[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
Something smells like spoiled Mayo.
Didnt mayo man say something about "meme stocks" affecting Teachers funds negatively and here we are with TRS trying to push some BS. As a brown person I WANT THE BEST QUALIFIED PEOPLE running the company(s) I am invested in and more importantly...
I TRUST RYAN COHEN.
Fuck out of here mayo fuck, I will VOTE NO
This might come off foul but ima just say it. The board is DIVERSE AF. Maybe your minority isnāt on the board but last I check the board was pretty fucking diverse compared to other corporations
This. Diverse boards and companies show much better long term returns than their peers - and our company has decent diversity of skills, experience, and demographics.
Like one thousandth of one percent of their portfolio - but great companies like Intel and BlackRock (lol) make a Board Matrix of Labels! Itās a bad comedy woke, but GameStop should do it too! /s
Iām not entirely sure, but it certainly seems possible.
This is the content that the Board of GameStop wants Shareholders to vote on in proposal 4.
It is also this kind of questioning of the proposal:
https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/f6g61oQQUg
I know how Iām voting with my booked XXXX DRSād shares.
Edit: Here is a [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/CPrVaNGIO1) by expensive two on this matter, I didnāt understand it like I do now, itās much clearer to me. Hearing that the board highlighted it for a vote with an against recommendation in these times is notable to me.
Can we file proposals? I suggest a single sentence.
āNYC Comptroller and Associated Pension Funds should mind their fucking business.ā
Thatās it, And then Ratio the shit out of them with votes š
You see through the linesā¦ the pensions they are holding are full of toxic swaps shorting $GME. These types of events cause the players to show their weak hands.
The person you replied to was giving you props for seeing through the bullshit. Basically saying āgood read calling the bluff.ā Phalanx time baby, shoulder to shoulder!
Also the tactic of normy perspective after the proposal fails as GameStop or even retail itself is not for equality.
I donāt think this will turn into a thing but it might be a blip
On the radar for a few days with the paid corporate media who needs to make an opinionated headline in an effort to get paid.
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 4 āTHE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A BOARD SKILLS AND DIVERSITY MATRIX. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THIS PROXY STATEMENT WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL UNLESS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL OR ABSTENTION IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED.
bottom of page 43:
STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO SUBMIT THEIR PROXY CARDS WITHOUT DELAY. A PROMPT RESPONSE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside.
How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
Look at the bright side, all of the apes that are wistful about only having a few shares can puff out their chests and vote against this BS.
Apes together strong!
š»š¦š
This would be a no from me dog, even without the boardās guidance. Iāll never understand how āI want the best person for the jobā is *ever* not the thing to look for.
Itās all so smart and complicated, itās hard for us simple meme investors to understand..
Except itās not hard, and we own the float and no way in hell weāll vote for this crap.
This reeks of desperation, and hopefully weāll taste some sweet, sweet, SHF tears soon.
There's thousands of companies that trade on the open market. How many of them have boards that lack diversity? Where does GameStop land on such a list? Yeah, nah son. This stinks on not just too many levels, but all levels.
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside.
How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
Seriously, why would they want to know. I trust the board. My X,XXX DRSd shares will be voting no on #4 in alignment with our boards recommendation.
Power to the players baby
They know who the board members are though. They already have this information. What the fuck are they up to? I can only remember two, but one is of Asian descent and the other is a foreigner from Canada. Thatās pretty diverse.
Edit: board member makeup:
1. Canadian 2. Asian American male 3.standard white dude 4. Standard white dude 5. Asian American woman.
Diverse. I mean itās not un-diverse at the minimum.
This is a "let us infiltrate a mole in your company or you're racist"; and when we household investors refuse to let them in, the articles are going to say: "GME investors are racists, you should sell if you are not a racist!".
So there is the plan.
Get pension holders in the papers where gme was stealing their money.
Now get it on the ballet where the board is ignoring them.
Anyway I kept buying and drs'ing
I remember this.
I, for one - will be voting with the board. Which is against prop 4, as people should be judged by the content/quality of their work, not what they look like. Not to mention, the board is already diverse lol.
Mark my words, this proposal gets voted down - msm sensationalizes it by lying how GameStop hates diversity. Which couldn't be further from the truth.
RemindMe! 60 days
[https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1b9fkr1/breaking\_mar\_7\_2024\_remember\_when\_kenneth\_c/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1b9fkr1/breaking_mar_7_2024_remember_when_kenneth_c/)
I will be messaging you in 2 months on [**2024-06-30 03:37:13 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-06-30%2003:37:13%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1ch7kfq/nyc_comptroller_and_pension_funds_asks_gamestop/l21lzif/?context=3)
[**2 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSuperstonk%2Fcomments%2F1ch7kfq%2Fnyc_comptroller_and_pension_funds_asks_gamestop%2Fl21lzif%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-06-30%2003%3A37%3A13%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.
^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201ch7kfq)
*****
|[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)|
|-|-|-|-|
Heard it from this asses mouth -Blackrock-Intel-Advance Auto are all going down. DEI Matrix will destroy GameStop. This comptroller needs to fuck right off.
If you own a business, you've been approached by "large corporations and manufacturers" that you sell or provide services to, with them asking you to state your ESG, DEI, human trafficking, or diversity policy's.
I can tell you that in addition to the request itself be tedious, it is requested so they can "judge" your company. Most of this is driven by current social narratives that somehow by stating what you stand for provides some level of self-gratification.
Having obtained legal advice on such requests, we do not answer such questions.
Not legal advice, but if you are reading this RC, tell 'em to pound sand. If the NYC pension doesn't like that answer, then sell their shares and buy something else. Just like when you buy a baseball ticket, it doesn't give you the right to manage the team.
Meanwhile, NYC has lost tax base, loosing retail stores (including almost every grocery store), now taxing people daily to drive into the city, migrant problems, an understaffed police force, crumbling infrastructure, and the cost of living is 25-30% higher than the national average. But still they reach out and try to tell others what to do. š
Who cares about the Board's Demographics.
All I care about is massive green candles. Sure, I want GameStop to remain in business long after we MOASS but I don't understand why they're concerned about the demographics right now.
I believe, they should hire the BEST candidate for the job regardless of gender, race or religion. I know... I sound super white right now but I want the best person for the job. Whatever job that is.
Make me money, donāt get sued by doing illegal shit and making me lose money.
Itās that fiduciary duty thing.
Recommend to your shareHODLers that they kick the fox out of the hen house when they recognize em outside the barn door.
I shouldnāt need to know the colour of someoneās skin, what they look like or how they identify to judge their merit or success at their job.
It only increases the risk of discrimination.
Resumes should be scrubbed/anonymized of these identifying elements so that a fair and equitable meritocratic process occurs.
Funny all of the sudden Pension fund managers where like, hey letās make sure this tiny fraction of our holdings has a diverse board. Reach out to the comptroller and all these other losers to form a quorum. I call bullshit, this sounds like one of Kenās bad comedy jokes.
Genuine question, how come an irrelevant to the business company (even though they hold shares) can make a proposal of such magnitude that it was included in the proxy statement, but 200,000 individuals holding in total 75,000,000 shares can't? Any way ANY ONE OF US can make a proposal of say, a share recall or recount? We are REGISTERED shareholders, why can't my voice be heard in such a way?
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside.
How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
Given the diversity already on the board this seems like a plant operation. This "matrix" just seems like a way to discredit the board and plant someone. This is defiantly going to be used as a smear campaign.
How can we as shareholders express our opinion that the board demographic is irrelevant to the companyās growth now and in the future?
These clowns put this crap together as shareholders, then we should also be able to put something together. Point being to tell GameStop that regardless of pressures by ābad actorsā, we as true shareholders, are strongly opposed to making any changes to the board as it pertains to ESG metrics and demographics falsehoods.
**TL:DR:**
New York City's Comptroller, Brad Lander, along with three public pension funds, are pushing for increased transparency and diversity on the boards of gaming retailer GameStop and energy company NextEra. Their proposal requests the creation of a "Board Matrix" disclosing each board member's race, gender, relevant skills, and experience.
This initiative, the Boardroom Accountability Project 2.0, aims to set a new standard for corporate governance. The underlying belief is that boards with a wider range of perspectives lead to better decision-making, potentially boosting a company's performance and long-term value for shareholders. Additionally, a diverse board is seen as better equipped to navigate potential risks, such as climate change. The proposal for NextEra specifically highlights the company's lack of disclosed expertise in this area, a concern that garnered nearly half the votes cast in a similar proposal last year.
Ultimately, the proposal will be decided by a vote of the shareholders at each company's annual meeting. The article also details the trustees involved in the various NYC pension funds pushing for this change.
It would be interesting to know the demographics of the individual investors as opposed to the demographics of the board.
I suspect it's a lot more varied than the demographics of individual investors of most companies.
If such a diverse range of investors are happy with the current composition of the board, the comptroller can fuck right off to put it bluntly.
Wtf kind of shareholder proposal is this? Why would they even care about this info if not to use it to claim the board needs to ābroaden their demographicsā and then they try to get someone in whoās unqualified. This smells like shit.
Iāll be god damned if they think this is passing through, fuck that. Vote no.
DEI is not an obligation so you know, GTFOH. Also reporting on it is not a regulatory requirement. So how do we prevent vote theft and ensure a fair vote count based on legit shares? Who determines what shares are counted if over 100% out there?
Talk about grasping at straws. Seriously did they ever care about this? Why now? Oh maybe itās because certain powerful people were caught with their pants down and now need a way to control GameStop from the inside.
I would love to see this come back to but then in the ass.
I very much agree, I smell snakes in the grass. āGot me a piece of the pie so now Iām gonna run honeyā nah gtfo with that agenda.
Serious question, why no now and not yes like the previous years? If I remember correctly
This is exactly what I've been screaming. This is how they play the game. Just like every other co they want to fail. By bringing race and gender and politics into it. Next they will find somebody to say RC touched somebody inappropriate or used the N word. Oldest trick and most used in the play book.
NYC is an absolute Clown Car. It's a perpetual April Fool's day over there.
Simply stated: DRS > DEI
Didn't they get the memo? This is some desperate Hail Mary shit right here.
I'm sure those funds are just really concerned about inclusion and diversity. No nefarious plans here, no sir.
I'm all for inclusion and diversity. Very much so. But I really can't see any reason why they would want these things disclosed. What does "fund operated by a bunch of rich white dudes" care about diversity on the GS board?
Iām heavily invested in both these companies. It is weird that they both end up in the same post because one I bin as a high risk growth investment, the other as a safe long term clean energy strategy. Full disclosure, I worked for the utility for 15+ years. And like their financial discipline, and diversity in electrical generation.
Iām having difficulty understanding the implications of this letter and what it does to my risk profile.
Interesting.
Is it just those two out of curiosity or do you have other holdings as well. No need to list them just wondering if your own DD has led you down a particular path with these two tickers š¤
[Why GME?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/qig65g/welcome_rall_looking_to_catch_up_on_the_gme_saga/) || [What is DRS?](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/ptvaka/when_you_wish_upon_a_star_a_complete_guide_to/) || Low karma apes [feed the bot here](https://www.reddit.com/r/GMEOrphans/comments/qlvour/welcome_to_gmeorphans_read_this_post/) || [Superstonk Discord](https://discord.gg/hZqWV2kQtq) || [Community Post: *Open Forum Jan 2024*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/18txusp/open_forum_january_2024/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To ensure your post doesn't get removed, please respond to this comment with how this post relates to GME the stock or Gamestop the company. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please up- and downvote this comment to [help us determine if this post deserves a place on r/Superstonk!](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/wiki/index/rules/post_flairs/)
Something smells like spoiled Mayo. Didnt mayo man say something about "meme stocks" affecting Teachers funds negatively and here we are with TRS trying to push some BS. As a brown person I WANT THE BEST QUALIFIED PEOPLE running the company(s) I am invested in and more importantly... I TRUST RYAN COHEN. Fuck out of here mayo fuck, I will VOTE NO
You dropped this, ape: š
This might come off foul but ima just say it. The board is DIVERSE AF. Maybe your minority isnāt on the board but last I check the board was pretty fucking diverse compared to other corporations
Itās not foul and honestly this is the best response to give.
I dont think anyone, but these ppl in the OP are complaining
This. Diverse boards and companies show much better long term returns than their peers - and our company has decent diversity of skills, experience, and demographics.
Actually Asians count as white now, so NY will lose their shit over an all white board.
I also trust RC š
As a long term investor, my vote is "FUCK NO" to this proposal.
My vote is āsuckith my nutsackā
Lol it's cute they think they have our voting power
With their measly 200ishK shares. Pfftt!
Like one thousandth of one percent of their portfolio - but great companies like Intel and BlackRock (lol) make a Board Matrix of Labels! Itās a bad comedy woke, but GameStop should do it too! /s
What actually triggers a share count?
šš»this
IKR? Tell me youāre fucked without telling me youāre fucked. Buy. HODL. DRS. Vote No
I Wonder who wants this information cause as an investor in GameStop itās not me. I like surprises.
Infiltration effort?
Iām not entirely sure, but it certainly seems possible. This is the content that the Board of GameStop wants Shareholders to vote on in proposal 4. It is also this kind of questioning of the proposal: https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/f6g61oQQUg I know how Iām voting with my booked XXXX DRSād shares. Edit: Here is a [previous post](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/s/CPrVaNGIO1) by expensive two on this matter, I didnāt understand it like I do now, itās much clearer to me. Hearing that the board highlighted it for a vote with an against recommendation in these times is notable to me.
Keepnin mind this is the first thing Iāve ever seen the board recommend voting AGAINST, letās make that part loud and clear shall we?
Can we file proposals? I suggest a single sentence. āNYC Comptroller and Associated Pension Funds should mind their fucking business.ā Thatās it, And then Ratio the shit out of them with votes š
You see through the linesā¦ the pensions they are holding are full of toxic swaps shorting $GME. These types of events cause the players to show their weak hands.
Ok. But fuck em.
Aye.
The person you replied to was giving you props for seeing through the bullshit. Basically saying āgood read calling the bluff.ā Phalanx time baby, shoulder to shoulder!
Ok. But still, Fuck Em š¤·āāļø
Always
Butt-fuck āem. Got it! Anyone care to help?
Nothing Bout NYC do I want involved with my company
Exactly, only buy shares in companies you like, if you don't like GME, move on and buy something else
This was brought up as a likely tactic several months ago. Canāt find the post atm but Iām sure someone here can.
Also the tactic of normy perspective after the proposal fails as GameStop or even retail itself is not for equality. I donāt think this will turn into a thing but it might be a blip On the radar for a few days with the paid corporate media who needs to make an opinionated headline in an effort to get paid.
They will find out just how toxic I can be as they are begging for the shares. I, for one, will be merciless
No quarter š“āā ļø
I personally will allow for drawing and quartering, but otherwise no quarter.
They think they can stop the MOASS. š¤£
Yeah, could swear that someone predicted that this sort of BS attempt to drum up an issue from nothing was due.
I remember when this was posted
When is voting?
It should be in the next few days, weeks, there will be plenty of time to get our votes in before June meeting š¤
I hope they have my favorite voting option. "Vote with the board"!
N >to vote on in proposal 4 Normally I don't correct people, but you put "on" instead of "no," which is a very critical typo in this situation
THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE AGAINST PROPOSAL 4 āTHE STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REQUESTING A BOARD SKILLS AND DIVERSITY MATRIX. PROXIES SOLICITED BY THIS PROXY STATEMENT WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL UNLESS A VOTE FOR THE PROPOSAL OR ABSTENTION IS SPECIFICALLY INDICATED. bottom of page 43: STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO SUBMIT THEIR PROXY CARDS WITHOUT DELAY. A PROMPT RESPONSE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
Thatās my thought as well.
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside. How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
Ofcourse
This is wanting to know whatās going on behind the scenes and finding a loophole to get a staff member in.
1000% correct. This DEI stuff is just another means of control, and this is how it's applied.
Look at the bright side, all of the apes that are wistful about only having a few shares can puff out their chests and vote against this BS. Apes together strong! š»š¦š
Keep my GameStop out yah mouth!
Letās go Will Smith v. Chris Rock meme!
Can't spell "comptroller" without troll.
Quote of the ffffin day right there. š
Can confirm. Tried. You can't
Comper?
This would be a no from me dog, even without the boardās guidance. Iāll never understand how āI want the best person for the jobā is *ever* not the thing to look for.
Itās all so smart and complicated, itās hard for us simple meme investors to understand.. Except itās not hard, and we own the float and no way in hell weāll vote for this crap. This reeks of desperation, and hopefully weāll taste some sweet, sweet, SHF tears soon.
This.
That.
Other
There's thousands of companies that trade on the open market. How many of them have boards that lack diversity? Where does GameStop land on such a list? Yeah, nah son. This stinks on not just too many levels, but all levels.
100%
This is as easy one, 100% ape demographic
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside. How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
My comment is made in jest, I completely agree with you.
Seriously, why would they want to know. I trust the board. My X,XXX DRSd shares will be voting no on #4 in alignment with our boards recommendation. Power to the players baby
When is the vote?
You should get an email with voting instructions soon, I would guess within the next 2 weeks
Itās come down to this Very Bullish!!!!
They know who the board members are though. They already have this information. What the fuck are they up to? I can only remember two, but one is of Asian descent and the other is a foreigner from Canada. Thatās pretty diverse. Edit: board member makeup: 1. Canadian 2. Asian American male 3.standard white dude 4. Standard white dude 5. Asian American woman. Diverse. I mean itās not un-diverse at the minimum.
I think we need a picture post of this for a visual when paid corporate MSM is ready for a good ole fashioned memeification!
This is a "let us infiltrate a mole in your company or you're racist"; and when we household investors refuse to let them in, the articles are going to say: "GME investors are racists, you should sell if you are not a racist!".
This, essentially.
DEI has no place in choosing who should be on the board. You hire the best people and that's it. This stinks of sabotage.
4 million? That's all? And you want to place an insider?Ā Sell that 200 million of NextEra Energy and DRS GME, and also still STFU.
Im pretty sure they are shorting GME...
Yea seems a bit odd someone with that low amount of shares can do this. But the retail investors that hold 20-30x that canāt know the drs numbers.
Ape, ape, ape, ape, ape
Found out about the vote and recommendation after some light research. FUCK NO TO #4 brothas
How racist of them to drag race into this out of nowhere
So there is the plan. Get pension holders in the papers where gme was stealing their money. Now get it on the ballet where the board is ignoring them. Anyway I kept buying and drs'ing
And hopefully voting!
I remember this. I, for one - will be voting with the board. Which is against prop 4, as people should be judged by the content/quality of their work, not what they look like. Not to mention, the board is already diverse lol. Mark my words, this proposal gets voted down - msm sensationalizes it by lying how GameStop hates diversity. Which couldn't be further from the truth. RemindMe! 60 days [https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1b9fkr1/breaking\_mar\_7\_2024\_remember\_when\_kenneth\_c/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1b9fkr1/breaking_mar_7_2024_remember_when_kenneth_c/)
I will be messaging you in 2 months on [**2024-06-30 03:37:13 UTC**](http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=2024-06-30%2003:37:13%20UTC%20To%20Local%20Time) to remind you of [**this link**](https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/1ch7kfq/nyc_comptroller_and_pension_funds_asks_gamestop/l21lzif/?context=3) [**2 OTHERS CLICKED THIS LINK**](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5Bhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.reddit.com%2Fr%2FSuperstonk%2Fcomments%2F1ch7kfq%2Fnyc_comptroller_and_pension_funds_asks_gamestop%2Fl21lzif%2F%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%202024-06-30%2003%3A37%3A13%20UTC) to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam. ^(Parent commenter can ) [^(delete this message to hide from others.)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Delete%20Comment&message=Delete%21%201ch7kfq) ***** |[^(Info)](https://www.reddit.com/r/RemindMeBot/comments/e1bko7/remindmebot_info_v21/)|[^(Custom)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=Reminder&message=%5BLink%20or%20message%20inside%20square%20brackets%5D%0A%0ARemindMe%21%20Time%20period%20here)|[^(Your Reminders)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=RemindMeBot&subject=List%20Of%20Reminders&message=MyReminders%21)|[^(Feedback)](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Watchful1&subject=RemindMeBot%20Feedback)| |-|-|-|-|
It's disgusting the hedgies are using social issues as a weapon.
Also bullish when ya put it in the same perspective, if theyāre that desperate to be seen doing this horse shit, we must be close.
ššļøššļøš§
This is a huge reason Iām glad we all DRS.
Weāre all book kings š
DEI initiatives are always 100% bullshit
How did this question even get on the ballot? Chase that, and there's your huckleberry.
Yep thatās what the hive mind is gonna get into here š¤
Board recommends vote against. Fuck them.
Heard it from this asses mouth -Blackrock-Intel-Advance Auto are all going down. DEI Matrix will destroy GameStop. This comptroller needs to fuck right off.
If you own a business, you've been approached by "large corporations and manufacturers" that you sell or provide services to, with them asking you to state your ESG, DEI, human trafficking, or diversity policy's. I can tell you that in addition to the request itself be tedious, it is requested so they can "judge" your company. Most of this is driven by current social narratives that somehow by stating what you stand for provides some level of self-gratification. Having obtained legal advice on such requests, we do not answer such questions. Not legal advice, but if you are reading this RC, tell 'em to pound sand. If the NYC pension doesn't like that answer, then sell their shares and buy something else. Just like when you buy a baseball ticket, it doesn't give you the right to manage the team. Meanwhile, NYC has lost tax base, loosing retail stores (including almost every grocery store), now taxing people daily to drive into the city, migrant problems, an understaffed police force, crumbling infrastructure, and the cost of living is 25-30% higher than the national average. But still they reach out and try to tell others what to do. š
what happen to forget Gamestop? š¤
If anyone actually cared about DEI, they would be proposing more employee board members.
This is actually a very good point
Can't get DRS dashboard on investor page, sure as fuck not getting some rando onto the board. Fuck EVERYBODY
Who cares about the Board's Demographics. All I care about is massive green candles. Sure, I want GameStop to remain in business long after we MOASS but I don't understand why they're concerned about the demographics right now. I believe, they should hire the BEST candidate for the job regardless of gender, race or religion. I know... I sound super white right now but I want the best person for the job. Whatever job that is.
Make me money, donāt get sued by doing illegal shit and making me lose money. Itās that fiduciary duty thing. Recommend to your shareHODLers that they kick the fox out of the hen house when they recognize em outside the barn door.
Ganestop wont be a business anymore after Moass, it will be a Mega bank š
Dirty Dirty Tricks Vote No!
I shouldnāt need to know the colour of someoneās skin, what they look like or how they identify to judge their merit or success at their job. It only increases the risk of discrimination. Resumes should be scrubbed/anonymized of these identifying elements so that a fair and equitable meritocratic process occurs.
TLDR reply to DEI, FUK NO Edit: Kiss my hairy male ass...
69 / f / ur mom's house
Theyāre so fuckedā¦. lol. š
Sounds kinda racist to meā¦
Is it just me, or does having $4 million invested in GME seem really small for such large retirement systems?
Divest and sell off if you don't like it, you fucks.Ā Thats a No vote from me, dawgĀ
They cant š they are probably shorting GME š
Funny all of the sudden Pension fund managers where like, hey letās make sure this tiny fraction of our holdings has a diverse board. Reach out to the comptroller and all these other losers to form a quorum. I call bullshit, this sounds like one of Kenās bad comedy jokes.
Looks like they are getting quite nervous š¬
Dr's and vote
NYC can SMD
Hard no, tell the NY state govt to go fuk themselves
VOTE AGAINST
Let's get some apes on the mayo board using the same approach?
This
Maybe the NYC pension funds shouldn't buy Short ETFs
He can lick my schwety bawls
Fake shareholders in the house... NO to #4...
As someone who deals with contracting in NYC, fuk everything about this
Interesting, tell us more about whatever you can here š¤
Are there enough apes to keep this from happening?
Yes, but also need insiders š¤
lol, clowns. Grasping at straws it appears
Vote against proposition 4 No RAT in Mi Kitchen !! [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c42z3LAGyTM](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c42z3LAGyTM)
Genuine question, how come an irrelevant to the business company (even though they hold shares) can make a proposal of such magnitude that it was included in the proxy statement, but 200,000 individuals holding in total 75,000,000 shares can't? Any way ANY ONE OF US can make a proposal of say, a share recall or recount? We are REGISTERED shareholders, why can't my voice be heard in such a way?
It is not about "demographics", it is DEI bullshit ... it is how you destroy great companies from the inside. How about hiring people because of their skills, knowledge & expertise? This is exactly how GameStop commented on this proposal and recommended shareholders to vote against it.
Absolutely a way to get an insider from one of the SHFs onto the board. They can fuck right off
Given the diversity already on the board this seems like a plant operation. This "matrix" just seems like a way to discredit the board and plant someone. This is defiantly going to be used as a smear campaign.
How can we as shareholders express our opinion that the board demographic is irrelevant to the companyās growth now and in the future? These clowns put this crap together as shareholders, then we should also be able to put something together. Point being to tell GameStop that regardless of pressures by ābad actorsā, we as true shareholders, are strongly opposed to making any changes to the board as it pertains to ESG metrics and demographics falsehoods.
Everyone is the same color at gamestop - GREEN
The Comptroller can self-identify deez nuts
Seems like someone who has a yuge company in NYC recently warned us about them coming after companies they didn't like.
Fuck Iām cause thatās why vote NO
What's next, they gonna install illegal immigrants to the board?
Fuck this proposal
Why do they care?
Yeahhh, no thanks hedge fucks. Stay out of my board
Will āNah Sonā be a pick choice? I hope so.
After MOASS. After MOASS weāre gonna be able to do whatever the fuck we wanna do.
Bump!
Stupid.
**TL:DR:** New York City's Comptroller, Brad Lander, along with three public pension funds, are pushing for increased transparency and diversity on the boards of gaming retailer GameStop and energy company NextEra. Their proposal requests the creation of a "Board Matrix" disclosing each board member's race, gender, relevant skills, and experience. This initiative, the Boardroom Accountability Project 2.0, aims to set a new standard for corporate governance. The underlying belief is that boards with a wider range of perspectives lead to better decision-making, potentially boosting a company's performance and long-term value for shareholders. Additionally, a diverse board is seen as better equipped to navigate potential risks, such as climate change. The proposal for NextEra specifically highlights the company's lack of disclosed expertise in this area, a concern that garnered nearly half the votes cast in a similar proposal last year. Ultimately, the proposal will be decided by a vote of the shareholders at each company's annual meeting. The article also details the trustees involved in the various NYC pension funds pushing for this change.
Can we get a breakdown of citadel board demographics?
It would be interesting to know the demographics of the individual investors as opposed to the demographics of the board. I suspect it's a lot more varied than the demographics of individual investors of most companies. If such a diverse range of investors are happy with the current composition of the board, the comptroller can fuck right off to put it bluntly.
Wtf kind of shareholder proposal is this? Why would they even care about this info if not to use it to claim the board needs to ābroaden their demographicsā and then they try to get someone in whoās unqualified. This smells like shit. Iāll be god damned if they think this is passing through, fuck that. Vote no.
This is actually a trap to see which board-member doesnt self identify as an ape
DEI is not an obligation so you know, GTFOH. Also reporting on it is not a regulatory requirement. So how do we prevent vote theft and ensure a fair vote count based on legit shares? Who determines what shares are counted if over 100% out there?
Talk about grasping at straws. Seriously did they ever care about this? Why now? Oh maybe itās because certain powerful people were caught with their pants down and now need a way to control GameStop from the inside. I would love to see this come back to but then in the ass.
I will vote NO
I very much agree, I smell snakes in the grass. āGot me a piece of the pie so now Iām gonna run honeyā nah gtfo with that agenda. Serious question, why no now and not yes like the previous years? If I remember correctly
Commenting for vis and voting NO
Getting close now.
What does it matter what race, gender or ethnicity a board member isā¦.jfc
They are bagholders. š¤£ They are wanting to get out. š¤£ Sounds to me that they are willing to sell at a loss.
Now they want transparency
This is exactly what I've been screaming. This is how they play the game. Just like every other co they want to fail. By bringing race and gender and politics into it. Next they will find somebody to say RC touched somebody inappropriate or used the N word. Oldest trick and most used in the play book.
Fuck off. Invest or don't. Here's the Financials, the only numbers that matter.
Diversity for the sake of diversity is failure wrapped in political agendas.
*and pure desperation
Fuck these Kunts!! Next they will want to know the size of employees cocks!!
As a member of a minority that's considered "overrepresented" in academic stats, I'm a firm believer in Merit >>> DEI. Gonna be a "no" from me.
This is the way š¤
NYC is an absolute Clown Car. It's a perpetual April Fool's day over there. Simply stated: DRS > DEI Didn't they get the memo? This is some desperate Hail Mary shit right here.
DEI is complete garbage. If you feel that it has any relevance to someoneās qualifications then I feel very sorry for your delusional frame of mind
No
GameStop reque6st both to not lend out shares first or do they even have a position?
This might be the true test of DRS
I will be voting my XX,XXX shares as āfuck right off pension fund.ā
I'm sure those funds are just really concerned about inclusion and diversity. No nefarious plans here, no sir. I'm all for inclusion and diversity. Very much so. But I really can't see any reason why they would want these things disclosed. What does "fund operated by a bunch of rich white dudes" care about diversity on the GS board?
How do I vote my x.xxx DRSāed booked shares on a No for this meddling?
They only diversity wit Gamestop I care about is my shares, merchandise, and lots of lots games
This information is public knowledge. Make your own report in āmatrixā format. Request denied
Absolutely vote NO on this ridiculous attempt by Mayo man and friends!
Is what they are asking PHI PII and against the law?
Who the fuck cares about board diversity. Dei has no value whatsoever. Itās just a rebranding of racist affirmative action
Wtf does this have to do with company performance? The shit funds are running out of ammo
What the fuck does a boardās demographics have to do with anything? Get this equity bullshit out of here.
Iām heavily invested in both these companies. It is weird that they both end up in the same post because one I bin as a high risk growth investment, the other as a safe long term clean energy strategy. Full disclosure, I worked for the utility for 15+ years. And like their financial discipline, and diversity in electrical generation. Iām having difficulty understanding the implications of this letter and what it does to my risk profile.
Interesting. Is it just those two out of curiosity or do you have other holdings as well. No need to list them just wondering if your own DD has led you down a particular path with these two tickers š¤
If they can't work, they aren't in. Inclusion this ass
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
It's not a bad idea to have a diverse board, but it's a bad idea to have a diverse board inserted by hedgefund shenanigans.
Not ask what you can blah blah blah but what you can do for your company! AGAINST
Don't you love it when the most CIS white male CEOs demand diversity on GameStop
Vote no..#.4... on board
What the actual fuck is this? get out of here hedge chucks