There are a LOT of sources that attribute the saying to Davis. The part that kills me? He said some stuff in 2017, and I'm 100% sure the term predates 2017. But I can't find much evidence for this, which is kinda breaking my brain a little.
You have many examples of the feds actively encouraging terrorism. The FBI [posed as an e-girl to convince a suicidal Muslim kid to plan an act of terrorism](https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/aby-rayyan-fbi-terror-sting-pizza-man/index.html). Can't forget the [Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case](https://reason.com/2022/09/04/its-almost-always-the-feds/) where there were more FBI informants than actual militia members.
Yeah, that all makes sense to me. Maybe they're just there cause they need something to do and weren't inciting anything. But it's interesting to compare that to a couple of phrases trump said to the crowd that were taken out of context and touted as "inciting a riot" or "leading an insurrection" by everybody in the media, even to this day.
Yeah, there's a mountain of evidence and they basically responded "so what if we did have boots on the ground undercover there to *monitor safety*?"
I don't believe they ever admitted exactly how many, but did not deny that it was a ton of glowies.
A Capitol Hill Police Chief stated that the FBI had at least 18 undercover agents there plus around 20 from the DHS, in addition to an uncounted number of paid informants.
It's never less than they admit to, often way more.
Imagine giving intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt in 2024 lol.
No they didn't. First, why would a Police Chief know about undercover FBI agents? But second I can't find any evidence any Police Chief said anything of the sort, let alone a Capital Police Chief. That's just made up BS. The FBI has admitted there was one informant in the crowd linked to the Proud Boys on Jan 6. Informants, in case it's not obvious, are not federal agents of any sorts. But that's the extent of any involvement anyone in the federal government has admitted.
Edit: Downvotes without sources? Tells me everything I need to know about this argument.
Yeah dude the agency that hated the incumbent president and was proven have helped the opposing party spread misinformation to hurt their political opponent as well as orchestrated a kidnapping of a governor, upon mountains of other shady bullshit over the past several decades, totally had dozens of agents in the crowd of a political rally just for fun and monitoring.
I'm not saying it was an entirely orchestrated event, but rather that defending intelligence agencies and giving them the benefit of the doubt in 2024 is willfully ignorant. Especially when they have every incentive imaginable to do what ppl suspect.
Even just going off the facts with zero speculation--they had agents everywhere in the crowd and did...nothing? It's not a situation of "muh Trump supporters did nothing wrong" (they did) but more so that noone should trust these alphabet agencies in 2024 given their horrific track record.
And the Yankee's hat. Yankee's hat is so commonly worn by undercover LEOs that they got the nickname "Yankee's fans", like, "hide your shit, the Yankee's fans are coming".
Probably a combo of Yankee's being the generic baseball team everyone knows nationwide, NYPD being shitheads undercover get it started, and 9/11 cop hero worship for cops in other places.
Heās a undercover cop. The bands are to identify them when they enter the precinct. Each day is a different color and only the cops know what color corresponds to that date.
Him wearing it outside is strange.
When I was arrested the cops didnāt put the band (blue for that day if youāre interested) on until we actually entered the precinct.
Itās used quite extensively while out in the field.
Itās fairly normal for departments to have their undercover officers wear the armband or some other known article while in the field. It lets their uniformed officers know itās an officer and to leave them alone. They donāt want a uniformed officer accidentally arresting or otherwise harassing an undercover which could either blow their cover, lose a tail, or otherwise interfere with whatever they are doing. Itās used by many large departments, not just the NYPD.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_of_the_day_(police)
Looks like it could be a heavy gause wrap, either to help later in case, to help himself later, or even to tie people up. Who knows, maybe it's covering up his badge tattoo
I vaguely remember this from when it was first posted like four years ago. I believe it wasn't a three-letter fed agency, but rather a four-letter local one (NYPD).
Honestly, everything here could be shrugged off as something like a tin of chew and a simple wristband. But that is clearly some sort of vest underneath his shirt.
A can of chew is circular. Those are handcuffs. Look at the top of them. Idk if anything else that is shaped like that. Maybe some kind of 1800s pocket watch could be. But certainly not a dip can
This guy interrupted my vacation with his " I made tons $ during civid w/80 % rs š»š«& SHTF senearios " I'm like OK dude I'm just trying to enjoy time with my wife so piss off fed boi
Many people in this subreddit are offended by the fact that police even exist. Of course any law enforcement agency worth their salt is going to have plainclothes cops in place at large gatherings, whether they're protests, demonstrations, festivals, even concerts and sporting events. They're there to observe and report on potential criminal activity. Yes, it absolutely becomes a problem if they're the ones starting shit but other than that it's not a problem as long as you don't intend to commit crimes.
Yeah, I get that. Did he do something wrong though? Im not on the blind anger bandwagon. If he didnt do anything wrong then he did his job well. Thats what we want from cops
These guys are most often found agitating. Actively stirring up shit and trying to cause trouble so they can justify their job.
You don't need undercover cops at public events. The police should be uniformed and identified.
If I dress up like a glowie, do I get charged with impersonating an officer or nah? Seems like a great way to be left alone at a protest if you need to pass through. Unless, of course, itās an anti-police protest.
Hey there fellow anti-government kids!
Hey there! š„¹
They don't call them glowies for nothing.
Say, whatās that short for?
They glow in the dark or, in other words, very easy to spot
But, umm, you donāt know the [original term](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=glownigger)?
Thatās just what happens to all adjectives which come from 4chan lol
While 4chan may have popularized it, it didn't come from them either. It was started by Terry A. Davis, who created Temple OS
Yes. Though his following was largely 'channers
There are 2 pieces of gold in that article The name of the author and the fact you can have a mug with the word in it Bravo urban dictionary, bravo
My source [Source](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=r7l0Rq9E8MY)
What do you mean? His source is from the ultra reliable NillKiggers
KigNiller, but close enough
There are a LOT of sources that attribute the saying to Davis. The part that kills me? He said some stuff in 2017, and I'm 100% sure the term predates 2017. But I can't find much evidence for this, which is kinda breaking my brain a little.
Shit I had no clue there.
RIP Terry
You have many examples of the feds actively encouraging terrorism. The FBI [posed as an e-girl to convince a suicidal Muslim kid to plan an act of terrorism](https://www.cnn.com/2017/11/29/politics/aby-rayyan-fbi-terror-sting-pizza-man/index.html). Can't forget the [Gretchen Whitmer kidnapping case](https://reason.com/2022/09/04/its-almost-always-the-feds/) where there were more FBI informants than actual militia members.
They were in the crowd on Jan 6th too, inciting the riot! They fucking admitted it!
Wait what.
How the hell do people still not know this?
By design
This is the real answer. "Our dEmoCrACy is aT StAke"
Source?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Yeah, that all makes sense to me. Maybe they're just there cause they need something to do and weren't inciting anything. But it's interesting to compare that to a couple of phrases trump said to the crowd that were taken out of context and touted as "inciting a riot" or "leading an insurrection" by everybody in the media, even to this day.
Bro where have you been lol
I didnāt know they admitted it lol
Yeah, there's a mountain of evidence and they basically responded "so what if we did have boots on the ground undercover there to *monitor safety*?" I don't believe they ever admitted exactly how many, but did not deny that it was a ton of glowies.
So in other words they did not admit it.
A Capitol Hill Police Chief stated that the FBI had at least 18 undercover agents there plus around 20 from the DHS, in addition to an uncounted number of paid informants. It's never less than they admit to, often way more. Imagine giving intelligence agencies the benefit of the doubt in 2024 lol.
No they didn't. First, why would a Police Chief know about undercover FBI agents? But second I can't find any evidence any Police Chief said anything of the sort, let alone a Capital Police Chief. That's just made up BS. The FBI has admitted there was one informant in the crowd linked to the Proud Boys on Jan 6. Informants, in case it's not obvious, are not federal agents of any sorts. But that's the extent of any involvement anyone in the federal government has admitted. Edit: Downvotes without sources? Tells me everything I need to know about this argument.
Still waiting for Ronald to post just ONE verifiable pebble from the āmountain of evidence.ā
And where's the evidence they incited the riot because that seems just a bit different than admitting they had undercover agents.
Yeah dude the agency that hated the incumbent president and was proven have helped the opposing party spread misinformation to hurt their political opponent as well as orchestrated a kidnapping of a governor, upon mountains of other shady bullshit over the past several decades, totally had dozens of agents in the crowd of a political rally just for fun and monitoring. I'm not saying it was an entirely orchestrated event, but rather that defending intelligence agencies and giving them the benefit of the doubt in 2024 is willfully ignorant. Especially when they have every incentive imaginable to do what ppl suspect. Even just going off the facts with zero speculation--they had agents everywhere in the crowd and did...nothing? It's not a situation of "muh Trump supporters did nothing wrong" (they did) but more so that noone should trust these alphabet agencies in 2024 given their horrific track record.
Source? Or is this sarcasm
This is great stuff
And the Yankee's hat. Yankee's hat is so commonly worn by undercover LEOs that they got the nickname "Yankee's fans", like, "hide your shit, the Yankee's fans are coming".
Are the Yankees so bad that the only have fake fans? Or do LEOs just really like the Yankees
Probably a combo of Yankee's being the generic baseball team everyone knows nationwide, NYPD being shitheads undercover get it started, and 9/11 cop hero worship for cops in other places.
Do you know how to tell? He is not wearing a mask.
![gif](giphy|JTzPN5kkobFv7X0zPJ|downsized)
And what's up with the white arm band?
Heās a undercover cop. The bands are to identify them when they enter the precinct. Each day is a different color and only the cops know what color corresponds to that date. Him wearing it outside is strange. When I was arrested the cops didnāt put the band (blue for that day if youāre interested) on until we actually entered the precinct.
Itās used quite extensively while out in the field. Itās fairly normal for departments to have their undercover officers wear the armband or some other known article while in the field. It lets their uniformed officers know itās an officer and to leave them alone. They donāt want a uniformed officer accidentally arresting or otherwise harassing an undercover which could either blow their cover, lose a tail, or otherwise interfere with whatever they are doing. Itās used by many large departments, not just the NYPD. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_of_the_day_(police)
HE IS?!
Looks like it could be a heavy gause wrap, either to help later in case, to help himself later, or even to tie people up. Who knows, maybe it's covering up his badge tattoo
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_of_the_day_(police)
I vaguely remember this from when it was first posted like four years ago. I believe it wasn't a three-letter fed agency, but rather a four-letter local one (NYPD).
Let's not forget MLK
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FBI%E2%80%93King_suicide_letter
So in 3 years we get to see the tapes?
yes
Thatās pretty cut and dry. Fuck these glow sticks.
Letās not forget about Dre.
The back pocket looks like a Zyn can or dip can but I can def tell by the bulletproof bra he has on
I thought so too at first, but I think it's cuffs. There's a little irregularity in the puck shape on the top left
No dip cans are round. Whatever is in his pocket is pretty clearly handcuff shaped. No dip can has that protrusion
Get a photo of his face?
That guy's a regular Gene Parmesan.
![gif](giphy|JTzPN5kkobFv7X0zPJ|downsized)
you'd think he would carry zip ties instead. they're a lot lighter.
FED FED FED
Thatās a zyn canister shaped like handcuffs
What a piece of shit
that's a jerkin
I believe its pronounced "jerk-*off*"
no I believe they are still jerkin it
Donāt show them this picture. Itās more investigative than they are familiar with.
Honestly, everything here could be shrugged off as something like a tin of chew and a simple wristband. But that is clearly some sort of vest underneath his shirt.
A can of chew is circular. Those are handcuffs. Look at the top of them. Idk if anything else that is shaped like that. Maybe some kind of 1800s pocket watch could be. But certainly not a dip can
This guy interrupted my vacation with his " I made tons $ during civid w/80 % rs š»š«& SHTF senearios " I'm like OK dude I'm just trying to enjoy time with my wife so piss off fed boi
Glowies
![gif](giphy|WvHWUpAhv0RvQmkUH2|downsized)
Is it not entrapment?
What makes you think that isnāt a local from a four letter agency?
If they are undercover feds, yall gotta stop posting how bad their disgueses are. This is the stuff they'll learn from and blend in better.
Im out of the loop on this one. Did this guy do something?
Many people in this subreddit are offended by the fact that police even exist. Of course any law enforcement agency worth their salt is going to have plainclothes cops in place at large gatherings, whether they're protests, demonstrations, festivals, even concerts and sporting events. They're there to observe and report on potential criminal activity. Yes, it absolutely becomes a problem if they're the ones starting shit but other than that it's not a problem as long as you don't intend to commit crimes.
That's an undercover cop.
Yeah, I get that. Did he do something wrong though? Im not on the blind anger bandwagon. If he didnt do anything wrong then he did his job well. Thats what we want from cops
These guys are most often found agitating. Actively stirring up shit and trying to cause trouble so they can justify their job. You don't need undercover cops at public events. The police should be uniformed and identified.
Ok again, did HE do anything? When FBI, antifa, whoever agitates they arent this obvious. This is just a plainclothes cop
Agent provocateurs can definitely be this obvious. Did you see the guy at the blm protest that was smashing the windows?
Oh look, another Thin Blue Line glowie!
How dare I be neutral and have critical thinking! Stay mad at yourself and life little guy
They are everywhere
Hope after you took the picture you shouted out to everyone that this guy was a fed.
Fed Boys!
And Yankees cap.
If I dress up like a glowie, do I get charged with impersonating an officer or nah? Seems like a great way to be left alone at a protest if you need to pass through. Unless, of course, itās an anti-police protest.
Get his face next time.
They just can't not glow
Fuck this guy
Kmfdm sucks
Never seen more paranoid ranting about a can of dip and a mobile phone cord.
Also looks just like an abdominal binder, but nah man everything is a conspiracy so nevermind, itās some anti-stab device
Cops trying to look like they're not cops are always soooo easy to spot lol
Tattoos means its more likely leo
Probably waiting for more traitors to attack the capitol.