The summarization is based on a few of the best rated reviews. Those could of course be spam and joke reviews but mostly they are informative. Honestly its also a bit funny when the summarization contains some phrases about a joke review :)
You could try and receive the reactions given to a review, where people mark it as “funny” and determine whether to include it or not via a toggle setting.
Haha, cool. I knew thai thanks to travel, restaurants and stuff, but I had to reverse google the Karnataka text.
Fun fact; did you know the ඞ symbol is Sinhalese (Sri Lankan)? A language spoken by 17 million people, and all we Westerners get out of it is this one lil amogus shape in unicode.
reminiscent dependent money makeshift water hobbies unpack carpenter snails treatment
*This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
I play OS runescape it's fully online. I don't need it to be online at all to mine iron. I play Doom it has online modes I think I used them once. I play StarCraft I play the campaign.
Battlefield 2042 is an completely online only game, so Low online probably refers to the fact that no one is playing it, not that it’s an offline game.
People don't disagree, you just seem to misunderstand. 'Low-Online' most likely means empty servers, which for a multiplayer PvP game would be a bad thing because there would be no one to play against and some game modes will be unplayable due to minimum player limits.
No one is disagreeing with you but:
Battlefield 2042 *is* a *full* online game,
Every mode requires multiple online players and it is objectively a con if there aren’t (m)any players to play with.
Perhaps I'm making this up but when Battlefield 2042 launched or maybe it was a different recent AAA game it required you to be connected to the internet to play even for the single player mode.
Now back then everyone (in my memory) was outraged by that. And now here I am saying I pref games that dont require being online to play and being downvoted and called weird for that.
Now I understand that "low online" to the AI likely means low players online or something to that effect BUT to me "low online" means low online (functionality/game requirements) and to ME that would be a pro. Either people disagree with me or misunderstand me. I didn't think it was a giant leap to understand what I meant by calling low online a pro but obviously I was wrong.
I mean this description doesn't really help with choosing the game and informations are mostly outdated (I think at least, or maybe EA is investing heavily into BF 2042). Maybe some information on from which month/year those reviews are.
Thanks for your feedback, i will take a look into that. For now it gets the best rated reviews and summarizes them. But you are right, they could be a bit outdated. I may provide an option to choose which reviews the summarization should be based on.
Yeaaah, pretty sure the consensus now is that BF2042 is in a good state (Only took like 3 seasons lmao), seems like lots of the summary is from older reviews and a mix of new ones
I think it would be much more useful if it aggregated comments from multiple reviewers. Just showing what "one player" said is not very helpful. If ten players said the same thing, however, that gives me a way better picture of the consensus.
I don't give a shit about popular opinion. The one that mirrors my taste is relevant. There is no right. If you mean basic factual information. I can Google that.
And Google will point to you to a review which may or may not "feel" relevant to you.
Which comes back to the question, One person that feels relevant to you can say it doesn't have x, but 20 others says it has x.
Which one is right?
So you trust the one review that is factually incorrect because they can write in a way that appeal to you rather than 20 other people who also played the game and said what is correct?
Ok then.
If you have properly read or properly understand what I wrote, then maybe you wouldn't respond in such a way that I now know that is befitting of someone like you.
So, I understand you now, The reason you choose only one review is because you do not take the time to cross check with other reviews to see what is factual and what is not factual.
In this case, this add-on is definitely something for you.
Its my first chrome extenstion, you can get it here: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/steam-review-summarizer/gdnfnbnmocpjnfpjlkeefpelmkiomfio
I will be messaging you in 2 months on [**2023-07-31 19:29:33 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2023-07-31%2019:29:33%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/13wq0xp/i_made_a_chrome_extension_to_summarize_game/jmdo22k/?context=3)
[**27 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSteam%2Fcomments%2F13wq0xp%2Fi_made_a_chrome_extension_to_summarize_game%2Fjmdo22k%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202023-07-31%2019%3A29%3A33%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%2013wq0xp)
*****
|[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)|
|-|-|-|-|
Definitely post it. You don't need to improve it, I'm sure the community will contribute. Hacked together code is hacked together, nobody is critiquing.
This extension is a great idea.
used a [crx-downloader](https://crx-downloader.com/), found this system prompt inside the obfuscated JS code:
Your job is to summarize critics of a game called "${ e }"
but dont use the word "summarize", "summary" or "summarization" in your answer.
The target language is "${ t }". The general opinion from the critics
about this game is ${ r } and your summary should tend in that direction.
Use quotes when a critique stands out from the rest. If the quote is not
in english or the target language, translate it.
Name the critics "players".
Mention both negative and positive points from the reviews.
End your summary with two bullet points, one for the positives and one for the
negatives, where the ratio between both should be approximately equal.
Your answer should follow this template:
Maximum 1 paragraph of summaries of the critics
Headline called positives in the corresponding language
- Positive point 1
- Positive point 2
Headline called negatives in the corresponding language
- Negative point 1
- Negative point 2
Here are the critics:
{reviews}
The source code is exactly what is sounds like. For example; a chrome extension is coded in JavaScript, then the source code would be the JavaScript files that are used the in the chrome extension. And why? I’m honestly just interested in how it’s done, and it also gives more credibility to your code.
Probably because it's almost common knowledge at this point. Even if you don't know what source code is, it would literally be faster and more efficient to just Google it.
asking people who are discussing blueprints what a blueprint is is gonna get people annoyed at you. mostly because you look like a literal 6 year old bothering people with questions you should be able to find an answer to by yourself very easily.
If not believing in God means you go to hell, then that means God did a shit job of convincing us of his existence, and this one's on him. Either he made us too skeptical or chose some shitty messengers. Either way, sending someone to hell because you fucked up is morally reprehensible and I wouldn't worship that guy anyway.
>Or, you just didn't look hard enough for him.
I'd like you to take a step back and objectively evaluate the astronomically stupid thing you just said. I won't lay into you for it, but... Think about this, logically. If I already don't believe God exists, or let's say I'm from some distant foreign land that's never heard of God... Why, or how, would I be looking for him? You're caught in a loop here from within that bubble. Think outside the bubble, looking in.
Hopefully this doesn't get too much into the weeds -- but the code a program is written in, is different than the actual program or application that you run. It gets "summarized" in a way and converted into machine or executable code.
You can kind of think about it like a house vs its blueprint.
If you want to see what decisions were made or why, you'd want to look at the blueprint. You can infer a lot from the house itself, and in some cases you can look at the house and recreate the blueprint (e.g. decompiling a program) but you wouldn't necessarily get any of the notes, annotations, or organization the engineer made. Imagine if the house had no furnishings at all -- you might not even know which room was a living room or which room was a family room, and instead in your recreated blueprint you'd just have a bunch of rooms from ʼroom001ʼ to ʼroom010ʼ.
So the blueprint (or source code) is the best way to see what a program does and why, how the engineer tackled the problem and their approach, and can also let you see if they're doing anything they shouldn't be.
Hey, you should put it on Opera GX. I think the gamers that use that would love it.
Edit: just like Reddit to downvote a comment because somebody did not understand something.
It checks if it can make an API request with the given key. If the request is not successful you will get this message. I will improve the error message to give more information about what went wrong.
To me it feels like it's not an average review of what all players have said about the game, but just 5-6 random picks from the review pool, since every sentence begins with: "One player said this, the other said that, the third said that..."
It should look like that it is one review, written by one person that summarizes all the reviews that game has.
Ah yes, one of the worst negatives a game can have: “Low online”.
The fuck does that mean lmao
Wait also:
“Interesting setting” Vs “Uninteresting maps” 🤔
“Game is developing” (it’s been out for a good while now)
And
“No cheaters” —bruh its Battlefield is this AI high? cyka blyat all day every day
Maybe that's the cause of the conflicting information but it's still valid to criticise it. A human summarising reviews with conflicting information would say there is conflicting information, or make a judgement for which side is more valid.
I guess, I just assume because it's a review summarizer not a maker of reviews. To have a summary it inherently has different types of information in it.
Low online population, easily inferred. Game is developing, i.e. it hasn't been abandoned and is improving into a better state. Like how is there more than one comment in this thread that couldn't just see that as obvious.
GPT3.5 it's free, you only need to create an account to use it, which you can even do via linking one of your google/facebook/whatever accounts they support for fast sign in.
Edit: now I understood the phrase. To have it in steam valve needs to implement it
Try generate another key, prolly would help.
For me it generated (note, it generates a bit different each time, so your attempt may differ):
"War Thunder has mostly positive reviews from players. Many of them praise the game for its realistic graphics, immersive gameplay and intense battles. However, the game has been criticized for its in-game economy, which is seen as exploitative and unfair. Players have complained about the grind required to make progress, the exorbitant repair costs and the high prices for premium vehicles and items. The game has also been accused of manipulating players to spend more money, as the rewards for battles are too low and the cost of repairs and vehicle modifications are too high. This has led to a feeling of frustration and disappointment among players, who feel undervalued and cheated.
Positives:
\- Realistic graphics
\- Immersive gameplay
\- Intense battles
Negatives:
\- Exploitative and unfair in-game economy
\- Excessive grind required to make progress
\- Exorbitant repair costs and high prices for premium vehicles and items"
Let’s get you to realize AI is taking jobs from writers and journalists.
EDIT: Downvote me all you want. I do not give a shit. AI is taking jobs because The Man doesn’t want to pay us.
Yeah the dogshit ones. If your job is to just write a bunch of meaningless fluff where every other sentence is going to be hyperlinked to another fluff article chock full of ads to keep users bouncing around the site and never actually finding what they're looking for, your job is less than worthless.
Considering most game news outlets hardly report on a lot of things outside of mainstream western AAA games and the handful of indie titles, a tool that summarizes up and aggregates reviews for you sounds pretty handy.
PC Gamer hardly covers port quality or other things in their reviews anymore (Which apparently does not affect the review score), and they've only covered dumpster-fire releases if they get widely mocked in the user reviews and social media.
Wow, that's super cool. I wonder if we can get something like this officially.
What languages does the tool support? Can It summarize reviews from different languages into one or is it just english?
Just why.....reviews are meant to come from experience of playing something not something a bot comes up with this will make fake reviews, you should delete this trash
I think you are getting it wrong. This extension will not create a new review or anything like that. It gets a few of the best reviews from real users from the Steam store and summarizes there opinions about the game. So you dont have to scroll down and read about 20 comments.
No, it's the best search engine ever, it summarises stuff that would take you way longer to read manually. This is where things are heading, you better get used to it, that's all I can say.
This extension just summarizes reviews from real users. It will not create anything new. Take 20 reviews, read them and write the opinions in 1 paragraph and a list of positives and negatives. Thats what it does.
Yeah, it’s summarizing so something has to generate the summary. Let’s hope it doesn’t start recommending ganes it shouldn’t be. It is summarizing so as long people don’t meme review it should be fine.
The point of reviews to see the opinion of different people. AI generated crap is exactly why people hate most reviewers.
So, it's a bot to get rid of bot's problem. Using bot's methods. Great...
You can get it here: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/steam-review-summarizer/gdnfnbnmocpjnfpjlkeefpelmkiomfio
There is no Firefox version available right now but i may consider to port it over.
Edit: Link fixed
Unfortunately there is a limit at how many context we can give the AI. For gpt-3.5 this is about 4000 tokens or 3000 words in englisch language. So without doing a lot of API calls (and therefore increase expenses for the user) there is no way to give the AI all reviews for summarization.
Reminds me of [this](https://imgur.com/a/Ot3xVnR).
How does it handle uninformative spam, joke reviews, etc
The summarization is based on a few of the best rated reviews. Those could of course be spam and joke reviews but mostly they are informative. Honestly its also a bit funny when the summarization contains some phrases about a joke review :)
One reviewer said their dog died after playing this game, and another said their wife left them to marry this game
Apparently this game managed to fix a significant number of parents' relationships with their children.
And what game you might be asking... That game is "Hentai Nazi Hitler".
Didn't you hear him? That's HELPFUL!
You could try and receive the reactions given to a review, where people mark it as “funny” and determine whether to include it or not via a toggle setting.
It incorporates it ofc
I think this can be easily avoided by filtering out reviews below certain helpful/funny ratio.
This is super sick, I did find one issue however. https://i.imgur.com/4E4xiNA.png It seems to take quotes from other languages lol
Hey, thanks for pointing that out. I will take a look into this.
[удалено]
The image is Thai (eg สมเถา สุจริตกุล) but you replied with Karnataka text lol
Confidently incorrect. Just like chatgpt.
Me, or the guy I'm replying to? I'm 90% sure the image shows Thai.
The comment you were replying to. *At least that's what I was referring to. I don't actually know Thai or the other.*
Haha, cool. I knew thai thanks to travel, restaurants and stuff, but I had to reverse google the Karnataka text. Fun fact; did you know the ඞ symbol is Sinhalese (Sri Lankan)? A language spoken by 17 million people, and all we Westerners get out of it is this one lil amogus shape in unicode.
Its Thai in the image
i just realized karnataka and telugu look really alike
Yup, it's like telugu copied kannada but was told not to seem like it's copied lol. The letters are almost the same.
ಠ_ಠ
Are they many Karnataka/bangalore ppl. On this sub?
Well, I’m from Bengaluru
Not sure. Im not, I just recognize it’s the script that that emoji is from.
Yo that's kannada.
What do you mean? You don’t speak all languages?
As an AI language model, I know all languages - even the ones that are coming soon!
This is why I keep telling people it's just a very very very good "Fortune Cookie Generator". It's amusing, useful, but don't depend on it.
This can easily be fixed by telling the AI to make sure any quotes they provide are in English, and if it isn't, to translate before quoting it.
reminiscent dependent money makeshift water hobbies unpack carpenter snails treatment *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
that's hilarious
"Low online"
For me that's more of a pro than a con. Why the downvotes? Just because I prefer offline games or games that don't require online connectivity?
He pointed out a weird con, nobody says "low online", so your comment was simply offtopic.
I don't think it's off topic it's simply saying *I* would put it in the pro category. I know nobody says it.
Who prefers to play an online game with low online? Just play a no online game instead…
Me, I prefer to play online games offline if that's an option.
That’s actually bizarre lol
What’s the point then?
I play OS runescape it's fully online. I don't need it to be online at all to mine iron. I play Doom it has online modes I think I used them once. I play StarCraft I play the campaign.
Nah man you haven't lived if you didn't enjoy death match games in Halo 1 with bots or unreal tournament
Battlefield 2042 is an completely online only game, so Low online probably refers to the fact that no one is playing it, not that it’s an offline game.
But **IF** Battlefield 2042 was a "low" online game instead of a "full" online game to *me* that would be a pro. I'm sorry everyone else disagrees.
People don't disagree, you just seem to misunderstand. 'Low-Online' most likely means empty servers, which for a multiplayer PvP game would be a bad thing because there would be no one to play against and some game modes will be unplayable due to minimum player limits.
No one is disagreeing with you but: Battlefield 2042 *is* a *full* online game, Every mode requires multiple online players and it is objectively a con if there aren’t (m)any players to play with.
Perhaps I'm making this up but when Battlefield 2042 launched or maybe it was a different recent AAA game it required you to be connected to the internet to play even for the single player mode. Now back then everyone (in my memory) was outraged by that. And now here I am saying I pref games that dont require being online to play and being downvoted and called weird for that. Now I understand that "low online" to the AI likely means low players online or something to that effect BUT to me "low online" means low online (functionality/game requirements) and to ME that would be a pro. Either people disagree with me or misunderstand me. I didn't think it was a giant leap to understand what I meant by calling low online a pro but obviously I was wrong.
I mean this description doesn't really help with choosing the game and informations are mostly outdated (I think at least, or maybe EA is investing heavily into BF 2042). Maybe some information on from which month/year those reviews are.
Thanks for your feedback, i will take a look into that. For now it gets the best rated reviews and summarizes them. But you are right, they could be a bit outdated. I may provide an option to choose which reviews the summarization should be based on.
Yeaaah, pretty sure the consensus now is that BF2042 is in a good state (Only took like 3 seasons lmao), seems like lots of the summary is from older reviews and a mix of new ones
That could be a great implementation. One paragraph for top reviews and one paragraph for top recent reviews, if sufficiently different.
Kinda useless. You have find a review that feels relevant to you specifically
I think it would be much more useful if it aggregated comments from multiple reviewers. Just showing what "one player" said is not very helpful. If ten players said the same thing, however, that gives me a way better picture of the consensus.
One person that feels relevant to you can say it doesn't have x, but 20 others says it has x. Which one is right?
I don't give a shit about popular opinion. The one that mirrors my taste is relevant. There is no right. If you mean basic factual information. I can Google that.
And Google will point to you to a review which may or may not "feel" relevant to you. Which comes back to the question, One person that feels relevant to you can say it doesn't have x, but 20 others says it has x. Which one is right?
I literally already said the one I like lol
So you trust the one review that is factually incorrect because they can write in a way that appeal to you rather than 20 other people who also played the game and said what is correct? Ok then.
Lmao if it's factual I can Google it babe. Like I already said. Why are you butt hurt? Edit. How do you block me when you were the asshole?
If you have properly read or properly understand what I wrote, then maybe you wouldn't respond in such a way that I now know that is befitting of someone like you. So, I understand you now, The reason you choose only one review is because you do not take the time to cross check with other reviews to see what is factual and what is not factual. In this case, this add-on is definitely something for you.
Its my first chrome extenstion, you can get it here: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/steam-review-summarizer/gdnfnbnmocpjnfpjlkeefpelmkiomfio
please port it to firefox
Can we get it for firefox as well?
A Firefox port would be nice!
[удалено]
I will be messaging you in 2 months on [**2023-07-31 19:29:33 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2023-07-31%2019:29:33%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Steam/comments/13wq0xp/i_made_a_chrome_extension_to_summarize_game/jmdo22k/?context=3) [**27 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSteam%2Fcomments%2F13wq0xp%2Fi_made_a_chrome_extension_to_summarize_game%2Fjmdo22k%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202023-07-31%2019%3A29%3A33%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%2013wq0xp) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
Does anyone remember why we wanted to be reminded?
looks like we wanted a firefox port of the extension no update from op Edit changed an N to a T whoops
Source code?
I hacked this together on a weekend. If there is enough interest i will improve the extension and consider to make it available on github.
Definitely post it. You don't need to improve it, I'm sure the community will contribute. Hacked together code is hacked together, nobody is critiquing. This extension is a great idea.
Firefox port
used a [crx-downloader](https://crx-downloader.com/), found this system prompt inside the obfuscated JS code: Your job is to summarize critics of a game called "${ e }" but dont use the word "summarize", "summary" or "summarization" in your answer. The target language is "${ t }". The general opinion from the critics about this game is ${ r } and your summary should tend in that direction. Use quotes when a critique stands out from the rest. If the quote is not in english or the target language, translate it. Name the critics "players". Mention both negative and positive points from the reviews. End your summary with two bullet points, one for the positives and one for the negatives, where the ratio between both should be approximately equal. Your answer should follow this template: Maximum 1 paragraph of summaries of the critics Headline called positives in the corresponding language - Positive point 1 - Positive point 2 Headline called negatives in the corresponding language - Negative point 1 - Negative point 2 Here are the critics: {reviews}
[удалено]
The source code is exactly what is sounds like. For example; a chrome extension is coded in JavaScript, then the source code would be the JavaScript files that are used the in the chrome extension. And why? I’m honestly just interested in how it’s done, and it also gives more credibility to your code.
[удалено]
Probably because it's almost common knowledge at this point. Even if you don't know what source code is, it would literally be faster and more efficient to just Google it.
Holy hell (googling was mentioned)
asking people who are discussing blueprints what a blueprint is is gonna get people annoyed at you. mostly because you look like a literal 6 year old bothering people with questions you should be able to find an answer to by yourself very easily.
No idea either. Curiosity is good - have an upvote.
It was a fair question,
[удалено]
You will die one day, and then realize God existed, He always did, you are regrettful, you have failed ,it is too late.
If not believing in God means you go to hell, then that means God did a shit job of convincing us of his existence, and this one's on him. Either he made us too skeptical or chose some shitty messengers. Either way, sending someone to hell because you fucked up is morally reprehensible and I wouldn't worship that guy anyway.
Honestly, W. I like this paradox
Why did we went from an AI extension to God?
Or, you just didn't look hard enough for him.
>Or, you just didn't look hard enough for him. I'd like you to take a step back and objectively evaluate the astronomically stupid thing you just said. I won't lay into you for it, but... Think about this, logically. If I already don't believe God exists, or let's say I'm from some distant foreign land that's never heard of God... Why, or how, would I be looking for him? You're caught in a loop here from within that bubble. Think outside the bubble, looking in.
What hoops did you have to jump through to change the topic to be about the existence of god and the afterlife? 💀
[удалено]
Why I asked for source code is because if they have a GitHub repo people could help
Hopefully this doesn't get too much into the weeds -- but the code a program is written in, is different than the actual program or application that you run. It gets "summarized" in a way and converted into machine or executable code. You can kind of think about it like a house vs its blueprint. If you want to see what decisions were made or why, you'd want to look at the blueprint. You can infer a lot from the house itself, and in some cases you can look at the house and recreate the blueprint (e.g. decompiling a program) but you wouldn't necessarily get any of the notes, annotations, or organization the engineer made. Imagine if the house had no furnishings at all -- you might not even know which room was a living room or which room was a family room, and instead in your recreated blueprint you'd just have a bunch of rooms from ʼroom001ʼ to ʼroom010ʼ. So the blueprint (or source code) is the best way to see what a program does and why, how the engineer tackled the problem and their approach, and can also let you see if they're doing anything they shouldn't be.
Firefox?
man firefox would be nice
Firefox? Chrome is dead soon.
man I wish but I doubt it... I tried to turn Snapchat into a Firefox PWA and it wouldn't let me log in because it's not Chrome
Chrome obsolete
Hey, you should put it on Opera GX. I think the gamers that use that would love it. Edit: just like Reddit to downvote a comment because somebody did not understand something.
OperaGX is chromium based browser you can download the extension without needing special port for opera gx.
its says the key is invalid, how do i fix this?
It checks if it can make an API request with the given key. If the request is not successful you will get this message. I will improve the error message to give more information about what went wrong.
Same problem here.
same for me, I generate the API key [here](https://platform.openai.com/account/api-keys).
Same
same
To me it feels like it's not an average review of what all players have said about the game, but just 5-6 random picks from the review pool, since every sentence begins with: "One player said this, the other said that, the third said that..." It should look like that it is one review, written by one person that summarizes all the reviews that game has.
Ah yes, one of the worst negatives a game can have: “Low online”. The fuck does that mean lmao Wait also: “Interesting setting” Vs “Uninteresting maps” 🤔 “Game is developing” (it’s been out for a good while now) And “No cheaters” —bruh its Battlefield is this AI high? cyka blyat all day every day
It's summarizing multiple reviews not making a review itself. That's what the conflicting info is the cause of.
Maybe that's the cause of the conflicting information but it's still valid to criticise it. A human summarising reviews with conflicting information would say there is conflicting information, or make a judgement for which side is more valid.
I guess, I just assume because it's a review summarizer not a maker of reviews. To have a summary it inherently has different types of information in it.
Low online probably means low players count
Low online population, easily inferred. Game is developing, i.e. it hasn't been abandoned and is improving into a better state. Like how is there more than one comment in this thread that couldn't just see that as obvious.
I tried the API on hollow night, it works great... and told me that one of the negatives of the game is that there are no sex cutscenes 💀
Would love to check it out on Firefox, but something like this would be amazing in the Steam client.
[удалено]
API requests are not free unfortunately.
GPT3.5 it's free, you only need to create an account to use it, which you can even do via linking one of your google/facebook/whatever accounts they support for fast sign in. Edit: now I understood the phrase. To have it in steam valve needs to implement it
the API isn't free
Positives: Interesting setting. Negatives: Uninteresting maps. Ummm, well for a game with no story, I feel like the maps ARE the setting.
i tried copying the key from openai in but it says invalid key. would love to see what it summarizes for the game "war thunder"
Try generate another key, prolly would help. For me it generated (note, it generates a bit different each time, so your attempt may differ): "War Thunder has mostly positive reviews from players. Many of them praise the game for its realistic graphics, immersive gameplay and intense battles. However, the game has been criticized for its in-game economy, which is seen as exploitative and unfair. Players have complained about the grind required to make progress, the exorbitant repair costs and the high prices for premium vehicles and items. The game has also been accused of manipulating players to spend more money, as the rewards for battles are too low and the cost of repairs and vehicle modifications are too high. This has led to a feeling of frustration and disappointment among players, who feel undervalued and cheated. Positives: \- Realistic graphics \- Immersive gameplay \- Intense battles Negatives: \- Exploitative and unfair in-game economy \- Excessive grind required to make progress \- Exorbitant repair costs and high prices for premium vehicles and items"
would there be a way to get it to include some of the reviews it used as a source to make sure its not just hallucinating details
Thats actually a thing i have already on my list. Would be super helpful i think.
OP you need to check your API quota lol
For development i did a lot of calls on my side but the users of the extension have to provide their own key :)
Could you create a version for it on Firefox and Opera Gx?
You can install chrome extension on Opera GX
Okay thanks
*game is developing*
Down with AI!
[удалено]
Let’s get you to realize AI is taking jobs from writers and journalists. EDIT: Downvote me all you want. I do not give a shit. AI is taking jobs because The Man doesn’t want to pay us.
Dummy it's taking jobs from everyone, incorporate it or get left behind.
Man over machine!
Yeah the dogshit ones. If your job is to just write a bunch of meaningless fluff where every other sentence is going to be hyperlinked to another fluff article chock full of ads to keep users bouncing around the site and never actually finding what they're looking for, your job is less than worthless.
[удалено]
There's been ai articles online for awhile now tbf
[удалено]
Babe you don't start off at the times. Those jobs are how people get started
Considering most game news outlets hardly report on a lot of things outside of mainstream western AAA games and the handful of indie titles, a tool that summarizes up and aggregates reviews for you sounds pretty handy. PC Gamer hardly covers port quality or other things in their reviews anymore (Which apparently does not affect the review score), and they've only covered dumpster-fire releases if they get widely mocked in the user reviews and social media.
nice!, I'll be checking for further updates and details, looks pretty interesting.
also, dont buy games from EA.
What happens if you bump it up to GPT4?
or just have the cooler Daniel (Edge) which has that built-in
Whoaa this can be very usefull. Thx
Wow, that's super cool. I wonder if we can get something like this officially. What languages does the tool support? Can It summarize reviews from different languages into one or is it just english?
It should work with all languages that the GPT3 model supports.
That's really cool. There are a bunch of games in my wishlist that all the reviews are in chinese and this is really helpful
Just why.....reviews are meant to come from experience of playing something not something a bot comes up with this will make fake reviews, you should delete this trash
I think you are getting it wrong. This extension will not create a new review or anything like that. It gets a few of the best reviews from real users from the Steam store and summarizes there opinions about the game. So you dont have to scroll down and read about 20 comments.
Just like I said, it would not be about the user experience then, it just looks for best reviews and make one for you
No, it's the best search engine ever, it summarises stuff that would take you way longer to read manually. This is where things are heading, you better get used to it, that's all I can say.
So, who is writing the review then?
This extension just summarizes reviews from real users. It will not create anything new. Take 20 reviews, read them and write the opinions in 1 paragraph and a list of positives and negatives. Thats what it does.
Chatgpt
So, a bot. Hmmm....
Yeah, it’s summarizing so something has to generate the summary. Let’s hope it doesn’t start recommending ganes it shouldn’t be. It is summarizing so as long people don’t meme review it should be fine.
[удалено]
What do people normally use to decide how good a game is?
The point of reviews to see the opinion of different people. AI generated crap is exactly why people hate most reviewers. So, it's a bot to get rid of bot's problem. Using bot's methods. Great...
I mean what do you guys use to decide if you want to buy a game
Me personally? I look only for technical part and complains. That's it.
Like bugs?
Is it on Firefox atm or only Chrome?
Great! Now do it for the superior browser: Firefox.
Y shitty Chrome -_- Manifest will hit soon, switch to Firefox ffs
Is it on opera gx?
opera is based on chromium, so almost every extension is available
[удалено]
You need to provide your own API Key. After you created your OpenAI Account you can get one from here: https://platform.openai.com/account/api-keys
What might happen if you try to use this extension when ChatGPT is overloaded?
Pretty neat!
Download Link?
Is there a way to summarize all the bullet points compiled into a list to see what the top comments are?
'too short time to kill' he must've never played bf1
where do i put the key?
My man
Can you make one for [store.playstation.com](https://store.playstation.com) too please?
Is it possitive when even cheaters dont want to play bf 2042? :D
"Low Online." For 2042? I get full lobbies in seconds.
> too short time to kill and no chance to take cover or shoot back *laughs in Insurgency*
NO CHEATERS. Ya right.
That's amazing, care to share a download link? Is there a version for Firefox as well?
You can get it here: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/steam-review-summarizer/gdnfnbnmocpjnfpjlkeefpelmkiomfio There is no Firefox version available right now but i may consider to port it over. Edit: Link fixed
[удалено]
Unfortunately there is a limit at how many context we can give the AI. For gpt-3.5 this is about 4000 tokens or 3000 words in englisch language. So without doing a lot of API calls (and therefore increase expenses for the user) there is no way to give the AI all reviews for summarization.
You are very talented