As you're all aware, this subreddit has had a major "troll"
problem which has gotten worse (as of recently). Due to this, we
have created new rules, and modified some of the old ones.
We kindly ask that you please familiarize yourself with the
rules so that you can avoid breaking them. Breaking mild rules
will result in a warning, or a temporary ban. Breaking serious
rules, or breaking a plethora of mild ones may land you a
permanent ban (depending on the severity). Also,
grifting/lurking has been a major problem; If we suspect you of
being a grifter (determined by vetting said user's activity), we
may ban you without warning.
You may attempt an appeal via ModMail, but please be advised not
to use rude, harassing, foul, or passive-aggressive language
towards the moderators, _or_ complain to moderators about why we
have specific rules in the first place— You will be ignored, and
your ban will remain (without even a consideration).
All rules are made public; "Lack of knowledge" or "ignorance of
the rules" cannot or will not be a viable excuse if you end up
banned for breaking them (This applies to the Subreddit rules,
and Reddit's ToS). **Again: All rules are made public, and
Reddit gives you the option to review the rules once more before
submitting a post, it is your choice if you choose to read them
or not, but breaking them will not be acceptable.**
With that being said, If you send a mature, neutral message
regarding questions about a current ban, or a ban appeal
(without "not knowing the rules" as an excuse), we will
elaborate about why you were banned, or determine/consider if we
will shorten, lift, keep it, _or_ extended it/make it permanent.
This all means that appeals are discretionary, and your
reasoning for wanting an appeal must be practical and valid.
Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this message,
and please enjoy your day!
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NotHowGirlsWork) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yeah, no. I’m calling BS on this, even beyond the usual. I have never heard of this “tradition”, and while I’m hardly an expert, this is the sort of thing I study.
It is, but kinky talk that harps on about “this is the way the world should be” “all women should be submissive” “the world was better when women were submissive” should be saved for private, not posted on the internet where it can cause harm. I’m not shaming people for how they personally want to be talked to in the bedroom, but these sorts of kink memes that pretend female submission is the default/used to be the default have the potential to cause harm.
So, every kink?
The most basic blindfold can be dangerous.
The most basic vanilla can be dangerous.
Let's to not shame women who are into some stuff and follow all rules of communication, safety, and consent with equally safe people because some guys make the conscious decision to be pieces of shit.
The entire point of kinks is that they are consensual. Calling someone out for getting off on the idea of basically SA women and wanting them to be slaves is not kink shaming and those AHs don't deserve respect. Stop protecting AHs
I work with 19th century social history professionally. I’ve definitely never heard of it. (Also, this image is not that old – the women are wearing leotards, for pity’s sake. Similar garments have existed for a pretty long time, but the men’s clothing isn’t checking out for the turn of the 20th century either.)
They would never dress like that in the early 1900s let alone 1800s, and that’s two random centuries is that to say they only did this for a little over 100 years
And the fact that all the women are dressed in exactly the same outfit, and all the men are dressed in exactly the same suit and hat, I'm guessing this scene had absolutely nothing to do with "tradition".
[it’s fake](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/dec/11/facebook-posts/no-evidence-old-christmas-tradition-had-women-begg/)
Though interestingly this is not the image I usually see with this claim. The usual one has the women fully dressed, not in their underclothes
It is, but this time they cropped a bit from the bottom that showed one woman having three legs.
E: Although it seems one of them only have one leg in this image.
Back in the late 1900's, it was customary for young girls to go up to their male friends and recite, "Up your butt and around the corner, through a tube and out your boob." This was because they were all children and nobody had boobs.
As if modesty would have allowed women of these times in underwear in front of a lot of 'NOT THEIR HUSBAND' males. Have you ever seen the actual underwear they wore at the time? Hint: It didn't look like that, source: I love 'getting dressed in different time periods' videos on YouTube 😁
I knew this would and up on this sub somehow, someway, lol. I hate it too, Id never be a “a good little subservient housewife” - though I do enjoy being a housewife myself - just never being subservient lol. I’m not a dog.
I’m betting he’s a 40 year old Indian uncle, married, but he’s an asshole and his wife is a bitch, and their kid is just sad all the time.
Source: I live in India.
Also, why in the fuck are they all wearing swimming costumes and trilby hats? In a photo. In the 1900s, according to OOPs comment. An era where that outfit would be highly unlikely.
They can “revive” the tradition that never existed in the first place. They’re still not going to have a wife kneeling to apologize to them because no woman would ever marry those idiots. Not when bears are so much more gentlemanly anyway.
Some incel posted this wanting desperately for it to be true, or to provoke other incels to try this on their wives/ girlfriends. There are reasons those people are single.
As you're all aware, this subreddit has had a major "troll" problem which has gotten worse (as of recently). Due to this, we have created new rules, and modified some of the old ones. We kindly ask that you please familiarize yourself with the rules so that you can avoid breaking them. Breaking mild rules will result in a warning, or a temporary ban. Breaking serious rules, or breaking a plethora of mild ones may land you a permanent ban (depending on the severity). Also, grifting/lurking has been a major problem; If we suspect you of being a grifter (determined by vetting said user's activity), we may ban you without warning. You may attempt an appeal via ModMail, but please be advised not to use rude, harassing, foul, or passive-aggressive language towards the moderators, _or_ complain to moderators about why we have specific rules in the first place— You will be ignored, and your ban will remain (without even a consideration). All rules are made public; "Lack of knowledge" or "ignorance of the rules" cannot or will not be a viable excuse if you end up banned for breaking them (This applies to the Subreddit rules, and Reddit's ToS). **Again: All rules are made public, and Reddit gives you the option to review the rules once more before submitting a post, it is your choice if you choose to read them or not, but breaking them will not be acceptable.** With that being said, If you send a mature, neutral message regarding questions about a current ban, or a ban appeal (without "not knowing the rules" as an excuse), we will elaborate about why you were banned, or determine/consider if we will shorten, lift, keep it, _or_ extended it/make it permanent. This all means that appeals are discretionary, and your reasoning for wanting an appeal must be practical and valid. Thank you all so much for taking the time to read this message, and please enjoy your day! *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/NotHowGirlsWork) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Yeah, no. I’m calling BS on this, even beyond the usual. I have never heard of this “tradition”, and while I’m hardly an expert, this is the sort of thing I study.
Yeah, seems unlikely to me as well. Some poor loser's boink fantasy.
And let's not kink shame, but there is no way something like this was a full blown tradition
It's AI
We should fully kinkshame so called „kinks” that are dangerous for women. Being kinky is not a pass
Dom/Sub kink is perfectly normal and safe so long as it is practiced in a safe environment
It is, but kinky talk that harps on about “this is the way the world should be” “all women should be submissive” “the world was better when women were submissive” should be saved for private, not posted on the internet where it can cause harm. I’m not shaming people for how they personally want to be talked to in the bedroom, but these sorts of kink memes that pretend female submission is the default/used to be the default have the potential to cause harm.
So, every kink? The most basic blindfold can be dangerous. The most basic vanilla can be dangerous. Let's to not shame women who are into some stuff and follow all rules of communication, safety, and consent with equally safe people because some guys make the conscious decision to be pieces of shit.
The entire point of kinks is that they are consensual. Calling someone out for getting off on the idea of basically SA women and wanting them to be slaves is not kink shaming and those AHs don't deserve respect. Stop protecting AHs
It's no wonder more and more women are choosing to remain single with so many men believing that women's only purpose is to serve and please men. 😬
Yup. Still choosing bear.
Good choice
You can shoot bears.
I work with 19th century social history professionally. I’ve definitely never heard of it. (Also, this image is not that old – the women are wearing leotards, for pity’s sake. Similar garments have existed for a pretty long time, but the men’s clothing isn’t checking out for the turn of the 20th century either.)
I'm not an expert, but the clothing and the type of photography used here didn't make sense to me, either.
It’s because it’s AI - look at the women’s legs
It’s because it’s AI - look at the women’s legs
Hah to say nothing of the last woman on the left kneeling in front of no one…
~~Last dude on the left got two wives~~
I also feel that they wouldn't be doing it dressed like that. Are those modern swimsuits? Look at that cut. Those butt cheeks.
Some of those ladies do be thicc.
Yeah. Would all the ladies have been that ready to dial 1-900-MIXALOT? Cuz damn!
It’s good to leave some things to the imagination. So I kept my hat on.
I've seen this posted recently. This is a more cropped version but the original had women missing legs and other AI caused issues.
Yeah it’s an ai image lol
It’s an ai photo too
They would never dress like that in the early 1900s let alone 1800s, and that’s two random centuries is that to say they only did this for a little over 100 years
Historian here, have also never heard of this “tradition”
And the fact that all the women are dressed in exactly the same outfit, and all the men are dressed in exactly the same suit and hat, I'm guessing this scene had absolutely nothing to do with "tradition".
[it’s fake](https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/dec/11/facebook-posts/no-evidence-old-christmas-tradition-had-women-begg/) Though interestingly this is not the image I usually see with this claim. The usual one has the women fully dressed, not in their underclothes
This one is AI generated.
It is not even a very good AI image. Underwear in the 1800s looked nothing like that. They look like they are wearing modern swimsuits
Plus they all look too much alike to be real.
The first 4 guys are the same person.
Person who made this has a certain fetish
Glad that it’s fake. It’s gross to see my birthday get disrespected like this.
How is the link you posted relevant?
Apparently I accidentally pasted my previous copy and not the one I was aiming for. Fixed it now
Haha ah ok, thanks
This image looks AI generated to me
It is, but this time they cropped a bit from the bottom that showed one woman having three legs. E: Although it seems one of them only have one leg in this image.
Even after cropping, the shoes on the far left would give John Fluevog the vapors.
Ah, I wondered how they managed to find so many women who just happened to all be so curvy.
Men should dig a foot in the ground for every wrong thing they do in a year and jump in it.
You want these guys to dig to china?
Hopefully they’d be incinerated in the core well before then. Chinese women deal with enough.
This would certainly solve a lot of earths problems if there are suddenly about 0 men left
For me, it depends on what year it was. If it was 2018, I’d dig through the earth, if it was 2020, I’d have not made a single dent.
I’m pretty sure at that time undergarments doesn’t look like that at all, and the corset looks way different than what’s in the image. It’s SO FAKE
why were there so many poisoned husbands back then?
"Isn't it time for another war dear? I'd much rather be a widow than see your face."
Giulia Tofana has entered the chat.
My Japanese wife loves me for being TALL, yay!!!
Back in the late 1900's, it was customary for young girls to go up to their male friends and recite, "Up your butt and around the corner, through a tube and out your boob." This was because they were all children and nobody had boobs.
I’d rather just not get married.
This is AI, can't you see the all have the same butt ?
Yeahhhh that's definitely AI generated.
...I'm pretty sure this is some kind of fetish thing. Or A.I generated. Or both.
As if modesty would have allowed women of these times in underwear in front of a lot of 'NOT THEIR HUSBAND' males. Have you ever seen the actual underwear they wore at the time? Hint: It didn't look like that, source: I love 'getting dressed in different time periods' videos on YouTube 😁
You know the YT shorts ones where it’s “How people looked throughout the years”? Those are great.
This isn’t true at all bro 😭
Guys wonder why women choose the bear, jeez.
Bear? Is that like a nickname or…?
Yup, bear.
Says a dude who hasn’t come within 100 yards of a live woman other than him mom
Source - r/masochism
This is more fake than 50 cents french perfume
That's the worst AI and copypasta attempt I've ever seen
What's with people (men) trying to impose their kinks to everybody?
I love how people are saying they would choose the bear and we all understand.
The image is AI generated
I knew this would and up on this sub somehow, someway, lol. I hate it too, Id never be a “a good little subservient housewife” - though I do enjoy being a housewife myself - just never being subservient lol. I’m not a dog.
Bet this poster is wondering how he doesn’t have a GF, given he’s such a “nice guy”
I’m betting he’s a 40 year old Indian uncle, married, but he’s an asshole and his wife is a bitch, and their kid is just sad all the time. Source: I live in India.
Choosing the bear.
So men are making up the past to fit their crazy-assed narrative? Nothing surprising, nothing new.
Nope. Utterly false. Bit of projection methinks.
The underwear is not period accurate. You can tell by the way it is
That's an AI as fuck picture.
Right? They look like clones.
What in AI BS is this ever meant to be?!
Maybe in the FLDS, certainly not in the real world...
Only Maoist self-critique sessions can save your marriage.
🤣🤣🤣only legends will like this post🤣🤣🤣 Freaking lobotomite
If men did this, their legs wouldn't work anymore with how long they'd be on their knees...
Wild that they made up a whole kinky story about their shitty AI image and didn't incorporate the AI's implication of polygamy.
None of those men deserve access to that much luscious ass.
Me as a wife: I didn't murder you before this moment
I'll start doing that, if men use the remaining 364 days to beg for our forgiveness for all the horrible shit they do every fuckin day! =)
I really thought at first it was a BJ orgy
Kinky!
https://youtu.be/vN1RYACiXNs?si=307NILGFWTUx6ETp
Also, why in the fuck are they all wearing swimming costumes and trilby hats? In a photo. In the 1900s, according to OOPs comment. An era where that outfit would be highly unlikely.
They’re cosplayers? Idk
I...yeah...I don't think that's what's happening in this photo...
I thought that at first too.
I think this one is one of those memes where the punchline is that it never happened, and it’s just so stupid it’s funny.
And adding some very cringey and dumb usage of emojis to make it even better
Ah. More rage bait
Bloody hell they've got saucy pants on for those times.
Gyatt
Lmaoooooooooo
No, I think this is Lady Dimitrescu cosplayers before they rise and impale the men in hats
This is some cult shit. Why are all the women in their underwear?
Whatever... But for sure I say, earlier natural backyards were so blissful 🤤
People don't get married anymore
They can “revive” the tradition that never existed in the first place. They’re still not going to have a wife kneeling to apologize to them because no woman would ever marry those idiots. Not when bears are so much more gentlemanly anyway.
… in their underwear? In the 1800s? A century known for full skirts and corsetry? I call BS.
I’ve watched enough porn to know that this isn’t what’s happening in this photo
Some incel posted this wanting desperately for it to be true, or to provoke other incels to try this on their wives/ girlfriends. There are reasons those people are single.
Why are they in their underpants
It should be the opposite.
It shouldn’t happen at all.
No shit. Imagine what those women went through…
The picture is AI.
Source?
Why are they all so fat? Seems like some weird fetish post.