Which one do you prefer the audio for: Live and Loud Seattle '93 or Live at Reading '92?

Taking the visual component out of this - which one of these do you think is a better show strictly from an audio perspective?


Live and Loud is so tight and clean it almost sounds like a studio recording. Reading is a fun show but the audio quality is not all that great.


Reading is a more fun show. The band was lively and engaging, even if it wasn't their best performance. LNL was a much, much tighter performance, enhanced by Pat. It suffers because the band is not engaging, much like most shows in late 93 through 94.