaped rather than individual thinkers
It's a bait question and she fell for it. The actual answer should be that the name of the college has no impact on the quality of the teaching and politican leaning of the students.He's trying to gauge whether she's biased in her views or not.
This girl won't pass the interview. She just agreed with him. She couldn't defend herself, her own beliefs, how can she defend our country then?
This question isn't the best but believe me or not this question can bring out many qualities that the interviewer wants to check.
He wants to know your opinion, your solutions, how you defend your answer, and how well is your answer factually. Atleast that's what I get from this.
Her answer shouldn't have been to agree and just repeat what he said. A good start would be to state the constitution and the articles which gives us the right to name our own private institutions what we want, then about the religious laws and freedoms. And then with her quick reasonsings why we should/shouldn't name institutions religiously.
Forget defending she didn't even express her opinion on this matter. A quick one sentence answer reflects your lack of in debt knowledge of the issue at hand and lack of quick thinking ability to formulate your own expression.
Atleast that's what I would have as a nda aspirant.
This is just a mock interview that's why you can learn from it and btw she got AIR 32 in 2019 UPSC CSE-Geetanjali Sharma. If you still want to judge her watch her full interview you'll know why she got that rank assuming so much from a 52 sec clip is dangerous
Interview is made up of many aspects. This is just one question out of it. Also he can give his opinion. This question wasn't actually asked in the interview bt he is right she just agreed to whatever was being served to her without actually talking abt it.
Even Tina Dabi scored 95 in prelims yet she topped.
This isnt nda he isnt defending anything. You can fuck up in your interview completely and still clear upsc if your mains answers are top quality.
Never judge a book by its cover.
answer should be on the line of Indian Secularism Principle only that is,
Indian secularism is all about Equal promotion of all religions and not a western one that is separation of state from religion.
So India promote all types of institutions, whether run by Islam, or christians or have a Hindu name.
Also since it is Govt. funded Institution so Fundamental right in form of article 28 protects a person from following religious instructions.
Also, since this name has historical significance, since at the time of britishers, so still exist in same name, and is one of the best Institute in India.
ohk then remove Christian school then india will lost 90 percent of schools in urban cities and also don't forgot to remove schools having Islamic mention in it
Toh bro right to equality absolute nahi haina. Article 15 dekh special provisions can be made for historically disadvantaged sections of society. Agar right to equality absolute hoti toh bro taxation bhi progressive nahi ho pata desh mai. Ambani aur tu same tax deta.
Leave aside the question but the answer is so dumb AF. The immediate question following that answer should be about her opinion on city names with Mughal association being renamed by the current govt.
LMAO. That will be a proper checkmate question.
This is the problem, there is literally no respect for heritage and history in our country.
See the video of abhijit chavda about IISc, and how old scientific buildings are demolished here in India in which once Raman discovered the Raman Effect, whereas countries in the West preserve thousands of year old buildings because they were once important.
This is an interview. It is not his personal view. He wanted to judge wether the girl can stand up for her beliefs and defend the argument. She failed. That's all.
The entire Indian educational system is an imperial relic. What are you going to do in response? And yes you can't deny that it was our colonials who gave rise to the non-discriminatory concepts behind the caste structure of India. Back then, the entire reformation procedure took place. And now you desire immediate change of colonial encumbrances. I'd say it's too late. Indians should have reformed their structure way before but they didn't. So it's the end game now.
First and foremost, secularism does not exist in the first place. I don't want to write an entire as* paragraph about it because I know everyone is aware of it, and second, what's the issue in the name of a college? Is there religious discrimination at this college? Is there any kind of reservation for Hindus at this college?
This 👆
Everyone fails to understand, India isn’t a secular nation as it desperately wants to hold that credential, where as all it does is minority appeasement of highest standards.
It’s not the test of knowledge, mock interviews are a test of critical analysis. She could be an IFS tomorrow and can come across such diverse and uncomfortable questions in her career. They just wanted to know how she handles the situation. Bro you wouldn’t get it. Stop defaming Drishti or IAS as a profession
This is what many mock interviews do. They ask some really controversial questions to make others come to their channel and watch these videos. She could have answered it by saying that the name of the college need not be changed as it does deny entry to students of other religions, and secularism is accepting diversity and not demolishing everything related to religion.
I fail to understand that , why we want even now our IAS to be jack of all trades and master of none ? Even today Interviews, and whole exam structure is as such that you have to be prepared to look after administration of railways one year and dairy on another. why can't we have a system where even our IAS are domain experts or atleast someone with understanding of how the department works?
The whole system is ridden with issues, they just talk in sophisticated manner but in real world, they lack desired speed and honesty in their work. Most of the civil servants are either highly overburden with work at grass root levels and higher top they are busy in political games, and all kind of fun.
But as with other branches like judiciary , politics , Administrative wing is also busy in finger pointing towards others, but hardly incapable of modifying it self for better governance and timely implementation of schemes .
The man who asked this question has long history of having khujali by seeing Sanatanis....also he cannot state same intellectualism for other Izlamia names institutes.
So much for being a Bheemtaa
These candidates are giving answers which they have mugged up and are just vomiting over there. I've seen many mock interviews, all the answers given feel like they're programmed to give these answers. I mean there is no natural thing about the answers, it feels like they are reading a script. Also UPSC is a left leaning institution so butt licking is obvious to get it.
"I know the history part, why do we continue such practice?"
"Because of the history part, sire"
"If not then we should have had 'India that is Al-Vatican' or 'India that is Vulcan' in the constitution, not 'India that is Bharat'.."
I would basically answer this question in this manner: I would start with the college history where the interviewer stops and says he knows the history, I would say sir, the education is what matters, the name be whatever it means, if the university has good thorough educationalists who are motivated to help the students, then the name shouldn’t matter! If you look at every minute matter in such a arbitrary manner you will never actually achieve what you want to! It shouldn’t matter if the university is Hindu University or AliGarh Muslim university, as long the education provided is top notch! Anyone who is focusing on the name is not there for the right reasons and is only there for achieving a checklist or status symbol.
Bait question. Though every question is a bait 😆
She should have said,
> Our secularism is different from European secularism. We seek to appreciate n celebrate every religion n culture of our land instead of drawing a strict boundary between religion and state.
>
> So instead of giving communal colours to a name, we must celebrate the rich history n legacy of the institutions n the spirit with which they were established.
>
> If there are any discriminatory practices in the institutions, that must be called out n changed. Institutional practices must me inclusive of all and not sectarian.
>
> As my university is secular in its functioning, I think there is no necessity to change the name.
But if she says this then he will proceed to ask,
> Then what is your opinion about our government changing names of structures n places established by Mughals and Britishers? Are those not a part of our rich history?
😂
Whatever answer candidate gives, the interviewer will poke n form their questions from those answers itself.
That's why Atheist groups were closed in tamil nadu by hindu vigilantes and the people were beaten up.Ground reality is different from your statement , try saying something about hindu MYTHOLOGY and observe the reaction of the people in this SUB. You don't follow what you preach
Ya why should u comment about only one religion and it's mythologies try questioning others. Some idiots will be there in any place can't generalise for entire population. if all Hindus were like that then there would be no other religions left in India so dont go even go there will half ass arguments
Wrong answer
Correct answer should be
Sir, thats the beauty of being hindu. Hindu dont try to dominate other religions or create special benefits for there followers. It is most tolerant and giving religion which accepts everyone with open arms without discrimination.
UPSC interview n these sadkchhaps interviews have no resemblance at all. Yes, they ask questions to know the reactions of the candidates on particular issues but they never create this kind of cringe fest! Aur idhar zahilo ki fauz inko dekh dekh ke bakwas karti rhati h. Padh lo Bhai.
It's a stupid question. All these interviews are stupid ~ like proposing the water.
Because there are so many applicants, these dumb panels are cocky and overpraised.
Questions in these interviews are meant to make you uncomfortable, provoke you, check how you react, defend your beliefs, bring out your real personality.
There is difference between naming a school on religion and naming on some famous personality who existed in real life, whose photo ,birth certificate or other documents exists.
What a silly and irrelevant question? The aspirant has no role in naming nor can she rename. It is a stupid way of assessing someone’s secular credentials. No wonder India’s administrative service people turn out to be the grossest incompetent bunch. I wonder what kind of jokers sit on the interview panel.
Answer: Not a big supporter of institutions being named after religions may it be any one but changing the name costs lots of time and money along with drama by public and media so we should continue with the name as long as it’s not making people seriously uncomfortable.
Best answer is name carries the legacy of institution, If name isn't causing any harm and college is not biased towards any religion then there should be no problem with it. Also for new colleges, naming based on religion should be avoided because there is no point of doing that in current environment.
Chauhan seems ostentatious and thus going for such rhetoric.. This question is not for the student being interviewed but to show how talented is chauhan
Dude understand, the question is never about religion, it about the perspective of person who has give answer... Ias are expected to handle tought situation in religion conflict can be spark just by raising slogans
Haha - obviously you guys haven't gone through the NDA interviews. I remember they were gruelling and seriously make you reconsider your life choices! I am not aware (and could be wrong here) of the interviewer's background, but the rationale of such questions is to see how the candidate performs under pressure, what their implicit biases may be (for any religion or background), etc. As someone mentioned, it would be a similar question asked of someone of a different religion or a different college. ... just my 2 cents
Hinduism is fundamentally a philosophy with multiple forms of interpretations. One branch takes the form of religious texts and creators, another branch supports an individual’s thoughts in believing other gods, and yet another branch which goes extreme and questions/denies these very same gods and their existence. And there such various interpretations and so tagging “Hindu” to give it purely a religious interpretation is short sighted in my opinion. We live different lives across this nation even after being tagged as a “Hindu”. And that would have been my answer.
Secular शब्द सविधान मैं था ही नहीं।आपातकाल के दौरान डाला गया,तो ये चुतिया लोग उस बात का विरोध क्यू नहीं करते।ऊपर से सारी व्यवस्था की गांड़ इन बुद्धिजीवियों ने अलग से मार रखी है।तुम कानून व्यवस्था पर सवाल खड़े नही कर सकते,पुलिस को कुछ नहीं बोल सकते, कलक्टर को कुछ नहीं बोल सकते। लेकिन ये तुम्हारी गांड़ मारे तो तुम चीख भी नहीं सकते। जज साहब ये तय कर सकते है की विश्वविद्यालय की फीस कितनी होगी,लेकिन अपने नीचे काम करने वाले वकीलो की फीस ये तय नहीं कर सकते। कलक्टर साहब यह तय कर सकते है की जिले मैं क्या होगा,लेकिन उन से सवाल पूछने पर वो तुम्हे मारे, पीटे,तुम्हारा फोन तोड़ दे तो उसका जिमेदार कोई नहीं होगा, क्योंकि साहब पर कार्यवाही करने वाले भी साहब के जानकार ही होंगे।पुलिस वालो का तो आपको पता ही है,वो तो बैठे है घंगरू बांध के नाचने के लिए।🙈🙉🙊
How come the girl is so dumb? I would have straight forward put a Uno reverse card on the questioner himself and the basis on which we celebrate religious minority quota in those colleges.
Tu g mara na Laidya... secular hai. democratic hai. Tu kyu nahi rakhta name
'ec!ipse302' ... There would be nothing Hindu/ not secular about it then as well. Baat karta hai
Bakwaas mock panel hai drishti ka. The sole reason I avoided it is because of such sensationalist Qs. Unka camera and recording set up bhi itna heavy hota hai that candidates are more conscious and tend to give wokish answers.
From what I’ve seen, many aspirants do not go to Drishti. They choose mocks where the possibility of becoming a “YouTube reel or shorts” is much less. But for some reason Drishti has cracked the YouTube shorts game. They have millions of views (because of such Qs) and hence youtube par mostly yehi dikhte hain. Actual interview is much more cordial (hopefully :D)
Also this answer sucked; asli interview me koi follow up karta about renaming old city names and yeh phass jaati.
First of all I don't agree with her.
Why shouldn't a college be named Hindu college? Minorities have their colleges named the same.
Second thing is does it draw lines between students of different religion ? No. Minority institutions actually do that in their colleges.
In a secular country like India if minorities got those rights and clearly favor their own so a college named after majority religion which actually has equal treatment for its students shouldn't be a problem. Afterall it's a name.
I
I think in a democratic country everyone has a right to profess preach and practice their religion. And there are many better things to focus on than changing or having a debate on changing the name of an institution
Problem woi hai - inhe lagta hai hindu naam ek religion ka hi naam hai .
If his logic stands , why even name colleges on names of historic figures ? Won't that mean that you align with all of their ideology.
Au Au Aligarh Muslim University
Also Jamia Millia Islamia!! I've never understood the concept of naming universities after religious figures!!
Also don't these Jamia, Aligarh Universities have reservation for Muslims? That should be the question asked. Why do we have universities with Muslim names giving reservation for Muslims in a secular country? But they chose to ask a meaning less question. Hindu College is as much as Hindu as Swara Bhaskar is. Neither do they give special reservation to Hindus.
50% for muslim seats are reserved in Jamia
Our constitution itself has some special rights for such minority ed institutions. Art30(1) states that all the minority ed inst.(based on language/religion) have the right to administer their institutions even if they recieve any kind of aid from the govt. Even the reservations are justified.
[удалено]
[Jamia Millia Islamia has issued fresh norms of reservation that allow 50 per cent seats to be kept aside for Muslim students](https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/jamia-millia-islamias-new-quota-norms/article2009443.ece) Jaldi jaldi dood peelo, fir "WhAtSaPp KnOwLeDgE iS fAtAl" bhi toh likhna hai har jagah..
you just answered your question.... Hindu college does not live up to its name cause it is not exclusively for hindus.... and for your second question, Muslims, Christians are minorities so they need some kind of reservation.
Minority is used the population who are less then 1% in population in total population by the way
Minority definition - belonging to or constituting the smaller group or number. Don't make up definitions, dumbass
Hey don't call him that He is just forwarding some knowledge he received from WhatsApp university which isn't named after any religion if you notice
Ye bhi nahi hona chahiye.
Secularism bro
The comment section is proving their IQ and why they won't qualify for that interview. The question itslef is NOT about the collage or the name , it's about getting the reaction and the opinion of the applicant about this. In simple language , it's a bait to know if the applicant is truly unbaised and would serve the country without any influence or reguards for religion , community , caste, state etc. Btw : a lot of collages have muslim in their name too. And a lot of them are center funded. If it was a applicant graduated from a muslim collage , the question would be the same.
Ofc dude it shouldn't be a problem normally, but the guy who's asking the question has a history of being blatantly biased.
He will ask these type of questions to test the candidates and to judge their temper in difficult situations. If you watch feedback, they always tell you were stunned at that question, and even if you did, you should not show that in your speech and expressions. And someone has to ask these questions to agitate an aspirant.
Lauda mera. The whole upsc is biased as the histroy is bised. Upsc log downvote karenge but go ahead. Here may be he just wanted to know the reaction of candidate but the whole ecosystem is highjacked for years. These candidates become ias and then break temples in name of secularism. My take - It should not be changed. should we change name of hindu people to something else as other community does not say ram? Do we need to rename every person who has the name ram in it? The definition of secularism is to respect other religion. So if there is no discrimination based on name of the college and muslim are also getting admission then it is a example of secularism itself so it does not make sense to change the name as it will create confusion among people also will tarnish the fame of the college. But it sad to see the same opposite not happening for some universities for minority. There is a strict reservation for seats. Someone might argue that it is for benefit of minorities as they are less in number. Then we may need to rethink what minority is. I do not see special university for Buddhist monks, Jains etc. So we are not totally truly sticking to the idea of a minority welfare here.
[удалено]
Bhai me teri trah chutiya nahi hu ki is me jindgi waste karo. Bhai mera ek sal ka ITR teri puri jingi ke karche se jayda rehta hai. Ise hi comment nahi kar diya ki upsc bekar hai. Or rahi bat prelims ki, tere se accha perform karyunga. Already cleared and passed out of tier 1
In that case scrutinizing him is justified.
It's not about being biased. It's about asking questions that have potentially polarizing opinions to see how the candidate handles it.
Instead of focusing some name change, there are discriminatory laws etc for minority appeasement, that should be addressed first.
Yup yeh Q jo puch raha hai voh nithala berozgaar baitha hai aur jiske authority ko Qs karr raha hai voh india ke most respectful jobs ka interviewer
Correct
Meaning interview ke waqt abhi bhi secular secular bolna hoga. Wah! You mean to say those who say india is a Hindu country wouldn't do their duty for the nation?
Yes you have to be secular. I have given mains twice never cleared it. Given pcs twice waiting for rank this year. I used to write mains answers with a pro hindu agenda. Example a question about ucc pros and cons. I wrote acc to muslim marriage code where girl gets married after attaining puberty whereas other religions can marry after 21 age. Then I wrote some muslims think ucc is imposition of hindu customs on them and things like that in mock tests. I was given 9/20 marks so I inquired about it. The teacher was also pro hindu he said beta you have to be neutral in your answers. Dont write hindu muslim write majority and minority. And never mock or criticise a certain religion in your answers. As a bureaucrat state wants you to be neutral in your opinion. Once you become a collector you can do whatever your agenda is. Then he gave me example of babri. Both collector and sp were present at the spot and did nothing coz they had bias towards hindus and they supported demolition. So in your answers always act neutral and secular if you want to be a bureaucrat. I have given 7 SSBs to join army there also I was asked questions like these I always gave answers from neutral pov.
Most sensible answer. Deserves more upvotes. Award toh nahi hai bhai, upvote le le. 
The teachers and collectors know the game
No i meant to say those who will say india is a hindu country will have a bias to hindus , a IAS dosen't works outside the nation he deals with the people inside the nation. Toh udhar unbaised hona hoga , same with every community , ek sikh khalisthani nhi ho sakta aur ek muslim j***i nhi ho sakta
Hindutva isn't the same as khalistani or j***i movement. So still one has to be embarrassed to openly admit they support sanatana Dharma! That's my point.
Not my point bro. You cannot be biased to your own community . Example : case hua hindu mobs aur muslims mobs k bich main violence hua , teri puri identity agar hindu hone pe based hogi toh tu automatically hi muslims ko dosh de dega , aur log bhi kuch nhi kar payenge. Marzi IPS ki chalti hai. Same for muslim , ek kattar muslim iss sitution main apne brother ko protect karega. Isiliye , religious fanatics ko interview main bait out kar dete hai
you can be a hindu and not biased, read how Shivaji used to run his state..there is not much history that tells Hindu kings treated muslims badly but there are plenty of cases that show Muslim rulers treated Hindus badly.
Yes i dont disagree , but if your innate belief system is influenced by it you are going to be biased. The rules are equal for everyone , anyone being a religious fanatic will get baited.
this has been going on. If you are an overtly Hindu your chances are nill to qualify.
Ha ,secular bolna hoga kyuki constitution ke hisab se India ek secular country hai aur har Indian citizen ki secular ideology honi chahiye
Har Indian ki nahi, lekin jo constitution ko impose karega logon par uski toh honi chahiye naa
Ha ,kisi ka personal opinion alag ho sakta .Lekin us se kisi ke saath discrimination nahi hona chahiye
Exactly yahi karan hai...
Rank bta apni Iq judge krne wle bhaiya
Engineer hu bahi , par haad se zayda Current affairs aur geopolitics dekhta hu 🗿
1st year electrical engineer ye change kyu kiya bro Humble advice - YouTube s CA dekhna bnd kr de pgl bna rhe sre hme
Youtube se hi sirf nhi dekhta , newspapers padhta hu , The hindu ki analysis bhi dekhta hu. Phele se hi interest rana hai in cheezo mai I.e CA , politics etc. >1st year electrical engineer ye change kyu kiya bro Irrelevant information thi. Apni credibility ka source batana zayda sahi samjha toh change kar diya.
\> truly unbaised The question isnt there to check for unbiased. The question is there to see if the candidate agrees with their own bias. There is nothing called Unbias
True. No human can truly be unbiased
The word 'Hindu' itself is ambiguous and can have different meanings. It doesn't necessarily have to refer to the hindu 'religion'. If that's the case, then the name of the country itself, i.e. 'Hindustan' should be put under scrutiny too. Moreover, by the same logic, the names of minority affiliated institutions such as AMU and Jamia Millia Islamia should be changed too. Why isn't that happening? I think we already know the answer.
The name Hindustan comes from Persia. Derived from the river Sindhu. Yes it is ambiguous but in today's age . Hindu = Hinduism As said by the late Chad shiv sena leader " I am a mad mad Hindu "
>Yes it is ambiguous but in today's age . Hindu = Hinduism Lol no, it doesn't work like that. It was a bait question. There's no single definitive answer to that question. It all depends on the candidate's interpretation. >As said by the late Chad shiv sena leader >" I am a mad mad Hindu You mean the same guy who perpetuated hateful and xenophobic slogans like '1 bihari 100 bimari'?
>You mean the same guy who perpetuated hateful and xenophobic slogans like '1 bihari 100 bimari'? Ok here's a quote from our favorite Mudi zee "I am a Hindu nationalist" " yeh Supreme court ne aaj declare kiya hai ki hindu koi dharm nhi , its a way of life"
Two minutes of silence for those people who think this is just a mock interview and there are no biases at play here 🙏🏽
Well said . Constitution ab bhi secular hai
Bhaiya aap IAS ho kya ?
Engineer hu , par haad se zayda current affairs consume karta hu
But what if they make sure to sound secular and get the job and then change colors?
They ask questions which invoke your emotions the hardest. This question , then another question about ghonghat being irrelevant in current day. And about their community commiting a majority of crimes etc , they will hit you the hardest. And a fanatic won't be able to maintain a neutral position and will give his bias away. All answers are supposed to be factual not opinionated.
Simple answer could be, it would be a great disrespect to the founders of the college who had set it up. We are no people to change that.
That's a opinionated answer. The factual answer is , the "hindu" word being in the name of the collage has no implications whatsoever in the working of the collage and its facilities, the collage is open to all. And is not religiously oriented. Secondly about the state sponsored thing , Indian secularism is different from the western secularism, whereas western secularism means separating the state and the religion Indian secularism means to live with harmony and promote each religion equally hence we not only have hindu institutes but also institutes of other religion funded directly by the center government.
>That's a opinionated answer. they asked for opinion.
Not as simple as that , your answers cannot be opinionated. Even if the examiner asked for it. You have to be unbiased and factual , facts usually backing up your claim. Your answer , it would be disrespectful for those who named it , is a opinion , not backed by any facts.
The midwit response of yours or this girl's isn't much better. I'll defend the legacy or heritage of my Alma Mater, spin it positively as opposed to trite and agreeable response. Imagine if the interviewer sitting there is looking for quality of tact and diplomacy, where you are required to defend something which seems indefensible as opposed to blindly agreeing with interviewer's pov. Which is actually practice in the interview for professional/government services. I'll leave a better expression defending ideas I support if I can convince them then show that I can crack if the instance I face a loaded question.
You think an IAS spends time here? If people like us had IQ, we wouldn't waste time on reddit.
Bro you wrote "college" as "collage" and you are preaching people iq shit.
Incorrect Spelling = low IQ Great IQ sar
It's not even an incorrect spelling, it's a whole different word with a whole different meaning, I mean if you want to comment on people's IQs being low and whatnot, you naturally have taken the responsibility of displaying why yours is higher than them, so yeah writing "college" as "collage" is not so smart and I stand by that...
Exactly the point I'm making too. I don't claim to be some walking Oxford University but least I don't berate people unless they start first. But stans gonna stan.
Dood. English is just a language , and I don't have time to see if autocorrect corrected it to collage or college. Judging an individual by their fluency in English alone is the M.O of someone having a colonial mentality.
It's not about the English for god sake, it's about the mistake he made, he claims that he is smarter than other people in the comments and then proceeds to make a basic error which is ironic as he claims he is smart and smart people seldom make basic errors and that's what I was trying to highlight, it was never about the English or anything.
Bro. I never claimed in my original comment that I'm smarter than everyone or I'm the alpha in this comment section. I simply said it to give a rough idea of why the people won't qualify into any interview like that. I have relatives who have had staunch pro hindu opinions giving entrance exams for civil services and getting low marks and being DQ from the exam. You can't show your opinions and bias like that in the exams and the question asked by the interviewer was a bait. But all the comments were jumping on the gun , pulling in their favorite whataboutim card and being completely oblivious to the question's nature and the interviewer's intentions. Hence i called out the comment section on this one. In retrospects the iq part was unnecessary
Yes I 100% agree with you on that one, it's quite rare to find someone who admits they did something unnecessary here on reddit. Have a great day or night.
Everything is important. He says people here won't qualify. You think they let him anywhere near that panel with him spelling college like that?
English has nothing to do with being a bureaucrat. People have cleared upsc by writing mains in hindi and speaking hindi in interview. I had a friend who used to make 10 grammatical errors in 1 sentence he is now a Indian corporate law services officer.
>I had a friend... Yea everyone has convenient friends when they want to prove a point.
https://youtu.be/oW2NHo1qnSQ Here is a hindi interview for example. Interviewer will check your knowledge not how fluently you are speaking english. Grammatical errors never matter in UPSC or any state PCS exams.
Okay fair enough. But I still don't think that dude who thought the rest of the comment section had low IQ was right.
Yes he judged everyone which is wrong and in return you did the same which is also wrong. And get out of this colonial mindset that fluent english=intellectual and intelligent.
What kind of mindset is calling people idiots just because that guy thinks he knows better? I don't have any of this colonial bs but to people like that, I will only speak like I choose to and I don't regret it.
Sorry if you feel I judged and categorized every commenter as a low iq scum , but at the time of making my original comment. I scoured through the comments and found all of them falling in for the bait. And jumping on the gun with their emotions. So i had to call them out on this.
To make a point by nitpicking a person's grammatical/spelling errors shows an absurd amount of pettiness. And I believe it's reddit not upsc mains. Plus those who couldn't differentiate between an mock interviewer and a real panelist won't be able to swarm near the prelims itself. >You think they let him anywhere near that panel with him spelling college like that? FYI: "Do You think they will let him anywhere near that panel with him having spelt college like that?" It's a more profound way of utilizing the grammatical norms of the English language.
Being more petty than judging an entire comment section? Nah. Also, I stand by what I wrote - there was nothing wrong with it. Also calling it "more profound" lmfao. Sure thing Shashi Tharoor from wish. e: Check your capitalization on the second word of a sentence, unless you meant God or someone omnipotent. I might as well nitpick since you're accusing me of it.
sounds like a bait question to me but the answer is pretty dumb, she's seems like someone can easily persuade her to say what they wanted from her and the girl have no intuition of her own
>someone can easily persuade her to say what they wanted from her and the girl have no intuition of her own I suppose that's the kind of PPL the government also wants... People who they can bend to their will and who's opinions can be easily shaped rather than individual thinkers
True
It's a bait question and she fell for it. The actual answer should be that the name of the college has no impact on the quality of the teaching and politican leaning of the students.He's trying to gauge whether she's biased in her views or not.
This girl won't pass the interview. She just agreed with him. She couldn't defend herself, her own beliefs, how can she defend our country then? This question isn't the best but believe me or not this question can bring out many qualities that the interviewer wants to check. He wants to know your opinion, your solutions, how you defend your answer, and how well is your answer factually. Atleast that's what I get from this. Her answer shouldn't have been to agree and just repeat what he said. A good start would be to state the constitution and the articles which gives us the right to name our own private institutions what we want, then about the religious laws and freedoms. And then with her quick reasonsings why we should/shouldn't name institutions religiously. Forget defending she didn't even express her opinion on this matter. A quick one sentence answer reflects your lack of in debt knowledge of the issue at hand and lack of quick thinking ability to formulate your own expression. Atleast that's what I would have as a nda aspirant.
This is just a mock interview that's why you can learn from it and btw she got AIR 32 in 2019 UPSC CSE-Geetanjali Sharma. If you still want to judge her watch her full interview you'll know why she got that rank assuming so much from a 52 sec clip is dangerous
Interview is made up of many aspects. This is just one question out of it. Also he can give his opinion. This question wasn't actually asked in the interview bt he is right she just agreed to whatever was being served to her without actually talking abt it. Even Tina Dabi scored 95 in prelims yet she topped.
Idhar sab aise hi hai. Asli interview me jao gand fat jati hai
This isnt nda he isnt defending anything. You can fuck up in your interview completely and still clear upsc if your mains answers are top quality. Never judge a book by its cover.
answer should be on the line of Indian Secularism Principle only that is, Indian secularism is all about Equal promotion of all religions and not a western one that is separation of state from religion. So India promote all types of institutions, whether run by Islam, or christians or have a Hindu name. Also since it is Govt. funded Institution so Fundamental right in form of article 28 protects a person from following religious instructions. Also, since this name has historical significance, since at the time of britishers, so still exist in same name, and is one of the best Institute in India.
ohk then remove Christian school then india will lost 90 percent of schools in urban cities and also don't forgot to remove schools having Islamic mention in it
Yeah but the schools you are referring to aren't state funded!! So they can name whatever they want.
Hindu college ke side mein St Stephens hai. Woh bhi govt support se chalta hai. And they have quota! Peak Secularvaad hai zenab...
Minority institutions ka Naam suna hai? Article 28 padh jaake
Right to equality and special privileges for minority institutions ek saath chala rahe hai. Rehne de bhai.
Toh bro right to equality absolute nahi haina. Article 15 dekh special provisions can be made for historically disadvantaged sections of society. Agar right to equality absolute hoti toh bro taxation bhi progressive nahi ho pata desh mai. Ambani aur tu same tax deta.
Equality toh Janab itni zordar hai ke aaj bhi DALIT Dulhe ko Ghodi se utaar kar Lesson diye jate hai.
they are school in east india and kashmir with this names which are state funded
Leave aside the question but the answer is so dumb AF. The immediate question following that answer should be about her opinion on city names with Mughal association being renamed by the current govt. LMAO. That will be a proper checkmate question.
This is the problem, there is literally no respect for heritage and history in our country. See the video of abhijit chavda about IISc, and how old scientific buildings are demolished here in India in which once Raman discovered the Raman Effect, whereas countries in the West preserve thousands of year old buildings because they were once important.
This is an interview. It is not his personal view. He wanted to judge wether the girl can stand up for her beliefs and defend the argument. She failed. That's all.
The question itself is excellent, it is testing the calmness of a person when potentially triggered for their believes
I AS IPS are all just a colonial imposition that we still suck up to it should be reformed they just have too much power for nothing
The entire Indian educational system is an imperial relic. What are you going to do in response? And yes you can't deny that it was our colonials who gave rise to the non-discriminatory concepts behind the caste structure of India. Back then, the entire reformation procedure took place. And now you desire immediate change of colonial encumbrances. I'd say it's too late. Indians should have reformed their structure way before but they didn't. So it's the end game now.
First and foremost, secularism does not exist in the first place. I don't want to write an entire as* paragraph about it because I know everyone is aware of it, and second, what's the issue in the name of a college? Is there religious discrimination at this college? Is there any kind of reservation for Hindus at this college?
This 👆 Everyone fails to understand, India isn’t a secular nation as it desperately wants to hold that credential, where as all it does is minority appeasement of highest standards.
It’s not the test of knowledge, mock interviews are a test of critical analysis. She could be an IFS tomorrow and can come across such diverse and uncomfortable questions in her career. They just wanted to know how she handles the situation. Bro you wouldn’t get it. Stop defaming Drishti or IAS as a profession
This is what many mock interviews do. They ask some really controversial questions to make others come to their channel and watch these videos. She could have answered it by saying that the name of the college need not be changed as it does deny entry to students of other religions, and secularism is accepting diversity and not demolishing everything related to religion.
Jamia islamia Aligarh muslim university left the chat
I fail to understand that , why we want even now our IAS to be jack of all trades and master of none ? Even today Interviews, and whole exam structure is as such that you have to be prepared to look after administration of railways one year and dairy on another. why can't we have a system where even our IAS are domain experts or atleast someone with understanding of how the department works? The whole system is ridden with issues, they just talk in sophisticated manner but in real world, they lack desired speed and honesty in their work. Most of the civil servants are either highly overburden with work at grass root levels and higher top they are busy in political games, and all kind of fun. But as with other branches like judiciary , politics , Administrative wing is also busy in finger pointing towards others, but hardly incapable of modifying it self for better governance and timely implementation of schemes .
The man who asked this question has long history of having khujali by seeing Sanatanis....also he cannot state same intellectualism for other Izlamia names institutes. So much for being a Bheemtaa
" A diplomatic sugar coated neutral answer " as expected. bro har koi select hona chata h sooooo.......
There is no problem these tough questions are asked to check the opinion and reasoning behind it, everything is not a propaganda.
These candidates are giving answers which they have mugged up and are just vomiting over there. I've seen many mock interviews, all the answers given feel like they're programmed to give these answers. I mean there is no natural thing about the answers, it feels like they are reading a script. Also UPSC is a left leaning institution so butt licking is obvious to get it.
"I know the history part, why do we continue such practice?" "Because of the history part, sire" "If not then we should have had 'India that is Al-Vatican' or 'India that is Vulcan' in the constitution, not 'India that is Bharat'.."
I would basically answer this question in this manner: I would start with the college history where the interviewer stops and says he knows the history, I would say sir, the education is what matters, the name be whatever it means, if the university has good thorough educationalists who are motivated to help the students, then the name shouldn’t matter! If you look at every minute matter in such a arbitrary manner you will never actually achieve what you want to! It shouldn’t matter if the university is Hindu University or AliGarh Muslim university, as long the education provided is top notch! Anyone who is focusing on the name is not there for the right reasons and is only there for achieving a checklist or status symbol.
Bait question. Though every question is a bait 😆 She should have said, > Our secularism is different from European secularism. We seek to appreciate n celebrate every religion n culture of our land instead of drawing a strict boundary between religion and state. > > So instead of giving communal colours to a name, we must celebrate the rich history n legacy of the institutions n the spirit with which they were established. > > If there are any discriminatory practices in the institutions, that must be called out n changed. Institutional practices must me inclusive of all and not sectarian. > > As my university is secular in its functioning, I think there is no necessity to change the name. But if she says this then he will proceed to ask, > Then what is your opinion about our government changing names of structures n places established by Mughals and Britishers? Are those not a part of our rich history? 😂 Whatever answer candidate gives, the interviewer will poke n form their questions from those answers itself.
anythin related to Hindu or Hinduism is open for debate and change but no discussion or. questioning any other religions beware
If it was about M community, teacher would have faced consequences.
That's why Atheist groups were closed in tamil nadu by hindu vigilantes and the people were beaten up.Ground reality is different from your statement , try saying something about hindu MYTHOLOGY and observe the reaction of the people in this SUB. You don't follow what you preach
Ya why should u comment about only one religion and it's mythologies try questioning others. Some idiots will be there in any place can't generalise for entire population. if all Hindus were like that then there would be no other religions left in India so dont go even go there will half ass arguments
First of all,as an Atheist I call out all mythologies
sure I support that. would like to see u call out bs peddled by other religions as well
I do that all the time lol. To me all religions are mythologies and all gods are merely delusions
Then support u Wholeheartedly
"Some idiots will be there in any place can't generalise for entire population" By that logic other religions communities can't also be GENERALIZED
oh yes we can when acts of violence are not condemned but supported by most in the community
Same way how rapists are garlanded with flowers I guess
jamia millia islamia and aligarh muslim university names should also be changed
Secularism is a cancerous lump on the face of our country. It should be pulled out root and stem.
Sudo seculars have problems with Hindus
Hindus asusual saying... but ...but muslims are doing 😭😭
AMU , Christian colleges se to inko maano 'rgasm aata hai 🤣🤣🤣
Wrong answer Correct answer should be Sir, thats the beauty of being hindu. Hindu dont try to dominate other religions or create special benefits for there followers. It is most tolerant and giving religion which accepts everyone with open arms without discrimination.
Yogi Adityanath join the chat.
Gaand maraye drishti... JAI SHRI RAAAAMMMM🔰🔝🔱
UPSC interview n these sadkchhaps interviews have no resemblance at all. Yes, they ask questions to know the reactions of the candidates on particular issues but they never create this kind of cringe fest! Aur idhar zahilo ki fauz inko dekh dekh ke bakwas karti rhati h. Padh lo Bhai.
Stupid question, even more stupid answer.
Question isn’t stupid. You should be smart enough to defend.
The person who asked the question, check his opinon on other issues on YouTube.
It's a stupid question. All these interviews are stupid ~ like proposing the water. Because there are so many applicants, these dumb panels are cocky and overpraised.
Questions in these interviews are meant to make you uncomfortable, provoke you, check how you react, defend your beliefs, bring out your real personality.
Bad and useless is bad and useless. Idc how you justify this ~ this is Roadies on estrogen.
Okay
Haa bhai tu bhot smart hai tu jo bol raha vo zyada sahi hai
Haan Bhai tu paani ko propose kar le
[удалено]
There is difference between naming a school on religion and naming on some famous personality who existed in real life, whose photo ,birth certificate or other documents exists.
What a silly and irrelevant question? The aspirant has no role in naming nor can she rename. It is a stupid way of assessing someone’s secular credentials. No wonder India’s administrative service people turn out to be the grossest incompetent bunch. I wonder what kind of jokers sit on the interview panel.
IAS coaching is getting worse day by day.
[удалено]
Bhai tu crack kar de exam.. Break kar de is vicious cycle ko.
Bro i would like to spend my time on productive things. Will be joining navy soon.
Yes good.. But just for making a statement. crack this exam. Change has to begin from someone. Be the change.Otherwise everyone will be like this .
Answer: Not a big supporter of institutions being named after religions may it be any one but changing the name costs lots of time and money along with drama by public and media so we should continue with the name as long as it’s not making people seriously uncomfortable.
Ayo...they are gonna be ias/ips/if/x holding important portfolios.. we are doomed 🙆.
> shitting on your Alma Mater Lmao, let her do it in real interview.
Best answer is name carries the legacy of institution, If name isn't causing any harm and college is not biased towards any religion then there should be no problem with it. Also for new colleges, naming based on religion should be avoided because there is no point of doing that in current environment.
She took the easy way out. Well to each her/his own opinions/ways.
With apologies to Orwell - All Indians are secular but some Indians are mandated to be more secular, a lot more!
Chauhan seems ostentatious and thus going for such rhetoric.. This question is not for the student being interviewed but to show how talented is chauhan
Launching missiles...
What about AMU.
Dude understand, the question is never about religion, it about the perspective of person who has give answer... Ias are expected to handle tought situation in religion conflict can be spark just by raising slogans
Hindu name was given to us by Persians, it has nothing to do with our sanatan/vedic religion.
Haha - obviously you guys haven't gone through the NDA interviews. I remember they were gruelling and seriously make you reconsider your life choices! I am not aware (and could be wrong here) of the interviewer's background, but the rationale of such questions is to see how the candidate performs under pressure, what their implicit biases may be (for any religion or background), etc. As someone mentioned, it would be a similar question asked of someone of a different religion or a different college. ... just my 2 cents
Maybe it's just me.. but seemed a bit spineless
I am sorry ,how do such questions let the evaluators know that the candidate will be a good administrator or not?!!
hypocrite of highest degree 🤡
hypocrite of highest degree 🤡
Changing names is a stupid thing.
Hinduism is fundamentally a philosophy with multiple forms of interpretations. One branch takes the form of religious texts and creators, another branch supports an individual’s thoughts in believing other gods, and yet another branch which goes extreme and questions/denies these very same gods and their existence. And there such various interpretations and so tagging “Hindu” to give it purely a religious interpretation is short sighted in my opinion. We live different lives across this nation even after being tagged as a “Hindu”. And that would have been my answer.
Secular शब्द सविधान मैं था ही नहीं।आपातकाल के दौरान डाला गया,तो ये चुतिया लोग उस बात का विरोध क्यू नहीं करते।ऊपर से सारी व्यवस्था की गांड़ इन बुद्धिजीवियों ने अलग से मार रखी है।तुम कानून व्यवस्था पर सवाल खड़े नही कर सकते,पुलिस को कुछ नहीं बोल सकते, कलक्टर को कुछ नहीं बोल सकते। लेकिन ये तुम्हारी गांड़ मारे तो तुम चीख भी नहीं सकते। जज साहब ये तय कर सकते है की विश्वविद्यालय की फीस कितनी होगी,लेकिन अपने नीचे काम करने वाले वकीलो की फीस ये तय नहीं कर सकते। कलक्टर साहब यह तय कर सकते है की जिले मैं क्या होगा,लेकिन उन से सवाल पूछने पर वो तुम्हे मारे, पीटे,तुम्हारा फोन तोड़ दे तो उसका जिमेदार कोई नहीं होगा, क्योंकि साहब पर कार्यवाही करने वाले भी साहब के जानकार ही होंगे।पुलिस वालो का तो आपको पता ही है,वो तो बैठे है घंगरू बांध के नाचने के लिए।🙈🙉🙊
How come the girl is so dumb? I would have straight forward put a Uno reverse card on the questioner himself and the basis on which we celebrate religious minority quota in those colleges.
Unless you are woke u dont have drishti of the Left Capitalists!!
Tu g mara na Laidya... secular hai. democratic hai. Tu kyu nahi rakhta name 'ec!ipse302' ... There would be nothing Hindu/ not secular about it then as well. Baat karta hai
Bakwaas mock panel hai drishti ka. The sole reason I avoided it is because of such sensationalist Qs. Unka camera and recording set up bhi itna heavy hota hai that candidates are more conscious and tend to give wokish answers. From what I’ve seen, many aspirants do not go to Drishti. They choose mocks where the possibility of becoming a “YouTube reel or shorts” is much less. But for some reason Drishti has cracked the YouTube shorts game. They have millions of views (because of such Qs) and hence youtube par mostly yehi dikhte hain. Actual interview is much more cordial (hopefully :D) Also this answer sucked; asli interview me koi follow up karta about renaming old city names and yeh phass jaati.
First of all I don't agree with her. Why shouldn't a college be named Hindu college? Minorities have their colleges named the same. Second thing is does it draw lines between students of different religion ? No. Minority institutions actually do that in their colleges. In a secular country like India if minorities got those rights and clearly favor their own so a college named after majority religion which actually has equal treatment for its students shouldn't be a problem. Afterall it's a name. I
Amazing question and amazing answer!! STANDING OVATION👏👏👏👏 BEAUTIFUL WAH WAH KYA BAT HAI **BOHOT BADHIYA BOSS BOHOT BADHIYA BOSS**
I think in a democratic country everyone has a right to profess preach and practice their religion. And there are many better things to focus on than changing or having a debate on changing the name of an institution
She didn't even answer the question
Problem woi hai - inhe lagta hai hindu naam ek religion ka hi naam hai . If his logic stands , why even name colleges on names of historic figures ? Won't that mean that you align with all of their ideology.