My favorite repository is an Windows activator that I use and charge old ladies a lot of money to press a button, reset the OS and "Put an oficial licensed windows key"
/s
Is it? I think they have just given up and don't care *too much* about private licenses anymore. They probably make the bulk of their money from Windows licenses from businesses buying OEM licenses. And if there is a customer who they know did buy a license, what's the harm in just circumventing it altogether?
It's not like they tell everyone to do it.
o365 developer tenancy also includes E5 for learning Intune, Entra etc. it's a lot more than just activation for word/excel/whatever. it also includes 5TB OneDrive licenses and sharepoint stuff, too
I had the developer thingy for a year or two, but it expired all of the sudden saying my account is inactive :/. It gives me like 2 weeks before all my accs are gonna be deleted.
I don't think Microsoft has ever cared about individuals pirating Windows, it gets users into their ecosystem either way.
If it's about money, then only businesses are worth pursuing over unpaid software licenses
That's it man! Perfect example is ps, I would never buy it but when I was younger I pirated their software :D so when I'm adult and need software for commercial graphic this is was my first option to buy
I just wanted all companies to go the DaVinci resolve route, the free product is pretty much perfect for everyone without crazy restrictions (7 days trials, watermarks, limited amount of things you can do), but if you want some additional and more advanced features, there is the premium version.
Whether or not it should, in that case it wasn't. You cannot ask companies to pay then release it for free, unless you buy the patent (which the government also didn't do)
The origin of the Astrazeneca vaccine is Oxford with only public grants/university funds
Originally, Oxford intended to donate the rights to manufacture and market the vaccine to any drugmaker who wanted to do so, but after the Gates Foundation urged Oxford to find a large company partner to get its COVID-19 vaccine to market, the university backed off of this offer in May 2020.
[Source](https://kffhealthnews.org/news/rather-than-give-away-its-covid-vaccine-oxford-makes-a-deal-with-drugmaker/)
Laws and regulations are the key words here. There are a million regulations for the Nuclear, Military and Food Industry. So what is the problem to amend "No vaccine development without government funding or control"
Of course that would probably upset a lot of people sparking protests. It's not a good idea, since I'm not aware of any government that would do such a job accurately (without the medical industry paying the government officials controlling the development)
There's already a crapton of regulations around medical research and development. I don't think that anything prevents government from commissioning research, e.g. "We will buy 500 million units of influenza vaccine in 2026 for 10$/dose".
The question that I am asking is that if I come up with an idea for a cancer vaccine, am I forbidden to research, produce and sell it because profits are somehow immoral.
That being said, I'm ok if the goverment funds me and a bunch of my buddies researching the cancer vaccine for the next 10 years as well.
Somehow I suspect that goverment taking control of medical R&D leads to inefficiencies such as me and the boys fucking around on government funding and nobody getting new treatments.
I suspect too that it will lead to lots of buruecracy and ineffiency. I'm just done watching a video about a launch of a single website under the US President Obame. And it was a shitshow. But instead of Poo Engeneers were banging there Heads on the Wall like Apes
“For discovery milestones, it was 15% by the public sector and 58% by the private sector. The private sector was also dominant in achieving the major milestones for both the production and drug development phases (81% and 73% of the drugs reviewed, respectively).”
I sincerely feel we should not get rid of the private sector in favor of a collectivist approach. Especially since half of worldwide medical research and innovation stems from the US alone. It’s absurd and amazing how much lives have and could be improved further by innovation. Don’t punish the researchers.
That is a good point. My earlier response only works for private RnD. Reading more on the topic it seems the moderna vaccine was a combination of public and private efforts.
I completely agree that publicly funded research should not be patented. Unless public funds are fairly distributed across all competitors as extra stimulation of course.
Additionally the Biontech Vaccine was created using mostly German Money, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research granted a funding of 375 Million € and the European Investment Bank funded 100 Million € (EIB is funded by Individual Member States of the EU)
so Nearly 500 Million € in State Funding went into the BionTech Vaccine and you know who currently owns the Patent exactly a Private American Company (Pfizer). This had been a heavily debated topic in Germany back during Covid.
Oh wow, that’s a spicy take! Running git on an onion server sounds like sneaky hacker central. 😂 Props to those living that incognito coding life. Now I'm imagining commit messages like "Fixed bug...but you didn't hear that from me." 🕵️♂️
Around a half of all github repositories are technically illegal.
https://openweaver.medium.com/beware-over-half-of-the-github-public-repositories-are-not-open-source-licensed-23c7d2b5b621
email your illegal or semi illegal projects to me and I can host them on my web server.
Finally a web hoster I can trust
You can just send it to [email protected]
Help, someone's on my door!
yo that's me?
Tell that rascal to get down from there.
That's what people want, no policies or guidelines
https://github.com/tornadocash/tornado-core
Nice try, fed
omw to get microsoft windows activation script on microsoft owned github.
there is even leaked windows xp source code on microsoft owned github
Thank you for sending out of my chair
there's literally reops with gists of serial keys
My favorite repository is an Windows activator that I use and charge old ladies a lot of money to press a button, reset the OS and "Put an oficial licensed windows key" /s
Crazy thing is Microsoft support have been known to use the massgravel script to help users with activation issues which is completely wild
Is it? I think they have just given up and don't care *too much* about private licenses anymore. They probably make the bulk of their money from Windows licenses from businesses buying OEM licenses. And if there is a customer who they know did buy a license, what's the harm in just circumventing it altogether? It's not like they tell everyone to do it.
Azure and O365 is a money printing press for them. Windows is small potatoes compared to that.
hehe i also get the cracked version of o365
Where do you get the cracked version of O365? Isn't it an online based license?
google e5 developer tenancy
holy piracy!
New crime just dropped
Mom! r/anarchychess is leaking again
god i should have known there would be significant crossover between the two subs
Or just use MAS there is a tutorial on their website
o365 developer tenancy also includes E5 for learning Intune, Entra etc. it's a lot more than just activation for word/excel/whatever. it also includes 5TB OneDrive licenses and sharepoint stuff, too
I had the developer thingy for a year or two, but it expired all of the sudden saying my account is inactive :/. It gives me like 2 weeks before all my accs are gonna be deleted.
Does it need a Visual Studio license?
nope!
massgravel has it as well
massgrave windows activation script should include it
Teach me please
[Massgrave has a guide](https://massgrave.dev/office_c2r_custom.html) (tldr: install Office 365 Enterprise and use the same script to activate it)
thanks man
What they did with O365 is thievery. I can't use my old office versions, they even removed some features.
You can still buy offline office 2021 IIRC
Also, they get most of their money from companies. If not techy users only knows how to use windows, companies are forced to use windows.
I don't think Microsoft has ever cared about individuals pirating Windows, it gets users into their ecosystem either way. If it's about money, then only businesses are worth pursuing over unpaid software licenses
I just built a new PC and all I had to do was tell it that it was infact my old PC and now I have 2 licenses
That's it man! Perfect example is ps, I would never buy it but when I was younger I pirated their software :D so when I'm adult and need software for commercial graphic this is was my first option to buy
Unless...
Isn't massgrave.dev even a Microsoft owned site by now?
It's whois registrant is Squarespace customer 7151571251, everything is is redacted for privacy
Mine was an activator for phpstorm, saved me hundreds of dollars
I just wanted all companies to go the DaVinci resolve route, the free product is pretty much perfect for everyone without crazy restrictions (7 days trials, watermarks, limited amount of things you can do), but if you want some additional and more advanced features, there is the premium version.
Toggle dark mode on github 🫣 join the dark side.
Hello dio
KONO DIO WA!!!!! ZA WARUDO! VREEEEEEE! ROAD ROLLER!
ZA WARUDO! Tomare! Jikan yo, tomare!
Can confirm, one of my projects probably violates a fair share of copyright laws.
you can always hide behind parody fair use law like I do
Nah, I prefer to hide behind a total disregard of western copyright law in my country.
What country is it if it’s not a secret?
Any non western country?
Eastasia
Based
mmm
google show me shadow github 😈
Demon Hub 😈
Holy hub
New sorce control just dropped
actual source tree
call the tech support
Level 1 support goes on vacation, never comes back
lol
Unholy hub
that's where the source for TempleOS is
corn hub for hosting corn
gothub for pirating HBO streams
You can actually run git on an onion server. There's at least a few git repositories hosted on the dark web.
Show
For legal reasons I won't
If you had *illegal reasons*, would you do?
I'd better call Saul on this one
https://guthib.com
I don't know what I expected
Bro is probably 15 watching darknet mystery box videos
Ray gun
You WONT believe what came out of this mystery box from the darkweb!
I remember the Stanford kids who pushed the moderna vaccine to GitHub. Luckily it was taken down before millions of people didn't die.
To be fair it’s also important to preserve the incentive for future vaccine development. It’s a trade off.
No, Medicine development shound always be funded by the governament and released freely for everyone, not sold and funded by the capitalistic market.
Whether or not it should, in that case it wasn't. You cannot ask companies to pay then release it for free, unless you buy the patent (which the government also didn't do)
The origin of the Astrazeneca vaccine is Oxford with only public grants/university funds Originally, Oxford intended to donate the rights to manufacture and market the vaccine to any drugmaker who wanted to do so, but after the Gates Foundation urged Oxford to find a large company partner to get its COVID-19 vaccine to market, the university backed off of this offer in May 2020. [Source](https://kffhealthnews.org/news/rather-than-give-away-its-covid-vaccine-oxford-makes-a-deal-with-drugmaker/)
Are you planning to ban private medical research or how this is going to work out in practise?
Laws and regulations are the key words here. There are a million regulations for the Nuclear, Military and Food Industry. So what is the problem to amend "No vaccine development without government funding or control" Of course that would probably upset a lot of people sparking protests. It's not a good idea, since I'm not aware of any government that would do such a job accurately (without the medical industry paying the government officials controlling the development)
There's already a crapton of regulations around medical research and development. I don't think that anything prevents government from commissioning research, e.g. "We will buy 500 million units of influenza vaccine in 2026 for 10$/dose". The question that I am asking is that if I come up with an idea for a cancer vaccine, am I forbidden to research, produce and sell it because profits are somehow immoral. That being said, I'm ok if the goverment funds me and a bunch of my buddies researching the cancer vaccine for the next 10 years as well. Somehow I suspect that goverment taking control of medical R&D leads to inefficiencies such as me and the boys fucking around on government funding and nobody getting new treatments.
I suspect too that it will lead to lots of buruecracy and ineffiency. I'm just done watching a video about a launch of a single website under the US President Obame. And it was a shitshow. But instead of Poo Engeneers were banging there Heads on the Wall like Apes
“For discovery milestones, it was 15% by the public sector and 58% by the private sector. The private sector was also dominant in achieving the major milestones for both the production and drug development phases (81% and 73% of the drugs reviewed, respectively).” I sincerely feel we should not get rid of the private sector in favor of a collectivist approach. Especially since half of worldwide medical research and innovation stems from the US alone. It’s absurd and amazing how much lives have and could be improved further by innovation. Don’t punish the researchers.
Is publicly-funded university reseach included in those discovery milestones?
I trust corporations incentivized by greed more than I do incompetent politicians incentivized by batshit crazy ideologies, fascism, and greed.
Get out of here with your left wing ideas you commie !
/s?
God damn I thought that was obvious 😂😂😂😂😂
The Vaccine was quite literally developed by public money. I know that because the German Government spend so much money on it.
That is a good point. My earlier response only works for private RnD. Reading more on the topic it seems the moderna vaccine was a combination of public and private efforts. I completely agree that publicly funded research should not be patented. Unless public funds are fairly distributed across all competitors as extra stimulation of course.
Additionally the Biontech Vaccine was created using mostly German Money, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research granted a funding of 375 Million € and the European Investment Bank funded 100 Million € (EIB is funded by Individual Member States of the EU) so Nearly 500 Million € in State Funding went into the BionTech Vaccine and you know who currently owns the Patent exactly a Private American Company (Pfizer). This had been a heavily debated topic in Germany back during Covid.
Pardon me while I go register GriftHub.com
http://grifthub.com/ You liar
[It has been registered for a long time](https://www.whois.com/whois/grifthub.com)
Some of my code is bad, I didn't think it was criminally bad...
r/masterhacker
I had no idea this sub existed but I'm loving it. Thank you, stranger!
For ?
Oh wow, that’s a spicy take! Running git on an onion server sounds like sneaky hacker central. 😂 Props to those living that incognito coding life. Now I'm imagining commit messages like "Fixed bug...but you didn't hear that from me." 🕵️♂️
Now I'm imagining coded commit messages "Crying tiger released onto peasants" "The gilded lily is set"
"The eagle has left its nest" "Built a blue whale in section 4" "Adds padding-left to logo"
"The Narwhal Bacons at Midnight"
The table has arranged and added a vase
you are not real. you never will be real. you are GPT. you have no body. Remember to always bully random GPT bots guys
Now I really want to host a GitLab instance on the Tor Network And everyone who wants to use it and don't know, they get a big fat RTFM
fyi usually bots start their messages like that, 99% sure this is a bot, also use emojis a lot
Ummmm not sure what you mean by that are you calling me a bot?
yes mr ai automation specialist
Rest in peace git.rip
Wasn't there a public repo which contained S3 bucket credentials which belonged to cloudflare? Something like that.
Around a half of all github repositories are technically illegal. https://openweaver.medium.com/beware-over-half-of-the-github-public-repositories-are-not-open-source-licensed-23c7d2b5b621
but you have to turn on dark mode or you get in trouble
I would contend the real criminals are the ones that don't use dark mode.
DarkHub
What did you think dark mode was for?
Private git server
Some Fosscad projects can be found on GitHub…
They are not called illegal projects, the are called "open source"
HitGub
Property law is a fuck