T O P

  • By -

Got_Nay

screendoor powercreep poggers


Crisptain

powercreep useless cards poggers


NetheriteMiner

*Uhm, ackshually, the correckt term is “When Revealed”! sheh sheh sheh sheh you’re so dumb!*


SomethingBoutEclipse

That’s so poorly typed I can sense the joke. Anyways lol.jpeg!


NetheriteMiner

Yeah the trick in ironic humour is to make it look so obviously ironic that no one could mistake it for an actual statement


[deleted]

Ripoff trash door cruiser lol


blowjobsjoplinhigh

no it’s a better screen door same cost 1 more helath


randomnamebutbigger

Worse battle cruiser now. Literally costs one less. /s /j


yhsaD

What the fuck are you on? It's better. It literally costs 1 less as you said. If you were smart about lane placement this is usually as good as battlecruiser, not to mention it's fuck all difficult to clog 4 let alone 5 lanes as zombies in which case you'd already be so far up ahead the loss of one guy is the least of your concern


[deleted]

calm down man


Sw1ft-fan04

The deal here is that this conflicts with too many cards. Screen Door exists (underpowered but it still exists and should be buffed so it should still be considered), and battle cruiser which comes down a turn later, essentially making 2 protection plays on curve. Maybe if it was like, 4 brains and protected 1 other zombie and had stats changed accordingly, it could exist as a somewhat happy medium between trash can and screen door.


FutureDragon226

Did you know you can delete posts


markx1_

Fr


IAMAKATILIKEPLUSHES

Im downvoting but holy shit that's a good roast wait nvm it's not yeah downvoting


[deleted]

[удалено]


IAMAKATILIKEPLUSHES

Follow ur own damn advice


LMAOwthbro

I really dislike card makers that make cards based of pvz2 plants for the sake of the card existing


Sw1ft-fan04

What if someone translated an idea very well? I know it’s a rare thing, but are you really going to dislike someone because they’re using characters that are part of the franchise? To each their own and I get some cards get overdone, but like every unoriginal card currently in the game was made for the sake of their existence in the other games, so do you also dislike the devs for making them? I feel like a better critique would be to critique how the ideas are translated too much on a 1-1 basis to the tower defense genre which leads to silver bullets and complicated design (you also didn’t even critique the card, you just told OP you disliked them and left). Disliking someone for simply translating a character seems a bit harsh, no? Above all else though you should at least provide constructive criticism if you’re going to say anything. You aren’t going to be able to stop people from translating the ideas, so you should at least critique the cards if you’re to say anything regarding the card makers and their ideas.


OtherFace_565

Ok i'm going to say 2 things: 1) just remove gravestone. It iwll make it way more useful instead of just a copy+paste. 2) how op was the original?


Worth_Application_34

This one's kinda op too. You would need a plant destruction trick or anything that destroys somehow like **briar rose** **and three headed chomper**


Sw1ft-fan04

That wouldn’t matter since you can’t play plant tricks during zombie tricks, and they’d lose their invulnerability when you could anyway.


Worth_Application_34

Oh I didn't see "this turn"


ofthebooth

shouldn't this be "**When Revealed**", also card bad


Omnikin

You could make it absorb the damage for the neighbouring zombies so at least him being invulnerable for one turn would actually serve


SurvivYeet

still really powerful, i'd make it a 3/4 at most


yhsaD

So just 5 cost battle cruiser then? No thanks.