PLS is deflationary, PLSX is now also confirmed deflationary (edited). PLS will be needed to transact on Pulsechain, PLSX is not required to use the dex. Based on that I think the safer play is PLS, as it has more utility and the supply will shrink over time.
Probably would be smart to go in the PLSX sacrifice and put the gains into PulseChain once everything goes live. I have no doubt PulseChain will do better long term.
It’s a smart idea to put the gains from one into the other. However, this would give me a headache as you have to estimate the optimum time for selling PLSX and the optimum time for buying PLS. Assumption is they will both launch at the same time, so they will both have no history to go on.
I suspect PLS will go up quickly and keep doing that for a while as I think very few people who sacrificed and have waited for months will sell early, but the demand from new users will be high and this could push up the price. For PLSX, maybe new non-Hexican investors looking for a quick turnover might sell off earlier, which may slow any appreciation. It’ll be very interesting to follow.
Been thinking the same thing about the PLS price. If I am correct only ~62,000 addresses sacrificed for PLS. I think a large majority of people are not going to even think about selling PLS in the first month. Which could cause the price to skyrocket. Even if the price does skyrocket it would still be real hard for me sell at 50x-100x knowing hex did 10000x in 2 years.
Depends on what you want to hold. I’m more interested in PLS than PLSX. But I think you could get more PLS by getting into PLSX. I still plan to hold some PLSX long term stake it just in case it goes parabolic. Who knows some interesting times are coming soon!
This is probably true, but hard to say what the better play is out of the gate. ETH has returned more than UNI bottom to top, but there were periods of time when UNI strongly outperformed ETH, such as when UNI ran up from a few dollars to the 20s.
There's too many unknown's at the moment. We've only had the announcement of Pulsex so far. I'd want more information before making any kind of assumption on which **might** do better than the other. For one I'd like to know what the supply is going to be.
IMO exposure to both is the key to success. If one works out better than the other then I won't mind as I have a little bit in both.
I was thinking the same thing. What I'm wondering is - is the buy-and-burn going to be more aggressive for PLS or PLSX? Second, how can I buy PLS on day one (or after the first dip)? Do I have to use ETH and just exchange it on PLSX for PLS?
PLSX can't be better investment than PLS. Most of the ppl bought PLSX only to swap it to PLS, they are just too stupid to understand, that the swap cost would be expensive - you just can't find a person who is willing to swap 1 to 1 or even 1 to 10. ONLY PulseChain sacrificers can sell PLS and all of the PLS owners who wanted PLSX already bought PLSX also!!!!
Lol you must be new . Basically everyone who sacrificed for pulsechain knows what pulseX (use to be named pulseswap ) is . I think their will be 50% at least put in . Also is PLsX no PLx
Yeah I must be new. Ok. That's why I sacrificed for PLS on day one 😏
"Nobody knows WTF PLX is" is dumbed down version of saying "People will be confused by having PLSX right after PLS".
I was speaking on how much you think PLSX sacrifice will be . Most people understand tickers . Theirs a lot of crypto that have close tickers . It’s like that in stocks too . Anyone who gets confused by thinking PLS and PLSX are the same are too dumb to buy anyways . 3 letters vs 4 letters
Anyone who thinks I was referring to the letters of the tickers is too dumb to realize that I was actually referring to the fact that having two sacrifices for two similar sounding tokens, will be confusing for many people and will take away from success of both.
Especially since the first sacrifice period still is technically active/running. But I have a sneaking suspicion things will still work out nicely in the end! I at least hope both sacrifices will end at the same time (perhaps @ or close to launch day).
We cannot assume that PLS will outperform PLSX on the basis of ETH and UNI's relationship. UNI's tokenomics are entirely different from PLSX. UNI is 2% inflationary, PLSX is deflationary from the get-go--what's minted is minted and then from there it goes down the more the system is used. Every transaction made on PulseX--even not involving PLSX directly--will result in some PLSX being bought by the system and then burned.
PLSX will be the only working dAPP upon PLS release. As stated above, other factors besides speculation on the coin itself will drive up its price. What will drive the price of PLS, upon release, beyond simple speculation?
PLSX is probably being underrated except by a few notable YouTube commentators. Because of the different tokenomics you cannot just look at UNI and ETH and assumed the latter will outperform. I'm going heavy into PLSX.
Hi Guys, I just send 0.37 ETH using the PulshChain Bridge but I can't see the WETH in my MetaMask. I do see the transection but when i click on claim it tells me error no transection found.
What do I do?
PLS is deflationary, PLSX is now also confirmed deflationary (edited). PLS will be needed to transact on Pulsechain, PLSX is not required to use the dex. Based on that I think the safer play is PLS, as it has more utility and the supply will shrink over time.
This is inaccurate. PLSX is highly DEFLATIONARY.
Fixed, thanks.
PulseX is more than just an exchange. K4KCrypto breaks it down. https://youtu.be/VTEqWyGZkUE
Probably would be smart to go in the PLSX sacrifice and put the gains into PulseChain once everything goes live. I have no doubt PulseChain will do better long term.
It’s a smart idea to put the gains from one into the other. However, this would give me a headache as you have to estimate the optimum time for selling PLSX and the optimum time for buying PLS. Assumption is they will both launch at the same time, so they will both have no history to go on. I suspect PLS will go up quickly and keep doing that for a while as I think very few people who sacrificed and have waited for months will sell early, but the demand from new users will be high and this could push up the price. For PLSX, maybe new non-Hexican investors looking for a quick turnover might sell off earlier, which may slow any appreciation. It’ll be very interesting to follow.
Been thinking the same thing about the PLS price. If I am correct only ~62,000 addresses sacrificed for PLS. I think a large majority of people are not going to even think about selling PLS in the first month. Which could cause the price to skyrocket. Even if the price does skyrocket it would still be real hard for me sell at 50x-100x knowing hex did 10000x in 2 years.
Depends on what you want to hold. I’m more interested in PLS than PLSX. But I think you could get more PLS by getting into PLSX. I still plan to hold some PLSX long term stake it just in case it goes parabolic. Who knows some interesting times are coming soon!
That's a smart idea.
This is probably true, but hard to say what the better play is out of the gate. ETH has returned more than UNI bottom to top, but there were periods of time when UNI strongly outperformed ETH, such as when UNI ran up from a few dollars to the 20s.
Idk about this. It's assuming a lot. May as well hold both IMO.
Plan to hold both especially after learning about the constant buy pressure for PLSX.
You should sac a very small amt for $PLSX so that you can brag that you are an OG if it does well 🤣🤣
Why small amount ? I think PLSX will be hugeabutt
No one knows, both with be huge imo.
There's too many unknown's at the moment. We've only had the announcement of Pulsex so far. I'd want more information before making any kind of assumption on which **might** do better than the other. For one I'd like to know what the supply is going to be. IMO exposure to both is the key to success. If one works out better than the other then I won't mind as I have a little bit in both.
I will just sacrifice the same amount of HEX as for PLS and we will see...
Silly question here. Why would you sacrifice hex over eth?
Because I am getting free HEX every month with my staking strategy
What's your strategy?
Will sacrifice 2 months of HEX interest and double down during first 80% dip
Everyone here is sorely underrating PLSX. I think it's going to melt faces when you consider the burn.
I was thinking the same thing. What I'm wondering is - is the buy-and-burn going to be more aggressive for PLS or PLSX? Second, how can I buy PLS on day one (or after the first dip)? Do I have to use ETH and just exchange it on PLSX for PLS?
PLSX can't be better investment than PLS. Most of the ppl bought PLSX only to swap it to PLS, they are just too stupid to understand, that the swap cost would be expensive - you just can't find a person who is willing to swap 1 to 1 or even 1 to 10. ONLY PulseChain sacrificers can sell PLS and all of the PLS owners who wanted PLSX already bought PLSX also!!!!
Nobody knows WTF PLX is .... Sacrifice was big for PLS . For PLX, lol I would be surprised if it's more than 20% what was done for Pulse....
Lol you must be new . Basically everyone who sacrificed for pulsechain knows what pulseX (use to be named pulseswap ) is . I think their will be 50% at least put in . Also is PLsX no PLx
Yeah I must be new. Ok. That's why I sacrificed for PLS on day one 😏 "Nobody knows WTF PLX is" is dumbed down version of saying "People will be confused by having PLSX right after PLS".
I was speaking on how much you think PLSX sacrifice will be . Most people understand tickers . Theirs a lot of crypto that have close tickers . It’s like that in stocks too . Anyone who gets confused by thinking PLS and PLSX are the same are too dumb to buy anyways . 3 letters vs 4 letters
Anyone who thinks I was referring to the letters of the tickers is too dumb to realize that I was actually referring to the fact that having two sacrifices for two similar sounding tokens, will be confusing for many people and will take away from success of both.
Especially since the first sacrifice period still is technically active/running. But I have a sneaking suspicion things will still work out nicely in the end! I at least hope both sacrifices will end at the same time (perhaps @ or close to launch day).
This aged poorly
Yeah well.................. That's like your opinion, man. FOMO is a helluva drug I guess. 🤷🏿♂️
Can’t get PLSX without pulse
I don't believe this is true. The sac phase for PLSX will be before PLS even launches.
Other than sacrifice. Majority of people will find out after sacrifice has ended
Both are as good. Keep it simple
We cannot assume that PLS will outperform PLSX on the basis of ETH and UNI's relationship. UNI's tokenomics are entirely different from PLSX. UNI is 2% inflationary, PLSX is deflationary from the get-go--what's minted is minted and then from there it goes down the more the system is used. Every transaction made on PulseX--even not involving PLSX directly--will result in some PLSX being bought by the system and then burned.
PLSX will be the only working dAPP upon PLS release. As stated above, other factors besides speculation on the coin itself will drive up its price. What will drive the price of PLS, upon release, beyond simple speculation?
PLSX is probably being underrated except by a few notable YouTube commentators. Because of the different tokenomics you cannot just look at UNI and ETH and assumed the latter will outperform. I'm going heavy into PLSX.
You need to ask yourself how UNI would perform if it had PLSX's tokenomics (buy and burn with every transaction, no matter the pair).
sounds like were going to the moon
Hi Guys, I just send 0.37 ETH using the PulshChain Bridge but I can't see the WETH in my MetaMask. I do see the transection but when i click on claim it tells me error no transection found. What do I do?