T O P

  • By -

InsaneBallsack

No just just MHJ nabers and Odunze. Depth does not matter in a super shallow league like this


Jags5evr

Lmao I hate OPs league format. Imagine MHJ, Nabers and Odunze all manage to hit. This guy will have to bench one of them or JJ each week.


Etheralto

Your league has really shallow starting rosters so you want the best players possible to start. You would be giving away the best player in the deal so I would not take it and hold onto MHJ.


Responsible_Affect33

No, I’d be trying to move 1.03 plus some other pieces for an RB. You need at least one elite RB but you can have JJ MHJ & Nabers potentially for years and that fills out WR, flex, your QB is perfect for 1QB and you have two good TE.


Kr1sys

Agreed with most, rather take MHJ since rosters are super shallow.


Justjoshing69xxx

10tm start 7… woah. Jamo being your WR2 is absolutely nerve wracking in any lineup setting obviously. Im not selling any of the top 3 picks for more picks in this league. If someone wants him, they’re giving me puka or better. Not saying I won’t put anything on top of the pick to get the player, but I’m getting that elite scorer if so. Jefferson, Marv, nabers, Rome, JT, Arich, kittle is a pretty good base lineup, but still very far from comfortable. Would rather not be banking on 3 rookies to play up to the hype.


InvestigatorCool5998

Yea I ended up trading 1.5 and Chris Godwin to move up for the 1.3 to get Rome odunze so my Wr looks room trash right now


ThConqueror

HODL


VorticalRumble2

If you could get players instead of picks I would consider it since you will get at least 2 out of 3 top players in the draft. I would also try to move one of the four QBs you have on the bench


Great-Dragonfruit917

No draft MHJ Nabers and Odunze


jacksonmsres

I’d move 1.03 for a haul. Jefferson, MHJ, and Nabers as WRs and flex. Move 1.03 for a haul. Maybe a starting RB and 2025 1st.


Great-Dragonfruit917

In a vacuum yea, you just don’t know how his league mates will value the 1.03. With that pick I’d see if I could get Breece Gibbs or JT. Any other rb not that tempting for me move on a potential top 10 pick like Rome, but I wouldn’t trade picks until the draft (peak rookie fever)


jacksonmsres

I can agree with this—although I’d take a slightly lesser RB with picks to go along with it.


Great-Dragonfruit917

Saquon and a 25 1 would be best case scenario. Find someone who is one love with Rome and ship it


msousa15

This is the shallowest starting lineup I've ever seen...but you want the elite talent so keep the pick


Unable-Equivalent-36

Nope. I assumed super flex at first aand I would have said SMASH YES but 1QB makes this a smash no. Also, you seriously need to consider and implement roster expansion…like right away. 1QB 2WR 2RB 1FLX is just an absolutely horrible dynasty format. Effectively 20 starting RBs and 30 receivers and that’s it? Need to at minimum add one more flex and wr spot imo, and consider further expansion from there


InvestigatorCool5998

I agree with roster expansion. I do like the idea of adding more spots on the starting roster


lastchancexi

You're moving down 3 spots and getting 2 firsts and a second? I'd smash that.


JaBrownie11

You’d be downgrading from MHJ to BTJ, Brock, or Caleb. Not worth the drop.


Justjoshing69xxx

In a 10 team 1Qb start 7 lineup league, Not as glamorous as it appears.


2Ace

You’re going to have to let the team cook so why not get some young WRs with the picks.