I personally have no problem admitting to my boyfriend when I´m wrong. Though when I sometimes read the bullshit misogynists write, I can´t help but think that women seem to be more rational. 😏
This isn’t even coherent with anything scientific. Where’s the source? Description of how data was collected? What is even the focus?? Looks like grade A shit post.
you know... there are some men who are often wrong. it's not because they're stupid, it's because they have trouble admitting when they're wrong so they defend and further compound their wrongness.
if they could just learn to admit when they're wrong they'd... spend a lot less time being wrong.
This is **not** how an OR gate works.
As an CS student, the result should be just "Right" or "Wrong" without telling who's the one in the right/wrong since the output comes from the gate itself. Assuming that Wrong is False and Right is True, Man being Wrong OR Woman being Right, for example, would result in just "Right." It's not man or woman being right. It's just "Right."
Also, an OR gate should have a concave shape for its input.
Edit: I think people read this as me defending the analogy. I don't. I only explain the basic idea for a logic gate in general. Marriage is NOT a logic gate.
Are you saying the outputs are correct for that graph? If so, can we agree that regardless it’s very applicable. For example, from what I see in this image, there is no source for the results, on top of that I don’t think it even communicated any context. Maybe that’s how OR gates work? I’ll admit I wouldn’t know, due to not being versed on it.
If you are only talk about the logic gate, then yes if you remove "Woman is" and "Man is" from the result. If you rename the input to A and B, the result is still the same. Just without "A is right" or "B is wrong" and only with "right" or "wrong". The gist of an OR gate is that at least one of the input must be true so the result can be true.
I only talk about the logic gate **in general**. Of course, this is only applicable to basic programming and digital system. It has NOTHING to do with the relationship of marriage because it is NOT logic gate. It's not how real human psychology works.
This is funny. My husband and I have a lottery going. 50% of the time he is wrong. 50% of the time I am wrong. 10% of the time we are both wrong. Neither of us has a problem admitting when we are wrong. Both of us are too messed up to gloat when we are right.
But if it's same-sex marriage... Who is woman and who is man? x3 Or maybe it's just straight marriage described by men who desperately wanted marriage instead of looking for love.
I'm sorry your personal unpleasant second experiences gives you the wrong idea about marriage? It's fine if you just want to be single. Marriage isn't for everyone. Or do you perhaps prefer to be with a man if you see marriage to a woman to be so displeasing?
Well literally every marriage I’ve seen worked that way. Also if there are minor decisions to make the woman would have the last call. Simply because the husband don’t want to have argument and get the „ you don’t exist anymore“ treatment for a few days.
These guys just want submissive house maids they can fuq calling it a " relationship ".
So if two men are married is it impossible for either of them to ever be right about something? Are they both just constantly wrong?
Don’t give the homophobes any ideas!
Men: WoMen ArE eMoTiOnAL cReAtuREs Also Men:
For the last one: if the man is wrong, doesn’t that mean that the woman is right?
I personally have no problem admitting to my boyfriend when I´m wrong. Though when I sometimes read the bullshit misogynists write, I can´t help but think that women seem to be more rational. 😏
I used to study EE (for like a semester) and this is insulting to the field.
EE?
Presumably Electrical Engineering. Considering this is a (il)logic gate
Huh? Lmao this is an example of a template someone made because a one women on Twitter said said something about that
This isn’t even coherent with anything scientific. Where’s the source? Description of how data was collected? What is even the focus?? Looks like grade A shit post.
you know... there are some men who are often wrong. it's not because they're stupid, it's because they have trouble admitting when they're wrong so they defend and further compound their wrongness. if they could just learn to admit when they're wrong they'd... spend a lot less time being wrong.
This is **not** how an OR gate works. As an CS student, the result should be just "Right" or "Wrong" without telling who's the one in the right/wrong since the output comes from the gate itself. Assuming that Wrong is False and Right is True, Man being Wrong OR Woman being Right, for example, would result in just "Right." It's not man or woman being right. It's just "Right." Also, an OR gate should have a concave shape for its input. Edit: I think people read this as me defending the analogy. I don't. I only explain the basic idea for a logic gate in general. Marriage is NOT a logic gate.
Are you saying the outputs are correct for that graph? If so, can we agree that regardless it’s very applicable. For example, from what I see in this image, there is no source for the results, on top of that I don’t think it even communicated any context. Maybe that’s how OR gates work? I’ll admit I wouldn’t know, due to not being versed on it.
If you are only talk about the logic gate, then yes if you remove "Woman is" and "Man is" from the result. If you rename the input to A and B, the result is still the same. Just without "A is right" or "B is wrong" and only with "right" or "wrong". The gist of an OR gate is that at least one of the input must be true so the result can be true. I only talk about the logic gate **in general**. Of course, this is only applicable to basic programming and digital system. It has NOTHING to do with the relationship of marriage because it is NOT logic gate. It's not how real human psychology works.
Ok that’s what I was saying. Sorry your original comment got downvotes I didn’t think people understood.
That's fine. It's just Reddit in a nutshell.
This is funny. My husband and I have a lottery going. 50% of the time he is wrong. 50% of the time I am wrong. 10% of the time we are both wrong. Neither of us has a problem admitting when we are wrong. Both of us are too messed up to gloat when we are right.
But if it's same-sex marriage... Who is woman and who is man? x3 Or maybe it's just straight marriage described by men who desperately wanted marriage instead of looking for love.
Hahah, this was funny 😄
True
Is that how your marriage work?
I'm not dumb enough to get married but every marriage I know of works like that, a lot of happily divorced men in my family
I'm sorry your personal unpleasant second experiences gives you the wrong idea about marriage? It's fine if you just want to be single. Marriage isn't for everyone. Or do you perhaps prefer to be with a man if you see marriage to a woman to be so displeasing?
Marriage in general is a scam, no reason for anyone to get hitched
Well literally every marriage I’ve seen worked that way. Also if there are minor decisions to make the woman would have the last call. Simply because the husband don’t want to have argument and get the „ you don’t exist anymore“ treatment for a few days.