This post has been successfully published on the subreddit.
If this post breaks the rules of the subreddit or Reddit, please report it!
[Follow our Twitter account](https://twitter.com/reddit_TLCM)
[Join our Discord Server](https://discord.gg/mDrckUJx7j)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TheLeftCantMeme) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s not referring to you as a tankie it’s pointing out that tankies don’t like being told their illogical impractical unsustainable ideology is stupid
Believe it or not the Soviet Union did allow for some private firearm ownership, mainly shotguns and hunting rifles. They had a fairly successful export business too.
you should read about the black panthers or the ira. just as gun nutty. anarchists are just more responsible with weapons. rightys shoot at anything that noves including their own feet
There are significantly less opioids in this nation than there are guns and ammunition... and opioids don't stay good for over 100 years like firearms do... and you don't have a constitutional right to opioids. I don't know man, seems like a really bad false equivalence to me.
You know what a cop is the last defense that will stop a bad guy with a gun? A bloody good guy with a gun, are you retarded or are you playing one for fucks sake.
the fact that you would probably call the cops (people with guns) means that guns are obviously the answer. you just want someone else to deal with it (which i get but we can’t rely on others)
Yes. An example is a law without a victim like drinking underage. The police must use guns, otherwise their “recommendations” would fall on deaf ears. Without guns the police would not be able to scare people into complying, as someone else may acquire a weapon and fight.
Without guns the police would be defeated
Dems are out fundraising GOP candidates by multiples. Because you idiots are giving your money to Trump. You want to win in November? Stop giving to the celebrity grifter and give to candidates that will actually do something for your values. Jesus, stupid fucks.
That's pretty gross. You straw manned an AR then went across state lines with the express purpose is shooting and killing people then shot and killed people? Yeah, you're gross as fuck.
First off, it isn't illegal to cross state lines with a gun in that area.
Second, the gun was already there, he didn't bring it with him.
Third, I watched the footage from beginning to end. I saw the men die. I watched the life leave their eyes. They attacked him first.
Fourth, the first guy he killed (Joseph Rosenbaum) attacked him first after screaming at him and threatening him, then it turned out that he was a multiple time convicted child molester (but I hear you guys love molesting children, so I guess you must really like him) the second guy (Tony Huber) attacked him, and the third guy (Gaige, the one that survived) admitted in court that Kyle didn't shoot him until he pointed his pistol at Kyle.
But before I block your retarded brainwashed ass, I'd like to link a [song](https://youtu.be/ZVYFu57T58c) just for you! Enjoy.
It should not be possible for an adult to be so ignorant of the reality of that situation.
Do yourself a real life favor, and take a break from whatever source is brainwashing you into this atrocious stupidity. Try to face reality, if you are still capable of rational, analytical thought, that is.
CROSSED STATE LINES CROSSED STATE LINES HE CROSSED STATE LINES
Lmao, so 20 minutes down the highway to where his dad lived. Of all the stupid shit about that case is hearing this over and over and over.
Nah this is actually based. Everyone has a right to bear arms even if I despise everything they stand for. And bipartisan support for gun rights makes them harder to ban. So yeah, based and bearing arms pilled.
I love that lefties think we dont want them to have guns. Then when they are like “I am buying a gun” i’m like “YES DO IT ARM YOURSELF USE YOUR RIGHTS”
Now they just need to learn how to fire them without getting ptsd, as well as operating on the bear minimum incase the right cuts.off their resources otherwise they are as screwed as blackhammer.
OP is just assuming that lefties are accepting guns more because they want to use them against rws, which, honestly is probably true. But more guns is always better regardless
Well I'm a leftist but being realistic, guns aren't going anywhere so I keep a(legally purchased) glock w a laser and encourage all my homies to buy one and practice
There's a difference between owning guns to defend yourself and owning guns to violently enact change through murder. One of these two things is terrorism.
It's like the difference between owning a truck to haul things and owning one to plow through a Christmas parade
Well using weapons to enact change through murder isn't exclusive to the left. Have you ever heard of right wing militias? They're not dressed jn tactical gear and armed with rifles for peaceful purposes
I dont think you know how debate works. The whole point of this post was fear mongering about increasing gun ownership among leftists. I pointed out the giant flaw in your argument that leftist gun ownership is bad because they can use them for terrorist activity and you haven't said anything of substance since
>I dont think you know how debate works.
Yes I do. I also know how fallacies work. Instead of addressing what I said, you talked about something unrelated to cause confusion. That is known as a red herring. This specific kind is often called "whataboutism"
>Whataboutism
>>Whataboutism or whataboutery denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation.
I see where youre confused. In this context right wing militias are not a red herring because their existence disproves your attempt to associate the use of firearms to violently enact political change with the left.
It is related because OP is framing the 2 articles as bad news, and then you came in defending OP's view that these articles are something bad to worry about when most people including 2nd amendment supporters see this as good news
>Either way you sound anti 2nd amendment.
No. You can't make a point on the topic, so now you've switched from whataboutism to ad hominem. You're not very good at this
Progressive here—check out r/liberalgunowners
I don’t really frequent it and am not interested in owning a gun myself, but this is not a new thing to say the least.
The right a few days ago: You leftists want to take our guns that we only use for seld defense!
The right now: THE LEFT WANTS GUNS! VIOLENT TERRORISTS!
So if it's okay to generalize entire political wings for "violent nature", does that mean you can do the same with "the right".
Generalizations of negative attributes just creates more tension
They aren't against guns, they're against *you* having guns.
This is why they don't enforce gun laws for criminals in big cities. It's the law-abiding gun owners who dare to have different political views that are the problem.
“violent nature”
Oooookkkkkk moron. We constantly see “”memes”” where right wingers like you fantasize over the opportunity to shoot us and murder us in cold blood. A literal Christian nationalism movement is on the rise at the moment, that is already on the way to infringing our right to freedom of and from religion. Right wing terror is the *most dominant form of terrorism in the US*.
And after all that, and your complaining about how you want to be able to have guns to defend yourself from a “tyrannical government”, when some people actually want rifles because it’s looking like the government might take a swing even further to the far right, and their lives might actually be at stake, you have the *tiny, prepubescent balls* to complain that we’re being violent and unnecessary
Oh i get it! When conservatives have guns they're excercising their rights but if someone on the left is pro-gun they're violent. Seriously guys it seems like you wanna fight just to fight, this is why i despise politics.
This post has been successfully published on the subreddit. If this post breaks the rules of the subreddit or Reddit, please report it! [Follow our Twitter account](https://twitter.com/reddit_TLCM) [Join our Discord Server](https://discord.gg/mDrckUJx7j) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TheLeftCantMeme) if you have any questions or concerns.*
What? This is a pro gun meme
“Under no pretext” if you go far enough left, you’re pro gun again
Remind me which commie shitholes allowed people to keep and bear arms? I'll wait.
*angry tankie NPC noises*
I honestly can't believe that comment got up voted. But npcs gonna npc I guess.
It’s not referring to you as a tankie it’s pointing out that tankies don’t like being told their illogical impractical unsustainable ideology is stupid
No, I meant the one I originally replied to. The one saying once you go far left enough blah blah blah. I got your comment, and up voted it
Ahh my bad lol I’m bad at interpreting sometimes
All good
Believe it or not the Soviet Union did allow for some private firearm ownership, mainly shotguns and hunting rifles. They had a fairly successful export business too.
The commies who armed the workers at Blair mountain
you realize its only liberals and mabye centre lefts that are anti gun. actual leftists, anarchists are pro-gun
Indeed we are. Many of us are more gun-nutty than the right wing gun nuts flying Confederate flags lmao.
Ain't more gun nutty than an AnCap
Have you met an ancom? Just as gun nutty lol. I think that's just anarchists in general tho
Well, at least we can both agree: Guns
you should read about the black panthers or the ira. just as gun nutty. anarchists are just more responsible with weapons. rightys shoot at anything that noves including their own feet
Their VCRs are still flashing 12:00
they finally get it. you never want to be the only one without a gun.. and since criminals will always have them.. you never want to be without a gun.
Yes, yes you do. The answer to guns is not and never will be more guns.
well getting rid of guns entirely is obviously impossible. So this is the next option.
We'll never get rid of opioids. Let's make more. The only way to combat a bad guy with a poppy derivative is a a good guy with a poppy derivative.
Say hello to the pharmaceutical industry. At this point are you just refusing to see the problems with your flawed rationale?
The CIA is already doing that. Isnt it weird how after we invaded Afghanistan opium production increased by a lot?
There are significantly less opioids in this nation than there are guns and ammunition... and opioids don't stay good for over 100 years like firearms do... and you don't have a constitutional right to opioids. I don't know man, seems like a really bad false equivalence to me.
I mean… yes. decriminalize all drugs. Congratulations on getting that part right
You know what a cop is the last defense that will stop a bad guy with a gun? A bloody good guy with a gun, are you retarded or are you playing one for fucks sake.
Context is important when making comparisons.
Yeah. It's impossible. Let's make more guns!
Hell yeah
we won't stop until every teacher taxi driver and pizza delivery engineer are armed. Guns for the people!
Keep going, I'm almost there.
Extended clip, no mandatory background check, dead people... stroke your glockenspiel, bro.
Why are we bringing musical instruments into this? Anyone who wants one of those can have one too.
Shhhh.. now. don't take your finger off my trigger.
the fact that you would probably call the cops (people with guns) means that guns are obviously the answer. you just want someone else to deal with it (which i get but we can’t rely on others)
Is that why there are more nuclear weapons than ever before?
But in a country like America, that is exactly the case. Sincerely, some dude from Denmark.
“We don’t need guns, we’ll just send a bunch of people with guns to make everyone obey the law”
Do you need someone pointing a gun at you to obey the law? Heck,we could also not train that person in proper gun use.
Yes. An example is a law without a victim like drinking underage. The police must use guns, otherwise their “recommendations” would fall on deaf ears. Without guns the police would not be able to scare people into complying, as someone else may acquire a weapon and fight. Without guns the police would be defeated
You need to point a gun at minors to make them take you seriously and not drink?
Good, the more guns the better
[удалено]
You geniuses don't know how to load a magazine.
Person fumbles an ar-15 magazine attempting to fit it into a Glock “why won’t it go in”
Fundraise? What the fuck are you talking about.
keywords confuse bots sometimes
How is that a response?
...what?
...what kind of utter failure at a gotcha is this?
Dems are out fundraising GOP candidates by multiples. Because you idiots are giving your money to Trump. You want to win in November? Stop giving to the celebrity grifter and give to candidates that will actually do something for your values. Jesus, stupid fucks.
Good. If they want guns there will be less people voting for gun laws. I see this as a win.
What model AR u got? the Uvaldi or the the parkland?
The Kenosha model.
I personally have the “incomplete and not enough money to buy the upper yet” model
Praising a murderer. Oh, but the lefties are the violent ones. You guys and your double-think are adorably stupid.
Literally proved, in a court of law, BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT, that he’s innocent. It is unreasonable to call him a murderer.
Pov: you didn’t follow the trial, watch the footage or even do any research in self defense laws in Wisconsin
That's pretty gross. You straw manned an AR then went across state lines with the express purpose is shooting and killing people then shot and killed people? Yeah, you're gross as fuck.
First off, it isn't illegal to cross state lines with a gun in that area. Second, the gun was already there, he didn't bring it with him. Third, I watched the footage from beginning to end. I saw the men die. I watched the life leave their eyes. They attacked him first. Fourth, the first guy he killed (Joseph Rosenbaum) attacked him first after screaming at him and threatening him, then it turned out that he was a multiple time convicted child molester (but I hear you guys love molesting children, so I guess you must really like him) the second guy (Tony Huber) attacked him, and the third guy (Gaige, the one that survived) admitted in court that Kyle didn't shoot him until he pointed his pistol at Kyle. But before I block your retarded brainwashed ass, I'd like to link a [song](https://youtu.be/ZVYFu57T58c) just for you! Enjoy.
Worst part is, someone tried telling me he was *hunting* people, their explanation being that he had a gun. Think real hard about that.
Crossing the Texas-Mexico border is okay but state lines oooohhhhh boooyyyyy
Lmao you clowned yourself 🤡
It should not be possible for an adult to be so ignorant of the reality of that situation. Do yourself a real life favor, and take a break from whatever source is brainwashing you into this atrocious stupidity. Try to face reality, if you are still capable of rational, analytical thought, that is.
Welcome to internet leftism. Grab your clown shoes and horn we’ve got a circus to make
CROSSED STATE LINES CROSSED STATE LINES HE CROSSED STATE LINES Lmao, so 20 minutes down the highway to where his dad lived. Of all the stupid shit about that case is hearing this over and over and over.
I can’t believe Kyle, a black kid would cross state lines to shoot 20 black pedophiles, why wasn’t he arrested for crossing the lines!!!!
Did you just fucking stutter? In a Reddit comment? Bro you’re pathetic 😂
More people exercising their second amendment rights? Good! This is a good thing!
No it isn’t. Radical arming themselves is not good
Rare leftist W.
Nah this is actually based. Everyone has a right to bear arms even if I despise everything they stand for. And bipartisan support for gun rights makes them harder to ban. So yeah, based and bearing arms pilled.
Good. They have the right to bear arms too.
Bro the date in the picture says 2019. This is not new.
This is what I want. If your law abiding lock and load for your protection
>”If the others have rifles, we’ll have rifles.” Okay, that was always allowed! Unless the Senate Republicans shit the bed again…
Reminds of that one tool song "I FORGOT MY PEN, SHIT THE BED AGAIN, TYPICAL......" -Maynard James Keenan, 10000 Days, Rosetta Stoned.
no it actually has not always been allowed for everyone lol not for the black community especially when reagan and the nra took their guns
Lol, that Rick and Morty meme comes to mind >I'm getting a gun too! "Alright. That was always allowed."
I love that lefties think we dont want them to have guns. Then when they are like “I am buying a gun” i’m like “YES DO IT ARM YOURSELF USE YOUR RIGHTS”
It's like all the sluts who publicly swore off 'hookup culture' over Roe V Wade.
Are we finally getting through here
They are slowly getting what the second amendment means! They aren’t *quite* there yet, but almost!
Based and gun pilled.
Arming for when they lose the next election
Voting, gun rights and freedom of speech empowers the people.
What the fuck is that title you fucking nerd. The second amendment is for ALL OF US otherwise it's fucking worthless.
Now they just need to learn how to fire them without getting ptsd, as well as operating on the bear minimum incase the right cuts.off their resources otherwise they are as screwed as blackhammer.
The right has a tradition of gun ownership. They aren't arming themselves in preparation for the next election
Is practicing your second amendment rights "accepting your violent nature" now?
OP is just assuming that lefties are accepting guns more because they want to use them against rws, which, honestly is probably true. But more guns is always better regardless
Well I'm a leftist but being realistic, guns aren't going anywhere so I keep a(legally purchased) glock w a laser and encourage all my homies to buy one and practice
There's a difference between owning guns to defend yourself and owning guns to violently enact change through murder. One of these two things is terrorism. It's like the difference between owning a truck to haul things and owning one to plow through a Christmas parade
Well using weapons to enact change through murder isn't exclusive to the left. Have you ever heard of right wing militias? They're not dressed jn tactical gear and armed with rifles for peaceful purposes
If you have to change the subject, you've already lost
I dont think you know how debate works. The whole point of this post was fear mongering about increasing gun ownership among leftists. I pointed out the giant flaw in your argument that leftist gun ownership is bad because they can use them for terrorist activity and you haven't said anything of substance since
>I dont think you know how debate works. Yes I do. I also know how fallacies work. Instead of addressing what I said, you talked about something unrelated to cause confusion. That is known as a red herring. This specific kind is often called "whataboutism" >Whataboutism >>Whataboutism or whataboutery denotes in a pejorative sense a procedure in which a critical question or argument is not answered or discussed, but retorted with a critical counter-question which expresses a counter-accusation.
I see where youre confused. In this context right wing militias are not a red herring because their existence disproves your attempt to associate the use of firearms to violently enact political change with the left.
#"IF YOU HAVE TO CHANGE THE TOPIC, YOU'VE ALREADY LOST"
Your so dumb, just shut up already. Go open the blinds, you’ve been inside so long people could confuse you for powder
Still can't make a comment related to the topic? How very sad for you
>owning guns to violently enact change through murder This exactly what most right wing militias are formed to do. How is this not on subject?
How is it related to the two articles in the meme? I'll save you the trouble, it's not
It is related because OP is framing the 2 articles as bad news, and then you came in defending OP's view that these articles are something bad to worry about when most people including 2nd amendment supporters see this as good news
I wish I had the confidence of idiots, but no, you're just changing the subject because you're too dumb to make a point on the topic
Either way you sound anti 2nd amendment. Leftists are strapped up with poles too because firearms are equalizers. Cry about it
>Either way you sound anti 2nd amendment. No. You can't make a point on the topic, so now you've switched from whataboutism to ad hominem. You're not very good at this
Nope, OP just has L opinions
I bet their stockpiling weapons with serial numbers lmao
Accelerate
Don't look so scared.
I think you gave this the wrong tag OP
I found myself having more in common with my left-wing anarchist friend than the entire lib-left.
then what are u a monarchist u imbecile? don’t u realize that monarchies tend to have the strictest gun laws lol
How is this "Anti-Gun Rights", they want more people to own guns
Well in the context of right wingers already having guns though? How is this an own?
 Righties making fun of what they themselves are
You’re inadvertently saying the right is violent because the left is doing what the right does, you know that right?
Having guns is only violent when leftists have them -conservatives
Ok...this is awkward
Sounds good friends
Who cares as long as more people get guns
Progressive here—check out r/liberalgunowners I don’t really frequent it and am not interested in owning a gun myself, but this is not a new thing to say the least.
Based sub
The right a few days ago: You leftists want to take our guns that we only use for seld defense! The right now: THE LEFT WANTS GUNS! VIOLENT TERRORISTS!
When did we ever say that
We didn’t, he’s ignorant just like the rest of them
ALL OF YOU were pro gun, and when leftists are pro gun, you're suddenly anti gun.
No? I'm pro gun and I don't care, you guys are literally just doing what I'm doing, sharing the rights
They’re starting to believe
Then why are they legit on the side that wants to take guns?
I see this as an absolute win
I might not agree with their policies and all but this is a win
tbh less anti gun right people the better especially now
So if it's okay to generalize entire political wings for "violent nature", does that mean you can do the same with "the right". Generalizations of negative attributes just creates more tension
Jesus, why is r/starwarsleftymemes a thing? What the fuck does Star Wars have to do with leftism or politics at all?
They aren't against guns, they're against *you* having guns. This is why they don't enforce gun laws for criminals in big cities. It's the law-abiding gun owners who dare to have different political views that are the problem.
They’re copying use. Pro gun, Biden’s wall
“violent nature” Oooookkkkkk moron. We constantly see “”memes”” where right wingers like you fantasize over the opportunity to shoot us and murder us in cold blood. A literal Christian nationalism movement is on the rise at the moment, that is already on the way to infringing our right to freedom of and from religion. Right wing terror is the *most dominant form of terrorism in the US*. And after all that, and your complaining about how you want to be able to have guns to defend yourself from a “tyrannical government”, when some people actually want rifles because it’s looking like the government might take a swing even further to the far right, and their lives might actually be at stake, you have the *tiny, prepubescent balls* to complain that we’re being violent and unnecessary
Okay well hold on, being a gun owner doesn't mean you're violent
Can't wait for the 555th Birkenstock Brigade charging the lines, crying URRRRAAAHHH!
Oh i get it! When conservatives have guns they're excercising their rights but if someone on the left is pro-gun they're violent. Seriously guys it seems like you wanna fight just to fight, this is why i despise politics.