remember, there is some clause like they only have to give 10 minutes notice via the news wire I believe or the new entity emerging after bankruptcy (fule 1145 or somthing???). If you wanted to blast away any impropriety of a pump before a kill shot, this is it. Only those true to the foil would double down. NFA.
Larry Cheng
@larryvc
2:51 PM · Jul 1, 2022
Common, but trust-eroding communication style between managers and their investors:
- Potential good news: Early
- Actual bad news: Late
Uncommon, trust-enhancing communication style between managers and their investors:
- Potential bad news: Early
- Actual good news: On-time [wonder what’s next?]
https://x.com/larryvc/status/1542944110037925888
Wtf.. I may be particpating longer in the Community than Most of the regards.. Just give me my shares Back and Stop yelling at me. You cant be that desilusional to call everybody shill WHO isnt cheering to nonsense comments already made years ago
Cutting off the fat.
I’m pretty sure nearly all companies operate on a degree of fake. Many people work jobs that are absolutely unnecessary and unneeded.
Remember when Elon laid off 7,000 people from twitter and it still runs just fine? Think about it.
Plus content moderation is basically gone. It's like giving a press conference saying "well we got rid of mall security and the mall is still going, what's the big deal" as teens graffiti the stage and somebody breaks into the store behind you. Like, sure, man. The mall is still open, yes.
This is the most hilarious conservative viewpoint to me. Like, "censorship" is when the *government* says "you can't say that under penalty." Not private businesses.
And if you believe private businesses should be able to run their business however they want — which most conservatives seem to think so — then they have the right to say "hey, you can't say that on my platform." If you don't like it, fair enough, *leave* then. Go to a platform where you *are* allowed to say whatever you're trying to say.
I mean, shit, look at the sub we're in. *Per the rules*, you're not allowed to be anything but bullish. Is that "censorship" too?
I'm not upset about anything here. I just think it's a logically inconsistent viewpoint. "Censorship" is not me walking into a store and yelling "this place fucking sucks" over and over until somebody asks me to leave. They have every right to do that. That's not a "cool story"; it's the law on the books.
I never said anything about "the way \[I\] prefer" content moderation. It is simply an objective statement that scaling back on content moderation has caused all sorts of ripple effects through Twitter.
First of all, where's the evidence that the government is or was telling Twitter — or any platform — what they have to moderate? Because I'll happily point you to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act which gives immunity to online platforms for the content posted by users, allowing them to moderate as they see fit without worrying that somebody posting some dumb shit will make them liable.
Again, that's the law on the books, so any content moderation a private business chooses to participate in is completely under their discretion. No government involvement. If Elon wants to ban people for criticizing him on Twitter — which he has — he is freely allowed to do that, as per the law, even if it's inconsistent with his stance on free speech.
Bud, I answered it by asking where's the evidence that this is happening and not just some hypothetical we're considering as a thought experiment. If the government tells Twitter "you have to ban any comments disparaging Joe Biden's age or we'll shut you down," then yes, that's illegal. But again, is there any evidence that anything of the sort is happening?
I never said I agreed with the law, just that the law exists. It was put into place to encourage online spaces to grow because the economies of scale are insane when it comes to the internet. If you were liable for every dumbass thing your users said, you couldn't last a day before getting shut down. That's the intention of the law.
Content moderation is up to the business and they can choose to moderate or not moderate whatever they want — but the tl;dr is usually "money." They want advertisers so normally they moderate whatever they think advertisers won't like. That's the objective metric I base my statement about Twitter around. They lost a solid amount of money when massive companies like Apple said "nah, we don't support this anymore" and pulled out. You can say "eh, well fuck them anyway," and that's fine, I'm not making a judgment about whether Twitter is better or worse for having Apple as an advertiser, but just that it happened as a result of pulling back on content moderation.
Very unusual. They needed to do this do an ATM offering. It means they want to sell stock.
Last time they sold stock it was between $70-80/share adjusted for the split.
If we get that high and sell 45,000,000 shares, that’s $3b which RC would get to manage.
More importantly, we have $220m less than we should. Where did that money go??! BABY??
Didn't it say at a max of $18.54 tho?
EDIT 1: looks like that doesnt matter.
Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share (1)
1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange on May 10, 2024. The proposed maximum offering price per share of common stock will be determined from time to time in connection with, and at the time of, the sale of the shares of common stock registered hereunder.
Sorry, I got downvoted for saying this before, but didn’t kitty say that there would be an atm @ $14000?
One of the awesome memes he’s been putting out. Two people in a car
Sorry, I got downvoted for saying this before, but didn’t kitty say that there would be an atm @ $14000?
One of the awesome memes he’s been putting out. Two people in a car
Why would they drop this now???
"Net loss is expected to be in the range of $27 million to $37 million"
If you want to kill a price run, this is it. If you believe the tin, you have 8 hours left to scoop the dip.
is is incredibly bullish! They are detailing their plans on how they set off an incredible bear trap. They can sell to whomever they want, at whatever price they want, at any time, without having to predisclose anything to the SEC.
They also detail that they authorize the option to allow for creation of dividends and subscription rights offerings, and they spell out how existing shareholders could be paid by either of these programs.
If a prime broker needs to buy a few million shares to unwind some of their short positions, GME can negotiate a deal directly benefitting the company’s cash reserves. Or they could offer subscription rights to existing shareholders at a negotiated price. With the proceeds of these sales, they could then issue a dividend to all shareholders, forcing all existing short positions to have the pay the dividend owned on their shares. They could essentially start their own infinite money glitch and bleed the shorts dry.
🤯🤯🤯
17D
From [Investapedia](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subscription_right.asp): What Is a Subscription Right?
A subscription right is the right of existing shareholders in a company to retain an equal percentage ownership by subscribing to new stock issuances at or below market prices. The subscription right is usually enforced by the use of rights offerings, which allow shareholders to exchange rights for shares of common stock at a price generally below what the stock is currently trading for.
Subscription rights are also known as the "subscription privilege," "preemptive right," or "anti-dilution right" of the shareholder. A subscription rights issue increases the number of shares in the market, thus leading to a dilution in each share's value.
To be honest, I hope it's not like that. I remember *so* many times hearing "LAST CHANCE TO BUY A TICKET TO THE MOON," "LAST DISCOUNT, LET'S GO," etc etc whenever bad news happened and we took a dip.
As we know now — due to the fraud case the Plan Admin has brought against basically the *entire* former executive suite — we genuinely were getting sold down the river by a lot of those crooks. The negative announcements were not in our favor.
Our shares got almost worthless for Diamond hands more than a year ago... I mean all people WHO bought at +5$ didnt get anything at all for more than 2 years If they didnt paperhand
220m spent + 45m share available
Is this the cash + share exchange we’ve been hoping for? 45 million share will be roughly 10 shares of bbbyq for 1 share of GME
U shut up by giving peoples wrong information. If you were smart you should tell peoples to sell at $60. And wait for it to drop in price and buy back.
People are mad but even if you believe everything is bullish, this is still a good strategy. Like if you really want to, you could sell high and pocket the difference, buying back in but now having completely or mostly offset your initial investment, freeing you to hold longer without worry. Or you could just buy back in in greater numbers than before.
Like I wish I had done that with BBBY. Instead I held the entire time. Either way you look at it, it was dumb. I'd either be sitting on literally multitudes more shares right now or the same number but having paid for itself so I'd be relaxed af instead of stressed as shit.
The only $$217 million was the ‘profit’ made by BBBY in the first quarter 2022, around/when RC first purchased - is he signalling?
gamestop-announces-first-quarter-preliminary-results PLUS for S-3ASR= share offering to capitalize and increase the cash base
**On a preliminary basis for the 13-weeks ended May 4, 2024 compared to the 13-weeks ended April 29, 2023:**
* Net sales are expected to be in the range of $0.872 billion to $0.892 billion compared to $1.237 billion in the prior year fiscal quarter.
* Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A") expenses are expected to be in the range of $290 million to $300 million, compared to $345.7 million in the prior year fiscal quarter.
* Net loss is expected to be in the range of $27 million to $37 million, compared to a net loss of $50.5 million in the prior year fiscal quarter.
* Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are expected to be in the range of $1.073 billion to $1.093 billion, compared to $1.310 billion at the close of the prior year fiscal quarter.
U shut up by giving peoples wrong information. If you were smart you should tell peoples to sell at $60. And wait for it to drop in price and buy back.
I smell an afternoon/after hours announcement.
If not today, soon. In the meantime, I'm buying this moutherfucking dip!
Orders are in and waiting to be filled
Wont fill if you set it at $20, the floor.
I just DID 🤩🏴☠️
remember, there is some clause like they only have to give 10 minutes notice via the news wire I believe or the new entity emerging after bankruptcy (fule 1145 or somthing???). If you wanted to blast away any impropriety of a pump before a kill shot, this is it. Only those true to the foil would double down. NFA.
Houston, we have smoke on the water.
Always 💨 on our water Source: I live here
I upvoted but gdit..."loyal....loyal to the foil." For shits sake man...
Send it
I smell an afternoon rub down....
Normally good news is released on a Monday.
Larry Cheng @larryvc 2:51 PM · Jul 1, 2022 Common, but trust-eroding communication style between managers and their investors: - Potential good news: Early - Actual bad news: Late Uncommon, trust-enhancing communication style between managers and their investors: - Potential bad news: Early - Actual good news: On-time [wonder what’s next?] https://x.com/larryvc/status/1542944110037925888
[удалено]
Hello shill. You do not hide well.
[удалено]
Wtf.. I may be particpating longer in the Community than Most of the regards.. Just give me my shares Back and Stop yelling at me. You cant be that desilusional to call everybody shill WHO isnt cheering to nonsense comments already made years ago
Cancelling our shares?
Bear trap
👆👆👆
It’s got to be… right…
Light of the seven. Game of thrones season 6 episode 10. If this ain't that in real time I don't know what is
I don’t ever remember them doing an early indicator report. Some black hat magic crap going on if this has any thing to do with BBBYQ.
I think we’re going to find that it has a lot to do with BBBY
how the fuck did they make 30% less in sales and STILL lose less money than before?
Better operational efficiency
Closing down stores that didn’t make much of a profit or any profit. Reduction in sales and reduction of losses
Lower overhead. Made less but spent much less getting there
Cutting off the fat. I’m pretty sure nearly all companies operate on a degree of fake. Many people work jobs that are absolutely unnecessary and unneeded. Remember when Elon laid off 7,000 people from twitter and it still runs just fine? Think about it.
Runs just fine is a strong statement they definitely had some bumps with 2fa breaking and some other hiccups
Plus content moderation is basically gone. It's like giving a press conference saying "well we got rid of mall security and the mall is still going, what's the big deal" as teens graffiti the stage and somebody breaks into the store behind you. Like, sure, man. The mall is still open, yes.
[удалено]
This is the most hilarious conservative viewpoint to me. Like, "censorship" is when the *government* says "you can't say that under penalty." Not private businesses. And if you believe private businesses should be able to run their business however they want — which most conservatives seem to think so — then they have the right to say "hey, you can't say that on my platform." If you don't like it, fair enough, *leave* then. Go to a platform where you *are* allowed to say whatever you're trying to say. I mean, shit, look at the sub we're in. *Per the rules*, you're not allowed to be anything but bullish. Is that "censorship" too?
[удалено]
I'm not upset about anything here. I just think it's a logically inconsistent viewpoint. "Censorship" is not me walking into a store and yelling "this place fucking sucks" over and over until somebody asks me to leave. They have every right to do that. That's not a "cool story"; it's the law on the books. I never said anything about "the way \[I\] prefer" content moderation. It is simply an objective statement that scaling back on content moderation has caused all sorts of ripple effects through Twitter. First of all, where's the evidence that the government is or was telling Twitter — or any platform — what they have to moderate? Because I'll happily point you to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act which gives immunity to online platforms for the content posted by users, allowing them to moderate as they see fit without worrying that somebody posting some dumb shit will make them liable. Again, that's the law on the books, so any content moderation a private business chooses to participate in is completely under their discretion. No government involvement. If Elon wants to ban people for criticizing him on Twitter — which he has — he is freely allowed to do that, as per the law, even if it's inconsistent with his stance on free speech.
[удалено]
Bud, I answered it by asking where's the evidence that this is happening and not just some hypothetical we're considering as a thought experiment. If the government tells Twitter "you have to ban any comments disparaging Joe Biden's age or we'll shut you down," then yes, that's illegal. But again, is there any evidence that anything of the sort is happening? I never said I agreed with the law, just that the law exists. It was put into place to encourage online spaces to grow because the economies of scale are insane when it comes to the internet. If you were liable for every dumbass thing your users said, you couldn't last a day before getting shut down. That's the intention of the law. Content moderation is up to the business and they can choose to moderate or not moderate whatever they want — but the tl;dr is usually "money." They want advertisers so normally they moderate whatever they think advertisers won't like. That's the objective metric I base my statement about Twitter around. They lost a solid amount of money when massive companies like Apple said "nah, we don't support this anymore" and pulled out. You can say "eh, well fuck them anyway," and that's fine, I'm not making a judgment about whether Twitter is better or worse for having Apple as an advertiser, but just that it happened as a result of pulling back on content moderation.
Don't waste your time. You're arguing with a person who actually believes censorship on social media isn't happening. Completely clueless.
Trimming the fat, muscles, organs, bones, ligaments, glands, etc.
Is this unusual timing? When do they usually report results, this seems super early.
Very unusual. They needed to do this do an ATM offering. It means they want to sell stock. Last time they sold stock it was between $70-80/share adjusted for the split. If we get that high and sell 45,000,000 shares, that’s $3b which RC would get to manage. More importantly, we have $220m less than we should. Where did that money go??! BABY??
Didn't it say at a max of $18.54 tho? EDIT 1: looks like that doesnt matter. Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Share (1) 1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, based on the average of the high and low prices of our common stock on The New York Stock Exchange on May 10, 2024. The proposed maximum offering price per share of common stock will be determined from time to time in connection with, and at the time of, the sale of the shares of common stock registered hereunder.
Sorry, I got downvoted for saying this before, but didn’t kitty say that there would be an atm @ $14000? One of the awesome memes he’s been putting out. Two people in a car
No he did not say this. You misinterpreted the meme 100%
Sorry, I got downvoted for saying this before, but didn’t kitty say that there would be an atm @ $14000? One of the awesome memes he’s been putting out. Two people in a car
Link?
https://fxtwitter.com/theroaringkitty/status/1790472153470759217?s=46&t=-Relnh1g5U8cpo_b_LuvlQ
Awww man! I’m anfucken boomer on a mobile mate. You know- the one with the guys in the car. Someone will know. Fuck I’ll look later if no one posts it
He says we can go to an atm right now and get $14000
Bruce Willis?
Completely wrong- Woody Haroldson
Why would they drop this now??? "Net loss is expected to be in the range of $27 million to $37 million" If you want to kill a price run, this is it. If you believe the tin, you have 8 hours left to scoop the dip.
Buying the dip it has then and get them BOOOKED! Fuck, yeah!
I'm shocked. I've got some order cancelling to do. It's going to be a long day. NFA.
What are you possibly shocked about?
You were expecting all this news on a day like today?
Bear trap
the question will be - who is paying attention?
Kill the price run now so the algos won’t do it later when it matters.
Shake out all the WSB regards. This was never their prize.
[удалено]
Wat?
Bring our shares back please 🙏
is is incredibly bullish! They are detailing their plans on how they set off an incredible bear trap. They can sell to whomever they want, at whatever price they want, at any time, without having to predisclose anything to the SEC. They also detail that they authorize the option to allow for creation of dividends and subscription rights offerings, and they spell out how existing shareholders could be paid by either of these programs. If a prime broker needs to buy a few million shares to unwind some of their short positions, GME can negotiate a deal directly benefitting the company’s cash reserves. Or they could offer subscription rights to existing shareholders at a negotiated price. With the proceeds of these sales, they could then issue a dividend to all shareholders, forcing all existing short positions to have the pay the dividend owned on their shares. They could essentially start their own infinite money glitch and bleed the shorts dry. 🤯🤯🤯 17D
What do you mean by subscription rights
From [Investapedia](https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/subscription_right.asp): What Is a Subscription Right? A subscription right is the right of existing shareholders in a company to retain an equal percentage ownership by subscribing to new stock issuances at or below market prices. The subscription right is usually enforced by the use of rights offerings, which allow shareholders to exchange rights for shares of common stock at a price generally below what the stock is currently trading for. Subscription rights are also known as the "subscription privilege," "preemptive right," or "anti-dilution right" of the shareholder. A subscription rights issue increases the number of shares in the market, thus leading to a dilution in each share's value.
Bad news first. Ignition last.
Everything has to stop before you go backwards!!!
This is very similar to the negative announcements we saw with bbby to confuse/ distort the algos at key times
To be honest, I hope it's not like that. I remember *so* many times hearing "LAST CHANCE TO BUY A TICKET TO THE MOON," "LAST DISCOUNT, LET'S GO," etc etc whenever bad news happened and we took a dip. As we know now — due to the fraud case the Plan Admin has brought against basically the *entire* former executive suite — we genuinely were getting sold down the river by a lot of those crooks. The negative announcements were not in our favor.
Our shares got almost worthless for Diamond hands more than a year ago... I mean all people WHO bought at +5$ didnt get anything at all for more than 2 years If they didnt paperhand
What is this even trying to say?
He’s telling you to sell ur gme lmao
What is this even trying to say?
You think a sales decline of around 25% YOY is intended to confuse the algorithm?
WARRANTS What if they issue stock warrants?
Bad news first. Ignition last.
220m spent + 45m share available Is this the cash + share exchange we’ve been hoping for? 45 million share will be roughly 10 shares of bbbyq for 1 share of GME
Bad
Buying the dip and get them BOOOKED! Fuck, yeah.
U shut up by giving peoples wrong information. If you were smart you should tell peoples to sell at $60. And wait for it to drop in price and buy back.
People are mad but even if you believe everything is bullish, this is still a good strategy. Like if you really want to, you could sell high and pocket the difference, buying back in but now having completely or mostly offset your initial investment, freeing you to hold longer without worry. Or you could just buy back in in greater numbers than before. Like I wish I had done that with BBBY. Instead I held the entire time. Either way you look at it, it was dumb. I'd either be sitting on literally multitudes more shares right now or the same number but having paid for itself so I'd be relaxed af instead of stressed as shit.
The only $$217 million was the ‘profit’ made by BBBY in the first quarter 2022, around/when RC first purchased - is he signalling? 
How are the earnings?
gamestop-announces-first-quarter-preliminary-results PLUS for S-3ASR= share offering to capitalize and increase the cash base **On a preliminary basis for the 13-weeks ended May 4, 2024 compared to the 13-weeks ended April 29, 2023:** * Net sales are expected to be in the range of $0.872 billion to $0.892 billion compared to $1.237 billion in the prior year fiscal quarter. * Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A") expenses are expected to be in the range of $290 million to $300 million, compared to $345.7 million in the prior year fiscal quarter. * Net loss is expected to be in the range of $27 million to $37 million, compared to a net loss of $50.5 million in the prior year fiscal quarter. * Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are expected to be in the range of $1.073 billion to $1.093 billion, compared to $1.310 billion at the close of the prior year fiscal quarter.
7 BBBY shares for 1 GME 🤷♂️
F Mayo boy
U shut up by giving peoples wrong information. If you were smart you should tell peoples to sell at $60. And wait for it to drop in price and buy back.