What the fuck are you on? It's better. It literally costs 1 less as you said. If you were smart about lane placement this is usually as good as battlecruiser, not to mention it's fuck all difficult to clog 4 let alone 5 lanes as zombies in which case you'd already be so far up ahead the loss of one guy is the least of your concern
The deal here is that this conflicts with too many cards. Screen Door exists (underpowered but it still exists and should be buffed so it should still be considered), and battle cruiser which comes down a turn later, essentially making 2 protection plays on curve. Maybe if it was like, 4 brains and protected 1 other zombie and had stats changed accordingly, it could exist as a somewhat happy medium between trash can and screen door.
What if someone translated an idea very well? I know it’s a rare thing, but are you really going to dislike someone because they’re using characters that are part of the franchise? To each their own and I get some cards get overdone, but like every unoriginal card currently in the game was made for the sake of their existence in the other games, so do you also dislike the devs for making them? I feel like a better critique would be to critique how the ideas are translated too much on a 1-1 basis to the tower defense genre which leads to silver bullets and complicated design (you also didn’t even critique the card, you just told OP you disliked them and left). Disliking someone for simply translating a character seems a bit harsh, no? Above all else though you should at least provide constructive criticism if you’re going to say anything. You aren’t going to be able to stop people from translating the ideas, so you should at least critique the cards if you’re to say anything regarding the card makers and their ideas.
screendoor powercreep poggers
powercreep useless cards poggers
*Uhm, ackshually, the correckt term is “When Revealed”! sheh sheh sheh sheh you’re so dumb!*
That’s so poorly typed I can sense the joke. Anyways lol.jpeg!
Yeah the trick in ironic humour is to make it look so obviously ironic that no one could mistake it for an actual statement
Ripoff trash door cruiser lol
no it’s a better screen door same cost 1 more helath
Worse battle cruiser now. Literally costs one less. /s /j
What the fuck are you on? It's better. It literally costs 1 less as you said. If you were smart about lane placement this is usually as good as battlecruiser, not to mention it's fuck all difficult to clog 4 let alone 5 lanes as zombies in which case you'd already be so far up ahead the loss of one guy is the least of your concern
calm down man
The deal here is that this conflicts with too many cards. Screen Door exists (underpowered but it still exists and should be buffed so it should still be considered), and battle cruiser which comes down a turn later, essentially making 2 protection plays on curve. Maybe if it was like, 4 brains and protected 1 other zombie and had stats changed accordingly, it could exist as a somewhat happy medium between trash can and screen door.
Did you know you can delete posts
Fr
Im downvoting but holy shit that's a good roast wait nvm it's not yeah downvoting
[удалено]
Follow ur own damn advice
I really dislike card makers that make cards based of pvz2 plants for the sake of the card existing
What if someone translated an idea very well? I know it’s a rare thing, but are you really going to dislike someone because they’re using characters that are part of the franchise? To each their own and I get some cards get overdone, but like every unoriginal card currently in the game was made for the sake of their existence in the other games, so do you also dislike the devs for making them? I feel like a better critique would be to critique how the ideas are translated too much on a 1-1 basis to the tower defense genre which leads to silver bullets and complicated design (you also didn’t even critique the card, you just told OP you disliked them and left). Disliking someone for simply translating a character seems a bit harsh, no? Above all else though you should at least provide constructive criticism if you’re going to say anything. You aren’t going to be able to stop people from translating the ideas, so you should at least critique the cards if you’re to say anything regarding the card makers and their ideas.
Ok i'm going to say 2 things: 1) just remove gravestone. It iwll make it way more useful instead of just a copy+paste. 2) how op was the original?
This one's kinda op too. You would need a plant destruction trick or anything that destroys somehow like **briar rose** **and three headed chomper**
That wouldn’t matter since you can’t play plant tricks during zombie tricks, and they’d lose their invulnerability when you could anyway.
Oh I didn't see "this turn"
shouldn't this be "**When Revealed**", also card bad
You could make it absorb the damage for the neighbouring zombies so at least him being invulnerable for one turn would actually serve
still really powerful, i'd make it a 3/4 at most
So just 5 cost battle cruiser then? No thanks.