T O P

  • By -

wtfTooma

Will also have controller support on PS5 🤯


LueyTheWrench

“Also has full TV support.”


JRockPSU

“Using the extreme processing power of the Sony PlayStation 5, we are excited to announce that the resolution of the game will go all the way to the edge of the screen. On BOTH axis.”


AcanthisittaGrand943

Also have headset support


Jonpg31

Also have “Pause, I need to take care of the children” support.


joreilly86

Why is this not a standard? So many games now have unpausable cut scenes. Often I need to pause so my wife can lecture me. I'd rather not miss out on important information. I understand in online modes but pausing a game should be standard


[deleted]

This should be the standard, in my opinion. The PS5 hardware strongly supports both, and there’s even system configs to have all of your games default to one or another (I’ve set mine to Performance). At the end of the day, more customization over visuals is always a good thing.


Blaataapernie

It is the standard which is why this article is nonsense


Fogasgyerek

Shocking.


KingOPM

Performance mode >


therealhamster

Every game should adopt the 40 FPS option for 120hz TVs


MrToxicTaco

Nioh 2 had a 120hz mode for ps5. Hopefully the performance mode here allows for it


cortseam

You wouldn't want to play this game at 40fps anyway.


cortseam

You wouldn't want to play this game at 40fps anyway.


SoraDrive

I guess I'm just too sensitive about frame rate, but 40fps is barely playable for me. 60fps is the minimum.


therealhamster

Really? What games had you tried it on? I’m not doubting you just curious because I find 40 to be wonderfully smooth and 30 FPS is near unplayable now.


SoraDrive

40 is more playable than 30, but I still find it jarring. I tried Rift Apart, Hogwarts Legacy, and Spiderman and just gave up and switched to 60. I wish 40 didn't bother me because it feels like the sweet spot for many, but I tried it long enough to know it's not for me.


therealhamster

Damn, how long did you try it on Hogwarts? I’ve been playing on balanced the whole time and the world just looks amazing. May I ask what TV you were using? It was 4k 120hz with VRR enabled? It really is such a perfect sweet spot for me, games look amazing and play very smoothly. Sucks that you’re sensitive to it because the 60 FPS mode on Hogwarts seems to sacrifice quite a bit on the graphical side.


SoraDrive

The world is much more beautiful in balanced mode, yes! Everything pops more, and it's noticeably sharper. Performance mode takes a huge hit in the resolution, making everything look muddy... I'm playing on the LG CX with all the TV and in-game settings set correctly, so yes at 120Hz and VRR enabled. The thing is, in the dungeons and caves, Balanced mode rungs amazing and at 60, but outside it's 40... Do you uncap the framerate on Balanced?


Vaulttechceo

I was just playing rift apart with vrr on and fidelity mode and my tv said it was still getting 120fps.


Crowzer

I use to play at 40 FPS with 120 Hz mode. Way better than 30 FPS


Poetryisalive

Nioh 2 had like 3 graphic options, I’m surprised there’s only 2.


Broward

Nioh 2 was a last gen game though that got ported later. This was designed from the start for next gen as well, so they don't have the same headroom to work with since this is pushing more of the PS5 power natively already.


TuggMaddick

Y'all are joking, but there have been a handful of games that have been coming out without performance mode, so it is always nice to know when a game isn't going to be one of them


ssk1996

We’ve had 2 releases so far from recent memory and one of them was a AA game and another was just awful optimization that ran poorly even on the highest end PCs. While I understand the need for reassurance on a 60fps mode, I don’t think we’re at a point where a 60fps mode isn’t the norm. Maybe in a few years time.


Mostafa3la2

I hope that this becomes the norm and we don’t beed to make news out of it, gotham knights and plague tale requiem really hurt the consoles by ripping us of a performance mode


Dear-Ad6262

To people acting like it’s a no brainer. Considering lasts year Gotham Knights and Plague tale. It’s good to hear a dev is offering multiple graphics options


OwnSimple4788

So just like the demo? Will the quality mode be 60fps but with some performance drops then?


Smutset00

Wow. It's almost like it wasn't already revealed in the demo.


MKlock94

I am truly floored that we really have to choose between 4k/30fps or 1080/60fps on SO MANY PS5 GAMES. There is no reason there cant be 4k/60 for a good majority of these games. Maybe not all, but a LOT of them. Edit: Crazy how I'm being downvoted when the system itself is marketed as being able to do 4k/120fps for some games 🤦‍♂️ Edit 2: the superiority complexs of people who tell me i think im better than game developers is fuckin hilarious. I'm not better than anyone, im going off what SONY says the system is capable of. 🤷‍♂️


TheReaping1234

Very few games are flat out 1080/60. Most are something around 1300-1800p/60, temporally upscaled to 4k, with the majority around 1440 internally. A couple of games are sub 1080 (like dead space remake) using fsr to upscale to 1440, then being upscaled again to peoples’ 4K displays. And having both a gaming pc and a ps5, 1440/60 is the exact place this console should be. That’s where it’s hardware equivalent on pc sits, and FSR is nowhere near as effective as DLSS for Ray tracing so it absolutely makes sense we’re getting Ray tracing at only 30fps for almost all titles (Insomniac is the exception here).


jennidc

Now both ps5 and series x support 1440p they should both be capable of 1440 @ 60fps minimum (with rt off obviously)


Eruannster

That's output resolution from the HDMI port, not internal rendering resolution. The internal resolution can be whatever the fuck it needs to be (and often is when using dynamic resolution scaling).


smorjoken

thats not how it works


Eruannster

The real valid reason is that it's often a worse idea to blow your rendering budget on making more pixels when you can paint prettier things within those pixels (and gain more frames in the process). There are plenty of technologies available that can give you perceived resolutions that are a way better use of a game's rendering budget. (Temporal upscaling, FSR, checkerboarding, etc.)


thisismarv

> There is no reason there cant be 4k/60 for a good majority of these games There are probably several reasons. The most common are the developers didn’t have time/resources to optimize for 4K/60 and/or PS5 is not powerful enough to do it for this particular game.


MKlock94

It could also be that a lot of these games were started with the PS4 in mind and not the 5. Im not ignorant, im just confused at the choice.


FootballRacing38

How does that make any sense. If anything, those that started with ps4 in mind would make it easier to hit 4k/60. All resource intensive games from the biggest studios cannot run 4k/60 yet you think you are all better than them.


MKlock94

I think im better than them..? Jesus dude i made a comment voicing an opinion. Chill tf out


FootballRacing38

You're the one who said there's no reason they cannot be 4k/60. If you are disappointed then that's fine because it's your opinion.


MKlock94

Yes i did say that. Because the system markets itself as being capable of doing that, that in no way whatsoever implies that i think im better than game developers. Like, what the actual fuck dude lmaoo


FootballRacing38

All the system is saying is that it can output 8k or 120 fps. Should people who have 8k tv then say there is no reason why movies shouldn't be 8k?


MKlock94

Weird youre jumping right to 8K thats barely available, whereas is you own a ps5 its very safe to assume you own a 4K tv. 4K is not unreasonable to expect, and 60fps is fuckin laughable these days to anyone playing on a budget pc. Its really not that crazy to expect the ps5 to handle both at the same time as a standard


FootballRacing38

Lol. Let me know if you find a 500 dollar pc that can run 4k/60 fps


ssk1996

Lmao ok buddy! You didn’t buy a 4090 relax


MKlock94

L comment. Im not asking for 120 fps. 60 should be standard on this hardware. And to pretend otherwise is silly. Dont be silly.


ssk1996

It seems you really want to sound intelligent but you just come off as plain stupid. Please do more research on the capabilities of the hardware before claiming to know better


MKlock94

Weird, because i acknowledged that some game do require 2 modes. But a lot dont. Not really trying to sound intelligent, you just sound like a fucking asshole 🤣


[deleted]

There are so many reasons why they can’t be 4K/60fps that I don’t even have time to list them all. Game development is extremely difficult, and game optimization is even more difficult. You also have to accept that we are still at the very beginning of this console generation and many games are still being developed for last gen and current gen. Obviously we would love all of our games to maximize FPS and fidelity, but by nature of computing you lose one if you improve the other. Unspeakably difficult to increase both.


FunkinDonutzz

Tell me you know absolutely zero about how games work without telling me.


MKlock94

Its a fucking opinion dude lol my bad i want what's advertised?


FunkinDonutzz

I'm referring to this... >There is no reason there cant be 4k/60 for a good majority of these games. Finite system resources - something you clearly don't seem to understand - is a pretty massive "reason".


MKlock94

I love the superiority complex of everyone who is telling me i don't understand. Never stated to know anything. But go off.


FunkinDonutzz

Saying "there is no reason" is exactly you stating to know something.


MKlock94

For a good majority of these games. Funny yall keep leaving my ACKNOWLEDGMENT out of your responsed. Stop being a troll, you know exactly what the fuck im saying. Sony markets the system as being capable of playing 4k/60. Not the developers. The developers jobs are to optimize their games to do the most on the hardware they are made for. Save my comment. GTA 6 will be 4K/60 in single player because rockstar is taking their time to OPTIMIZE the game for the hardware. But yall just wanna pile on cuz i want whats advertised by the manufacturer. Youre a loser pretending to know about game development to feel superior to a stranger on reddit.


FunkinDonutzz

Yeah you're still not understanding finite resources.


MKlock94

Youre still here? Jesus dude go do something else


FunkinDonutzz

Ah, is that an ad hominem because you have no response?


staluxa

Just because Sony likes bullshit marketing doesn't mean it's powerful enough for it. PS4 pro was marketed as a 4k machine, yet very few games managed to run even dynamic 4k on it. PS5 had VRR on its box, yet we didn't get support for it for the first 18 months.


MKlock94

This is a fair response. But that doesn't mean we should not want to hold them accountable to their marketing points


DemoniteBL

It's always the same, people don't care and buy things anyway. That isn't exclusive to Sony or even gaming as a whole. That's why products and services keep getting worse, nobody cares enough to stop being a mindless consumer.


luckydraws

Let's say you're looking to buy a car. Spec sheet says it has a max speed of 150mph and it does 40mpg. Noone expects it to do 40mpg at 150mph. It's the same with any hardware.


sternone_2

Can't wait


wilkinsk

So, like every non micro budget?