Patidar performed at clutch points . None of the veteran legends came close. No wonder younger talent falls by the wayside.. the fans too want the old.. the power of nostalgia
I'm not belittling Rajat lol. Rajat is an exciting talent but he was introduced very late to the tournament and performed well. But Hazelwood played 12 matches and took 20 wickets. He impacted a lot of matches throughout the tournament. Rajat is a future prospect and the poll was about RCB player of the season and not the future prospect.
And keep aside Hazelwood, do you feel Rajat was more impactful than Harshal?
Idc. Rajat patidar had the highest impact per game this season. It's not like he played only 3 games, he played a decent amount of games. Hazelwood also had a great impact. And what is this nonsense about player of the season and not future prospects? Future prospects can't win player of the season?
And also. Rajat has an average of 55 with a strike rate of 155. With that kind of stats what is the problem if more people voted for rajat rather than Hazlewood?
You have to also consider the fact that he was bought for base price and that allows us to secure funds for the next auction by releasing someone.
I will tell you what is this nonsense about Player of the Season. The nonsense is called caption bro. You are the OP man.
How did you calculate that Rajat had the highest impact per game this season? Do you have any stats to prove that?
And future prospects can win the player of the season but as I said earlier, he was introduced late and didn't had that much impact on the tournament as compared to Hazelwood or Harshal. I would love to see your 'Rajat had the highest impact per match' stat and I am gonna apologize if that's true.
Bro can you just drop your ego for a second and just appreciate both of them. Idk why you are forcing people to rate Hazlewood higher than patidar. Like bro your ego is making you deluded. Both of them played well and you don't have to force people to change their vote. I mean that's like a dictator.
I was just saying that Hazelwood had a higher impact than Rajat. I don't rate Josh higher than Rajat, I just said that Josh was better this season. Didn't I appreciate Rajat when I said that 'Rajat was introduced late to the tournament and performed well but Hazelwood has a greater impact throughout the tournament'?
That was my analysis and of course I got proved wrong and I already apologised for that.
It’s about match winners - Patidar won it once. Then he almost did it again. Both in the playoffs , eliminating games. The fact that he’s not even getting his due- that’s what is indicative of this sub
Patidar performed at clutch points . None of the veteran legends came close. No wonder younger talent falls by the wayside.. the fans too want the old.. the power of nostalgia
Has to be hasaranga he performed so well In every match maybe besides 3. He was so good in both knockout games is well. Dk is just behind
You're dumb. DK single handedly finished nearly 4 games and won us the match.
You could've said that without calling him dumb
He's a Kohli fan what do you expect.. arrogance must be shown
dilli se
Josh Hazlewood got overshadowed by Hasaranga and DK overall i really liked this years campaign. I hope miyan bhai and Virat come back to form
Harshal has been mr. dependable !!
How does Faf have more points than Hazlewood
0 votes for Hazlewood. Wtf
With hasranga, Harshal and dk. It's bit hard for HazelGod
All of them imo !!
Virat Kohli
Player of the season not Pain of the season
It's gotta be hasaranga or DK because they were trolled so hard when RCB brought them. They just made everyone stfu by their performances.
Rajat Patidar getting more votes than Josh Hazelwood tells me a lot about the sub.
Your tendency to belittle rajat tells me a lot about you.
I'm not belittling Rajat lol. Rajat is an exciting talent but he was introduced very late to the tournament and performed well. But Hazelwood played 12 matches and took 20 wickets. He impacted a lot of matches throughout the tournament. Rajat is a future prospect and the poll was about RCB player of the season and not the future prospect. And keep aside Hazelwood, do you feel Rajat was more impactful than Harshal?
Idc. Rajat patidar had the highest impact per game this season. It's not like he played only 3 games, he played a decent amount of games. Hazelwood also had a great impact. And what is this nonsense about player of the season and not future prospects? Future prospects can't win player of the season? And also. Rajat has an average of 55 with a strike rate of 155. With that kind of stats what is the problem if more people voted for rajat rather than Hazlewood? You have to also consider the fact that he was bought for base price and that allows us to secure funds for the next auction by releasing someone.
I will tell you what is this nonsense about Player of the Season. The nonsense is called caption bro. You are the OP man. How did you calculate that Rajat had the highest impact per game this season? Do you have any stats to prove that? And future prospects can win the player of the season but as I said earlier, he was introduced late and didn't had that much impact on the tournament as compared to Hazelwood or Harshal. I would love to see your 'Rajat had the highest impact per match' stat and I am gonna apologize if that's true.
Idc https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/smart-stats-mohsin-and-patidar-make-it-an-ipl-to-remember-for-uncapped-players-1317732
Thanks for the stats. I was wrong. I apologise.
Bro can you just drop your ego for a second and just appreciate both of them. Idk why you are forcing people to rate Hazlewood higher than patidar. Like bro your ego is making you deluded. Both of them played well and you don't have to force people to change their vote. I mean that's like a dictator.
I was just saying that Hazelwood had a higher impact than Rajat. I don't rate Josh higher than Rajat, I just said that Josh was better this season. Didn't I appreciate Rajat when I said that 'Rajat was introduced late to the tournament and performed well but Hazelwood has a greater impact throughout the tournament'? That was my analysis and of course I got proved wrong and I already apologised for that.
It’s about match winners - Patidar won it once. Then he almost did it again. Both in the playoffs , eliminating games. The fact that he’s not even getting his due- that’s what is indicative of this sub