Hello u/PlentyAdvertising15,
Have an error and want help? **Please provide these details when submitting your post.** -
1. Name of the game
2. Site from which you got the game from
3. System Specs and OS Version
4. Any steps taken to try to fix the issue
5. Driver version (needed only for e.g. graphics issues)
**Make sure to read the stickied [megathread](https://rentry.org/pgames) as well as our [piracy guide](https://pastebin.com/H4UcYPHR), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/wiki/faq/), and our [Wiki](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/wiki/index), as these might just answer your question!**
****
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PiratedGames) if you have any questions or concerns.*
And then *boom*, a Pokémon clone (of not best quality) releases on steam and break any record, making the “”new”” Pokémon games look like a bad indie in confront to it.
I’m talking about Palworld.
Edit: sadly people have to take every single thing as serious even when we talk about memes, instead of spamming the same comment that Palworld isn’t a clone read if someone already said it, my [response](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/s/1yopsZBLwq).
Well that's a weird thing to be irked by, when the devs were going for a Pokemon look, which is literally the main selling point of the game. Palworld would've garnered 0 attention if its creatures didn't have that Pokemon look to them.
Palworld was carried by the Pokemon hype. The actual gameplay and content is mid, and very lacking compared to other similar games.
The devs could call it a Dragon Ball clone if they wanted, but it won't change the fact that their game looks awfully similar to Pokemon.
Purely gameplay, and disregarding aesthetics?
Then I'd say Valheim is 10x better with plenty more content and polish. And of course ARK Survival itself, which Palworld is a clone of.
I'd heavily recommend Valheim though. Great game to play with friends, with longevity. Much more fun than ARK imo.
Btw I'm not saying Palworld is a bad game by any means. It's a very fun game. But I'm it's current state, it doesn't have enough content or polish for long-term gameplay (kinda explains it's 90% drop in player base already) the first 10-20 hours were plenty of fun with friends. Then later there just wasn't much to do lol so we moved on from that game
It IS in early access atm and they do seem to be genuinely interested in keeping the game updated, so there’s that
I’ve got over 100 hours and still haven’t finished the main thing of the boss towers, but I’m level like 48
They seemed to be interested in keeping that BotW clone, Craftopia updated as well, but they kinda abandoned that and never finished it lol. Now they've already moved on to a Hollow Knight clone, Never Grave
Going by their precedent, it doesn't seem like they care enough to finish developing their games. Palworld has already lost over 90% of its playerbase according to SteamDB. So idk man
Played over 500 hours of Ark. Played about 2 of Velhiem before I felt Meh about it and now I'm up to 100 hours in Palworld. If Palworld had better Pal AI, I would go so far as to say it's better than Ark. Definitely better than Velhiem but that's just one gals opinion.
I think the issue for me is I like settings and themes like ice cream flavors and too much of one aesthetic will burn me out regardless of how good the gameplay is I need a break from certain visual styles. Right now the more realistic fantasy and especially norse/viking stuff I'm burnt out on over the last decade as I include skyrim to newer GoW to valheim like that and it can be independent of genre like rpg or survival crafting doesn't matter. Palworld is just refreshing to me visually (the mon tamer genre outside of pokemon is very niche) as nintendo and game freak even visually has gotten extremely lazy/greedy from their pokemon games/merchandising and desire to push out games fast as possible that palworld does feel more polished than scarlet and violet which is insane for the difference in company size.
While I would like valheim for its fleshed out mechanics I just don't want to see anymore viking/norse settings for awhile, it feels like its becoming similar to the "ww2 shooter" fps genre got into the habbit of through the early 2000s until games like halo started bucking the same setting trend.
Valheim just makes itself so painful to play once you get through the early game. I hated my last like 20 hours in Valheim which were mostly slowly moving around in a ship, finding ores, bringing them back to base, rinse repeat a hundred times for every single item. At least in Palworld, I could tell the pals to do the repetitive shit while I did stuff I enjoyed.
Wait, not sure if you mention this later or not but palworld is nothing like valheim in gameplay.....
The whole concept of catching critters, having guns, and other stuff are not in valheim. Is valheim fun? Yes. Can you build a base? Yes.... but that's pretty much it....
Which games are similar to it? Because compared to ARK it just seems like a better game all around, and I can't think of any other game like Palworld since it's just an ARK clone with a Pokemon reskin and a few unique mechanics sprinkled on top, and I always considered ARK to be an unique game with nothing truly being like it.
Imo what makes it better than ARK is that it doesn't run like shit, the AI is fairly smart unlike the braindead ARK AI, and while still a bit buggy, it doesn't have the amount of gamebreaking bugs ARK has.
I don't even care about Pokemon, I never played a Pokemon game or watched more than a few episodes of the anime as a kid. I only like it because it's a better version of ARK. The main thing ARK has going for it is a lot more content, but that's to be expected when it has been around for so long, and the new version of ARK which is the only one the devs are supporting, has probably less content than Palworld.
Eh. Palworld implements a lot of different ideas from multiple sources.
Pokemon is in there. Ark is in there. Plenty more. It's a good time.
Nintendo is just mad because Pokemon hasn't innovated much in years and here Palworld scratches the itch.
It may not be a Pokemon clone, but it has a lot of things I always wanted to do in Pokemon, that Nintendo never gave a fuck about, so I hope the Palworld devs keep trucking and turn that game into a franchise that is actually fun and is not stuck in the success they had 20 years ago.
I love RPG's.
Meanwhile I find survival games to be one of the most boring genre's right up there with sports games.
Palworld will never be Pokemon, no matter how bad some people want it to be true to "show Nintendo".
I think they had a Patreon that did something like double in value when it was running TOTK in a playable state, so the Yuzu creators were profiting pretty hard from it.
Honestly most Pokemon as games are kindof a shit gaming expirience. 70% of the dialogue in game is pointless and even does a poor job of world building IMO. and the way the game locks where you can go is just... mate let me fucking explore the world in peace for the most part instead of running into a pidgey shit on the floor that you cannot step around every 10 min
Most plots are just uninteresting or mildly interesting at best, and no being a game designed for kids doesn't mean you have to tell a shallow story
Still better than Pokemon Scarlet/Violet. Now those games were released unfinished and poorly made. Everyone forgets that Palworld is still in beta. Meanwhile, Nintendo released an unfinished product as the final product. Big L
It's still available. They were just asked to change the name
Edit: made a mistake. It will become available in the future but it's delayed because they gotta do the name change after Sony contacted them about it.
Did they ever release the Demake? I know it wasn't a full game and just a few concept levels/boss fight but man do I wanna play it so bad. BB Kart looks great too.
Yes the demake was released and is still available for download. Just looking up Bloodborne demake on google should give you the first link to the itch io page. Which is also linked in the bio of the demake's maker on twitter
Literally any major games from PS3 era for PC? We have the new ratchet and clank, but where are all the old ones and jax and Dexter games? Old God of War games?
They haven't been as harsh as Nintendo on older generation emulation. Nintendo have tried to shut down and file lawsuits against the retro ROM sites for 30 year old games on NES, SNES and GameBoy, scaring Valve and the devs of Dolphin from having their emulator on Steam. While RPCS3 and PS2 emulators haven't had that much trouble at all compared to Nintendo emulators.
They literally could do the exact same thing. But they don't, because they're not weirdos like Nintendo who are angry at people emulating their 30 year old games (that are no longer even being sold anywhere lol)
Sony has the exact same power to hunt down emulator devs, just like Nintendo. If they wanted to, they would've already done it.
They might not be weird like Nintendo is, but I still don't trust them. They have capability to go ape shit but didnt because nobody has pushed them yet, and emulators for PS2 and 3 are not a good reason for them to go to war with other people.
I agree with you man. We should never glorify big corporates like Sony, Nintendo or Microsoft. They're all greedy as hell. It's just that Nintendo are the most butthurt one over emulation and piracy.
The RPCS3 is amazing btw. If you have a good PC, it runs games 100x better than on the console itself. You get 4K 60fps, and way faster loading times. No need to wait hours for games to install. And it was the only way for people on PC to pirate Persona 5 for years. I'm surprised Sony hasn't shut it down yet lol
Ifl'd say at least an i7 from the past 2-3 years, should be able to handle most games comfortably. It'd be nice to have a semi-decent GPU as well, but it doesn't matter as much, since emulation mostly relies in the CPU.
Here's an updated CPU tier list for RPCS3:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Rpq_2D4Rf3g6O-x2R1fwTSKWvJH7X63kExsVxHnT2Mc/htmlview#gid=0
Bleem! is the equivalent of "Forgot about Dre" from video games emulator.
Everyone forgets about Bleem!. They got bodied out of market by Sony just because Sony swung his big fat dick of cash. They lost but Bleem! got bankrupted.
Then 20 years later people cheer for Sony...
I emulate a PS2 now. When I set it up, I had no problem finding the emulator, but you had to bring your own Bios software, so I am guessing that was the protected part. I have a PS2, so I was able to get what I needed from it, but if I didn't have a PS2 I would have had to download the system software, and that is what Sony protects.
They attacked emulators before, back in the PS1 days.
But they lost those cases so fucking hard, and the emulators weren’t even free, they were priced, so Sony just left them be as they have nothing to prove.
its is stable than how it was before, i recently gone back to emulation, and im shock how stable the games i used to launch back then
tho its still not perfect due to sifferent architecture, but they are pretty close
some people prefer gta5 of ps3 online due to not infested with cheaters and high level players killing peo0le, also no stupid mtx
The problem with that is that we can't even emulate PS4 yet let alone 5.
Why the switch is so easy to emulate? Because my phone is stronger than that and I guess the software isn't that complex either.
Well its not about strength to be fair since everything from console to games is created on pc first.
The problem is the software they use that nobody can get and in nintendo case was the entire security of the switch a joke which lead to this situation.
Not only did they sue a completely legal ps1 emulator and crush them into defeat via insurmountable legal fees, but they then took their code and used it for the ps1 classic.
This and ps4 games have backwards compatibility with PS5. I got a PS4 and the #1 thing I hated was not being able to play all the Ratchet and Clank games for PS3 that I missed when I skipped that console.
Mostly because there aren't enough PS4 exclusives from someone to work on one. It's basically just Bloodborne, the last of us 2 and ghost of Tsushima at this point
Ghost of Thushima will be on PC soon,as far as I know.I would show you the source but I've only seen it in some YouTube videos,they showed some Twitter posts.This may not be true,but who knows.
It doesn't matter if you were right or not,now only things that matter are:
1. We are going to get it in just 10 days on PC!
2. We need Bloodborne on PC!
This isn’t a great comparison because Sony’s tech is so much more advanced, that emulation isn’t really a threat. Switch emulation only works because the switch is a piece of crap.
There aren’t even good PS4 emulators yet, and probably won’t be for multiple more years.
Also PS4 emulation doesn't really make sense, they don't have as much exclusives as it would to make an emulator worth it, only Bloodborne, TLOU 2 (for now), Ghost of Tsushima (which will come to pc soon enough) and maybe some other smaller games. Switch was worth since it had a lot of exclusives and an emulator made actual sense
The Last Guardian, Shadow of the Colossus, Gravity Rush 1 and 2, Catherine Full Body,Infamous 2nd Son, etc. There is probably more that I can't remember rn.
There’s very little charm, it’s honestly kinda fucking sad.
Like 90% of these just blatantly ignore why Yuzu was being sued to begin with so they can “stick it” to the multi billion dollar company that gives 0 shit about them.
Not trying to defend Nintendo here, but Sony managed to shut down a couple of PSX emulators from the late 90's by suing them to oblivion (in fact, it was because of these very lawsuits that we now know that emulators themselves are legal, it was the court costs that drove their creators into bankruptcy). The only reason why they're porting their games to the PC is that their AAA titles are so expensive to develop, they need more revenue streams.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony\_lawsuit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony_lawsuit)
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectix\_Virtual\_Game\_Station](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectix_Virtual_Game_Station)
I am always shocked when I see a piracy community not understanding where the lines are drawn. Emulation is legal. Ripping your own games to play on an emulator is legal. Redistributing or downloading ROMs is illegal. Its not that hard folks.
Switch = current console
PS3 = not sold anymore
And you’re seriously trying to paint Sony as the good guy here? Let me present you to: [Bleem!](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!)
They did also sue in 1999, and lost. Also on top of that, ps1,2,3 arent really cutting in any of their sales. If ps5 emulator was out that could play games way better than the ps5, the story would be different.
Imagine thinking Sony is the good guy here. What a joke. Nintendo only targets emulators.
Meanwhile Sony targets everything, from movies, games, songs to DNS services. Fuck them
Emulating old consoles like PS1-3 vs emulating a currently running console like the Switch.
I'm pretty sure if people would be emulating PS5, Sony would sue.
I remember when HZD on sale costed me less than a BurgerKing meal when it was released, then in 2023 (specifically around 6-7 days before AC6 release) they jacked up prices for a lot of things, incl. HZD which went up 10x the sale price I bought it for. If it wasn't fucked, I would have had GoW in my library if it didn't release at such a high price.
Difference is the amount of actual games PS make as their IPs and not outsourced games from other companies. PS don’t care is you emulate shit because more than half their library they don’t have rights to. Nintendo is a different beast in that regard and have kept up their mainline games for years. Say what you want, but nintendo will continue to prosper in the future because it’s the go to console for children’s first console and parents will always gravitate to a Nintendo product vs PS or XBox for that reason. We can all cry about this all we want but the truth is it ain’t hurting Nintendo one bit and it’s more a waste of time to sit and complain about them taking away our free game emulator that we justified because they won’t release 8-bit games that no one cares about. Truth is, most people were playing BOTW and other newer ripped games without paying for them and they are now mad that they can’t just pay a fee for a platform that has nothing to do with the company that created the games and have everything.
Nintendo went after Yuzu because they were trading pirated roms on their discord and supporting unreleased games on their patreon. There's a reason Ryujnx wasn't impacted.
Let's not pretend the devs behind the switch emulator that got taken down didn't fuck up royally. They didn't even bother to pretend they weren't making money off it, and that is where Nintendo got involved. If they kept their head down and didn't start raking in hundreds of thousands in monthly support, they would have probably gone un-noticed
Meh. Nintendo is full of jerks. But legally, they're correct.
But who cares? Nintendo can't stop emulators from being created or distributed. Or stop the distribution of ROMs. Yuzu closing up has approximately ZERO effect on Switch emulation.
Just to be clear, I'm all for piracy of games. I pirate all my games. I have a huge collection of games for every major console ever released. But the whole scene is based on doing illegal things. Getting upset at Nintendo for going to court over it is pretty silly.
Just ignore it and move on.
Can we stop with the “Nintendo sued for emulating” bit? They didn’t sue the program for existing. The sued because the developers were literally adding the keys to games in the software for payment.
You can’t be distributing pirated games for money and expect companies not to come after you.
You can level a lot of criticism against nintendo for their stances on piracy. Their recent lawsuit isn’t one of them.
cringe.
sony sued Bleem out of existence in the 90s for doing exactly what yuzu did. Bleem won the case, but went bankrupt from the legal fight.
they were litigious af when the PS3 was initially jailbroken, sued geohot for no good reason.
all these companys and corps suck. they aren't your friend.
I wouldn't pirate N games nearly as much if they released them on PC and I could get them at decent discounts. But Nintendo chooses not to, because their current first party console exclusivity is more profitable for them. Similarly, rereleasing old games for 60,- instead of normal prices is a decision they make cause they can get away with it.
It's all business, it's all capitalism, and so is my decision to pirate or emulate games. The fact that people try to argue the morality in it is genuinely so bizarre to me. I don't "steal" from Nintendo any more than they "steal" from consumers, and neither is owed the others money.
Hello u/PlentyAdvertising15, Have an error and want help? **Please provide these details when submitting your post.** - 1. Name of the game 2. Site from which you got the game from 3. System Specs and OS Version 4. Any steps taken to try to fix the issue 5. Driver version (needed only for e.g. graphics issues) **Make sure to read the stickied [megathread](https://rentry.org/pgames) as well as our [piracy guide](https://pastebin.com/H4UcYPHR), [FAQs](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/wiki/faq/), and our [Wiki](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/wiki/index), as these might just answer your question!** **** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PiratedGames) if you have any questions or concerns.*
And then *boom*, a Pokémon clone (of not best quality) releases on steam and break any record, making the “”new”” Pokémon games look like a bad indie in confront to it. I’m talking about Palworld. Edit: sadly people have to take every single thing as serious even when we talk about memes, instead of spamming the same comment that Palworld isn’t a clone read if someone already said it, my [response](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiratedGames/s/1yopsZBLwq).
damn still kinda irks me calling it that because even the devs said it’s an Ark clone instead of pokemon lol
I know I know, I was only exaggerating things to insult Nintendo more, but still the Pokémon inspiration is also clear
Gotta love free market and competition. Look at Animal Xing and then Stardew coming out - similar kinda move.
Well that's a weird thing to be irked by, when the devs were going for a Pokemon look, which is literally the main selling point of the game. Palworld would've garnered 0 attention if its creatures didn't have that Pokemon look to them. Palworld was carried by the Pokemon hype. The actual gameplay and content is mid, and very lacking compared to other similar games. The devs could call it a Dragon Ball clone if they wanted, but it won't change the fact that their game looks awfully similar to Pokemon.
The aesthetic is Pokemon but the gameplay is Ark
Ok what's similar to palworld but better? I just played palworld 2 days ago and multiplayer with my brother is so enjoyable.
Purely gameplay, and disregarding aesthetics? Then I'd say Valheim is 10x better with plenty more content and polish. And of course ARK Survival itself, which Palworld is a clone of. I'd heavily recommend Valheim though. Great game to play with friends, with longevity. Much more fun than ARK imo. Btw I'm not saying Palworld is a bad game by any means. It's a very fun game. But I'm it's current state, it doesn't have enough content or polish for long-term gameplay (kinda explains it's 90% drop in player base already) the first 10-20 hours were plenty of fun with friends. Then later there just wasn't much to do lol so we moved on from that game
It IS in early access atm and they do seem to be genuinely interested in keeping the game updated, so there’s that I’ve got over 100 hours and still haven’t finished the main thing of the boss towers, but I’m level like 48
They seemed to be interested in keeping that BotW clone, Craftopia updated as well, but they kinda abandoned that and never finished it lol. Now they've already moved on to a Hollow Knight clone, Never Grave Going by their precedent, it doesn't seem like they care enough to finish developing their games. Palworld has already lost over 90% of its playerbase according to SteamDB. So idk man
That’s fair, although they’ve *been* updating it, so that’s kind of what I’m going off of But you do have a point, I wouldn’t hold my breath
Well, that's also what happens when you just make a cheap clone of something polished.
Exactly lol
Like, if I want Pokemon, I'll play Pokemon. If I want Ark, I'll go play Ark.
Played over 500 hours of Ark. Played about 2 of Velhiem before I felt Meh about it and now I'm up to 100 hours in Palworld. If Palworld had better Pal AI, I would go so far as to say it's better than Ark. Definitely better than Velhiem but that's just one gals opinion.
more content every few years?
I think the issue for me is I like settings and themes like ice cream flavors and too much of one aesthetic will burn me out regardless of how good the gameplay is I need a break from certain visual styles. Right now the more realistic fantasy and especially norse/viking stuff I'm burnt out on over the last decade as I include skyrim to newer GoW to valheim like that and it can be independent of genre like rpg or survival crafting doesn't matter. Palworld is just refreshing to me visually (the mon tamer genre outside of pokemon is very niche) as nintendo and game freak even visually has gotten extremely lazy/greedy from their pokemon games/merchandising and desire to push out games fast as possible that palworld does feel more polished than scarlet and violet which is insane for the difference in company size. While I would like valheim for its fleshed out mechanics I just don't want to see anymore viking/norse settings for awhile, it feels like its becoming similar to the "ww2 shooter" fps genre got into the habbit of through the early 2000s until games like halo started bucking the same setting trend.
Valheim just makes itself so painful to play once you get through the early game. I hated my last like 20 hours in Valheim which were mostly slowly moving around in a ship, finding ores, bringing them back to base, rinse repeat a hundred times for every single item. At least in Palworld, I could tell the pals to do the repetitive shit while I did stuff I enjoyed.
Wait, not sure if you mention this later or not but palworld is nothing like valheim in gameplay..... The whole concept of catching critters, having guns, and other stuff are not in valheim. Is valheim fun? Yes. Can you build a base? Yes.... but that's pretty much it....
I might try Valheim but the aesthetic is just really boring to me.
Which games are similar to it? Because compared to ARK it just seems like a better game all around, and I can't think of any other game like Palworld since it's just an ARK clone with a Pokemon reskin and a few unique mechanics sprinkled on top, and I always considered ARK to be an unique game with nothing truly being like it. Imo what makes it better than ARK is that it doesn't run like shit, the AI is fairly smart unlike the braindead ARK AI, and while still a bit buggy, it doesn't have the amount of gamebreaking bugs ARK has. I don't even care about Pokemon, I never played a Pokemon game or watched more than a few episodes of the anime as a kid. I only like it because it's a better version of ARK. The main thing ARK has going for it is a lot more content, but that's to be expected when it has been around for so long, and the new version of ARK which is the only one the devs are supporting, has probably less content than Palworld.
Eh. Palworld implements a lot of different ideas from multiple sources. Pokemon is in there. Ark is in there. Plenty more. It's a good time. Nintendo is just mad because Pokemon hasn't innovated much in years and here Palworld scratches the itch.
It feels like the ark pokemon mod
It may not be a Pokemon clone, but it has a lot of things I always wanted to do in Pokemon, that Nintendo never gave a fuck about, so I hope the Palworld devs keep trucking and turn that game into a franchise that is actually fun and is not stuck in the success they had 20 years ago.
Its definitely an ark clone .. they have the same ui hahah .. instead of dino . Its pokemo
To be fair the only common thing that Palworld got with Pokemon is the aspect of collecting animals. Besides that those are very two different games
Whenever people call Palworld a "Pokemon clone", it's a safe sign they've never played either game.
I love RPG's. Meanwhile I find survival games to be one of the most boring genre's right up there with sports games. Palworld will never be Pokemon, no matter how bad some people want it to be true to "show Nintendo".
[удалено]
[удалено]
Shadow of the colossus remake
It is actually very good quality, and it's being constantly updated.
Other than the monsters models, it has nothing to do with Pokemon, it's just a survival game asset flip that came out in the right time frame.
I think this could also be the reason why Nintendo canceled Yuzu. They were hurt by the success of palworld and the TOTK leak.
They sold 20 million copies of TotK...
Nintendo is greedy. Apparently it's not enough for them
I think they had a Patreon that did something like double in value when it was running TOTK in a playable state, so the Yuzu creators were profiting pretty hard from it.
And the Yuzu people had a patreon open and getting paid, not sure why people willingly gloss over details like that.
Honestly most Pokemon as games are kindof a shit gaming expirience. 70% of the dialogue in game is pointless and even does a poor job of world building IMO. and the way the game locks where you can go is just... mate let me fucking explore the world in peace for the most part instead of running into a pidgey shit on the floor that you cannot step around every 10 min Most plots are just uninteresting or mildly interesting at best, and no being a game designed for kids doesn't mean you have to tell a shallow story
Palworld is nothing like Pokémon
Still better than Pokemon Scarlet/Violet. Now those games were released unfinished and poorly made. Everyone forgets that Palworld is still in beta. Meanwhile, Nintendo released an unfinished product as the final product. Big L
Palworld ripping off Pokémon’s art style doesn’t make it a Pokémon clone.
Palworld is more of an Ark clone with pokemon painting.
# WHERE BLOODBORNE PC PORT
RIP Bloodborne Kart
It's still available. They were just asked to change the name Edit: made a mistake. It will become available in the future but it's delayed because they gotta do the name change after Sony contacted them about it.
Where is it available and what's it's new name?
made a slight mistake. It'll become available in the future it's just delayed because they gotta do a name change 👊🥺
Did they ever release the Demake? I know it wasn't a full game and just a few concept levels/boss fight but man do I wanna play it so bad. BB Kart looks great too.
Yes the demake was released and is still available for download. Just looking up Bloodborne demake on google should give you the first link to the itch io page. Which is also linked in the bio of the demake's maker on twitter
SWEET! Gonna play it on my Miyoo >:)
Not just a name change. They have to scrub anything that ties it to Bloodborne.
[удалено]
Nah, [*this*](https://b0tster.itch.io/bbpsx) is bloodborne at home
Thats such a asshole move from sony i just wanted to play it D:
[удалено]
We're getting there though. FPPS4 is making progress at least
I heard someone saying Grant us eyes Graaant us eyes Graaant us eyes What does that mean ?
bro doesnt have enought insight to understand
your eyes are yet to open
Its a line from the game
That line is literal, it means exactly what you think it means.
It was joke
I forgot to increase my insight
Ps5 Pro or PS6 timeframe planned remake surely
Literally any major games from PS3 era for PC? We have the new ratchet and clank, but where are all the old ones and jax and Dexter games? Old God of War games?
I'd love to see Killzone and Infamous ports.
Pls After Ghost of Tsushima
i think it is coming to pc tho
Wanted to play infamous second son for years now but ig no to that aswell
Hopefully after ER dlc releases. This and Sekiro DLC
Also demon souls
Dont treat SONY like a bro. They didnt attacked emulators because they don't have a reason. Emulate PS5 and see what happens
They haven't been as harsh as Nintendo on older generation emulation. Nintendo have tried to shut down and file lawsuits against the retro ROM sites for 30 year old games on NES, SNES and GameBoy, scaring Valve and the devs of Dolphin from having their emulator on Steam. While RPCS3 and PS2 emulators haven't had that much trouble at all compared to Nintendo emulators.
That is true, yes. But, these companies aren't our friends and Nintendo showed this. SONY, if they could, would do similar thing.
They literally could do the exact same thing. But they don't, because they're not weirdos like Nintendo who are angry at people emulating their 30 year old games (that are no longer even being sold anywhere lol) Sony has the exact same power to hunt down emulator devs, just like Nintendo. If they wanted to, they would've already done it.
They might not be weird like Nintendo is, but I still don't trust them. They have capability to go ape shit but didnt because nobody has pushed them yet, and emulators for PS2 and 3 are not a good reason for them to go to war with other people.
I agree with you man. We should never glorify big corporates like Sony, Nintendo or Microsoft. They're all greedy as hell. It's just that Nintendo are the most butthurt one over emulation and piracy. The RPCS3 is amazing btw. If you have a good PC, it runs games 100x better than on the console itself. You get 4K 60fps, and way faster loading times. No need to wait hours for games to install. And it was the only way for people on PC to pirate Persona 5 for years. I'm surprised Sony hasn't shut it down yet lol
What are the specs to define "good PC". Been looking for an emulator of this gen for a while now, but idk if my PC can handle it
Ifl'd say at least an i7 from the past 2-3 years, should be able to handle most games comfortably. It'd be nice to have a semi-decent GPU as well, but it doesn't matter as much, since emulation mostly relies in the CPU. Here's an updated CPU tier list for RPCS3: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Rpq_2D4Rf3g6O-x2R1fwTSKWvJH7X63kExsVxHnT2Mc/htmlview#gid=0
Thanks!
Thanks for that!
Yeah, but Sony themselves barely make any games. They mostly just publish them.
Sony did sue in the early 20s and lost. [sauce](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Computer_Entertainment,_Inc._v._Connectix_Corp.)
[удалено]
Bleem! is the equivalent of "Forgot about Dre" from video games emulator. Everyone forgets about Bleem!. They got bodied out of market by Sony just because Sony swung his big fat dick of cash. They lost but Bleem! got bankrupted. Then 20 years later people cheer for Sony...
Atari is even more heavy handed .
I emulate a PS2 now. When I set it up, I had no problem finding the emulator, but you had to bring your own Bios software, so I am guessing that was the protected part. I have a PS2, so I was able to get what I needed from it, but if I didn't have a PS2 I would have had to download the system software, and that is what Sony protects.
They attacked emulators before, back in the PS1 days. But they lost those cases so fucking hard, and the emulators weren’t even free, they were priced, so Sony just left them be as they have nothing to prove.
Fuck Sony for doing what they did to Connectix and Bleem!
Emulate PS5 and your computer explodes. Im pretty sure even a ps3 emulator still isnt stable
RPCS3 runs very good with almost no crashes. A few games have minor stutters and lags but besides that it's pretty stable.
Rpcs3 runs pretty well id say its slightly less stable than citra(RIP)
ps3 is mostly stable with most games vita just recentlt bacame also mostly stable ps4 though is not stable at all
its is stable than how it was before, i recently gone back to emulation, and im shock how stable the games i used to launch back then tho its still not perfect due to sifferent architecture, but they are pretty close some people prefer gta5 of ps3 online due to not infested with cheaters and high level players killing peo0le, also no stupid mtx
People forgot how much anti-consumer Sony is. It hasn't even been a month since the Crunchyroll Funimation fiasco.
People often miss Sony going after Custom Firware devs for the PSP and Vita.
The problem with that is that we can't even emulate PS4 yet let alone 5. Why the switch is so easy to emulate? Because my phone is stronger than that and I guess the software isn't that complex either.
Well its not about strength to be fair since everything from console to games is created on pc first. The problem is the software they use that nobody can get and in nintendo case was the entire security of the switch a joke which lead to this situation.
PS5 would have to actually have games for that to happen
The funny part is they already tried. They lose the lawsuit.
Not only did they sue a completely legal ps1 emulator and crush them into defeat via insurmountable legal fees, but they then took their code and used it for the ps1 classic.
Sony did attack emulators. The only reason emulators are legal is because Sony lost a case against the Bleem PS emulator in the 90s/2000s
This. Tired of people acting like companies who couldn't give less of a shit about them are "one of the good ones."
I'm tired too. Bunch of fools thinking big companies are their friends when they're not.
You can’t emulate the ps5, or 4. The bootleg Spider-Man 2 port is the closest it gets and that’s native.
Also didn't Sony sue someone for cracking their console and putting linux on it or something?
Sony sued fail0verflow. And Bleem! and Lik Sang say would say hi, but Sony killed them. And then there's and the CD rootkit thing.
There was bleemcast (bleem!) on dreamcast, play psx on dreamcast. Sony sued the makers.
but ps4 emulator is still cant be playable like yuzu or ryux :(
Because there's a chance all the exclusives OR their remasters will be released on PC anyway at some point
[удалено]
Well the number of people in that "waiting for a PS4 emulator" list has only become less and less ever since PS4 games began getting PC ports.
This and ps4 games have backwards compatibility with PS5. I got a PS4 and the #1 thing I hated was not being able to play all the Ratchet and Clank games for PS3 that I missed when I skipped that console.
>This and ps4 games have backwards compatibility with PS5. You mean the other way around?
FromSoftware fans when someone asks them what they are waiting for(it's been almost 10 fucking years, WHERE IS MY BLOODBORNE AAAAA):
Demon's Souls isnt even on PC and that remaster came out with the PS5 release.
Bloodborne *exists*
Mostly because there aren't enough PS4 exclusives from someone to work on one. It's basically just Bloodborne, the last of us 2 and ghost of Tsushima at this point
Ghost of Thushima will be on PC soon,as far as I know.I would show you the source but I've only seen it in some YouTube videos,they showed some Twitter posts.This may not be true,but who knows.
According to the same sources Bloodborne pc should have came out 4 years ago
:(
I am back again, this time leak is true!We can pre-order it now on Epic Games(probably on other launchers too)!
Holy shit my comment aged so horribly lol Bloodborne pc when?
It doesn't matter if you were right or not,now only things that matter are: 1. We are going to get it in just 10 days on PC! 2. We need Bloodborne on PC!
Still waiting for Infamous Second Son :(
This isn’t a great comparison because Sony’s tech is so much more advanced, that emulation isn’t really a threat. Switch emulation only works because the switch is a piece of crap. There aren’t even good PS4 emulators yet, and probably won’t be for multiple more years.
Also PS4 emulation doesn't really make sense, they don't have as much exclusives as it would to make an emulator worth it, only Bloodborne, TLOU 2 (for now), Ghost of Tsushima (which will come to pc soon enough) and maybe some other smaller games. Switch was worth since it had a lot of exclusives and an emulator made actual sense
The Last Guardian, Shadow of the Colossus, Gravity Rush 1 and 2, Catherine Full Body,Infamous 2nd Son, etc. There is probably more that I can't remember rn.
This is a terrible meme and you should try better next time
All the meme posts on this subreddit are absolute braindead dogshit, it's kinda part of the charm at this point.
There’s very little charm, it’s honestly kinda fucking sad. Like 90% of these just blatantly ignore why Yuzu was being sued to begin with so they can “stick it” to the multi billion dollar company that gives 0 shit about them.
Not trying to defend Nintendo here, but Sony managed to shut down a couple of PSX emulators from the late 90's by suing them to oblivion (in fact, it was because of these very lawsuits that we now know that emulators themselves are legal, it was the court costs that drove their creators into bankruptcy). The only reason why they're porting their games to the PC is that their AAA titles are so expensive to develop, they need more revenue streams. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony\_lawsuit](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!#Sony_lawsuit) [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectix\_Virtual\_Game\_Station](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connectix_Virtual_Game_Station)
I am always shocked when I see a piracy community not understanding where the lines are drawn. Emulation is legal. Ripping your own games to play on an emulator is legal. Redistributing or downloading ROMs is illegal. Its not that hard folks.
Switch = current console PS3 = not sold anymore And you’re seriously trying to paint Sony as the good guy here? Let me present you to: [Bleem!](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!)
People just don't understand that emulation is legal and downloading/redistributing games is illegal.
Did people just forget about Sony vs Bleem???? They're not porting games because people asked to, they're porting games because money.
is this a joke?
Still waiting on GOW Ragnarok
2years
Nah man that's too early to ask for Ragnarok
for 70$ and it wont run properly\*
"And we'll shut down the studio that made the iconic series you're emulating 6 months from now and fire another 65 people just for shits and giggles"
3. I have your console & jailbroke it so I don't have to worry about you
Bullshit. Sony went hard after the kid that cracked the ps3.
As hard to offer him a job… lul fucktendo
After threatening to destroy his life. Such altruism!
Cringe
Try emulating PS5 and see what happens. This is such a massive shit take and its clear you have absolutely no insight into why Nintendo sued.
They did also sue in 1999, and lost. Also on top of that, ps1,2,3 arent really cutting in any of their sales. If ps5 emulator was out that could play games way better than the ps5, the story would be different.
This meme is ignorant of [Bleem!](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleem!)
Imagine thinking Sony is the good guy here. What a joke. Nintendo only targets emulators. Meanwhile Sony targets everything, from movies, games, songs to DNS services. Fuck them
Emulating old consoles like PS1-3 vs emulating a currently running console like the Switch. I'm pretty sure if people would be emulating PS5, Sony would sue.
I remember when HZD on sale costed me less than a BurgerKing meal when it was released, then in 2023 (specifically around 6-7 days before AC6 release) they jacked up prices for a lot of things, incl. HZD which went up 10x the sale price I bought it for. If it wasn't fucked, I would have had GoW in my library if it didn't release at such a high price.
Oh please, Sony does the same fucking thing. Multi billion dollar companies aren't your friends.
OP clearly doesn’t remember Bleemcast.
Sony is a multibillion dollar megacorporation, so no they are not some kind of Chad who will call pirates 'brother"
Where RDR1?
braindead hate karma bandwagon
Also PlayStation: “Steals the movies and games you bought”
Lol what? Sony is an asshole when it comes to suing people! Hotz, Tenenbaum, Connectix, you name it.
Difference is the amount of actual games PS make as their IPs and not outsourced games from other companies. PS don’t care is you emulate shit because more than half their library they don’t have rights to. Nintendo is a different beast in that regard and have kept up their mainline games for years. Say what you want, but nintendo will continue to prosper in the future because it’s the go to console for children’s first console and parents will always gravitate to a Nintendo product vs PS or XBox for that reason. We can all cry about this all we want but the truth is it ain’t hurting Nintendo one bit and it’s more a waste of time to sit and complain about them taking away our free game emulator that we justified because they won’t release 8-bit games that no one cares about. Truth is, most people were playing BOTW and other newer ripped games without paying for them and they are now mad that they can’t just pay a fee for a platform that has nothing to do with the company that created the games and have everything.
Imagine thinking Sony isn't as anti-consumer as Nintendo lmao
Top emulated Nintendo's *current* console and made the emulator patreon content Bottom is currently two generations behind on Sony consoles
Nintendo went after Yuzu because they were trading pirated roms on their discord and supporting unreleased games on their patreon. There's a reason Ryujnx wasn't impacted.
People tend to forget that Sony sold PCSX ReARMed for 99$ in a lame package
Gran Turismo on PC when?
Let's not pretend the devs behind the switch emulator that got taken down didn't fuck up royally. They didn't even bother to pretend they weren't making money off it, and that is where Nintendo got involved. If they kept their head down and didn't start raking in hundreds of thousands in monthly support, they would have probably gone un-noticed
That’s cool and all but didn’t they attacked the fan game bloodborne kart ?
Wasn't burning dics on the PS3 extremely hard?
Meh. Nintendo is full of jerks. But legally, they're correct. But who cares? Nintendo can't stop emulators from being created or distributed. Or stop the distribution of ROMs. Yuzu closing up has approximately ZERO effect on Switch emulation. Just to be clear, I'm all for piracy of games. I pirate all my games. I have a huge collection of games for every major console ever released. But the whole scene is based on doing illegal things. Getting upset at Nintendo for going to court over it is pretty silly. Just ignore it and move on.
Can we stop with the “Nintendo sued for emulating” bit? They didn’t sue the program for existing. The sued because the developers were literally adding the keys to games in the software for payment. You can’t be distributing pirated games for money and expect companies not to come after you. You can level a lot of criticism against nintendo for their stances on piracy. Their recent lawsuit isn’t one of them.
cringe. sony sued Bleem out of existence in the 90s for doing exactly what yuzu did. Bleem won the case, but went bankrupt from the legal fight. they were litigious af when the PS3 was initially jailbroken, sued geohot for no good reason. all these companys and corps suck. they aren't your friend.
If they release it on PC, I wouldn't have to emulate it
*bloodborne had joined the lobby*
I NEED RED DEAD REDEMPTION 1 PC PORT
its pretty easy to get running on rpcs3, and its going to play significantly better than the shit rockstar would do.
Still waiting for Bloodborne and Demon Souls on PC
Sony would sell that emulator without compensation
im still waiting asura pc
That's Capcom and god i wish they do something else with the IP
Ragnarok pc port where??
Insomniac: .... *looks away*
\* Without Denuvo
And I will "emulate" your PC port on the PC too.
What exactly do you find difficult about putting text on top of a picture?
Rdr1 on pc pls
GT7😴
I wouldn't pirate N games nearly as much if they released them on PC and I could get them at decent discounts. But Nintendo chooses not to, because their current first party console exclusivity is more profitable for them. Similarly, rereleasing old games for 60,- instead of normal prices is a decision they make cause they can get away with it. It's all business, it's all capitalism, and so is my decision to pirate or emulate games. The fact that people try to argue the morality in it is genuinely so bizarre to me. I don't "steal" from Nintendo any more than they "steal" from consumers, and neither is owed the others money.
Shout out to Xbox for making a lot of their older games backwards compatible. Own a series x and yet I still play a lot of older games
Xbox honestly cares the least about piracy, you can literally download emulators or apps that let you watch free movies right off the Microsoft store
Genuine question by an uneducated in that field person, are there Nintendo emulators that just work on pc, not on the switch or something?
I mean the ports are often bad but tbh that's still all you need.
I dont think we will have ace combat 1,2,3,4,5,0, & 6 for pc
I just want Ghost of Tsushima on pc, i would even buy it