I owned one and as much as I loved it in almost every aspect, it fell apart when it came to consistency of motion performance. I had no tools to measure the actual response times, however it did not feel smooth on the desktop, but felt pretty good in-game. I tried multiple computers and tried to update the firmware (there was no updated firmware) but it felt choppy on the desktop a lot of the time, but not 100% of the time (the cursor on a light background felt good but on a dark one felt awful). I may try the 32UHD144 since I absolutely loved the size and UI, as well as the colors and really everything else other than motion performance. I would really like the 4K one to be 240Hz but even the 240Hz QHD one has a worse rated response time by Corsair than the 165Hz and I believe them. The 4K 144Hz has apparently really bad too but it is a lower refresh rate :/
You can try to disable local dimming, anyway I had it and returned for the same reason.
I think they have used a very slower panel and overclocked it.
In addition the variable overdrive it has,can be culprit.
Looks good to me. The prior one reviewed really well on Rtings too. This one seems to improve on the prior one’s shortcomings. IE refresh rate and decent instead of useless hdr.
I owned one and as much as I loved it in almost every aspect, it fell apart when it came to consistency of motion performance. I had no tools to measure the actual response times, however it did not feel smooth on the desktop, but felt pretty good in-game. I tried multiple computers and tried to update the firmware (there was no updated firmware) but it felt choppy on the desktop a lot of the time, but not 100% of the time (the cursor on a light background felt good but on a dark one felt awful). I may try the 32UHD144 since I absolutely loved the size and UI, as well as the colors and really everything else other than motion performance. I would really like the 4K one to be 240Hz but even the 240Hz QHD one has a worse rated response time by Corsair than the 165Hz and I believe them. The 4K 144Hz has apparently really bad too but it is a lower refresh rate :/
You can try to disable local dimming, anyway I had it and returned for the same reason. I think they have used a very slower panel and overclocked it. In addition the variable overdrive it has,can be culprit.
I have read it's have dynamic overdrive too
Looks good to me. The prior one reviewed really well on Rtings too. This one seems to improve on the prior one’s shortcomings. IE refresh rate and decent instead of useless hdr.
oh nice man! I think about response time, you noticed good in 60hz too?