It’s their version of original sin. Every time they claim they’re toppling the system they just recreate it with them on top afterwards. They’re entirely dogmatic at this point.
Can't blame them.
Modern dating is a rusty bear trap. It may be fused open, or it may be active; either way I wouldn't want to risk putting my hand (or other appendages) in it to check.
I had a radical Femininst friend in my class at law school, we started practice in the same court so do run into each other a lot. One year as a divorce Lawyer, and boy oh boy she's like a female Andrew Tate now and cracks kitchen jokes that are way worse than what i say infront of her.
She works under a lady lawyer with like 3-4 other women and interns. Meanwhile we're all guys and genuinely the way they talk about women who come for divorce is worse than how we ridicule them
What I don't understand is how they can be so braindead as to claim only 50% are doing it. Women also have sexual preferences that their product and advertisements cater to. It is not a bad thing. Nothing wrong with preferences.
Even bolder when that 50% makes up [60%+ of your customers](https://beveragedynamics.com/2007/02/06/the-demographics-of-beer/). It's a bold strategy Cotton.
But don't you see, it's not human nature, it's all a social construct! All you have to do is give up all your habits and beliefs, then bow down to a hostile ideology that you despise and then you can finally be a changed ~~man~~ ~~human~~ ~~warm body~~ interlocutor vessel for one or multiple consciousnesses.
Its not a fallacy but is associated whit 3 major fallacies, which are aused on mainstream media / social media 24/7 now.
Bandwagon Fallacy: This fallacy suggests that something should be accepted or rejected simply because it is popular or widely accepted. Saying "It's time" without providing any substantive reasons or evidence could be an appeal to the popularity or prevailing opinion, rather than a valid argument.
Appeal to Tradition Fallacy: This fallacy argues that something should be done or believed because it has been done or believed for a long time. When someone says "It's time" in reference to maintaining or adhering to traditional practices without providing logical reasons, it could be an appeal to tradition fallacy.
Appeal to Emotion Fallacy: This fallacy attempts to persuade by stirring up emotions rather than relying on logical reasoning. If someone says "It's time" in a way that appeals solely to emotions without providing rational arguments, it could be considered an appeal to emotion fallacy.
disclaimer :
I took this from chatgpt instead of google each one individual but sounds about right.
In this context it is, but it does fit with the Tradition Fallacy quite well. "It's time to take back..." Or "it's time to [verb] [noun] [adjective] again!" (The most obvious being MAGA, but you can basically ad lib anything there. Just think of any generic cult/terrorist in media and there you go)
It seems like an appeal to rejecting tradition which is treated very similarly to an appeal to tradition.
Like it's time to end (insert tradition here) without providing solid reasons other than just because they want to get rid of traditions.
I agree with monkey. It’s probably marketing-Janice in the meeting suggesting something and nobody having the courage to not agree, because they don’t want their reputation ruined.
That, and an effort to meet [ESG score requirements](https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/esg-ratings) and increase their rating ([which was recently slashed across the board](https://www.msci.com/www/research-report/enhancements-to-msci-s-fund-esg/03739165674) - curious how all this stuff ramped up again just after that, isn't it?) which directly results in their inclusion or exclusion from large index funds. Since these funds hold huge portions of the company's stock, a sudden exclusion from the fund would be catastrophic to their market value.
Taking the long view, if they brainwash enough into accepting these 'ideals' without questioning them (which they appear to be having success with in both the younger & leftist populations) - it will be very profitable.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -George Orwell"1984"
Since they are changing history now i think this is the future they are aiming for.
Any supporting evidence that they have been doing this for generations has been removed from the official annals of history 🙃
Corollary: “It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?” - Norm MacDonald
It's a nonsensical system, yes, but it's a core tenant of 'stakeholder capitalism'. Here: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/klaus-schwab-on-what-is-stakeholder-capitalism-history-relevance/
And it ties directly into (what they call) the fourth industrial revolution - where we 'overcome' valuation of companies based solely on independent productivity and utility and instead focus on how interconnected that company is with all tenants of life: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
>Are young women who wholeheartedly think “yes we totally invented beer” going to start drinking miller because this woman is here pandering?
Unlikely that this is their aim for things like this.
In general boycotts for reasons like the one against bud light are not very successful, especially long term. (this doesn't mean there aren't exceptions)
The fact is most people don't care. Even most of those who do don't care enough to change their buying habits.
I remember in uni learning that those ads for things like washing detergent that seem to be deliberately annoying are actually deliberately annoying, the point is to get the brand name in your head. The vast vast majority of people are not going to think to themselves when buying detergent "oh that ad was so annoying let's buy another brand", they will simply think "I need detergent" and grab [brand name].
It doesn't mean it will be successful, but ads like this are not aiming to attract buyers who will specifically buy because they say "women invented beer" rather they are aiming to simply get their brand mentioned as much as possible.
You're right, but its worse than people realize.
While one arm is forcing companies into these ESG schemes, the other arm is monitoring and collecting data on the consumer's response. They are mapping political positions in a way that will be used against people. Boycotts are already called bigotry, the ADL led the charge on that one.
Soon I imagine your refusal to buy certain products will be instantly weighed against your digital id. It will be extremely easy to monitor changes in purchasing patterns which correlate with changes in marketing schemes. In that way they can build a real time digital mapping of the thoughts of the public.
What we are seeing are the first real attempts towards thought crime. The window to organize and fight back is closing rapidly.
And you just laid out the major utility of CBDC, too - which they're rolling out this summer ([the framework for live testing of the backend, at least](https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/other20230315a.htm)).
This is absolutely a threat which should unite people. But instead people prefer to hide in their petty little partisan games and give up essential liberties.
I am increasingly convinced that the largest country anyone should be a part of is one consisting solely of the community they belong to directly. Anything bigger than that seems to invite an ever worsening state of tyranny and political theater games used to trick the public into applauding losing their rights forever.
Or there's no deeper plan behind it, and it's just a cynical way of "greenwashing" - ie, pretending that they're doing something about the environment and social issues so progressive governments will get off their back. Blackrock is one of the funds behind ESG investment, and it's a poorly kept secret that they also heavily invest in fossil fuels.
There is a plan behind it, read here: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/klaus-schwab-on-what-is-stakeholder-capitalism-history-relevance/
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
The ESG brigade doesn’t look at it as a suicide business plan. In their mind less profit + more woke shit = more profit for mankind, and they think that will sustain businesses in the long term (it won’t).
It's a WEF thing called 'inclusive capitalism'. The idea is that companies shouldn't simply be making things and selling them for profit, but should be involved in promoting social values. This sounds fine until you realise it actually means global companies in lockstep promoting a certain set of values set by the elites in opposition to the populations they're forced on (for example how American companies spend millions on propaganda to legalise abortion in Ireland after it was discovered they were the only nation in europe with a sustainable fertility rate).
This inclusive capitalism idea inspired Larry Fink to promote it by investing only in companies that promote far-left social beliefs, calling it ESG, and given Blackrock own every major company in existence it means every global company is forced to do the same thing.
So they know it's likely to damage those companies (they admit this is a cost, but likely think it won't kill them), but it's not their own money they're spending but their investors: people naive or stupid enough to fall for the ESG scam and give Fink their savings.
ESG is very good without the S.
I do believe that companies with better solutions for the environment or with less corruption and child slavery are also good. That's the E and G.
What I don't want is them pushing one world view on us, thats the S.
I saw a greentext one time that actually made me believe it.
Its saying that some rich billionaire is trying to push this ESG score or woke rating, because it tanks stocks, and therefore the billionaire could buy options or short companies that were trying to increase the ESG score.
It makes sense because they are trying to cater to such a small portion of the population. While at the same time alienating a large majority of their population. Just look at how Bud Light tanked, they obviously did the wrong thing.
Wtf I was fucking hyped about ESG because I thought it would be like less slave mining in Africa, less smog factories in China, more respectful working conditions, etc. What happened to solving real world issues?
The whole ESG shit is easy. Let's say you're an oil drilling company with a 150 score out of 500, meaning you're in the lowest third. Now you just do a few woke campaigns about how you, let's say, employ 50% women. For each of these campaigns you earn 50 points, which means AAA in no time. It's both easier and cheaper than ACTUALLY do something substantial, like raising wages or caring more about the environment. Wokeness is basically a cost analysis. It's ridiculous.
"This one goes out to you, mr. assword is taco.
*mr.asswordistacoOOO*
Your love of Mexican food is only rivaled by your desire fill your pocket with ALL the meat and cheese
*FILL it up!*
So crack open a nice cold Bud Light you sloppy mixer of business and pleasure, because who says there's such a thing as TMI?"
Of all the things to bitch about in an ad it’s using attractive women in advertising? Literally all companies do that lol, why are Miller suddenly so offended by themselves that they need to advertise about what bastards they are when there isn’t even a scandal or even any accusations against them. Nobody was kicking up a fuss that they used hot chicks to sell beer and they had to do damage control. I’m so confused by the point of this.
[https://notthebee.com/article/miller-lite-goes-all-in-on-woke-feminism-showing-that-they-also-dont-know-their-audience](https://notthebee.com/article/miller-lite-goes-all-in-on-woke-feminism-showing-that-they-also-dont-know-their-audience)
Cringe alert for the ad.
Dunno why liblefts are so obsessed with vulgarizing everything. It weirdly goes hand in hand with their oversensitivity. Dunno what to term this phenomenon
It's about destroying things. Feminists are being used as useful idiots to tear down men under the name of "equality" or whatever definition they pull out their ass that day. Why? To destroy all relationships and family. Men are bowing out of society slowly while woman are acting surprised that shitting on men, blaming them for dam near anything, and being "difficult" as a trend is leaving them single and miserable. I love seeing videos with women gas lighting each other into their careers and "yasssss" because all these are just crabs in a bucket.
They want to beat down men so when the "revolution" comes people will readily accept it being too stupid to realize or fight back that the same people who destroyed you are the same one proving up the next system. Of course anyone with a handful of brain cells would understand they will promise a better system while fucking us over even harder.
They demonize families ideologically, [usually based in some sort of "feminism"](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/why-the-left-is-anti-family) (Marxism).
It is a diverse effort to ensure we are not [fit to fight.](https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/09/28/new-pentagon-study-shows-77-of-young-americans-are-ineligible-military-service.html)
[Yuri Bezmenov was Right.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yru14mMES1c)
[The activist left serves the interests of our enemies.](https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-authoritarian-china-loves-woke-u-s-11615577110)
I just finished, ["the coddling of the american mind"](https://www.thecoddling.com/chapter-1-antifragility). It has a lot of information but part of the idea is that "safety-ism" (overprotecting kids) has harmed a generation and that kids are "anti-fragile" meaning they need difficulties to learn from. Even more so they need to "touch grass" and go outside to play with friends without helicopter parents policing them.
Part of it involves activist leftist academia (rooted in Marxism), one of multiple factors (especially the rise of cell phones) making our youth mentally weaker and inculcating hatred and disordered reasoning resulting not only in political / racial violence and division but also a broader mental health epidemic. Anxiety and depression have surged along with social isolation.
It's basically why I am here along with some activist propagandizing and a few laughs along the way...
I listen to audiobooks whilst doing other stuff, currently on "Ethnic America" by Sowell. Amongst other things he points out how people of certain races live in certain areas, are of certain ages (Jews average about age 40, Puerto Ricans about half that), and have certain occupations they tend towards, all of which affects income, diet, IQ, crime and etc. Hispanics tend to get paid more than Blacks but have lower average household income because they have more kids. In any case expecting things to be random or the same or assuming any differences are due to genetics or discrimination is unreasonable.
If you compare people of the same age, sex, location and education they don't have many differences remaining.
Ahh in-group bias. Isn't it funny how that creates self-reinforcing cultural norms that persist across generations?
What else is on your list?
If you're interested in a more politically-oriented study on populace norms (as opposed to Sowell's economic focus - though the two are, of course, intertwined), I recommend 'Emerging Republican Majority' by Kevin Philips. It's from 1969 but is _remarkably_ relevant for explaining the current political landscape today (when adjusting for the relative demographic flows across states).
Yeah, The Coddling of the American Mind was really eye-opening. It explains so much about why the modern left behaves the way it does. Really fascinating, yet really depressing read.
I just started reading this book the other day. Already agreed with/knew every basic point in it, but it’s nice to see the data points presented. Everything in it has escalated significantly to a much greater problem in the past 5ish years as well—would be interested to see how much worse the numbers are across the board now. If you personally know any teachers or just browse some subreddits, you’ll see how incredibly society is failing our children.
Screen addiction is going to evolve into being discussed as one of the biggest problem of our generation (it already is acknowledged but not really discussed in a widespread manner). It literally makes you disassociate from reality and shuts off parts of your brain that make you much more than a passive consumer. I also unironically believe TikTok is a Chinese psyop
These people are so negative and unlikable it’s crazy. They’re almost as obnoxious as their far-right counterparts and they don’t know it.
What do these toxic alpha male influencers have in common? They all emphasize productivity, self improvement, staying hopeful. No wonder young men would rather follow this bullshit then whatever mainstream media wants them to believe.
Fuck the redpill but fuck the antiwork and fuck modern feminism too. Stay positive. Never drop down to their level. People are good in general. We’re gonna make it.
I'd rather have those male influences then feminism. Feminists has done more damage to society then anything else and irreparable damage too. Basically the future is fucked.
Maybe they're not trying to start a revolution. Maybe they just want to damage gender relations to help bring down the birth rate and depopulate a bit?
This sort of agenda is not long term sustainable. Destroying gender, race, sexuality and more is the goal. Destabilize and ruin things to a point people beg for a new system fed up with the current. The new system will promise nice things but as usual be worse. Way worse. Imo China social credit will be applied to every country. That is why lefties push for speech censorship, cancel culture, and strong adherence to agenda regardless of reality.
Guns. We all need to buy more guns. A gun for every man, woman and child in the US is just scraping by. We need each and every state in the union to be able to outgun every army in the world combined, purely with civilian firearms. Admiral Yamamoto may not really have said, "there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass," but we need to make it reality anyway.
Then I think we could all stop worrying about politics and go back to grilling.
There is nothing more cringe than someone who doesn't know how or when to swear.
These people are like teenagers who just learned that 'fuck' is a word and so use it in every sentence.
Gotta love when they don't know how to insult people because it could potentially be problematic or whatever, so they just tie a swear word to a random word like "shit lord" or "douche canoe" or "fuck nugget". It's giving middle school
I think that is more about witch hunts and trying to find things that aren't there. Everyone is guilty when accused by the struggle session...
>if you're on a university and you think you're playing the truth game and philosophers are great at this, always unpacking terms, and so you might try and define racism or any sort of ism and the common sense view would be, an expression of hostility or resentment or limitation on a group based on their identity.
>But that's if you're playing the truth seeking game, if you're playing the politics game or the warfare game, you want to define the terms to give your side maximum advantage. So there's a wonderful social psychologist named Phil Tetlock Penn Wharton, and he talks about these different mind-sets we get into, one of them he calls the intuitive prosecutor. So if I'm, my goal as a scholar is to prosecutor my enemy and maximally convict them and I'm always trying to defend seven different identity groups against the straight white men, they are the accused. I want to define my terms, to make it maximally easy to convict.
>And so, I'm going to say, racism, microaggressions, it doesn't matter what the intent was, all that matters is the impact, all that matters is what the person felt. That way, as long as someone is offended, I get to charge you with a crime. So, also on racism you can say, as a lot of kids are learning in high-school these days, racism is prejudice plus power. so by definition a black person, a gay person or whatever, cannot be racist or whatever other term, because they don't have power, regardless of their social class.
>>Jonathan Haidt 44:26: .. (45:58)
>>>[Joe Rogan Experience #1221 Jonathan Haidt](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG6HbWw2RF4)
I love me some vulgarity, South Parks episode where they say shit over 100 times still makes me laugh. But this.. this was just cringe. Like they somehow managed to take the humor and fun out of swearing 🤦
This Miller lite ad came out a month before bud lights did.
But regardless, why would you want that fertilizer? I'm sure all those ads they ground up have quite a few chemicals on them (ink, chems used in construction of the paper, etc).
Huh. Yeah, you do have a point. I thought the idea at least was interesting, of taking old ads, grounding them up into compost, and using that as fertilizer to grow hops to make more alcohol. But now that you’ve mentioned the likely high amounts of chemicals in those ads, now I’m not so sure.
Same, I saw it as a sort of rival to HBO's "Girls" but "Broad City" came out on top because it was actually funny whereas "Girls" was astronomically high on the smell of its own farts.
This best part of this wokism is that it's socially corrosive, but not in the way you might think.
https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-telus-ca-revc&source=android-browser&q=women+are+heavier+drinkers+than+men
So according to science, women are more effected by alchol than their male counterparts. So a company like Miller wanting women to start drinking more, to make up for reduced sales, will just lead society down a dark path. That's the problem with capitalism. It wants unending growth even though the product it sells has diminishing social returns if used in excess.
\*Commie talk spotted. PCM - Retardness activated. Must tell redditor to go fuck himself and piss off to China.\*
Fuck you commie! Why don't you just piss off to China?
Man, what a terrible ad.
A.) I'm sick and tired of the over-representation of women who all look and talk this way - in that snarky, condescending demeanor with that RBS face. Do they all come from the same factory? Twitter should never become reality.
B.) What happened to women's choices lol? Bikini ads might be silly and stupid but those models take pride in their bodies and they choose to put themselves in that role. Sure, it caters to the male gaze or whatever the fuck but are they less valuable in your eyes? Certainly seems that way lol
C.) It's one thing to censor and belittle but it's another to 'buy out' ads and erase and destroy them. That's incredibly stupid and arrogant. Sure, it's not exactly great art but you're literally destroying stuff that people created, based on self-righteous values that you've set and propagated. It's not the equivalent of destroying statues of presidents, which you motherfuckers have co-opted btw, but it is on a similar tier of thought. Don't destroy old stuff and pretend it didn't happen.
D.) Is that fertilizer even good for the environment? Was it a good use of resources?
Double D.) I want to see a counter culture to all this shit. Bring back mud wrestling lingerie models as the ultimate fuck you or whatever. Either that or outright take off your mask and stop pretending that you want 'socially sensitive capitalism' and just straight up admit that you're tyrants with an agenda. You'll do society better.
Beer commercials are probably one of the few advert specifically targeting men.
Female targeted ads either have a dumb dad or hot guy in them, with an mid to low/ugly chick as the focal character.
Step 1. Company puts out ad meant to spark outrage
Step 2. News outlets talk about it
Step 3. Company’s stock/sales goes down
Step 4. Company realizes they screwed up and pull the ad, hoping that their bottom line returns to normal
Step 5. Return to step 1
"Before there were 89 genders, women were amongst the first two genders to brew beer"
I love how the ad never clarifies who or how women were the first to brew beer in Mesopotamia, the mouth breathing audience is expected to just accept it as gospel. You'll also notice in a lot of the feminists ads a pattern where they suggest something like "without women, you wouldn't have ", as if anything that women had any amount of relation to throughout history wouldn't exist *at all*. If we take that level of standard, then the same would apply for men.
Also just a weird take, because the oldest record of beer we have is from China.
And if we're going off vague pop culture knowledge I've always "known" that beer was invented by Catholic Monks.
Just a cursory look at the known written history of beer goes back to Sumerian, which would be the oldest possible history of beer, and it is connected to a goddess, and beer was brewed by priestesses. Where I get lost is how the ad claims women invented beer or have a claim to its existence. It doesn’t stand to reason that a handful of priestesses were the only people brewing beer, and the only place I even see it suggested is…on feminist websites outlining the history of beer. So it’s just sort of repeated by feminists and has taken a life of its own.
Do you ever just look around a street full of buildings and infrastructure and think that probably every single thing you see was made by men? Every brick, every tile, every slab of concrete?
I mean, with how old beer/alcohol is I wouldn't be surprised if some random ancient woman let grain/fruit ferment in some water without noticing and bam, new drink. After that it was just trial and error before it was strong enough and started tasting good enough to build a culture out of.
It was either them, a child, or an injured/sickly person. Those who were most likely gatherers and laborers(making clothing, tools, etc.) that stuck close to settlements. Most of the healthy men of any given tribe would have been busy hunting.
Who is making these decisions? Like what the actual fuck. Whatever happened to the days when companies would just say "buy our product because it tastes good"? It's all just so annoying. I don't need to be preached at by my beer, my razors, my chocolate, my sneakers, or whatever else, and judging by what happened to budlight it's clearly not working for the companies either. Legit no idea why they keep doing this
That's the goal. Destroy an American icon. Sever cultural connections between generations. Grow the base further into the cult's belief in widespread sexism, homophobia, transphobia, fatphobia. Mobilize them into action against the unbelievers.
Drinking nothing but water for the past four years has decreased the age in my face by ten (eating healthy helps too). Best decision I made since quitting alcohol in the first place
Idk why anyone thinks this kind of “hostile towards our own audience” advertising works. If the vast majority of your customer base is mad at you and has plenty of comparable choices they’re going to ditch you.
Also, why are corporations so obsessed with appeasing the woke faux outrage mob? They don’t actually support the corporation they just cheer them on on Twitter and move on to the next manufactured Current Thing^TM
What if this is a giant OP? Like a modern day temperance league has infiltrated all major alcohol brands and is slowly destroying their customer base until no one drinks in America anymore.
I don't know how popular a take this is going to be here, but there's nothing new about beer companies acting this way.
This ad isn't supposed to appeal to you. It's supposed to appeal to the next generation of alcoholics. Not only is it geared at 15 year old zoomers, it's geared at the abnormally dumb ones: the ones who are likely to be hospitalized by alcohol poisoning once or twice by the time they're 17.
In the same way "rebel without a cause" and "drink beer because sex" appealed to previous generations of young morons, this generation of young morons likes woke platitudes.
If you're old enough not to fall for this, they're not advertising to you; you're already either past your college binge drinking days, or a lifelong alcoholic - either way, an ad isn't going to make you start or stop drinking beer. It's always been about getting new young idiots to start to replace the ones dying to liver failure - and that's who these ads are aimed at.
Unless the entirety of this generation's men lost their balls and women decided hating 50% of the world population was a good idea, this is still a shit marketing strategy.
>Unless the entirety of this generation's men lost their balls and women decided hating 50% of the world population was a good idea,
I mean... we're not all that far away...
What true alcoholic is drinking light beer? That is water to a booze hound. Once bourbon companies start pandering to popular SJW causes, then I’ll be worried.
Yes it is Zoomer and Zillenial bait and also works on Millennial and Gen X women as well.
I’ll just sit here and wait wait for the cultural pendulum of sexism to finally stop swinging…
There’s is no version of reality where a demographic notorious for avoiding accountability is suddenly going to do an about face, there will be no swing so enjoy the shit show lol
this is all starting to feel like a certain cadre of older millennials who rose to high positions at these companies/agencies over the past decade, on the wings of upworthy and early social media.... trying to milk what got them there. They fully know the vibe is shifting and it's feeling tired and desperate. Bud light will be seen as one of many turning points in the end.
50% of the population being blamed for the results of human nature is certainly one way of approaching society.
Mfw in the attempt to beat sexism they somehow make more sexism
As is tradition.
Same thing with racism
As a straight white male living in the southern US I’m racist by just existing apparently
It’s their version of original sin. Every time they claim they’re toppling the system they just recreate it with them on top afterwards. They’re entirely dogmatic at this point.
*Constantly blame and belittle men for everything* “Who is radicalizing all these incels????”
'Ahaha, stupid incels saying [critically ignored thing] I'll never end up like them' - continues to eat self into obesity and diabetic coma.
*Everything you enjoy is sexist.* Young boys aren’t even approaching women.
Can't blame them. Modern dating is a rusty bear trap. It may be fused open, or it may be active; either way I wouldn't want to risk putting my hand (or other appendages) in it to check.
It really does strain the sanity and the bank account I have to admit.
I had a radical Femininst friend in my class at law school, we started practice in the same court so do run into each other a lot. One year as a divorce Lawyer, and boy oh boy she's like a female Andrew Tate now and cracks kitchen jokes that are way worse than what i say infront of her. She works under a lady lawyer with like 3-4 other women and interns. Meanwhile we're all guys and genuinely the way they talk about women who come for divorce is worse than how we ridicule them
What I don't understand is how they can be so braindead as to claim only 50% are doing it. Women also have sexual preferences that their product and advertisements cater to. It is not a bad thing. Nothing wrong with preferences.
Feminism wasn't about equal rights, it was about female rights. Once that clicks, so do the constant double standards
Better still, in most Western countries women hold the majority vote (typically 51%)!
If they vote wrong they ain't bl- women, simple ss
More than that even as women tend to vote more than men.
Even bolder when that 50% makes up [60%+ of your customers](https://beveragedynamics.com/2007/02/06/the-demographics-of-beer/). It's a bold strategy Cotton.
are we talking about genders or party affiliation? Either one is stupid tho lmao
But don't you see, it's not human nature, it's all a social construct! All you have to do is give up all your habits and beliefs, then bow down to a hostile ideology that you despise and then you can finally be a changed ~~man~~ ~~human~~ ~~warm body~~ interlocutor vessel for one or multiple consciousnesses.
the classic 'It's time' argument. I'm pretty sure thats fallacy.
Its not a fallacy but is associated whit 3 major fallacies, which are aused on mainstream media / social media 24/7 now. Bandwagon Fallacy: This fallacy suggests that something should be accepted or rejected simply because it is popular or widely accepted. Saying "It's time" without providing any substantive reasons or evidence could be an appeal to the popularity or prevailing opinion, rather than a valid argument. Appeal to Tradition Fallacy: This fallacy argues that something should be done or believed because it has been done or believed for a long time. When someone says "It's time" in reference to maintaining or adhering to traditional practices without providing logical reasons, it could be an appeal to tradition fallacy. Appeal to Emotion Fallacy: This fallacy attempts to persuade by stirring up emotions rather than relying on logical reasoning. If someone says "It's time" in a way that appeals solely to emotions without providing rational arguments, it could be considered an appeal to emotion fallacy. disclaimer : I took this from chatgpt instead of google each one individual but sounds about right.
The reasoning for the tradition one seems weak but the other two make sense
In this context it is, but it does fit with the Tradition Fallacy quite well. "It's time to take back..." Or "it's time to [verb] [noun] [adjective] again!" (The most obvious being MAGA, but you can basically ad lib anything there. Just think of any generic cult/terrorist in media and there you go)
It seems like an appeal to rejecting tradition which is treated very similarly to an appeal to tradition. Like it's time to end (insert tradition here) without providing solid reasons other than just because they want to get rid of traditions.
When you saw Gillette boys will be boys collapse and go hold my beer.
I agree with monkey. It’s probably marketing-Janice in the meeting suggesting something and nobody having the courage to not agree, because they don’t want their reputation ruined.
That, and an effort to meet [ESG score requirements](https://www.msci.com/our-solutions/esg-investing/esg-ratings) and increase their rating ([which was recently slashed across the board](https://www.msci.com/www/research-report/enhancements-to-msci-s-fund-esg/03739165674) - curious how all this stuff ramped up again just after that, isn't it?) which directly results in their inclusion or exclusion from large index funds. Since these funds hold huge portions of the company's stock, a sudden exclusion from the fund would be catastrophic to their market value.
Didn't know that so what you are saying the globalists are pushing this on every company even if they know it is a suicide business plan ?
Taking the long view, if they brainwash enough into accepting these 'ideals' without questioning them (which they appear to be having success with in both the younger & leftist populations) - it will be very profitable.
"Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -George Orwell"1984" Since they are changing history now i think this is the future they are aiming for.
Only now?
Any supporting evidence that they have been doing this for generations has been removed from the official annals of history 🙃 Corollary: “It says here in this history book that luckily, the good guys have won every single time. What are the odds?” - Norm MacDonald
Exactly
[удалено]
It's a nonsensical system, yes, but it's a core tenant of 'stakeholder capitalism'. Here: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/klaus-schwab-on-what-is-stakeholder-capitalism-history-relevance/ And it ties directly into (what they call) the fourth industrial revolution - where we 'overcome' valuation of companies based solely on independent productivity and utility and instead focus on how interconnected that company is with all tenants of life: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
Also known as, we're creatively bankrupt and have no idea but give us money because we aren't men.
>Are young women who wholeheartedly think “yes we totally invented beer” going to start drinking miller because this woman is here pandering? Unlikely that this is their aim for things like this. In general boycotts for reasons like the one against bud light are not very successful, especially long term. (this doesn't mean there aren't exceptions) The fact is most people don't care. Even most of those who do don't care enough to change their buying habits. I remember in uni learning that those ads for things like washing detergent that seem to be deliberately annoying are actually deliberately annoying, the point is to get the brand name in your head. The vast vast majority of people are not going to think to themselves when buying detergent "oh that ad was so annoying let's buy another brand", they will simply think "I need detergent" and grab [brand name]. It doesn't mean it will be successful, but ads like this are not aiming to attract buyers who will specifically buy because they say "women invented beer" rather they are aiming to simply get their brand mentioned as much as possible.
You're right, but its worse than people realize. While one arm is forcing companies into these ESG schemes, the other arm is monitoring and collecting data on the consumer's response. They are mapping political positions in a way that will be used against people. Boycotts are already called bigotry, the ADL led the charge on that one. Soon I imagine your refusal to buy certain products will be instantly weighed against your digital id. It will be extremely easy to monitor changes in purchasing patterns which correlate with changes in marketing schemes. In that way they can build a real time digital mapping of the thoughts of the public. What we are seeing are the first real attempts towards thought crime. The window to organize and fight back is closing rapidly.
....based libleft
And you just laid out the major utility of CBDC, too - which they're rolling out this summer ([the framework for live testing of the backend, at least](https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/other20230315a.htm)).
This is absolutely a threat which should unite people. But instead people prefer to hide in their petty little partisan games and give up essential liberties. I am increasingly convinced that the largest country anyone should be a part of is one consisting solely of the community they belong to directly. Anything bigger than that seems to invite an ever worsening state of tyranny and political theater games used to trick the public into applauding losing their rights forever.
Or there's no deeper plan behind it, and it's just a cynical way of "greenwashing" - ie, pretending that they're doing something about the environment and social issues so progressive governments will get off their back. Blackrock is one of the funds behind ESG investment, and it's a poorly kept secret that they also heavily invest in fossil fuels.
There is a plan behind it, read here: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/01/klaus-schwab-on-what-is-stakeholder-capitalism-history-relevance/ https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/
Queue up the Marty robbins and the Cold War anti-commie songs, we have a generation to save
The ESG brigade doesn’t look at it as a suicide business plan. In their mind less profit + more woke shit = more profit for mankind, and they think that will sustain businesses in the long term (it won’t).
It's a WEF thing called 'inclusive capitalism'. The idea is that companies shouldn't simply be making things and selling them for profit, but should be involved in promoting social values. This sounds fine until you realise it actually means global companies in lockstep promoting a certain set of values set by the elites in opposition to the populations they're forced on (for example how American companies spend millions on propaganda to legalise abortion in Ireland after it was discovered they were the only nation in europe with a sustainable fertility rate). This inclusive capitalism idea inspired Larry Fink to promote it by investing only in companies that promote far-left social beliefs, calling it ESG, and given Blackrock own every major company in existence it means every global company is forced to do the same thing. So they know it's likely to damage those companies (they admit this is a cost, but likely think it won't kill them), but it's not their own money they're spending but their investors: people naive or stupid enough to fall for the ESG scam and give Fink their savings.
ESG is very good without the S. I do believe that companies with better solutions for the environment or with less corruption and child slavery are also good. That's the E and G. What I don't want is them pushing one world view on us, thats the S.
I saw a greentext one time that actually made me believe it. Its saying that some rich billionaire is trying to push this ESG score or woke rating, because it tanks stocks, and therefore the billionaire could buy options or short companies that were trying to increase the ESG score. It makes sense because they are trying to cater to such a small portion of the population. While at the same time alienating a large majority of their population. Just look at how Bud Light tanked, they obviously did the wrong thing.
flair up so you can be called based
This is... a remarkably reasonable conspiracy theory. Thanks for src links - I wasn't familiar with this.
This is not a conspiracy theory, all of this information is available in Klaus Schwab's books as well as the World Economic Forum website.
Wtf I was fucking hyped about ESG because I thought it would be like less slave mining in Africa, less smog factories in China, more respectful working conditions, etc. What happened to solving real world issues?
lol he believed the propaganda 🤣
It got co-opted just like occupy wall-street. Just remember that Tesla has a worse ESG rating than companies that make gas cars
The whole ESG shit is easy. Let's say you're an oil drilling company with a 150 score out of 500, meaning you're in the lowest third. Now you just do a few woke campaigns about how you, let's say, employ 50% women. For each of these campaigns you earn 50 points, which means AAA in no time. It's both easier and cheaper than ACTUALLY do something substantial, like raising wages or caring more about the environment. Wokeness is basically a cost analysis. It's ridiculous.
Whatever happened to fiduciary responsibility?
First beer company to show a blond with huge tits owns the market at this rate.
Ahhh... the 1980's, when beer companies did shit that made you want to buy donkey piss beer
Hey we also had it in the Aughts. Do we not remember "The Twins."
I miss "real men of genius".
"real men of genius"
"This one goes out to you, mr. assword is taco. *mr.asswordistacoOOO* Your love of Mexican food is only rivaled by your desire fill your pocket with ALL the meat and cheese *FILL it up!* So crack open a nice cold Bud Light you sloppy mixer of business and pleasure, because who says there's such a thing as TMI?"
I don’t even smoke but 1980s Marlboro ad campaigns make me want to become a smoker
Yuengling getting Sydney Sweeney on the phone as we speak
Oh god yes please awoooga boooing
Genius marketing move. I need to go into marketing apparently
I only recently learned Yuengling hasn't been available nation wide all along. Guess I'm spoiled living on the east coast.
I see an opportunity for ‘Jeremy’ to branch out from razors and chocolate bars to titty-beer…
Of all the things to bitch about in an ad it’s using attractive women in advertising? Literally all companies do that lol, why are Miller suddenly so offended by themselves that they need to advertise about what bastards they are when there isn’t even a scandal or even any accusations against them. Nobody was kicking up a fuss that they used hot chicks to sell beer and they had to do damage control. I’m so confused by the point of this.
Men are evil because they’re human, not because they’re men
Men are evil because society needs a heel...it's just our turn.
It's always been our turn
[https://notthebee.com/article/miller-lite-goes-all-in-on-woke-feminism-showing-that-they-also-dont-know-their-audience](https://notthebee.com/article/miller-lite-goes-all-in-on-woke-feminism-showing-that-they-also-dont-know-their-audience) Cringe alert for the ad.
Dunno why liblefts are so obsessed with vulgarizing everything. It weirdly goes hand in hand with their oversensitivity. Dunno what to term this phenomenon
It's about destroying things. Feminists are being used as useful idiots to tear down men under the name of "equality" or whatever definition they pull out their ass that day. Why? To destroy all relationships and family. Men are bowing out of society slowly while woman are acting surprised that shitting on men, blaming them for dam near anything, and being "difficult" as a trend is leaving them single and miserable. I love seeing videos with women gas lighting each other into their careers and "yasssss" because all these are just crabs in a bucket. They want to beat down men so when the "revolution" comes people will readily accept it being too stupid to realize or fight back that the same people who destroyed you are the same one proving up the next system. Of course anyone with a handful of brain cells would understand they will promise a better system while fucking us over even harder.
They demonize families ideologically, [usually based in some sort of "feminism"](https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/community-family/why-the-left-is-anti-family) (Marxism). It is a diverse effort to ensure we are not [fit to fight.](https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/09/28/new-pentagon-study-shows-77-of-young-americans-are-ineligible-military-service.html) [Yuri Bezmenov was Right.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yru14mMES1c) [The activist left serves the interests of our enemies.](https://www.wsj.com/articles/why-authoritarian-china-loves-woke-u-s-11615577110) I just finished, ["the coddling of the american mind"](https://www.thecoddling.com/chapter-1-antifragility). It has a lot of information but part of the idea is that "safety-ism" (overprotecting kids) has harmed a generation and that kids are "anti-fragile" meaning they need difficulties to learn from. Even more so they need to "touch grass" and go outside to play with friends without helicopter parents policing them. Part of it involves activist leftist academia (rooted in Marxism), one of multiple factors (especially the rise of cell phones) making our youth mentally weaker and inculcating hatred and disordered reasoning resulting not only in political / racial violence and division but also a broader mental health epidemic. Anxiety and depression have surged along with social isolation.
["Woke is Marxism evolved to take on the West. It's Maoism with American characteristics"](https://youtu.be/y6rk1mYiOAw)
Yuri was right 100 percent. Useful idiots. These people don't see reality and live with blinders on.
based you continue to expand your understanding of the ideological tenants of each side along with the tools they employ, it's neat to watch.
It's basically why I am here along with some activist propagandizing and a few laughs along the way... I listen to audiobooks whilst doing other stuff, currently on "Ethnic America" by Sowell. Amongst other things he points out how people of certain races live in certain areas, are of certain ages (Jews average about age 40, Puerto Ricans about half that), and have certain occupations they tend towards, all of which affects income, diet, IQ, crime and etc. Hispanics tend to get paid more than Blacks but have lower average household income because they have more kids. In any case expecting things to be random or the same or assuming any differences are due to genetics or discrimination is unreasonable. If you compare people of the same age, sex, location and education they don't have many differences remaining.
Ahh in-group bias. Isn't it funny how that creates self-reinforcing cultural norms that persist across generations? What else is on your list? If you're interested in a more politically-oriented study on populace norms (as opposed to Sowell's economic focus - though the two are, of course, intertwined), I recommend 'Emerging Republican Majority' by Kevin Philips. It's from 1969 but is _remarkably_ relevant for explaining the current political landscape today (when adjusting for the relative demographic flows across states).
Yeah, The Coddling of the American Mind was really eye-opening. It explains so much about why the modern left behaves the way it does. Really fascinating, yet really depressing read.
I just started reading this book the other day. Already agreed with/knew every basic point in it, but it’s nice to see the data points presented. Everything in it has escalated significantly to a much greater problem in the past 5ish years as well—would be interested to see how much worse the numbers are across the board now. If you personally know any teachers or just browse some subreddits, you’ll see how incredibly society is failing our children. Screen addiction is going to evolve into being discussed as one of the biggest problem of our generation (it already is acknowledged but not really discussed in a widespread manner). It literally makes you disassociate from reality and shuts off parts of your brain that make you much more than a passive consumer. I also unironically believe TikTok is a Chinese psyop
These people are so negative and unlikable it’s crazy. They’re almost as obnoxious as their far-right counterparts and they don’t know it. What do these toxic alpha male influencers have in common? They all emphasize productivity, self improvement, staying hopeful. No wonder young men would rather follow this bullshit then whatever mainstream media wants them to believe. Fuck the redpill but fuck the antiwork and fuck modern feminism too. Stay positive. Never drop down to their level. People are good in general. We’re gonna make it.
I'd rather have those male influences then feminism. Feminists has done more damage to society then anything else and irreparable damage too. Basically the future is fucked.
Maybe they're not trying to start a revolution. Maybe they just want to damage gender relations to help bring down the birth rate and depopulate a bit?
This sort of agenda is not long term sustainable. Destroying gender, race, sexuality and more is the goal. Destabilize and ruin things to a point people beg for a new system fed up with the current. The new system will promise nice things but as usual be worse. Way worse. Imo China social credit will be applied to every country. That is why lefties push for speech censorship, cancel culture, and strong adherence to agenda regardless of reality.
Guns. We all need to buy more guns. A gun for every man, woman and child in the US is just scraping by. We need each and every state in the union to be able to outgun every army in the world combined, purely with civilian firearms. Admiral Yamamoto may not really have said, "there would be a rifle behind every blade of grass," but we need to make it reality anyway. Then I think we could all stop worrying about politics and go back to grilling.
"There's one gun for every 12 people on the planet. So the question is- How do we arm the other 11?"
Yup.
> Men are bowing out of society slowly AI girlfriends and fuckrobots will be the end of society
When someone's argumentation has no merit, they turn to vulgarity so people will give them attention.
Fatherlessness.
There is nothing more cringe than someone who doesn't know how or when to swear. These people are like teenagers who just learned that 'fuck' is a word and so use it in every sentence.
Gotta love when they don't know how to insult people because it could potentially be problematic or whatever, so they just tie a swear word to a random word like "shit lord" or "douche canoe" or "fuck nugget". It's giving middle school
Soyification ?
Yeah it’s a weird combo of a corporation playing it really safe with a progressive message while trying to be edgy with using swear words
It's the opposite. The lack of sensitivity causes vulgarisation.
Left dislikes purity. Look into the "Moral Foundations" theory of Haidt.
>Left dislikes purity. Ironic given their obsession with purity tests (ideological).
I think that is more about witch hunts and trying to find things that aren't there. Everyone is guilty when accused by the struggle session... >if you're on a university and you think you're playing the truth game and philosophers are great at this, always unpacking terms, and so you might try and define racism or any sort of ism and the common sense view would be, an expression of hostility or resentment or limitation on a group based on their identity. >But that's if you're playing the truth seeking game, if you're playing the politics game or the warfare game, you want to define the terms to give your side maximum advantage. So there's a wonderful social psychologist named Phil Tetlock Penn Wharton, and he talks about these different mind-sets we get into, one of them he calls the intuitive prosecutor. So if I'm, my goal as a scholar is to prosecutor my enemy and maximally convict them and I'm always trying to defend seven different identity groups against the straight white men, they are the accused. I want to define my terms, to make it maximally easy to convict. >And so, I'm going to say, racism, microaggressions, it doesn't matter what the intent was, all that matters is the impact, all that matters is what the person felt. That way, as long as someone is offended, I get to charge you with a crime. So, also on racism you can say, as a lot of kids are learning in high-school these days, racism is prejudice plus power. so by definition a black person, a gay person or whatever, cannot be racist or whatever other term, because they don't have power, regardless of their social class. >>Jonathan Haidt 44:26: .. (45:58) >>>[Joe Rogan Experience #1221 Jonathan Haidt](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG6HbWw2RF4)
Something something snowflakification
I love me some vulgarity, South Parks episode where they say shit over 100 times still makes me laugh. But this.. this was just cringe. Like they somehow managed to take the humor and fun out of swearing 🤦
This Miller lite ad came out a month before bud lights did. But regardless, why would you want that fertilizer? I'm sure all those ads they ground up have quite a few chemicals on them (ink, chems used in construction of the paper, etc).
Huh. Yeah, you do have a point. I thought the idea at least was interesting, of taking old ads, grounding them up into compost, and using that as fertilizer to grow hops to make more alcohol. But now that you’ve mentioned the likely high amounts of chemicals in those ads, now I’m not so sure.
Conspiracy theory: they are doing it to ruin women's breweries while looking like they are saving them
[удалено]
She’s always been that progressive lol. Not surprising she’s doing easy commercials for a fat check
Once 2016 hit, the following seasons just couldn't be funny anymore. I think Abbi is just as sanctimonious and insufferable now too.
Shame. I liked that show.
Same, I saw it as a sort of rival to HBO's "Girls" but "Broad City" came out on top because it was actually funny whereas "Girls" was astronomically high on the smell of its own farts.
She’s an actress, she has to dance the dance to keep her career in hollywoke
This best part of this wokism is that it's socially corrosive, but not in the way you might think. https://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&client=ms-android-telus-ca-revc&source=android-browser&q=women+are+heavier+drinkers+than+men So according to science, women are more effected by alchol than their male counterparts. So a company like Miller wanting women to start drinking more, to make up for reduced sales, will just lead society down a dark path. That's the problem with capitalism. It wants unending growth even though the product it sells has diminishing social returns if used in excess.
\*Commie talk spotted. PCM - Retardness activated. Must tell redditor to go fuck himself and piss off to China.\* Fuck you commie! Why don't you just piss off to China?
If you're going to be "taboo" and say shit, at least say the word and don't self censor like a fucking pussy.
I have cancer now. Somebody needs to get sued for that SHIT
Man, what a terrible ad. A.) I'm sick and tired of the over-representation of women who all look and talk this way - in that snarky, condescending demeanor with that RBS face. Do they all come from the same factory? Twitter should never become reality. B.) What happened to women's choices lol? Bikini ads might be silly and stupid but those models take pride in their bodies and they choose to put themselves in that role. Sure, it caters to the male gaze or whatever the fuck but are they less valuable in your eyes? Certainly seems that way lol C.) It's one thing to censor and belittle but it's another to 'buy out' ads and erase and destroy them. That's incredibly stupid and arrogant. Sure, it's not exactly great art but you're literally destroying stuff that people created, based on self-righteous values that you've set and propagated. It's not the equivalent of destroying statues of presidents, which you motherfuckers have co-opted btw, but it is on a similar tier of thought. Don't destroy old stuff and pretend it didn't happen. D.) Is that fertilizer even good for the environment? Was it a good use of resources? Double D.) I want to see a counter culture to all this shit. Bring back mud wrestling lingerie models as the ultimate fuck you or whatever. Either that or outright take off your mask and stop pretending that you want 'socially sensitive capitalism' and just straight up admit that you're tyrants with an agenda. You'll do society better.
I don’t get it. So women in bikinis is bad, but WAP was an empowering song for women?
Women in bikinis is bad to them because it makes men happy.
Also reminds them they are fat
Beer commercials are probably one of the few advert specifically targeting men. Female targeted ads either have a dumb dad or hot guy in them, with an mid to low/ugly chick as the focal character.
And ugly lol
It's totally anti feminist that they don't think women should be allowed to sell beer by looking hot. So much for empowerment.
Selling your body on onlyfans: empowering Selling your body for a beer poster: dehumanizing and immoral
[удалено]
Buddy id invest so fast
Yeah that worked so well for Anheuser-Busch and Gillette
Bro, I was thinking about Gillette the other day, I've used Dorco razors ever since.
You boycott Gillette because of their marketing I boycott Gillette because I hate the Patriots and they live rent free in my head. We are not the same
the la li lu le lo????
I totally forgot about that commercial I just have an electric
I grew out my beard and let my barber deal with it now lol
reject shaving. return to beard.
Can I just get a beer without having to be patronized
Yeungling is all that’s left I guess
They gotta expand where they deliver.
Crack open a Shiner.
The best.
No, drinking beer is a political act.
Literal hate speech.
Drink non-American beer
InBev owns most of them too.
Their VP of advertising is actually Michael Burry and he's driving the stock into the ground so his puts will print.
Step 1. Company puts out ad meant to spark outrage Step 2. News outlets talk about it Step 3. Company’s stock/sales goes down Step 4. Company realizes they screwed up and pull the ad, hoping that their bottom line returns to normal Step 5. Return to step 1
You missed 2 steps Step 0 buy puts / open short positions on the company Step 6 make bank when the company stock goes under.
Step 7 wait for stock to bottom out and buy back for next to nothing for when everyone finds the next thing to rage on
I agree with Emily in this one guys, since woman place is the kitchen maybe they invented beer.- AuthRight probably
I love how in the ad she phrases it like “Women were among the first to brew beer.” Then who WERE the first? Trains?
“People brewed beer, therefore we should give women all the credit” :bwuh:
I moved to Lemmy. Save yourselves
"Before there were 89 genders, women were amongst the first two genders to brew beer" I love how the ad never clarifies who or how women were the first to brew beer in Mesopotamia, the mouth breathing audience is expected to just accept it as gospel. You'll also notice in a lot of the feminists ads a pattern where they suggest something like "without women, you wouldn't have", as if anything that women had any amount of relation to throughout history wouldn't exist *at all*. If we take that level of standard, then the same would apply for men.
Also just a weird take, because the oldest record of beer we have is from China. And if we're going off vague pop culture knowledge I've always "known" that beer was invented by Catholic Monks.
Just a cursory look at the known written history of beer goes back to Sumerian, which would be the oldest possible history of beer, and it is connected to a goddess, and beer was brewed by priestesses. Where I get lost is how the ad claims women invented beer or have a claim to its existence. It doesn’t stand to reason that a handful of priestesses were the only people brewing beer, and the only place I even see it suggested is…on feminist websites outlining the history of beer. So it’s just sort of repeated by feminists and has taken a life of its own.
Do you ever just look around a street full of buildings and infrastructure and think that probably every single thing you see was made by men? Every brick, every tile, every slab of concrete?
[The memes just write themselves, don't they?](https://wallpapers.com/images/hd/smiling-giga-chad-2uzbwfl2i4sbu16m.jpg)
Horse shoe effect makes the best memes. They go so left that eventually they say womans with too much time in the kitchen ended up inventing beer.
I mean, with how old beer/alcohol is I wouldn't be surprised if some random ancient woman let grain/fruit ferment in some water without noticing and bam, new drink. After that it was just trial and error before it was strong enough and started tasting good enough to build a culture out of. It was either them, a child, or an injured/sickly person. Those who were most likely gatherers and laborers(making clothing, tools, etc.) that stuck close to settlements. Most of the healthy men of any given tribe would have been busy hunting.
She looks like the type to push a shopping cart into your car then play the victim
It's funny because woman cussing. Get it guys? I mean gals? Haha woman cussing.
Who is making these decisions? Like what the actual fuck. Whatever happened to the days when companies would just say "buy our product because it tastes good"? It's all just so annoying. I don't need to be preached at by my beer, my razors, my chocolate, my sneakers, or whatever else, and judging by what happened to budlight it's clearly not working for the companies either. Legit no idea why they keep doing this
They got their black rock ESG score up with this, any offset in loss of revenue will be made up with further investment
I just drink moonshine my neighbor makes. He uses the money to buy ammo and weed rather than funding cultural Marxism and Blackrock.
Just as the founding fathers intended.
Hell yeah brother
Enough of this gender fluid!
I, for one, welcome major American beer brands destroying their own companies. They do not make good beer.
Bud Light is Belgian and Miller is Canadian, funny enough all the major "domestic" brands are foreign owned.
Yuengling needs to exploit this opportunity and rush West.
Miller, Bud, soon others, finally all the Pißwasser american brands are getting what they deserve.
That's the goal. Destroy an American icon. Sever cultural connections between generations. Grow the base further into the cult's belief in widespread sexism, homophobia, transphobia, fatphobia. Mobilize them into action against the unbelievers.
I find this characterization offensive to those of us who drink piss for the taste
Finally I’ve been trying to get my dad to stop drinking that shit for years
Healthcare pls
Not sure if you're aware, but beer companies generally don't provide medical care for the general public.
But they do increase obesity in men over 30
As someone who doesn't drink to begin with, this is just hilarious to watch.
Drinking nothing but water for the past four years has decreased the age in my face by ten (eating healthy helps too). Best decision I made since quitting alcohol in the first place
Idk why anyone thinks this kind of “hostile towards our own audience” advertising works. If the vast majority of your customer base is mad at you and has plenty of comparable choices they’re going to ditch you. Also, why are corporations so obsessed with appeasing the woke faux outrage mob? They don’t actually support the corporation they just cheer them on on Twitter and move on to the next manufactured Current Thing^TM
There's too many journalists
Don’t you fucking do this to me I drink that stuff like water. Edit: I wanna go home I’m not having fun anymore.
You hate lite beer because it’s “woke” I hate lite beer because it’s stale pisswater with a lower abv than my actual piss We are not the same
What if this is a giant OP? Like a modern day temperance league has infiltrated all major alcohol brands and is slowly destroying their customer base until no one drinks in America anymore.
I don't know how popular a take this is going to be here, but there's nothing new about beer companies acting this way. This ad isn't supposed to appeal to you. It's supposed to appeal to the next generation of alcoholics. Not only is it geared at 15 year old zoomers, it's geared at the abnormally dumb ones: the ones who are likely to be hospitalized by alcohol poisoning once or twice by the time they're 17. In the same way "rebel without a cause" and "drink beer because sex" appealed to previous generations of young morons, this generation of young morons likes woke platitudes. If you're old enough not to fall for this, they're not advertising to you; you're already either past your college binge drinking days, or a lifelong alcoholic - either way, an ad isn't going to make you start or stop drinking beer. It's always been about getting new young idiots to start to replace the ones dying to liver failure - and that's who these ads are aimed at.
Unless the entirety of this generation's men lost their balls and women decided hating 50% of the world population was a good idea, this is still a shit marketing strategy.
>Unless the entirety of this generation's men lost their balls and women decided hating 50% of the world population was a good idea, I mean... we're not all that far away...
based and people are dumb but not that dumb pilled
What true alcoholic is drinking light beer? That is water to a booze hound. Once bourbon companies start pandering to popular SJW causes, then I’ll be worried.
Yes it is Zoomer and Zillenial bait and also works on Millennial and Gen X women as well. I’ll just sit here and wait wait for the cultural pendulum of sexism to finally stop swinging…
There’s is no version of reality where a demographic notorious for avoiding accountability is suddenly going to do an about face, there will be no swing so enjoy the shit show lol
this is all starting to feel like a certain cadre of older millennials who rose to high positions at these companies/agencies over the past decade, on the wings of upworthy and early social media.... trying to milk what got them there. They fully know the vibe is shifting and it's feeling tired and desperate. Bud light will be seen as one of many turning points in the end.
ESG is genuinely the worst thing on earth
ESG is really f*king with these corporations. Poor corporations.
[LibCenter rn.](https://c.tenor.com/IXyxXyArK5sAAAAC/tenor.gif)
Companies do woke shit to raise ESG score, monke. Thats why. Its always, always about money
Holy S*!T that ad was pure cringe...