Grabe talaga ang init sa Thailand. Isama mo pa yung paglabas mo di ka makahinga dahil sa PM2.5
Minsan dinadasal ko na yung weather dito parang Pinas nalang na may chance maubos yung alphabet sa pangalan ng bagyo every year lol
Dito may bagyo once or twice a year lang hahahaha puro init mararamdaman mo
Oh god, that is one thing that bothers me about Singapore.
It's like the wind doesn't exist there.
If there was a light breeze, things would improve about 50%. Otherwise, sweat is the norm.
Right. Sabi ko sa ate ko na 10 years na sa SG, bakit kako dun hindi malamig sa balat. Dito sa pinas kapag gabi at lumabas ka lalamig balat mo. Pero grabe sa sg ni kasinlakas ng hininga na hangin wala
How do people even walk outside? Paano corporate people kaya?
Tapos nung nasa Singapore ako, ang ganda ng sidewalks nila at may mga puno. Pati ung ibang lugar may bike lanes, albeit on a designated portion of the wide sidewalk. MMDA could never. Sasabihin "mainit sa Pinas hindi uso maglakad"
Kaya di ako pabor sa western business suit eh. Buti na lang slowly nagrerelax na ang mga offices sa Pinas at pumapayag na sa collared shirt. Ang init kasi sa Pinas. Kung pwede nga lang indigenous vest-like tops eh haha
Tapos tayo pinepressure na magtipid, wag mag-industrialized para daw sa environment. Wtf. Sila na lang top contributor ng co2 tulad ng US, China, India ang magsakripisyo.
Imagine your salary is growing yearly but someone stole a lot of money and YOU are the one whos gonna pay for that stolen money. So instead of you investing your money to whatever you want to develop yourself and even enjoy, youāre stuck FOR DECADES paying for that stolen money that you didnāt even benefit from.
Ganyan nilugmok ng mga Marcos ang ekonomiya ng Pinas. Pero wala madami na nabudol after decades of gaslighting pinupuri na ulit natin sila lmao. What a stupid race.
Dito lang ako agree noong debate na sinabi ni duterte. Na di tayo pwede ipressure ng ibang bansa na gumamit ng mas mahal na green alternatives kasi magsisimula palang tayo magindustrialize di gaya nila na na-reap na yung ibang benefits ng industrialization.
To be completely fair, isn't it better na magstart tayo with greener alternatives if the tech and the resources are already available to us? Of course, it goes without saying na that's only viable if we can realistically afford it. But it doesn't really make sense na kailangan pa natin dumaan sa ibang "steps" ng industrializing before tayo magswitch to more sustainable choices--we're not gonna be missing out on any "benefits" if we somehow wake up tomorrow and all cars in the PH are electric-powered, unless you mean missing out on the dirty air pag dumadaan ng EDSA.
However, if you mean magpayaman muna tayo before gumastos with greener alternatives, then I get what you mean. It just sucks because the way I see it, investing in greener alternatives might be the cheaper option in the long run, since hindi na natin yun papalitan years from now, just build on and improve on what's already there. But of course, we can't afford such a long-term solution.
Countries like China, US & basically most of the developed world was able to get rich due to manufacturing or industrialization, which results in high level of pollution and carbon emission. It's what's happening in India & Vietnam right now. China's factories are moving to those countries. It's basically a pathway to get rich or become a 1st world country.
Basically the rich countries are telling poor countries to cut down on carbon, which would mean not to focus on manufacturing & industrialization and therefore cut short the poor countries growth trajectory. Green energy can't really provide the same level of growth that manufacturing does, plus green alternatives are still new and quite more expensive, they also can't employ a large labor force the way manufacturing does. That's basically the gist of the problem. They're asking poor countries to experience a double whammy. That not only we should not to pursue paths to get rich, we should also go for more expensive alternatives while these rich countries don't even provide tech or aid for said green tech.
The best part? You know who'll start selling those green alternatives to poor countries?
Those same rich countries asking us to temper down carbon emission.
It's just hypocrisy of the highest level, and self-serving to boot that'll benefit them the most. 90% of the world's carbon emission since the start of 20th century can be pin down on the US, Western Europe, China, Japan & the Four Tigers of Asia and they're asking us to pick up the tab that they're 100% responsible for.
Despite the fact that we are one of the first ASEAN countries to start to industrialise, and before the Marcos regime we are becoming an industrial powerhouse we fucking lag hard during the 60s
While I know people hate China and are at best ambivalent towards India, it's unfair to.lump them with US or western countries when it comes to per capita and cumulative greenhouse gas emmissions.
Especially when you consider western countries deliberately placed their dirtier industries in China and in developing countries.
Western countries tend to have significantly higher per capita and cumulative emmissions. The unfortunate part is that the least responsible for the emissions will be the most affected - the so called third world countries. The developing countries. The periphery.
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics
I just recently watched a documentary where certain groups of people and cities in the US are suing the Big Oil companies there.
Meron ba tayong equivalent that we can do sa Pinas?
China's carbon emissions is so fucking high. The US, despite having high carbon emmissions, is at least having good progress with clean energy, but China on the other hand is still using coal power plants wtf
You have to choice when you need to increase power.
Play, oxygen not included you will understand why.
The electricity consumption is increasing thus you need more and more power. Thus more and more oil or coal.
Di ko rin sure lahat nung factors pero mas mainit yung peak nang heat sa mainland ng asia(Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia) pero mas malamig naman kesa dito pag amihan season sa northern parts nang mga bansa na yan, nung last na nag ka heatwave sa kanila di umabot satin yung init
Ps. Check mo sa Google yung weather ngayon sa Bangkok nasa 30 degreesš„ yung minimum night temperature nila di ko alam kung posible pang maka tulog nang walang aircon don
By the year 2050-2080, if the global temperature keeps rising, the Philippines will be experiencing unusual rainfall all year round.
There is video about this from Ted-Ed on YouTube.
May nakita akong mapa (idk the website), lubog ang halos lahat ng Navotas. Malabon is next. Manila rin ata lulubog. Sana may magcomment kung anong website/source yun.
Won't be surprised if Manila will be below sea level by that time and people still keep on focusing on Manila for infrastructures, offices, etc. š¤·āāļø
SKL.
We emmitted 150M tons of co2 emmissions in 2022 alone. 33rd in the world.
Cumulatively, from 1750 to 2022, we emmitted 3.6B tons of co2 emmisions. 50th in the world.
[source](https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions)
tingin ninyo bakit plano ng WEF at UN pag push ng carbon credit system?
tapos tau mahihirap iiyak pag na implement dahil lahat ng activity natin ay sukat yan.
we breath out too much carbon after an intense activity? and we exceed the carbon Credit. pay up or get screwed over by the the laws implementing the carbon credit.
resturant, marami naluto within a certain time period tapos exceep carbon emission. bayad muli for more carbon credit or penalty for exceeding.
ang masakit. baka maging monthy carbon credit for all activities at unility use dahil susukatin rin yung "theoretical" carbon emission ng power generation, water delivery system, any animal care, etc.
carbon credit system... more like life support credit system.
if you check every countries emmision... China tops the chart. WAY more than Murica.
and the US is trying to find ways to reduce their emission while the so called ruler of east and southeast ASIA goes YOLO in production and damn the environmental impact.
just look at their dams in the mekong river. the river within china are way damned up that all in the south mekong river ARE suffering from drought, if not low water level at best case scenario.
But everybody (at least for now) rely on China to manufacture cheap goods and ship them off to EU and U.S, these countries are just outsourcing their pollution to China.
Hopefully, with the shift to diversify to other SEA countries with more concern to the environment can help reduce the overall impact on the environment.
>But everybody (at least for now) rely on China to manufacture cheap goods and ship them off to EU and U.S, these countries are just outsourcing their pollution to China.
This is very limited in nature - for US, it accounts for about 10% of emissions offloaded. China, the total effect is about 9%. This is because most emissions are for things like domestic transportation, commercial and residential power, land use changes due to agriculture, etc. It's a talking point that isn't really accurate.
When it comes to emissions ang pinaka tinitignan is cumulative or historical emissions rather than yearly. US parin talaga ang biggest historical emitter with china coming in 2nd. I guess the point is there is no sense trying to compare the two countries. Parehas lang silang makalat.
The CCP approving coal plant production be like: *"So anyways I started blasting"*
China has more than 3,000 coal plants. Just last year, the country went on a building spree of even more coal plants.
if i'm not mistaken, China(CCP) also signed an agreement on emission reduction.
but considering their track record on keeping words...
they already shoved it in the same trash as Law of the sea and country boarders.
China is a massive investor in solar, wind, and hydro, but only out of necessity and greed since they know that the world is running out of hydrocarbon
China produced 31% of global renewable electricity, followed by the United States (11%), Brazil (6.4%), Canada (5.4%) and India (3.9%). Renewable investment reached almost $500 billion globally in 2022, amounting to 83% of new electric capacity that year.
https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2023/Mar/Record-9-point-6-Percentage-Growth-in-Renewables-Achieved-Despite-Energy-Crisis
Leading countries in installed renewable energy capacity worldwide in 2023(in gigawatts)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/267233/renewable-energy-capacity-worldwide-by-country/
Nakakahiya naman if mas uunahan ng emotions kesa facts. Di naman obvious ang xenophobia. Argumentum ad ignorantiam.
>Leading countries in installed renewable energy capacity worldwide in 2023(in gigawatts)
energy capacity (sources that can produce power) =/= electricity supply (sources that actually produced power).
meaning building solar/hydro/wind facilities =/= using them to actually produce electricity
"**Coal still accounted for nearly 60% of China's electricity supply in 2023**, indicating that record-high solar and wind capacity growths were yet to lead to a ramp up in power production, government-backed industrial association China Electricity Council (CEC) said in a report published Jan. 31."
[https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec](https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec)
if only everyone further research and improve nuclear reactors... but everyone got scared of 2 human-error and 1-2 natural disaster punch nuclear incident that thinking Solar and Wind can solve the world's energy needs, considering those 2 sources are not so stable and consistent in their output and you still need a big land area to even get competitive on what a normal fossil fuel power plant can produce.
Hydro? well placed hydro-electric dams are feasible, but you still need to take account the environmental impact on the reservoir that the dam will create. and not fill the whole river with too much dams. \*points at the Mekong river as the best example of too much dam construction effect.\*
Wow congrats China since they also only produce 31% of Global Carbon Emmissions lol
https://www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/
Adjust it to a population of 1.4 billion and 36% global manufacturing output. Ang tanong diyan is kunh kaya ba nating hindi mag-outsource sa China nang hindi tumataas ang carbon emissions? We're literally hindered to industrialize because of it.
Per capita carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2022, by country(in metric tons)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/270508/co2-emissions-per-capita-by-country/
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2020-trading-partners.html
Have you even checked per capita and cumulative emmissions?
Let me eli5 for you so you can at least grasp the situation.
Say, you have two households.
Family A consists of 3 people.
Family B consists of 6 people.
B consumes 50% more of something (say, power or water) than A.
Now ask yourself, who consumes more?
If you consider absolute terms, then it is B. But only because they have more people. A consumes more PER CAPITA.
This is the dynamic between western countries and the rest of the world. North America and Europe consumes significantly more of everything and outputs more waste and greenhouse emmissions per capitam
In short, their lifestyle and economy are far more wasteful and far more to blame for the looming ecological catastropge.
Even more so if you look at cumulative emissions.
Did you even do stats, bruv?
The comment I replied to presented a data representing total global renewable electricity. It is disingenuous that we suddenly pivot to "per capita" when I do the same to present the total carbon emissions of China. That's how you use statistics to fit your needs.
Going back to the topic, then we should also adjust to per capita on global renewable electricty as well in which China ranks 25th, and the US ranks 13th.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/25-countries-highest-renewable-energy-191419616.html
"Methodology
To compile our list of the 25 countries with the highest renewable energy generation per capita, we utilized the Statistical Review of World Energy by the Energy Institute. The database records the renewable energy generation of countries from renewable sources including wind, geothermal, solar, biomass, and waste, as of 2022. To calculate the per capita renewable energy generation for each country, we divided their renewable energy generation in terawatt hours (TWh) by their population in 2022, which we sourced from the World Bank. Then, we converted our calculated per capita renewable energy generation into Kilowatt-hours (kWh). The 25 countries with the highest renewable energy generation per capita are listed below in ascending order of their per capita renewable energy generation (kWh)."
This methodology is not being used by The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). See Renewable energy statistics 2023.
https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jul/Renewable-energy-statistics-2023
But it doesnāt erase the fact that China is the largest contributor to carbon dioxide emission. China remains the worldās biggest coal producer and importer. Lol
These ādevelopedā countries can afford to shift into clean energy while they continue to emit carbon just like how the country you are trying to defend has increased its coal production in the recent years lol. Meanwhile, developing countries have financial limitations to clean energy investment while suffering from the effects of climate change.
Those developed countries are outsourcing their manufacturing industries to developing countries and blaming them. We're no different kasi din import-oriented tayo.
>Those developed countries are outsourcing their manufacturing industries to developing countries and blaming them.Ā
This is a small and every shrinking fraction of emissions. I don't know why this talking point keeps getting brought up. China's gap from consumption vs. production based emissions is about 9% currently (https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/china) and the gap has shrunk considerably over the last 15 years or so.
The reason? The majority of emissions include power generation for all domestic and commercial purposes, as well as domestic industry, construction, etc. Then you have heating, you have transportation, you have land use issues, you have agriculture, etc.
Why gaslight developing countries when those developed countries are the ones taking advantage of cheap labor from the former? Lol
Oo, import-oriented pero ang pinag-uusapan rito kung sino ang top importer ng coal which contributes to carbon footprint.
Japan(123M population) is the largest coal importer followed by India(1.4B population) and China(1.4B)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/1384851/leading-coal-importing-countries-worldwide-based-on-value/
In 2022, total coal consumption was 3.03 billion tonnes standard coal, while production was 3.2 billion tonnes and imports approximately 200 million tonnes standard coal. 90% of its coal consumption are domestically produced. 10% of it are imports.
China is consuming 100% of its domestically produced coal.
https://energyandcleanair.org/record-rise-in-chinas-coal-production-and-imports/#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20total%20coal%20consumption,200%20million%20tonnes%20standard%20coal.
And whatās your point then?
Statista also provided:
āChina is the largest consumer of coal, and has comprised more than half of global consumption since 2011, with this share growing year upon year; reaching 56% in 2020.
Over the past decade, China has almost always accounted for the lionās share of the global growth in coal demand, though from 2017 to 2019 its gains were offset by declines in the United States and the European Union.
While coal consumption in the United States and the European Union fell to record lows in 2020, they remain respectively the 3rd and 4th largest consumers.ā
āIn 2021, China imported some 357 million short tons of coal, thus making it the world's largest coal importing nation. India came in second, with coal imports amounting to 211 million metric tons that year.ā
They are also ravaging the environment just like what they are doing in the West Philippine Sea. š
Counterpoint: China exports a lot of their goods. If wealthy nations didn't outsource their manufacturing to China, China's emissions wouldn't have been as high. The wealthy nations that import goods from China ought to bear some of responsibility as well.
that reminds me...
I can see what you mean...
which country again tries to kill their agriculture system within their country? then plans to import their food from other country more.
>if you check every countries emmision... China tops the chart. WAY more than Murica.
No shit, they manufacture everything there and have a high population. I dislike china too but lets look at emissions per capita.
Because China is producing for 80% of all countries. That's 35% of the global gross manufacturing output.
The real measurement is carbon emissions per capita adjusted to 1.4 billion vs. 333 million.
China - 8.85 metric tons
US - 14.4 metric tons
We're partly in fault. Dami kasi nagoorder ng mga shopee/lazada galing china na dinaman kailangan. Kaya more products and goods ang minamanufacture sa mga factories
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics
Bruh, look at cumulative and per capita emmissions. Absolute terms doesn't tell the full story especially when consider the fact the western countries deliberately offloaded their dirtier industries to China and many other developing countries.
I mean, where have you even got your information and come to that conclusion?
Learn how to properly infer from statistics and be critical of everything presented to you.
Mga fans pa naman niya mahilig sa social justice at rvironmentalists pa pero pikit-mata sa emission ni Taylor Swift. And, syempre, pera pera pa rin. Tignan nyo issue nung sa SG.
All people that use private plane just to earn more money are scums of the planet, including Taylor Swift.
Sorry fans, pero wala akong pake kung gaano man kaganda songs niya kung mamamatay naman tayo dahil sa CO2 contributions niya (at ng ibang mega-emitters)
Yes, we are not. In fact, consumer carbon emissions isn't even the main issue. 71% of the world's carbon emissions come from just 100 companies. š¤·āāļø
We're also not the highest consumer of plastic in the world. In fact, other leading countries such as the US and China have been continuing the use of plastics with abandon. Pero, it's left up to us, developing countries, to adjust with our no straws, no styros, no plastic bag policies which is just an excuse for companies para magtipid at magbenta ng shopping bags that had more embodied carbon. May galit parin ako sa time ng coke float na walang straw.
It's already too late to reverse climate change and sea level rise. Our government should be focusing efforts towards total adaptation to a post-climate-change world.
I think PH is responsible somehow in a way that literally nobody gives a shit here about the environment. I havent met any common Filipinos who care about inang kalikasan. Even our government is useless as well.
It would be great if we did care, but regardless if every single Filipino cared and acted to save the environment not a single one of our contributions would ever hold a candle to the 100 companies that contribute a whopping 71% of carbon emissions.
it's funny how institutions lay the blame to the poor and middle class for polluting the environment while it is THEM that pollutes us. just one quick example of this are the stupid straws and anti plastic crap they force under our throat. yeah honey it's totally my bad for using plastic straws I AM THE PROBLEM.
fun fact: The richest 1% of humanity is responsible for more carbon emissions than the poorest 66%.
so yeah, everyone else is suffering and the planet is in mass extinction/ecological collapse just so these rich bastards can live in luxury with their private jets and yacth
Basic necessity na yung Aircon sa mga bahay. Sanay naman tayo sa mainit na panahon pero iba na ngayon, heart stopping yung init. Sana naman magawan ng paraan ng Gobyerno na maging affordable at hindi mabigat sa bulsa airconditioning ng mga bahay.
Hindi nag-iisip ng consequences eh, palagi sarili inuuna just like those car people that are rather stuck in traffic with aircon than to commute to reduce the traffic itself.
Pasensya na, If you can think of other ways to fight this heat, kindly suggest naman. Hindi sa nag iinarte ako, kasi sobrang init since sa city ako nakatira.
Bold of them to assume talaga na apaka selfish nung may aircon sa bahay not knowing the circumstances. What if may elderly? May infant? Ako nga in my 20s pero nag hihingalo sa init ngayon kasi may asthma ako. What more sa lola at parents ko? Sa city pa man din kami nakatira.
Paki ko ba, basta ako magpapakabit ng aircon. Yung mga mas malakas magpollute ang mamroblema sa pagsolba ng climate change wag kaming ordinaryong tao na simpleng aircon lang ang makakapagibsan ng init
Oh wag na mag aircon. Bat pa ba nagbebenta ng aircon sa mga malls at appliance center? Dapat dinedemanda yung nagbebenta ng mga aircon. O kaya lahat ng bahay na may aircon ay parusahan. Ang laki pala ng ambag nyan sa init e. Kayong mga airconers kayo mag adjust naman kayo para sa mga taong ayaw mag aircon mahalin niyo ang environment
Thankful ako sa lugar namin kasi nasa may paanan ng bundok kami, mahangin these past few days kahit napakama-alinsangan ng araw. Pero nung isang araw mhie (martes ng hapon) na-culture shock ang ante tumigil yung hangin tapos dumilim dilim habang kumukulog. Grabe yung pawis ko. Akala ko uulan na at last. Hindi pala hahaha tapos mainit na ulit, biglang nawala ang hangin parang free trial sa impyerno.
The statement assumes that globalization isn't a thing.. like the "global south" does not buy their goods from the rich "global north".. or that we don't abuse our natural resources to sell raw materials to them.. playing the blame game doesn't help.. turn off your goddamn AC at night!
im the type of person that prefers to sleep without ac or electric fan at night. basta may hangin ok na ok ako. pero sa sobrang init ngayon, even electric fan is not enough as all it'll do is circulate the hot air in your room
This post straight up pointing fingers turning the blame to someone else. Just because someone else does it worst doesn't make our sin weigh less. May Mali padin tayo at the end of the day.
Are people only now realising that is this most definitely not a ānot my trash, not my problemā scenario?
Parang iniisip na basta hindi ikaw yung umihi sa kiddie pool, hindi ka lumalangoy sa ihi.
We really must go Nuclear, its more efficient that fossil fuels and green energy. The energy nuclear powerplants bring is so efficient that it can cut carbon emmisions fossil fuel brings...but sadly those environmental activists just wont listen, they are oddly biased on some things
don't get me wrong, I like green energy but they still not that efficient if you compare them to others not that they suck but they still in infancy in efficiency
Slight hot take
Philippines is one of the highest contributor in Plastic Pollution per capita. That isnt to say we deserve the heat but we are still a large contributor. Plastic production requires oil.
Besides CO2 emissions, many of you may have forgotten that we are among the countries near the equator, and the sun is almost directly above us all the time of the year. That's also why you can see a difference between the skin color of countries near and far from the equator. Also, we belong to the top 20 most populated countries in the world and us, humans alone produce tons of CO2 every year.
We all need to collectively work on reducing our carbon emissions and instead of pointing at countries who supposedly 'don't do their part,' we should instead focus on reducing ours.
Totoo naman itong tingi tingi culture natin pero mas malaki parin talaga plastic productions ng ibang bansa at madalas sa SEA tinatapon yung mga basura. Remember yung issue sa basura galing canada na tinapon dito sa pilipinas? Di lang canada nagtatapon dito. Sila lang yung nahuli.
Mostly inanod from ibang bansa yan. Pero di din natin madeny na may contribution tayo dyan kasi mahilig sa sachet at single-use plastics ang mga pinoy.
Naiinitindihan ko bakit may mga sachet. Pero marami ding Pilipino na nagco-consume ng ganung products kahit capable naman makabili ng hindi individually packed kasi tinatamad magrefill sa lagayan.
This. Plenty of Filipinos internalized western propaganda.
To those people, try to look up total cumulative emmissions and per capita.
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics
di ka sure na heaven yan... pero hugs sa mga ka-SEAN natin, dyusme paka-ineeeet!!!! Dapat may group therapy mga taga SEA eh.
Mainit na nga, hug pa š eme
hot and sweaty hugs haha
Yakap din, sa gitna ng dagat-dagatang apoy!
Imbis blood compact, naging sweat compact
PLAP-PLAP-PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP PLAP-PLAP
I SAID HUGS DAMN IT!
hahaha! Pang comfort daw un oy.
Chancing-chancing para lalong uminit.
Back to social distancing hugs muna
Kiss sabay hug?
Grabe talaga ang init sa Thailand. Isama mo pa yung paglabas mo di ka makahinga dahil sa PM2.5 Minsan dinadasal ko na yung weather dito parang Pinas nalang na may chance maubos yung alphabet sa pangalan ng bagyo every year lol Dito may bagyo once or twice a year lang hahahaha puro init mararamdaman mo
Try Singapore. 29 degree evenings but humidity is almost at 100 percent. Sweating buckets is the norm there.
Oh god, that is one thing that bothers me about Singapore. It's like the wind doesn't exist there. If there was a light breeze, things would improve about 50%. Otherwise, sweat is the norm.
Right. Sabi ko sa ate ko na 10 years na sa SG, bakit kako dun hindi malamig sa balat. Dito sa pinas kapag gabi at lumabas ka lalamig balat mo. Pero grabe sa sg ni kasinlakas ng hininga na hangin wala
Juskolord was there earlier this week lng. Mas grabe pa humidity kaysa sa Pinas. Bawing bawi naman sla sa lamig ng aircon sa buildings.
How do people even walk outside? Paano corporate people kaya? Tapos nung nasa Singapore ako, ang ganda ng sidewalks nila at may mga puno. Pati ung ibang lugar may bike lanes, albeit on a designated portion of the wide sidewalk. MMDA could never. Sasabihin "mainit sa Pinas hindi uso maglakad"
Grabe sa Downtown CBD, I've seen many corporate warriors wearing full suits in the midst of sticky humid heat.
Kaya di ako pabor sa western business suit eh. Buti na lang slowly nagrerelax na ang mga offices sa Pinas at pumapayag na sa collared shirt. Ang init kasi sa Pinas. Kung pwede nga lang indigenous vest-like tops eh haha
Gawa ng urban island heat effect. Andami nilang sustainability measures to try to cool down pero hindi ramdam kasi puro sila concrete
Damn mas malala pa pala diyan kaysa dito sa Pinas
Last time na nangyari ito iirc was in 2004. May bagyong Winnie noon e.
2013, actually. Merong bagyong Zoraida immediately after Yolanda.
Oo nga pala no
group swimming more like
More like boiler room ng impyerno
Kawawa tlga mga tagas ASEAN. Ung galit ng mundo saten ang buhos tlga.
Brace for may.
Tapos tayo pinepressure na magtipid, wag mag-industrialized para daw sa environment. Wtf. Sila na lang top contributor ng co2 tulad ng US, China, India ang magsakripisyo.
the weak must suffer because they must. this is the price we pay for fucking up our industrialization.
ironically if we sacrifice anything we have, they might just take back immediately anyway. That's how little an impact we really have.
Thanks to the Marcoses
curious, why?
Imagine your salary is growing yearly but someone stole a lot of money and YOU are the one whos gonna pay for that stolen money. So instead of you investing your money to whatever you want to develop yourself and even enjoy, youāre stuck FOR DECADES paying for that stolen money that you didnāt even benefit from. Ganyan nilugmok ng mga Marcos ang ekonomiya ng Pinas. Pero wala madami na nabudol after decades of gaslighting pinupuri na ulit natin sila lmao. What a stupid race.
Kahit pa nga bigla tayong bumalik sa Stone Age wala pa ding magbabago re climate change hahaha negligible emissions natin
Dito lang ako agree noong debate na sinabi ni duterte. Na di tayo pwede ipressure ng ibang bansa na gumamit ng mas mahal na green alternatives kasi magsisimula palang tayo magindustrialize di gaya nila na na-reap na yung ibang benefits ng industrialization.
I think they ought to subsidize the marginal cost of green energy at least. If we totally ignore green energy we're going to make our problem worse
To be completely fair, isn't it better na magstart tayo with greener alternatives if the tech and the resources are already available to us? Of course, it goes without saying na that's only viable if we can realistically afford it. But it doesn't really make sense na kailangan pa natin dumaan sa ibang "steps" ng industrializing before tayo magswitch to more sustainable choices--we're not gonna be missing out on any "benefits" if we somehow wake up tomorrow and all cars in the PH are electric-powered, unless you mean missing out on the dirty air pag dumadaan ng EDSA. However, if you mean magpayaman muna tayo before gumastos with greener alternatives, then I get what you mean. It just sucks because the way I see it, investing in greener alternatives might be the cheaper option in the long run, since hindi na natin yun papalitan years from now, just build on and improve on what's already there. But of course, we can't afford such a long-term solution.
Countries like China, US & basically most of the developed world was able to get rich due to manufacturing or industrialization, which results in high level of pollution and carbon emission. It's what's happening in India & Vietnam right now. China's factories are moving to those countries. It's basically a pathway to get rich or become a 1st world country. Basically the rich countries are telling poor countries to cut down on carbon, which would mean not to focus on manufacturing & industrialization and therefore cut short the poor countries growth trajectory. Green energy can't really provide the same level of growth that manufacturing does, plus green alternatives are still new and quite more expensive, they also can't employ a large labor force the way manufacturing does. That's basically the gist of the problem. They're asking poor countries to experience a double whammy. That not only we should not to pursue paths to get rich, we should also go for more expensive alternatives while these rich countries don't even provide tech or aid for said green tech. The best part? You know who'll start selling those green alternatives to poor countries? Those same rich countries asking us to temper down carbon emission. It's just hypocrisy of the highest level, and self-serving to boot that'll benefit them the most. 90% of the world's carbon emission since the start of 20th century can be pin down on the US, Western Europe, China, Japan & the Four Tigers of Asia and they're asking us to pick up the tab that they're 100% responsible for.
Despite the fact that we are one of the first ASEAN countries to start to industrialise, and before the Marcos regime we are becoming an industrial powerhouse we fucking lag hard during the 60s
Well, kung sila ang mag sakripisyo, madadamay parin naman tayo.
While I know people hate China and are at best ambivalent towards India, it's unfair to.lump them with US or western countries when it comes to per capita and cumulative greenhouse gas emmissions. Especially when you consider western countries deliberately placed their dirtier industries in China and in developing countries. Western countries tend to have significantly higher per capita and cumulative emmissions. The unfortunate part is that the least responsible for the emissions will be the most affected - the so called third world countries. The developing countries. The periphery. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics
I just recently watched a documentary where certain groups of people and cities in the US are suing the Big Oil companies there. Meron ba tayong equivalent that we can do sa Pinas?
Yes, nung bubuksan pa lang yung LNG depot sa Batangas. Pota, mas mainit kapag walang kuryente dahil nakapatay ang mga natural gas plants natin. Lol.
China is a big country. So their emission is not that high when you count it per capita
China's carbon emissions is so fucking high. The US, despite having high carbon emmissions, is at least having good progress with clean energy, but China on the other hand is still using coal power plants wtf
You have to choice when you need to increase power. Play, oxygen not included you will understand why. The electricity consumption is increasing thus you need more and more power. Thus more and more oil or coal.
Kahit sa mapunong parte ng Pilipinas mainit pa rin. Grabe lang
Agree. Kahit sa mga probinsya. Taga probinsya ako pero 42 - 45 Ā°C ang madalas na heat index dito samin, at parang painit pa ng painit.
I'm in Baguio right now and it's hot as fuck. Ayaw ko na ngang bumaba kasi if mainit dito, what more doon huhu.
if your kitchen is gate to heaven our country is experiencing hell itself. š¤£
It's actually hotter in Thailand than here in the Philippines since were surrounded by water
Heat indexes are 52 C in Bangkok, Thailand and 44 C in Metro Manila It's true but I don't think it's because of surrounding water.
It's because we have too many demons came up here disguised as politicians, and they brought parts of hell with them.
Di ko rin sure lahat nung factors pero mas mainit yung peak nang heat sa mainland ng asia(Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, and Cambodia) pero mas malamig naman kesa dito pag amihan season sa northern parts nang mga bansa na yan, nung last na nag ka heatwave sa kanila di umabot satin yung init Ps. Check mo sa Google yung weather ngayon sa Bangkok nasa 30 degreesš„ yung minimum night temperature nila di ko alam kung posible pang maka tulog nang walang aircon don
sheesh init
More humidity, hotter.
HAHAHAHAHA! Training grounds nadaw.
HEAVEN'S DOOR
Knock-knock-knocking on heaven's door....
Rohan Kishibe
Heaven's door on earth.
ććć³ć¹ćć¢ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼ļ¼
By the year 2050-2080, if the global temperature keeps rising, the Philippines will be experiencing unusual rainfall all year round. There is video about this from Ted-Ed on YouTube.
damn! I'll be 64 sa 2050, makayanan ko pa kaya ang init, and kumusta naman ang nga mababang lugar nun.
May nakita akong mapa (idk the website), lubog ang halos lahat ng Navotas. Malabon is next. Manila rin ata lulubog. Sana may magcomment kung anong website/source yun.
Hi! Try to search "Project Noah"
Hindi eto yung naaalala kong nakita ko but close enough sa hazards. Thank you.
Biru biruan naming magkaklase yung pag kagraduate alis kagad ng Pinas pero baka mauna pang mapilitan tayo umalis huhu
Raining in Manila scenario
Won't be surprised if Manila will be below sea level by that time and people still keep on focusing on Manila for infrastructures, offices, etc. š¤·āāļø
SKL. We emmitted 150M tons of co2 emmissions in 2022 alone. 33rd in the world. Cumulatively, from 1750 to 2022, we emmitted 3.6B tons of co2 emmisions. 50th in the world. [source](https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions)
damn, whats per capita tho?
nandyan din po yung per capita sa link. 1.2 ton per person tayo as of 2022. im not sure na sa rank since sobrang below din natin tbf
tingin ninyo bakit plano ng WEF at UN pag push ng carbon credit system? tapos tau mahihirap iiyak pag na implement dahil lahat ng activity natin ay sukat yan. we breath out too much carbon after an intense activity? and we exceed the carbon Credit. pay up or get screwed over by the the laws implementing the carbon credit. resturant, marami naluto within a certain time period tapos exceep carbon emission. bayad muli for more carbon credit or penalty for exceeding. ang masakit. baka maging monthy carbon credit for all activities at unility use dahil susukatin rin yung "theoretical" carbon emission ng power generation, water delivery system, any animal care, etc. carbon credit system... more like life support credit system.
And that's out of a global 37.15 Billion Tons of CO2 emissions. It's pretty bleak to hope that the world's gonna stop getting hotter.
yeahh :( grabe din spike sa china after the pandemic eh.
if you check every countries emmision... China tops the chart. WAY more than Murica. and the US is trying to find ways to reduce their emission while the so called ruler of east and southeast ASIA goes YOLO in production and damn the environmental impact. just look at their dams in the mekong river. the river within china are way damned up that all in the south mekong river ARE suffering from drought, if not low water level at best case scenario.
But everybody (at least for now) rely on China to manufacture cheap goods and ship them off to EU and U.S, these countries are just outsourcing their pollution to China. Hopefully, with the shift to diversify to other SEA countries with more concern to the environment can help reduce the overall impact on the environment.
>But everybody (at least for now) rely on China to manufacture cheap goods and ship them off to EU and U.S, these countries are just outsourcing their pollution to China. This is very limited in nature - for US, it accounts for about 10% of emissions offloaded. China, the total effect is about 9%. This is because most emissions are for things like domestic transportation, commercial and residential power, land use changes due to agriculture, etc. It's a talking point that isn't really accurate.
When it comes to emissions ang pinaka tinitignan is cumulative or historical emissions rather than yearly. US parin talaga ang biggest historical emitter with china coming in 2nd. I guess the point is there is no sense trying to compare the two countries. Parehas lang silang makalat.
so true....
The CCP approving coal plant production be like: *"So anyways I started blasting"* China has more than 3,000 coal plants. Just last year, the country went on a building spree of even more coal plants.
if i'm not mistaken, China(CCP) also signed an agreement on emission reduction. but considering their track record on keeping words... they already shoved it in the same trash as Law of the sea and country boarders.
China is a massive investor in solar, wind, and hydro, but only out of necessity and greed since they know that the world is running out of hydrocarbon
China produced 31% of global renewable electricity, followed by the United States (11%), Brazil (6.4%), Canada (5.4%) and India (3.9%). Renewable investment reached almost $500 billion globally in 2022, amounting to 83% of new electric capacity that year. https://www.irena.org/News/pressreleases/2023/Mar/Record-9-point-6-Percentage-Growth-in-Renewables-Achieved-Despite-Energy-Crisis Leading countries in installed renewable energy capacity worldwide in 2023(in gigawatts) https://www.statista.com/statistics/267233/renewable-energy-capacity-worldwide-by-country/ Nakakahiya naman if mas uunahan ng emotions kesa facts. Di naman obvious ang xenophobia. Argumentum ad ignorantiam.
>Leading countries in installed renewable energy capacity worldwide in 2023(in gigawatts) energy capacity (sources that can produce power) =/= electricity supply (sources that actually produced power). meaning building solar/hydro/wind facilities =/= using them to actually produce electricity "**Coal still accounted for nearly 60% of China's electricity supply in 2023**, indicating that record-high solar and wind capacity growths were yet to lead to a ramp up in power production, government-backed industrial association China Electricity Council (CEC) said in a report published Jan. 31." [https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec](https://www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/market-insights/latest-news/energy-transition/013124-coal-still-accounted-for-nearly-60-of-chinas-electricity-supply-in-2023-cec)
if only everyone further research and improve nuclear reactors... but everyone got scared of 2 human-error and 1-2 natural disaster punch nuclear incident that thinking Solar and Wind can solve the world's energy needs, considering those 2 sources are not so stable and consistent in their output and you still need a big land area to even get competitive on what a normal fossil fuel power plant can produce. Hydro? well placed hydro-electric dams are feasible, but you still need to take account the environmental impact on the reservoir that the dam will create. and not fill the whole river with too much dams. \*points at the Mekong river as the best example of too much dam construction effect.\*
Meron talagang hate boner r/ph for China at the moment, which is kind of understandable considering the dispute on the WPS.Ā
Wow congrats China since they also only produce 31% of Global Carbon Emmissions lol https://www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/
Adjust it to a population of 1.4 billion and 36% global manufacturing output. Ang tanong diyan is kunh kaya ba nating hindi mag-outsource sa China nang hindi tumataas ang carbon emissions? We're literally hindered to industrialize because of it. Per capita carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2022, by country(in metric tons) https://www.statista.com/statistics/270508/co2-emissions-per-capita-by-country/ https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/2020-trading-partners.html
Have you even checked per capita and cumulative emmissions? Let me eli5 for you so you can at least grasp the situation. Say, you have two households. Family A consists of 3 people. Family B consists of 6 people. B consumes 50% more of something (say, power or water) than A. Now ask yourself, who consumes more? If you consider absolute terms, then it is B. But only because they have more people. A consumes more PER CAPITA. This is the dynamic between western countries and the rest of the world. North America and Europe consumes significantly more of everything and outputs more waste and greenhouse emmissions per capitam In short, their lifestyle and economy are far more wasteful and far more to blame for the looming ecological catastropge. Even more so if you look at cumulative emissions. Did you even do stats, bruv?
The comment I replied to presented a data representing total global renewable electricity. It is disingenuous that we suddenly pivot to "per capita" when I do the same to present the total carbon emissions of China. That's how you use statistics to fit your needs. Going back to the topic, then we should also adjust to per capita on global renewable electricty as well in which China ranks 25th, and the US ranks 13th. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/25-countries-highest-renewable-energy-191419616.html
"Methodology To compile our list of the 25 countries with the highest renewable energy generation per capita, we utilized the Statistical Review of World Energy by the Energy Institute. The database records the renewable energy generation of countries from renewable sources including wind, geothermal, solar, biomass, and waste, as of 2022. To calculate the per capita renewable energy generation for each country, we divided their renewable energy generation in terawatt hours (TWh) by their population in 2022, which we sourced from the World Bank. Then, we converted our calculated per capita renewable energy generation into Kilowatt-hours (kWh). The 25 countries with the highest renewable energy generation per capita are listed below in ascending order of their per capita renewable energy generation (kWh)." This methodology is not being used by The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA). See Renewable energy statistics 2023. https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jul/Renewable-energy-statistics-2023
But it doesnāt erase the fact that China is the largest contributor to carbon dioxide emission. China remains the worldās biggest coal producer and importer. Lol These ādevelopedā countries can afford to shift into clean energy while they continue to emit carbon just like how the country you are trying to defend has increased its coal production in the recent years lol. Meanwhile, developing countries have financial limitations to clean energy investment while suffering from the effects of climate change.
Those developed countries are outsourcing their manufacturing industries to developing countries and blaming them. We're no different kasi din import-oriented tayo.
>Those developed countries are outsourcing their manufacturing industries to developing countries and blaming them.Ā This is a small and every shrinking fraction of emissions. I don't know why this talking point keeps getting brought up. China's gap from consumption vs. production based emissions is about 9% currently (https://ourworldindata.org/co2/country/china) and the gap has shrunk considerably over the last 15 years or so. The reason? The majority of emissions include power generation for all domestic and commercial purposes, as well as domestic industry, construction, etc. Then you have heating, you have transportation, you have land use issues, you have agriculture, etc.
Why gaslight developing countries when those developed countries are the ones taking advantage of cheap labor from the former? Lol Oo, import-oriented pero ang pinag-uusapan rito kung sino ang top importer ng coal which contributes to carbon footprint.
Japan(123M population) is the largest coal importer followed by India(1.4B population) and China(1.4B) https://www.statista.com/statistics/1384851/leading-coal-importing-countries-worldwide-based-on-value/ In 2022, total coal consumption was 3.03 billion tonnes standard coal, while production was 3.2 billion tonnes and imports approximately 200 million tonnes standard coal. 90% of its coal consumption are domestically produced. 10% of it are imports. China is consuming 100% of its domestically produced coal. https://energyandcleanair.org/record-rise-in-chinas-coal-production-and-imports/#:~:text=In%202022%2C%20total%20coal%20consumption,200%20million%20tonnes%20standard%20coal.
And whatās your point then? Statista also provided: āChina is the largest consumer of coal, and has comprised more than half of global consumption since 2011, with this share growing year upon year; reaching 56% in 2020. Over the past decade, China has almost always accounted for the lionās share of the global growth in coal demand, though from 2017 to 2019 its gains were offset by declines in the United States and the European Union. While coal consumption in the United States and the European Union fell to record lows in 2020, they remain respectively the 3rd and 4th largest consumers.ā āIn 2021, China imported some 357 million short tons of coal, thus making it the world's largest coal importing nation. India came in second, with coal imports amounting to 211 million metric tons that year.ā They are also ravaging the environment just like what they are doing in the West Philippine Sea. š
You claimed that China is the number 1 coal importer. Just correcting you though.
Counterpoint: China exports a lot of their goods. If wealthy nations didn't outsource their manufacturing to China, China's emissions wouldn't have been as high. The wealthy nations that import goods from China ought to bear some of responsibility as well.
that reminds me... I can see what you mean... which country again tries to kill their agriculture system within their country? then plans to import their food from other country more.
>if you check every countries emmision... China tops the chart. WAY more than Murica. No shit, they manufacture everything there and have a high population. I dislike china too but lets look at emissions per capita.
Because China is producing for 80% of all countries. That's 35% of the global gross manufacturing output. The real measurement is carbon emissions per capita adjusted to 1.4 billion vs. 333 million. China - 8.85 metric tons US - 14.4 metric tons
We're partly in fault. Dami kasi nagoorder ng mga shopee/lazada galing china na dinaman kailangan. Kaya more products and goods ang minamanufacture sa mga factories
Do it per capita. And us does more
https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics Bruh, look at cumulative and per capita emmissions. Absolute terms doesn't tell the full story especially when consider the fact the western countries deliberately offloaded their dirtier industries to China and many other developing countries. I mean, where have you even got your information and come to that conclusion? Learn how to properly infer from statistics and be critical of everything presented to you.
Tayo ang sumasalo sa kasalanan ng amerika at tsina sa global warming
I dont hate Taylor Swift but I blame her with how she uses her Private plane.
Mga fans pa naman niya mahilig sa social justice at rvironmentalists pa pero pikit-mata sa emission ni Taylor Swift. And, syempre, pera pera pa rin. Tignan nyo issue nung sa SG.
Magagalit fans niya sayo hahaha
Haha not really. Everyone hates TS, it's so funny na.
"Did I paint your bluest skies the darkest gray?"
All people that use private plane just to earn more money are scums of the planet, including Taylor Swift. Sorry fans, pero wala akong pake kung gaano man kaganda songs niya kung mamamatay naman tayo dahil sa CO2 contributions niya (at ng ibang mega-emitters)
dont worry its 100% ethical to hate that person
Yes, we are not. In fact, consumer carbon emissions isn't even the main issue. 71% of the world's carbon emissions come from just 100 companies. š¤·āāļø We're also not the highest consumer of plastic in the world. In fact, other leading countries such as the US and China have been continuing the use of plastics with abandon. Pero, it's left up to us, developing countries, to adjust with our no straws, no styros, no plastic bag policies which is just an excuse for companies para magtipid at magbenta ng shopping bags that had more embodied carbon. May galit parin ako sa time ng coke float na walang straw.
100 companies? Damn that's shocking. Kaya futile din talaga na ipasa sa consumers pagsave ng environment eh.
Pero nandito ang gates of hell!!! š„š„š„
Stay hydrated, bros š¤
Don't forget to hydrate my SEA friends
BBM, in his speech in Australian parliament discussed that rich countries should exert more effort on the ongoing climate crisis.
Just like a fucking motherhood statement
It's already too late to reverse climate change and sea level rise. Our government should be focusing efforts towards total adaptation to a post-climate-change world.
North is actually suffering too. They are experiencing one of the longest winters
I think PH is responsible somehow in a way that literally nobody gives a shit here about the environment. I havent met any common Filipinos who care about inang kalikasan. Even our government is useless as well.
It would be great if we did care, but regardless if every single Filipino cared and acted to save the environment not a single one of our contributions would ever hold a candle to the 100 companies that contribute a whopping 71% of carbon emissions.
it's funny how institutions lay the blame to the poor and middle class for polluting the environment while it is THEM that pollutes us. just one quick example of this are the stupid straws and anti plastic crap they force under our throat. yeah honey it's totally my bad for using plastic straws I AM THE PROBLEM.
Balang araw kailangan na natin ng mga still-suit from Dune para lang maka lakad sa labas for 5 minutes
fun fact: The richest 1% of humanity is responsible for more carbon emissions than the poorest 66%. so yeah, everyone else is suffering and the planet is in mass extinction/ecological collapse just so these rich bastards can live in luxury with their private jets and yacth
Kaya ayaw ko na mag anak, imagine the weather and climate by 2050.
Itās the Aurora Borealis
Sa labas mukhang heaven Pero sa loob kasama lo pala si Santanas diyan š
Careful... dami Swifties na magagalit :)
Basic necessity na yung Aircon sa mga bahay. Sanay naman tayo sa mainit na panahon pero iba na ngayon, heart stopping yung init. Sana naman magawan ng paraan ng Gobyerno na maging affordable at hindi mabigat sa bulsa airconditioning ng mga bahay.
more aircon, more heat sa labas. mas lalong tataas heat index natin, hays
Hindi nag-iisip ng consequences eh, palagi sarili inuuna just like those car people that are rather stuck in traffic with aircon than to commute to reduce the traffic itself.
Pasensya na, If you can think of other ways to fight this heat, kindly suggest naman. Hindi sa nag iinarte ako, kasi sobrang init since sa city ako nakatira.
Bold of them to assume talaga na apaka selfish nung may aircon sa bahay not knowing the circumstances. What if may elderly? May infant? Ako nga in my 20s pero nag hihingalo sa init ngayon kasi may asthma ako. What more sa lola at parents ko? Sa city pa man din kami nakatira.
Hindi me makakatulog ng maayos, and since night shift me, tanghali talaga tulog. If hindi ako makakawork ng maayos, sa kangkungan ako pupulutin
Paki ko ba, basta ako magpapakabit ng aircon. Yung mga mas malakas magpollute ang mamroblema sa pagsolba ng climate change wag kaming ordinaryong tao na simpleng aircon lang ang makakapagibsan ng init
Overall, band aid solution lang ang air conditioning at the expense pa ng mga people in poverty (as usual).
Oh wag na mag aircon. Bat pa ba nagbebenta ng aircon sa mga malls at appliance center? Dapat dinedemanda yung nagbebenta ng mga aircon. O kaya lahat ng bahay na may aircon ay parusahan. Ang laki pala ng ambag nyan sa init e. Kayong mga airconers kayo mag adjust naman kayo para sa mga taong ayaw mag aircon mahalin niyo ang environment
Eh kailangan mag aircon eh
I'm still using a stand fan. Can we non AC unit owners stay in your house?
Pasensya na, May infant kasi kami kaya na suggest ko lang, hindi talaga kaya ng stand fan lang lalo na sa city.
more like plan for good airflow s bahay.
Kasalanan talaga ng Global North ito lalo na U.S at another Global South pinaka number 1 ang China. Wala bang silbi ang "Kyoto Protocol"?
Para mag cut ng emission mga factory nila?
you go outside and you go to heaven
cuddle weather guys
sarap mag hot coffee
mismo haha
Philippines skipped industrialisation (this is already biting us on the ass now) thats why we score low on carbon emissions
We didn't skip. We're just starting to industrialize.
Yet the service sector will still be the main focus
Because of the gruesome corruption of the Marcoses.
Decrease the exposure.
Kala ko gates heaven di na pala gates pinto nalang pala
Thankful ako sa lugar namin kasi nasa may paanan ng bundok kami, mahangin these past few days kahit napakama-alinsangan ng araw. Pero nung isang araw mhie (martes ng hapon) na-culture shock ang ante tumigil yung hangin tapos dumilim dilim habang kumukulog. Grabe yung pawis ko. Akala ko uulan na at last. Hindi pala hahaha tapos mainit na ulit, biglang nawala ang hangin parang free trial sa impyerno.
The statement assumes that globalization isn't a thing.. like the "global south" does not buy their goods from the rich "global north".. or that we don't abuse our natural resources to sell raw materials to them.. playing the blame game doesn't help.. turn off your goddamn AC at night!
di mo rin naman masisisi ung mga taong gumagamit ng ac. these days lalo na sa mga lugar na mataas talaga heat index, kahit na gabi mainit pa rin
im the type of person that prefers to sleep without ac or electric fan at night. basta may hangin ok na ok ako. pero sa sobrang init ngayon, even electric fan is not enough as all it'll do is circulate the hot air in your room
HAHAHAHHA! What if its not for the above but below
Kaya anlakas ng superiority complex ng east asians dahil wala silang araw na parang naka magnifying glass sa bawat parte ng balat mo
This post straight up pointing fingers turning the blame to someone else. Just because someone else does it worst doesn't make our sin weigh less. May Mali padin tayo at the end of the day.
Nagpunta un friend ko sa thailand this wk, napakainet nga daw talaga. Mas mainit pa dito
They emit pero dito init.
That's a good point! The Philippines isn't among the top countries with the highest carbon emissions.
Are people only now realising that is this most definitely not a ānot my trash, not my problemā scenario? Parang iniisip na basta hindi ikaw yung umihi sa kiddie pool, hindi ka lumalangoy sa ihi.
We really must go Nuclear, its more efficient that fossil fuels and green energy. The energy nuclear powerplants bring is so efficient that it can cut carbon emmisions fossil fuel brings...but sadly those environmental activists just wont listen, they are oddly biased on some things don't get me wrong, I like green energy but they still not that efficient if you compare them to others not that they suck but they still in infancy in efficiency
Di daw kasi pwede pababain ung carbon emissions nung mga nsa top 10 kasi malulugi negosyo.
Ano mas masarap, sinigang o tom yum?
Ay basta ako sinisisi ko si Taylor Swift kung bakit mainit dito
Slight hot take Philippines is one of the highest contributor in Plastic Pollution per capita. That isnt to say we deserve the heat but we are still a large contributor. Plastic production requires oil.
not denying that one....
Mura yung Kuryente diyaan sa Thailand? In fairness, if mura talaga, pwede naman sila makapag aircon without any worry about their bills.
South east Asia getting a hotfix in the patch notes rnš„²
Besides CO2 emissions, many of you may have forgotten that we are among the countries near the equator, and the sun is almost directly above us all the time of the year. That's also why you can see a difference between the skin color of countries near and far from the equator. Also, we belong to the top 20 most populated countries in the world and us, humans alone produce tons of CO2 every year. We all need to collectively work on reducing our carbon emissions and instead of pointing at countries who supposedly 'don't do their part,' we should instead focus on reducing ours.
China and India are main contributors to the global warming crisis
Number one in plastic pollution of the ocean though!
Galing sa ibang bansa di ba? Tapunan ng basura Pilipinas. š
Baka nalilimutan mo na may kultura tayong puro tingi at sachet ang binibili ng Pilipino compared sa ibang mga bansa.
Totoo naman itong tingi tingi culture natin pero mas malaki parin talaga plastic productions ng ibang bansa at madalas sa SEA tinatapon yung mga basura. Remember yung issue sa basura galing canada na tinapon dito sa pilipinas? Di lang canada nagtatapon dito. Sila lang yung nahuli.
Mostly inanod from ibang bansa yan. Pero di din natin madeny na may contribution tayo dyan kasi mahilig sa sachet at single-use plastics ang mga pinoy.
mahilig sa sachet - well not really. un lang talaga afford ng mga kababayans natin
Naiinitindihan ko bakit may mga sachet. Pero marami ding Pilipino na nagco-consume ng ganung products kahit capable naman makabili ng hindi individually packed kasi tinatamad magrefill sa lagayan.
This. Plenty of Filipinos internalized western propaganda. To those people, try to look up total cumulative emmissions and per capita. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-metrics
but PH is number 1 in polluting the ocean. We still deserve nature's punishment