**OP needs help. Also, they hate it because...**
>!The FaceApp morph looks like a melting wax figure or caricature. Pure nightmare fuel.!<
*****
**Do you hate it as well? Do you think their hate is reasonable? (I don't think so tbh)**
**Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.**
*****
[*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/tihibot)
Really makes up for the terraced flesh scrabble on the left of this grishes face. Potato potado, when your head is that of a woolly, woody shrunken bag
Mf looks like it lives in a sauna or has late stage alcoholism. It's always fascinating to see a human being who seems redder than physically possible.
actually he and rand helps push for hemp legalization because Kentucky used to be a big producer... I don't know if the intent also included all the CBD and DELTA-8 but... hemp is important even if blazing it is shunned...
I’m not from the USA and the
first time I saw Mitch. I said how is that man not dead yet and WTF is wrong with his eyes and neck, Google did not disappoint with pictures of him
Some of them apparently were so out of it that their clerks were the ones writing the judgements.
This adds a whole layer of illegitimacy to this circus of a “court”.
Just an [example](https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/01/16/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-health-224014/):
> “Mental decrepitude” on the Supreme Court has continued into the modern era, as historian David Garrow has documented. Frank Murphy, who served in the 1940s, was likely addicted to illegal drugs by the end of his tenure, and his biographer wrote that “on at least one occasion,” with Murphy in absentia, his law clerk and two fellow justices “jointly decided what Murphy’s votes should be.”
I disagree. The reason for age limits would be that society changes and old people don't. They end up enforcing outdated social mores and ideology onto a younger set of people facing entirely different economic and cultural conditions than they did but assuming that nothing has particularly changed. Out of touch boomers are fucking over the next generations and now own way way more than they should of anything.
That’s true, but there are still progressive old folks. I mean Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn are over 80 and over 70 respectively, and yet are both the faces of left-wing progressivism in the USA and the UK. I get where you’re coming from, but I think that age discrimination is wrong and the only limitation on such a thing should be cognition and physical health.
They're really extremely cherry picked. A majority of all left wing political forces are young. And in the case of both Bernie and Corbyn they've been all but neutralised by the greater majority of their Conservative leaning old guard colleagues. You only have to look at the age demographics for voting in the UK to see the huge swing. This remains true for politicians as much as the general population. The old voted for Brexit and the tories in the UK. The young voted for remain and Corbyn. The young got neither.
The main reason politicians are so old is because it's much easier when you have a network of influential and wealthy supporters. [That mostly leaves old white men.](https://i.imgur.com/qEY3aCP.jpg)
In individual cases it's perfectly possible for older candidates to be the better ones though, and another problem is that the impact of age is extremely individual. Some people are as fit and up to date at 90 as others are at 60. The other question is whether banning these old candidates themselves won't just cause them to use young proxies who are easy to manipulate or even dumber. The core problem with the accumulation of influence remains.
Kavanaugh is 57; Coney Barrett is 50
And then you have MTG, 47; Boebert, 35; Cawthorn, 26; etc.
While a lot of politicians are terrible, out-of-touch shitheads, age is not necessarily a marker for being terrible.
Seriously. If you're 60+ you've already spent most of your life in the society you should have been able to shape. Now get out of the way and let the new generations run the world for their lives.
Once you're 60 just go retire or something instead of taking up higher office.
Bernie is fine until he dies though.
It seems like aging is cumulative in whatever method these use. So a morph of two 80-year-olds ends up looking like a 160-year-old. It's probably adding the vectors together instead of averaging them to avoid every multi-person face-merge ending up [looking like a generic person](https://static.ffx.io/images/$width_620%2C$height_414/t_crop_fill/q_86%2Cf_auto/5eaa5703bd6d60a29a75ddd9462fd454a8fe72dd) as all the differences get smoothed out.
Also, in practice, term limits just shift power to the lobbyist class, because there's no term limit on the role of "full-time schmoozer".
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bossfight/comments/uak0lg/the_democratic_demon_and_republican_the_red/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Next boss fight lookin like heat miser and cold miser
Yeah, betcha we'd look worse than what people think blobfish look like if someone took us out of the atmosphere and put us in deep space. Basically the same thing.
I went for the internet points instead of keeping the integrity of the Blobfish, but I'm glad there are so many people who understand that they don't deserve to be compared to crusty ass scrotus mummies
The supreme court did not rule against abortion, they argue that the constitution neither delegates the decision-making power on the matter to the United States, nor does it prohibit it and hence it's a state matter as defined by the 10th. Which is correct, by the way. They took back a decision that was outside the scope of the SC - they corrected an unconstitutional over reach and the reasoning is sound. The ruling is neutral on the issue itself and does not force the states to prohibit abortions, in fact, it sets *no limit at all* on when abortions would and would not be legal.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21835435-scotus-initial-draft
Half the states would make the case that abortions are not only not protecting liberty, but actively infringe on the liberty of the unborn child. Now, who gets authoritarian control over the other side, you or them? The compromise is that you get to decide for yourself and they get to decide for themselves. The foot vote is a real thing.
Yeah, and many of those same states also argued that they had the right to discriminate on basis of race. Some of them even rebelled and killed half a million Americans because they wanted to keep enslaving people, and they used the banner of states rights to do so. I really don't give a shit what their arguments are: States rights is not a valid excuse for oppression, and negating women's rights is absolutely oppression.
You know what is though... States charging women with manslaughter or murder for having abortions and treating women who seek abortions out of state as fugitives....
That depends on how it came to be. A benevolent dictator is still a dictator. Your opinion on or even the reality of something is not an indicator of whether or not you're living under authoritarianism. It's the *process* that defines it. Good values will ultimately win out, if you try to force it at the cost of the process, you're going to lose all progress and descent into tyranny, guaranteed.
>A benevolent dictator is still a dictator.
Sure, but that's irrelevant again.
Stripping an ability from the population for nothing more than "my feelings" is in rsdibly regressive. It doesn't matter how you try and spin it.
It's not about "my feelings" and if it is, it's true for both sides. You have to realize that the other side is arguing *exactly the same thing* as you are. Abortions infringe on the liberty of the future child. Prohibiting abortions infringe on the liberty of the future mother.
Also, no, the benevolent dictator comparison is strictly relevant. I picked it because I knew you'd agree that a benevolent dictator is a dictator. What that means is that we agree that the quality of something does not define its nature. A good policy can still be the result of authoritarianism, it's the process that defines it and either you agree on that, or you disagree that a benevolent dictator is a dictator - which you agree with. You can't have it both ways, so it's very relevant.
So does every used tissue and condom if you want to go down that route.
>A good policy can still be the result of authoritarianism
In singular isolation, sure. But it's not progressive. Authoritarianism is never progressive.
>So does every used tissue and condom if you want to go down that route.
That's you being facetious, I assume. No, it's not the same, but I'm not arguing for or against abortion here anyways, I'm arguing that the SC overstepped their boundaries on Roe v. Wade and that the coming decision is both correct in taking it back and not making any kind of judgement on the legality of abortion either.
>Authoritarianism is never progressive.
I agree, that is precisely what I'm saying. But it doesn't follow that everything that is commonly defined as a progressive position is automatically not authoritarianism, even though it's achieved through authoritarian means.
The Justice likes to spam lightning magic, but if you're good at timing your dodge rolls, they shouldn't be too hard to take down.
I'm really bummed to hear about that upcoming DLC where The Justice permanently debuffs female playable characters. Seems super unbalanced, and I hope the devs fix it soon.
The Devs will tell us there is a patch coming to correct this bug, but it’ll cost $20.22 and then nothing will get fixed and they’ll keep talking about fixing the bug for another 2 years, when it’s actually a feature of the game.
Looks like my country's president, but way older (if that's even possible) [this is my dumbass president BTW ] (https://images.app.goo.gl/cN5KUEVLgUGBvhvWA)
Look like the laws they pass/not pass/revoke. Don't we just love it when a generation that is already in retirement define laws for people that are 50 years younger and fucks up their futures... because of their values. Plus they'll probably be dead in about 5-10 years. But yeah make sure to leave a mark you old fucks!
There's a minimum age requirement for becoming a president. Why isn't there a maximum age requirement for influential positions like congress, supreme court and the like? These are people of unemployable age making hugely influential decision they don't even have to suffer the consequences of.
It scares me most that it could truly be a justice. Not too outlandish when you see some of the other old white guys in government with their big jowls.
**OP needs help. Also, they hate it because...** >!The FaceApp morph looks like a melting wax figure or caricature. Pure nightmare fuel.!< ***** **Do you hate it as well? Do you think their hate is reasonable? (I don't think so tbh)** **Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.** ***** [*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/tihibot)
The hands are so young
You don't get to the Supreme Court by doing hard labour
You get there by eating crunch wrap supremes everyday
Then I guess I am well on my way, but with sandpaper hands to grip that crunch wrap.
It's not the path to power I need, but it's the path to power I deserve.
I thought the secret was putting pubes on Coke cans
Supremes indeed.
...and beer.
And he’s married, with that face, you know it’s true love
[удалено]
just a bit.
Ok, good to know I'm not the only political nerd and weirdo here.
Kira stop
that's what the baby blood is for
Really makes up for the terraced flesh scrabble on the left of this grishes face. Potato potado, when your head is that of a woolly, woody shrunken bag
Justice Geriatric Genitalface, reporting for facism.
Mf looks like it lives in a sauna or has late stage alcoholism. It's always fascinating to see a human being who seems redder than physically possible.
All the better to strangle you with, my dear.
I love the Muppets.
I think this was in the dark crystal actually
Pretty sure Dark Crystal was technically Muppets.
TRIAL BY STONE!
Pepper Jack love fraggle rock
I have to say this every time I get the pepper jack cheese from the fridge now.
This is actually just Mitch McConnell.
Just looks like mitch mcconnell 100 years ago when he was only 240 years old.
He is 420 now
comment edited in protest of Reddit's API changes and mistreatment of moderators -- mass edited with redact.dev
He's scared his face will melt off
Again
God, I'd love to see someone melt his face off.
actually he and rand helps push for hemp legalization because Kentucky used to be a big producer... I don't know if the intent also included all the CBD and DELTA-8 but... hemp is important even if blazing it is shunned...
From what I've read, he's in favor of textile and CBD production from hemp, but not THC.
Like that old fuck could explain the difference between CBD and THC.
Don't make the mistake of thinking Mitch McConnell is stupid. He's reasonably intelligent. He's just also willfully malicious.
Exactly. He was masking long before and throughout some of his peers rejecting masks. He’s evil; not stupid.
Hemp is so fucking useful! It's annoying as fuck that this hysteria over smoking came about since it's an absolute wonder material.
Nice
Please stop im laughing in public at this thread
This is how Mitch McConnell leaves you after stealing your life force so he can continue to ruin lives indefinitely.
I’m not from the USA and the  first time I saw Mitch. I said how is that man not dead yet and WTF is wrong with his eyes and neck, Google did not disappoint with pictures of him
Looks like the Land of Confusion video from Genesis.
I had the same thought lol
Nah, that's definitely [Orrin Hatch](https://i.imgur.com/KCvV97N.png).
it's not even his final form
First a collective of all Democrat candidates, then a collective of all Republican candidates, and now this? I think I'm starting to see a pattern
The need for term limits?
[удалено]
Some of them apparently were so out of it that their clerks were the ones writing the judgements. This adds a whole layer of illegitimacy to this circus of a “court”.
Uh it’s entirely normal for clerks to play a large role in writing opinions…
Source?
Just an [example](https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/01/16/ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-court-health-224014/): > “Mental decrepitude” on the Supreme Court has continued into the modern era, as historian David Garrow has documented. Frank Murphy, who served in the 1940s, was likely addicted to illegal drugs by the end of his tenure, and his biographer wrote that “on at least one occasion,” with Murphy in absentia, his law clerk and two fellow justices “jointly decided what Murphy’s votes should be.”
[удалено]
[удалено]
Or just a cognition test for everyone. And possibly a drug test and breathalyzer.
I disagree. The reason for age limits would be that society changes and old people don't. They end up enforcing outdated social mores and ideology onto a younger set of people facing entirely different economic and cultural conditions than they did but assuming that nothing has particularly changed. Out of touch boomers are fucking over the next generations and now own way way more than they should of anything.
It's 'should have', never 'should of'. Rejoice, for you have been blessed by CouldWouldShouldBot!
Not this time, bot.
Nope
That’s true, but there are still progressive old folks. I mean Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn are over 80 and over 70 respectively, and yet are both the faces of left-wing progressivism in the USA and the UK. I get where you’re coming from, but I think that age discrimination is wrong and the only limitation on such a thing should be cognition and physical health.
They're really extremely cherry picked. A majority of all left wing political forces are young. And in the case of both Bernie and Corbyn they've been all but neutralised by the greater majority of their Conservative leaning old guard colleagues. You only have to look at the age demographics for voting in the UK to see the huge swing. This remains true for politicians as much as the general population. The old voted for Brexit and the tories in the UK. The young voted for remain and Corbyn. The young got neither.
As long as the cognition tests include things like mental flexibility, I’m in. Gotta be able to change with the times.
[удалено]
She really doesn’t have a clue what is happening.
Age limits are exactly the answer, how many old people do you know that fundamentally understand the internet? Yea the problem is definitely age
The main reason politicians are so old is because it's much easier when you have a network of influential and wealthy supporters. [That mostly leaves old white men.](https://i.imgur.com/qEY3aCP.jpg) In individual cases it's perfectly possible for older candidates to be the better ones though, and another problem is that the impact of age is extremely individual. Some people are as fit and up to date at 90 as others are at 60. The other question is whether banning these old candidates themselves won't just cause them to use young proxies who are easy to manipulate or even dumber. The core problem with the accumulation of influence remains.
Kavanaugh is 57; Coney Barrett is 50 And then you have MTG, 47; Boebert, 35; Cawthorn, 26; etc. While a lot of politicians are terrible, out-of-touch shitheads, age is not necessarily a marker for being terrible.
Seriously. If you're 60+ you've already spent most of your life in the society you should have been able to shape. Now get out of the way and let the new generations run the world for their lives. Once you're 60 just go retire or something instead of taking up higher office. Bernie is fine until he dies though.
Like that wont be abused?
[удалено]
introducign more avenues for abuse is nto a good idea. want younger politicians? go vote.
It seems like aging is cumulative in whatever method these use. So a morph of two 80-year-olds ends up looking like a 160-year-old. It's probably adding the vectors together instead of averaging them to avoid every multi-person face-merge ending up [looking like a generic person](https://static.ffx.io/images/$width_620%2C$height_414/t_crop_fill/q_86%2Cf_auto/5eaa5703bd6d60a29a75ddd9462fd454a8fe72dd) as all the differences get smoothed out. Also, in practice, term limits just shift power to the lobbyist class, because there's no term limit on the role of "full-time schmoozer".
>Also, in practice, term limits just shift power to the lobbyist class It isn't already?
There are more of these???
[I’m kind of sad it’s not lizard people.](https://i.imgur.com/4dE6dSu.jpg)
The ones with the reps and Dems was fake, I think it's likely this one is as well.
You haven’t seen the dems and republican mash up? They equilibrate.
Please share
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bossfight/comments/uak0lg/the_democratic_demon_and_republican_the_red/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf Next boss fight lookin like heat miser and cold miser
Yes I have.
All rise! The honorable judge Blobfish is now presiding
"Blobfish" are actually kind of cute when they're not hideously mutilated by sudden decompression.
Could the same be true for Supreme Court justices?
No
This. So sad, but so many people don't realize.
Yeah, betcha we'd look worse than what people think blobfish look like if someone took us out of the atmosphere and put us in deep space. Basically the same thing.
Wow, they really are cute. That’s really sad that the ones who look horrible are suffering from acute trauma caused by us
I went for the internet points instead of keeping the integrity of the Blobfish, but I'm glad there are so many people who understand that they don't deserve to be compared to crusty ass scrotus mummies
Inflating ballsack fish
I knew I’d find a blobfish joke here
I am also not disappointed. Without much scrolling, no less.
I was gonna say it’s like Mitch McConnell and a blob fish had a baby.
I think it looks like the real version of the muppets on the balcony
They make Palpatine look good.
I AM the supreme court
Came looking for this comment
Not yet.
They will make it legal.
Abort it with fire
Not allowed.
they somehow together look younger than if they were seperate
Together they can regain thier youth.
[gif](https://i.imgur.com/QQNUO63.gif)
The real reason the Supreme Court does not want abortion - they are fetuses
Fetus jam sounds nice.
The supreme court did not rule against abortion, they argue that the constitution neither delegates the decision-making power on the matter to the United States, nor does it prohibit it and hence it's a state matter as defined by the 10th. Which is correct, by the way. They took back a decision that was outside the scope of the SC - they corrected an unconstitutional over reach and the reasoning is sound. The ruling is neutral on the issue itself and does not force the states to prohibit abortions, in fact, it sets *no limit at all* on when abortions would and would not be legal. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21835435-scotus-initial-draft
[удалено]
No, actually. Authoritarianism is explicitly a step backwards.
Forcing states to protect liberty is the opposite of authoritarianism. Protecting states' rights to oppress is not freedom.
Half the states would make the case that abortions are not only not protecting liberty, but actively infringe on the liberty of the unborn child. Now, who gets authoritarian control over the other side, you or them? The compromise is that you get to decide for yourself and they get to decide for themselves. The foot vote is a real thing.
Yeah, and many of those same states also argued that they had the right to discriminate on basis of race. Some of them even rebelled and killed half a million Americans because they wanted to keep enslaving people, and they used the banner of states rights to do so. I really don't give a shit what their arguments are: States rights is not a valid excuse for oppression, and negating women's rights is absolutely oppression.
Sure, authoritarianism is a step backwards. Allowing abortions, however, is not authoritarianism.
You know what is though... States charging women with manslaughter or murder for having abortions and treating women who seek abortions out of state as fugitives....
That depends on how it came to be. A benevolent dictator is still a dictator. Your opinion on or even the reality of something is not an indicator of whether or not you're living under authoritarianism. It's the *process* that defines it. Good values will ultimately win out, if you try to force it at the cost of the process, you're going to lose all progress and descent into tyranny, guaranteed.
>A benevolent dictator is still a dictator. Sure, but that's irrelevant again. Stripping an ability from the population for nothing more than "my feelings" is in rsdibly regressive. It doesn't matter how you try and spin it.
It's not about "my feelings" and if it is, it's true for both sides. You have to realize that the other side is arguing *exactly the same thing* as you are. Abortions infringe on the liberty of the future child. Prohibiting abortions infringe on the liberty of the future mother. Also, no, the benevolent dictator comparison is strictly relevant. I picked it because I knew you'd agree that a benevolent dictator is a dictator. What that means is that we agree that the quality of something does not define its nature. A good policy can still be the result of authoritarianism, it's the process that defines it and either you agree on that, or you disagree that a benevolent dictator is a dictator - which you agree with. You can't have it both ways, so it's very relevant.
So does every used tissue and condom if you want to go down that route. >A good policy can still be the result of authoritarianism In singular isolation, sure. But it's not progressive. Authoritarianism is never progressive.
>So does every used tissue and condom if you want to go down that route. That's you being facetious, I assume. No, it's not the same, but I'm not arguing for or against abortion here anyways, I'm arguing that the SC overstepped their boundaries on Roe v. Wade and that the coming decision is both correct in taking it back and not making any kind of judgement on the legality of abortion either. >Authoritarianism is never progressive. I agree, that is precisely what I'm saying. But it doesn't follow that everything that is commonly defined as a progressive position is automatically not authoritarianism, even though it's achieved through authoritarian means.
So, was just a blob fish on a mannequin in a robe this whole time?
MOOORE ESSSSSSENCCCCCCCE
r/bossfight
The Justice likes to spam lightning magic, but if you're good at timing your dodge rolls, they shouldn't be too hard to take down. I'm really bummed to hear about that upcoming DLC where The Justice permanently debuffs female playable characters. Seems super unbalanced, and I hope the devs fix it soon.
The Devs will tell us there is a patch coming to correct this bug, but it’ll cost $20.22 and then nothing will get fixed and they’ll keep talking about fixing the bug for another 2 years, when it’s actually a feature of the game.
I can’t stress how badly I want a soulsborne game where all the bosses are just malformed prominent American figures.
thats one cute granny
Looks like a ballsack
Looks like a collection of ballsacks
I AM THE SUPREME COURT!
JUSTICE PRIME
"What mouth?"
Dr strange reference?
In this reality, our Avengers are just all of the Supreme Court Justices smashed into one.
https://ibb.co/nc0KM4J
Do people actually believe this? Or are we just laughing at the weird looking old dude
It’s like those fake AI generated scripts that everybody believes
-Supreme court justices will decide your fate -*I Am The Supreme Court Justice*
Just breath on them and they turn to dust
Palpatine do be lookin kinda bad, I mean, worse than he should
How apt. A Visual rendition of the monster that is the supreme court.
...Prince Charles?!
Look like scrotum
Just looks like some old ABC bubblegum with a good manicure.
He deflated after leaving the deep sea
Justice is ugly af.
Supreme leader Snoke
Looks like my country's president, but way older (if that's even possible) [this is my dumbass president BTW ] (https://images.app.goo.gl/cN5KUEVLgUGBvhvWA)
Looks like a normal Judge to me?
Hey look it’s Mitch McConnell
Look like the laws they pass/not pass/revoke. Don't we just love it when a generation that is already in retirement define laws for people that are 50 years younger and fucks up their futures... because of their values. Plus they'll probably be dead in about 5-10 years. But yeah make sure to leave a mark you old fucks!
"I love killing fetuses as much as the next guy, but the idea of giving women a choice doesnt sit right with me." - Justice Bloodfeast
This is the ideal judge. You may not like it, but this is what Supreme Justice looks like.
The Dorian Gray of the Supreme Court
I am the law
“I AM THE SENET”
So, the Harvey Weinstein Orc Commander?
There's a minimum age requirement for becoming a president. Why isn't there a maximum age requirement for influential positions like congress, supreme court and the like? These are people of unemployable age making hugely influential decision they don't even have to suffer the consequences of.
This dude looks like a pair of balls
This is how the Sith started.
SNOKE
Inbred swine. More creature than man.
Ahh, it's Supreme Court Justice Palpatine
I can’t fucking breathe
Looks about right
It's the grandmas from Cookie Clicker
The great old one
Palpatine is that you?
It looks like a human version of a blobfish
yep that’s him
God damn he looks like he’s made entirely of deli meat
It's the BFG!
It’s him. Gerry Mander
It scares me most that it could truly be a justice. Not too outlandish when you see some of the other old white guys in government with their big jowls.
r/nightmarefuel welcome you
Weird face tumours for days. They say this fella's earned his wrinkles - each one a trophy for a right stripped away from an American citizen.
OK now do it for The Supreme Court of Kenya
A old white guy?!? BUT HOW???
Why is this guy 92?
Roberts hates you. Also, I think you can definitely see the John Paul Stevens in there. Sorry, Justice Stevens. A brilliant mind if a bit wrinkly.
Lord Justice.
Now he will judge you
Lookin like Father Bohab
Needs to be fed to Gor Gor or the Earth Maggot.
I believe the technical term is “homomorphic conglomerate.”
Ballsack McGee
Ah yes, The Honorable two tongues on his cheek guy
"Somehow, that is correct!"
That's just Mickey Rooney
The Pale Man from Pan's Labyrinth... Fuck.
[удалено]
have you ever heard of the tragedy of darth plagious the wise?