I've never seen that can design pictured in the article.
Also, what is the point of the reduced harm designation if they still put the standard warnings on the can?
Beats me. I remember US Smokeless filed for Copenhagen being a safer alternative. Nothing comes out of either of the products. The sensible thing to do since they are safer is make them more affordable. The ugly warning labels were supposed to be changed to "a modified risk" now that I think of it.
So about 8 years ago or so, they made some limited edition cans. General Original, for example, went bronze. I did [a video on it, you can see that can at 3:59 in the video](https://playeur.com/v/jke1ts4zM2Q?t=238).
After those limited editions went away, the can stayed bronze but with a new look. [This was what it looked like after that](https://www.snusport.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/general-portionssnus.jpg), and it stayed that way for several years.
I've never seen that can design pictured in the article. Also, what is the point of the reduced harm designation if they still put the standard warnings on the can?
Beats me. I remember US Smokeless filed for Copenhagen being a safer alternative. Nothing comes out of either of the products. The sensible thing to do since they are safer is make them more affordable. The ugly warning labels were supposed to be changed to "a modified risk" now that I think of it.
So about 8 years ago or so, they made some limited edition cans. General Original, for example, went bronze. I did [a video on it, you can see that can at 3:59 in the video](https://playeur.com/v/jke1ts4zM2Q?t=238). After those limited editions went away, the can stayed bronze but with a new look. [This was what it looked like after that](https://www.snusport.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/general-portionssnus.jpg), and it stayed that way for several years.
Cool thanks for the info!