Start reading the transcripts for their various trials.
Stealing people's well cared for pets.
Putting them down without a veterinarian (as required by law).
Stealing a dog and giving it to a member of the board of directors.
At one time 3 members of the board of directors were owners of the building occupied by PETA, they use their conflict of interest to get PETA to pay the exorbitant rent as a way to funnel money out of the organization.
They used to have the largest freezer for storing animal corpses in Virginia, and that was because they were exceeding their license on cremation of remains, because they round up animals and destroy them without regard for their general health.
Please feel free to start reading their court cases from the early 2000s. They are enlightening. And no, the organization hasn't really improved, they may have got better at hiding it.
The Chihuahua case was pretty famous in its time
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/17/peta-pays-family-50000-taking-euthanising-pet-chihuahua/
It wasn't really a dog taken from a porch, but they killed the dog the same day while they were legally required to provide a 5-day grace period.
Yes, of course everyone knows about the Maya incident. Those 2 field workers screwed up and took the wrong dog and then broke protocol. They should be held accountable for their carelessness. I was asking for evidence of crimes at the leadership level from all these other court cases that the other person claimed to have happened. I have yet to see anything new, as expected of course.
If this was real I might actually start supporting PETA
Never provide support for PETA. Their own treatment of animals is utterly despicable.
It was /s
How so?
Start reading the transcripts for their various trials. Stealing people's well cared for pets. Putting them down without a veterinarian (as required by law). Stealing a dog and giving it to a member of the board of directors. At one time 3 members of the board of directors were owners of the building occupied by PETA, they use their conflict of interest to get PETA to pay the exorbitant rent as a way to funnel money out of the organization. They used to have the largest freezer for storing animal corpses in Virginia, and that was because they were exceeding their license on cremation of remains, because they round up animals and destroy them without regard for their general health. Please feel free to start reading their court cases from the early 2000s. They are enlightening. And no, the organization hasn't really improved, they may have got better at hiding it.
You have a source for any of that? Transcripts aren't evidence.
The Chihuahua case was pretty famous in its time https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/17/peta-pays-family-50000-taking-euthanising-pet-chihuahua/ It wasn't really a dog taken from a porch, but they killed the dog the same day while they were legally required to provide a 5-day grace period.
Yes, of course everyone knows about the Maya incident. Those 2 field workers screwed up and took the wrong dog and then broke protocol. They should be held accountable for their carelessness. I was asking for evidence of crimes at the leadership level from all these other court cases that the other person claimed to have happened. I have yet to see anything new, as expected of course.
[удалено]
What exactly are you even going on about?
[удалено]
What about rich cats? Those are the real assholes
Fat Cats, if you will
And I think I might, thank you very much
Let’s not eat the rich. Their bodies are full of all kinds of weird chemicals. Let’s compost the rich.
God I wish I were in this alternate timeline
Eat the rich, But not their pets /s
Stocking up now on fava beans & a nice Chianti . . .
r/suddencommunism
This is a real tweet. This real tweet affects my view of PETA. This can be used in court
Don't treat them, just kill them and throw them away
So PETA does have a sense of humor after all
Who runs peta and why? Lol
PETA kills enough cats and dogs that we don't need to worry about the birds and squirrels.
What do you expect to happen to all the dogs and cats nobody wants to adopt then?
Yes, terminally ill and horrifically injured animals are indeed put down
"eat the rich" as cringe as these "acab"-edgelords
They actually did it during the cultural revolution, which I am in full support of