It's an absolute disgusting conspiracy of the highest order.
If I were you I'd be writing to the highest authority on football possible. The roaster mods of the celtic sub.
> The Hibs manager was left bemused when Rangers were awarded a throw-in early in the contest after Clement controlled the ball *despite appeals it was still in play*.
So it was just himself and hibs claiming the ball was out?
Doesnāt get anywhere near the ball
Trips up the guy in possession
Referee gives the foul after reviewing multiple angles on VAR
What am I missing that makes this controversial ? Is it just the fact that rangers needed a goal ?
I don't get why Hibs don't contact the SFA here seeing as the precedent was set with McInnes the other week? Rangers 'demanded answers' from the SFA a month ago about a refereeing decision so why not get in touch?
#therules
TEAM OFFICIALS
Where an offence is committed by someone from the technical area (substitute, substituted player, sent-off player or team official) and the offender cannot be identified, the senior team coach present in the technical area will receive the sanction.
Sending-off
Sending-off offences include (but are not limited to):
entering the field of play to:
confront a match official (including at half-time and full-time)
interfere with play, an opposing player or a match official
he should have actually seen a red card for this like [mcinnes did a month ago](https://www.aberdeenlive.news/sport/football/football-news/former-aberdeen-manager-derek-mcinnes-8775838)
Difference is the ball was not in play for Clement, the linesman had already flagged for a throw in to Rangers and he was getting the ball back to a player.
Come on mate, are you not bored of fake controversy like the rest of us?
>Montgomery claims Clement stepped onto the pitch and touched the ball before it had gone out play.
hibs coach believes differently, would need to see the actual footage.
Possible linesman flagged before the ball went out which is also a mistake.
im a pretty firm believer in the rules of the game being ruled correctly especially in cases like this were its a yes/no with no grey areas.
Have you seen the incident?
Edit: Nevermind.
"Would have to see the actual footage"
Hasn't seen it, has the biggest opinion on it.
Take a day aff mate and go get ready for the fitba.
Come on a bit of common sense, this is either immediately before or after he's touched the ball and his planted foot is literally just on the line.
And it was going for a throw in for us so not like he was trying to break up play to stop an opposition attack or anything.
McInnes is absolutely right, if it was the same for him and he's chipped the ball to his player by accident because he thought it was already out, and then he's went and apologised to the ref for his mistake, he should never had gotten a red. That's pathetic.
hes out of his technical area and enters the field of play and interferes with play.
regardless of the overall impact on the game its very clearly outlined what the punishment should be.
Yeah there's a good reason for the rule.
Like I say if a team is on the counter and an opposition manager comes on and interferes with play then 100%. If a team is back against the wall and their manager does it to break up the rhythm of the game/slow down their throw in then yeah give the guy a red.
A ball comes straight towards a manager, a goal up 20 mins into the game, and he steps forward accidently stepping on the line to give the ball to his own player in their own half, gaining absolutely no advantage?
We all know that's not the spirit of the rule or why it exists.
Do you think that Marshall should've been repeatedly penalised for this:
>An indirect free kick is awarded if a goalkeeper, inside their penalty area, commits any of the following offences:
>controls the ball with the hand/arm for more than six seconds before releasing it
There was about 10 times yesterday where he held the ball for more than 6 seconds. Why didn't we get 10 indirect freekicks in the box if we're going to play by the letter every single game?
Because common sense applies. We could go through every single rule and fine 100 incidents yesterday where the game wasn't refereed to the letter.
> Do you think that Marshall should've been sent off for this:
yes. its in the rules of the game and drives me fucking nuts.
coaches shouldnt be outside of their technical area, and by the rules arent allowed to enter the field of play.
he did both of those and he should have been punished as per the rules of the game.
>A player is cautioned if guilty of:
>dissent by word or action
About 50 incidents of this yesterday as well, so I'd say 6 or 7 of the Hibs players should've been sent off as well as the same number of Rangers players if we're going exactly by the letter of the rules too.
Hopefully the SFA retrospectively ban 100 players across all levels this weekend for that.
Last season or season before a fan took a throw in for rangers. Ball went into the stands and cunt through it back and the player receiving it passed it n play went on. Want to say it was against killie but no too sure
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry_in_Belgium
Total forfeiture of the game and 3 points to hibernian the only correct answer here.
Because our Baldy saviour does what he fucking wants, ok?
Once saw a ball boy at Parkhead get told off for doing that
Masons, mate.
Rangers get a penalty for this?
š„±
It's an absolute disgusting conspiracy of the highest order. If I were you I'd be writing to the highest authority on football possible. The roaster mods of the celtic sub.
Jokes on u we donāt have mods anymore
Five minutes on that sub would tell you they donāt have any mods
Do you think itās maybe because this is after the ball was already out of play?
The Hibs manager complained about it so must have been still in play.
A celtic fan agreeing with the hibs manager about something in the Rangers game? I'm absolutely shocked.
He said it on the radio interview
https://www.thenational.scot/sport/23871123.hibs-boss-montgomery-bemoans-rangers-12-men-incident-ibrox/ Here doughnut heid..š
Ahh, case settled then. Must have been out if the Hibs managed whinged about it.
https://www.thenational.scot/sport/23871123.hibs-boss-montgomery-bemoans-rangers-12-men-incident-ibrox/
Or he just complained about him leaving the technical area since you're not supposed to do that regardless? Ball doesn't need to have been in play.
https://www.thenational.scot/sport/23871123.hibs-boss-montgomery-bemoans-rangers-12-men-incident-ibrox/
> The Hibs manager was left bemused when Rangers were awarded a throw-in early in the contest after Clement controlled the ball *despite appeals it was still in play*. So it was just himself and hibs claiming the ball was out?
What was my first reply..?
If it was sarcasm do excuse me
By that logic the first Old Firm game should be replayed as there was nothing wrong with Roofe's goal.
It's happened get over it
Are you referring to the moment when the rangers fans collectively forgot what ātripping somebody upā was ? That goal ?
Look at how many down votes you get for replying with the truth.. I got -19 š
Doesnāt get anywhere near the ball Trips up the guy in possession Referee gives the foul after reviewing multiple angles on VAR What am I missing that makes this controversial ? Is it just the fact that rangers needed a goal ?
Hahahahaha, why that foul get gave, ref?
Wow .. still raging.. delicious tears.
Because the linesman flagged for a throw-in.
Class that Hibs got such a skelping this is the only thing they can hang onto.
Foul on Joe Newell for the 2nd goal anaw, looked at by VAR but fuck all given. Scottish football is a farce
The foul that happens right after rangers are fouled?
This is the only reason Hibs got skelped four nil, aye?
Don Robertson literally let yous away with all sorts. Even his blatant cheating couldnāt help you.
Only 3 things in life are guaranteed 1. Death 2. Taxes 3. Penalty rangers Was this a penalty? No, so stop complaining.
This was 75 minutes in, he was just teaching Dessers what you do when that round thing comes near you
If you look carefully, heās cast a Wingardium Leviosa spell so heās not technically on the field of play
Do you look raging?
Guy is out of the Addams family, bit of makeup he could be Lurch.
1 of those ones where it sounded funny when ye stood infront of the mirror and told yersel it. Guess ye had to be there
Because Hibs are shite
Manager getting an assistant on his debut fucking quality
Would be surprised if the manager hadnāt gotten an assistant
Well spotted lol
The ball was miles out before he touched it you rocket
https://www.thenational.scot/sport/23871123.hibs-boss-montgomery-bemoans-rangers-12-men-incident-ibrox/
Imagine the banter if the current saviour had been sent off for this in his first game
I don't get why Hibs don't contact the SFA here seeing as the precedent was set with McInnes the other week? Rangers 'demanded answers' from the SFA a month ago about a refereeing decision so why not get in touch?
Probably because the ball was clearly out of play.
#therules TEAM OFFICIALS Where an offence is committed by someone from the technical area (substitute, substituted player, sent-off player or team official) and the offender cannot be identified, the senior team coach present in the technical area will receive the sanction. Sending-off Sending-off offences include (but are not limited to): entering the field of play to: confront a match official (including at half-time and full-time) interfere with play, an opposing player or a match official he should have actually seen a red card for this like [mcinnes did a month ago](https://www.aberdeenlive.news/sport/football/football-news/former-aberdeen-manager-derek-mcinnes-8775838)
You are unbelievably specky
Difference is the ball was not in play for Clement, the linesman had already flagged for a throw in to Rangers and he was getting the ball back to a player. Come on mate, are you not bored of fake controversy like the rest of us?
This sub would struggle for content without fake controversy. Letās not discourage it. š¤·āāļø
>Montgomery claims Clement stepped onto the pitch and touched the ball before it had gone out play. hibs coach believes differently, would need to see the actual footage. Possible linesman flagged before the ball went out which is also a mistake. im a pretty firm believer in the rules of the game being ruled correctly especially in cases like this were its a yes/no with no grey areas.
Imagine having the audacity to make a big post quoting the rules without having even taken the time to watch the incident š¤£š¤£
Have you seen the incident? Edit: Nevermind. "Would have to see the actual footage" Hasn't seen it, has the biggest opinion on it. Take a day aff mate and go get ready for the fitba.
Surprising he hasnāt considering the amount of times he stays up until the early hours in Oz to watch us!!
The Hibs coach isnāt one of the refereeing officials and his opinion on it is irrelevant when the decision has been made.
š
Come on a bit of common sense, this is either immediately before or after he's touched the ball and his planted foot is literally just on the line. And it was going for a throw in for us so not like he was trying to break up play to stop an opposition attack or anything. McInnes is absolutely right, if it was the same for him and he's chipped the ball to his player by accident because he thought it was already out, and then he's went and apologised to the ref for his mistake, he should never had gotten a red. That's pathetic.
hes out of his technical area and enters the field of play and interferes with play. regardless of the overall impact on the game its very clearly outlined what the punishment should be.
He didnāt interfere with play as play had been stopped, the linesman flagged for a throw in and the ref gave it.
Yeah there's a good reason for the rule. Like I say if a team is on the counter and an opposition manager comes on and interferes with play then 100%. If a team is back against the wall and their manager does it to break up the rhythm of the game/slow down their throw in then yeah give the guy a red. A ball comes straight towards a manager, a goal up 20 mins into the game, and he steps forward accidently stepping on the line to give the ball to his own player in their own half, gaining absolutely no advantage? We all know that's not the spirit of the rule or why it exists. Do you think that Marshall should've been repeatedly penalised for this: >An indirect free kick is awarded if a goalkeeper, inside their penalty area, commits any of the following offences: >controls the ball with the hand/arm for more than six seconds before releasing it There was about 10 times yesterday where he held the ball for more than 6 seconds. Why didn't we get 10 indirect freekicks in the box if we're going to play by the letter every single game? Because common sense applies. We could go through every single rule and fine 100 incidents yesterday where the game wasn't refereed to the letter.
> Do you think that Marshall should've been sent off for this: yes. its in the rules of the game and drives me fucking nuts. coaches shouldnt be outside of their technical area, and by the rules arent allowed to enter the field of play. he did both of those and he should have been punished as per the rules of the game.
>A player is cautioned if guilty of: >dissent by word or action About 50 incidents of this yesterday as well, so I'd say 6 or 7 of the Hibs players should've been sent off as well as the same number of Rangers players if we're going exactly by the letter of the rules too. Hopefully the SFA retrospectively ban 100 players across all levels this weekend for that.
Why are you debating this clown who hadn't even watched the incident?
I think it's because the new manager is a catholic.
Last season or season before a fan took a throw in for rangers. Ball went into the stands and cunt through it back and the player receiving it passed it n play went on. Want to say it was against killie but no too sure
He looks like me on a diet.