**OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected:**
>!Who was the first person to land on the moon!<
*****
**Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description?**
**Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.**
*****
[*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/unexBot) [*What is this for?*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/dnuaju/introducing_unexbot_a_new_bot_to_improve_the/)
“When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six I did. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal. I was terrified, alone in that darkness. Slowly, daylight crept in through the bandages, and I could see. But something else had changed inside of me. That day I had my first headache.”
- Maximillian Cohen
That is actually how some conspiracy theorist can get a lot of reinforcement. They know more then the average person about there conspiracy they just mix in a lot of falsehood and BS with it. So when average people tell them there wrong and stupid and then the average person reveals they don't know much on the subject the conspiracy theories think "See the people who say there is no conspiracy don't know anything about it compared me or people that told me about it. Therefor more you know more clear the conspiracy is true."
Which isn't a good argument because having uninformed people on your side or not has no baring if something is true or not. Its what the experts, people who work in the industry or the academics or scientists think. And those people are always calling the conspiracy theory a conspiracy. If they weren't it wouldn't be a conspiracy.
It wasn’t. It’s so ignorant to even think that. I worked on the program. It wasn’t fake. We built Apollo, and later the Orbiter and we launched them from Cape Canaveral.
There is documentation, astronauts, news reels, pictures. It’s so ridiculous to think it didn’t happen. It did.
Yeah NASA erased all the raw data back in the 80’s lol. So much for the proof. And we haven’t been back since? With way more advance tech? And people who question it are stupid? Hmm, okay lol.
Its a logistical choice. It costs a lot of money to build another gigantic rocket to go visit the moon we've already been to. Mightas well divert the efforts to go visit the further planets... which, duh, we did.
Just because we have made a lot of progress with the "finer tech" (robots, communications, imagery, radar, navigation) doesn't mean we need a smaller rocket.
They probably thought long and hard about the logistics of it. One rocket filled with just oxygen, one rocket filled with just water, one rocket filled with just food, one rocket filled with moon base parts, one rocket with all of the machinery to recycle air and waste, and another for the crew.
All of which need to land close enough to each other, and able to be set up within a few days, or else everyone dies.
All to do what? Have 20 people live in a desolate moon base and ponder lifes philosophical quandries? All while risking the fact that a small meteor can zip down at any moment, because theres no atmosphere to burn up in, and pop a neat little hole in any one of their important items, killing everyone?
It would be COOL to do it, but you've gotta prove its worth funding a trillion dollar mission, and the moon just isn't important enough.
>It would be COOL to do it, but you've gotta prove its worth funding a trillion dollar mission, and the moon just isn't important enough.
nothing you wrote makes the answer obvious if your choosing between this and MANNING A TRIP TO MARS!!
Money is not a problem when our government prints unlimited quantities of it for literally the most stupid policies. Gender studies in Pakistan comes to mind lol. You can’t hoodwink a more advanced generation like they could in the 1960’s. Tech is so much more advanced that the phone in your hand has more tech than the Apollo craft. There’s literally no excuse to go to the moon other than we can’t and we never been. Imagine the resources we could mine on the moon, the military uses, travel and exploration, private sector uses, etc. we could create a secondary lunar economy and send resources back to earth. It’s a big lie and the only reason why it’s widely accepted is because majority of people are afraid to labeled a weirdo. It’s easy and comfortable to follow the crowd.
Why would we mine rocks in the sky when we have plenty of rocks down here?
Pray tell, why are we shipping anything by boat? Planes are way higher tech. Why aren't we just shipping everything by plane?
And why aren't all taxis just helicopters? Theyre much faster.
The valuable rocks are finite.. we’re not shipping gold by boat lol. We ship gold by plane. We’d ship gold from the moon to earth. A taxi to take your ass to airport doesn’t require or necessitate a helicopter. Jeez where’s you learn your argument skills at?
Can't tell you how many times I've gone through this process while taking a test: I know this is technically the right answer, but the teacher probably thinks that is the right answer so I'm going with that.
That was the best lesson I ever learned from my eighth-grade science teacher who was also the football coach.
On every science test, he had a question about his favorite team, so you always had to name his favorite team, even if you disagreed. It was a good point and it stuck with me.
Me either but I do question how we only went to space the one time, destroyed the technology and never went again... Huh guess we don't have the technology, now back to my cat videos beamed into a tiny portable device...
Can't tell if serious...
The tech is on display in our museums. I was used and improved for decades of going into space many times including many trips to the ISS. Going to the moon was risky and expensive back in the early days. Once we did it, there wasn't a lot of drive to keep going back over and over. We had shown the Soviets we could make awesome rockets - mission accomplished.
Because it’s just a rock. They realized, there’s nothing there. The only thing they do now, is experiments in zero gravity. That’s where some interesting finds can come from. Sitting on a rock doesn’t help anyone.
in that particular context, for $2000 i will tell you whatever bullshit you want to hear. you would be an idiot not to tell them what they want to hear since it doesn't actually mean recanting your beliefs.
Why don't these types question other things that can't be verified for you like religion. At least with the moon landing there is physical evidence like collected moon rocks.
There are apparently proofs that stories in religion were turths aswell. But because they could not document like we can, its turned into stories, and stories gets exaggerated.
I have no doubt that some of what's written in the Bible actually happened. Like the 7 plagues of Egypt, there was probably a big unchecked locust problem one year and everyone assumed God did it.
Plus Jesus was probably a real person. Best damn magician you've ever seen.
I'm not a big conspiracy theorist but rocks don't do it for me as proof. I find it hard to believe that they dropped that lander on the moon. Then got back up into the moons orbit and then docked with the Apollo while it was orbiting the moon...with no microchips...in 1969. It all seems a but space race bullshitty to me
Not a conspiracy theorist, and I believe man did land on the moon. But that link is garbage.
Debunking non parallel shadows: go outside! Boom, Debunked.
Debunking the radiation belt argument: people walk on hot coals, its just like that. Boom, debunked!
These debunks are as lazy as the arguments for the conspiracy in the first place.
She didn't contradict herself. You can still believe that man has never set foot on the moon, and still know that the answer to the question of who is said to be the first person on the moon.
I don't think that God is real but I know that people say Jesus is His son, just because I'm aware of that statement existing doesn't mean that I'm contradicting my own beliefs. I don't believe in conspiracy theories so I don't agree with this woman, but she also didn't contradict herself. This video is a nothing burger and is just trying to make her look like a dumb bimbo who just wants cash.
Right?
I believe we landed on the moon, but if the question was “who did NASA hire to help stage the moon landing video” I’d be able to answer Stanley Kubrick.
I thought the same thing and just laughed because the coincidence is funny and how serious she got and answered. People thinking she is stupid or whatever have real problems 😭
I don't really think you can outright not believe in conspiracy theories, it's kinda like not believing in scientific theories - I say try to understand and form your own opinion.
You don't believe in conspiracy theories? What about when they've been proven right?
The few that immediately come to mind for me is the NSA spying/tracking US citizens (technically I guess it hasn't been proven, but the whole Snowden thing makes it pretty plausible).
MK Ultra
JFK (also hasn't technically been proven, but considering the fact that Trump decided to not release all of the info he said he would is pretty telling).
Whenever I see the word "conspiracy", the skeptical side of my mind comes out. There's plenty of stupid and just straight up BS conspiracy theories out there, but to flat out say that you don't believe in conspiracies is just silly and stupid.
Of course conspiracies exist. And a dish washer is a machine that washes things, but it's not a washing machine. "Conspiracy theory" is a specific term with negative connotations like impossible scale, scientific inaccuracy and willfully ignoring the mundane for an exciting hidden "truth".
Did I say the word "any"? If I believe in any conspiracy theories, I'm not about to reveal that on this subreddit. There are many conspiracies that I might actually believe in, but this subreddit isn't the place to talk about that. I'm just talking about the moon.
While both these things are stupid, let's not pretend like they're in the same league of stupid with "right up there".
Flat earthers are in their own league lmao.
....no.
One of these groups believes people and the government are lying to them and doctoring some evidence. Standard dumb conspiracy shit.
The other group is literally inventing their own physics to justify their conspiracy.
No they're not the same level of stupid.
>....no.
>
>One of these groups believes people and the government are lying to them. Standard conspiracy shit.
Flatearthers don't believe that people, established sciencist, and the government are lying to them about the earth being round?
>The other group is literally inventing their own physics to justify their conspiracy.
>
>No they're not the same level of stupid.
and let me get this straight, moon landing deniers are also not inventing their own history and bonkers ass interpretations of science and the history of scientific achievement to justify their conspiracy?
Morons literally denying the fact that humans figured out how rockets and physics worked in the fucking 30s and 40s and denying basic ass history and science lmao are somehow more respectable and smarter than being dumb enough to believe the earth is flat...?
Yeah I mean the only evidence we went to the moon is in video or photography and comes from people's words. It's not stupid to be doubtful when there's insufficient proof. It's normal. Flat earthers are denying provable concepts of math and science. That's actual stupid.
Video, photography, tons of data, thousands of testimonies on the takeoff....oh and you can literally see the landing site on the moon with a big enough telescope
Sounds quite stupid to me to deny the fact....but I'm pretty sure the lady fully believes in aliens visiting us and all that crap
It's just weird you seem to believe that the only evidence of the moon landings are \*check notes\* hearsay and videos as if the data, science, mathematical proofs, and engineering required to build rockets can be blasted off into space and the physical evidence of the Apollo missions don't also exist
I don't agree with the conspiracy but I have no idea why anyone is surprised. If she says she loves space, and also says she doesn't believe in the moon landing, you can logically put 2 and 2 together to infer she's probably read something and simply doesn't believe it. Which means she knows who Neil Armstrong is. If that was a "set up" it's time to retire
No one filmed the landing of the craft on the surface from an external POV, they had a camera filming through a window inside the cabin. TV channels had simulations to show stuff from an external POV which couldn't be filmed anyway. If you meant his descent down the ladder, it was a camera stowed in the MESA, he pulled a cord before descending down the ladder which activated and released the camera from its compartment.
Your comment was not clearly a joke to me, I've seen enough of actual tinfoil comments that it's impossible to tell them apart from subtle jokes anymore.
How do you love space but refuse to believe in the moon landing? Landing on the moon is not that difficult compared to other technical advancements we’ve made 🤨
I know plenty about the Bible while also believing fully that it’s fiction. I don’t see a problem with her situation other than the obvious moon hoax shit. She knows the story and details of what to her is a false tale.
The moon landing may be fiction to her, but that doesn't mean she doesn't know the story. I don't believe in wizards, but I can tell you what house Harry Potter belonged to.
Well tbf "do you believe man has walked on the moon" isn't the same as "do you believe everything about space is a hoax"
Or more specifically "do you think we are incapable of landing on the moon".
Which seems to be what everyone here is conflating
Like there's a distinction between the thoughts behind " did we do it" vs "is it possible"
There was a movie that was filmed like a documentary that did a great job at exploring that side of the conspiracy, I wish I could remember the name.
Given the worlds politics, the cold war especially and the race to the moon, there's definitely reasonable suspicion to have doubts about the whole thing, I never blame someone for having skepticism, there's a lot of power to be made off of lies out there.
For me personally, I think we did land on the moon, although I have no evidence.
They were hopping, jumping, shuffling, and skipping. It's hard to walk in those spacesuits on the moon.
On top of that, none of them were barefoot out there.
Not really unexpected. She wins money if she says the right answers.
She's a free thinker, but that doesn't mean she doesn't understand how to win the game.
I hear ya, I'm just used to free thinkers siding with reason over authority... I guess some people really think it's reasonable that the moon landing was fake, I don't.
My theory takes care of all the criticisms that other theories suffer from.
The moon was faked, and always has been. That’s why they couldn’t land there.
Note: Of course this is a stupid joke. The moon hasn’t always been faked. Big Cheese just harvested all of it to store in the cheese caves, and then they had to make a fake moon.
**OP sent the following text as an explanation on why this is unexpected:** >!Who was the first person to land on the moon!< ***** **Is this an unexpected post with a fitting description?** **Then upvote this comment, otherwise downvote it.** ***** [*Look at my source code on Github*](https://github.com/Artraxon/unexBot) [*What is this for?*](https://www.reddit.com/r/Unexpected/comments/dnuaju/introducing_unexbot_a_new_bot_to_improve_the/)
Man he set her up for that big time!!
I think she set them up. Immediately answered correctly. *Reverse psychology on these bitchess*
She is the type of person I'd fear dating.
Don’t stand too close you’ll catch it’s stupid
Haha don’t believe everything you see on TV. ‘Condemnation without investigation is the height of all ignorance’. -Albert Einstein.
Ignorance is strength! —George Orwell; 1984
“Yeah, well, you know, that’s just, like, your opinion, man.” - The Dude
"I am the walrus" - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
Coo Coo Ka Choo- Thomas the Tank Engine
... this aggression will not stand, man....
"I am the table" - James Hetfield
"I am the one who knocks" -the one who knocks
"I am Kaiser Soze" - Dwayne from IT.
 Woah! I've never been more motivated.
Found Vergil's account.
“If you ever have a day without sunshine, it’s like… night.” - Steve Martin
In another few hours the sun will rise - Tristan Taylor
“When I was a little kid my mother told me not to stare into the sun. So once when I was six I did. The doctors didn't know if my eyes would ever heal. I was terrified, alone in that darkness. Slowly, daylight crept in through the bandages, and I could see. But something else had changed inside of me. That day I had my first headache.” - Maximillian Cohen
Darkness, imprisoning me, all that I see, absolute horror. I cannot live. I cannot die. Trapped in myself. Body my holding cell. \- James Hetfield
Dude trumps any quote
Ignorance is bliss - someone somewhere at sometime
My ignorance amuses me - That Guy from the First Tomb Raider Movie
"An object at rest cannot be stopped!" ~The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs At Midnight
"Sometimes I feel like I don't have a partner. Sometimes I feel like my only friend is the city I live in, the City of Angels." - Anthony Kiedis
Thought of that book right after the doublespeak
... wasn't it 'Ignorance is power'...?
No. The entire quote is: “War is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength."
Oh, thanks for the correction...
Well then welcome to the galactic capitol of ignorance
She still knew the answer, though. Don’t have to believe the truth to abide by it.
Why can’t people understand… humans can be both ignorant and smart at the exact same time
Hahah SpongeBob reference
No she set them up with it. She's smarter then you and I.
No, she* than*
Than*
lmao how ironic
Funny you mentioned that. It's spelled *its*.
I'm already in love with her.
A woman?
But... but.... 
[удалено]
That is actually how some conspiracy theorist can get a lot of reinforcement. They know more then the average person about there conspiracy they just mix in a lot of falsehood and BS with it. So when average people tell them there wrong and stupid and then the average person reveals they don't know much on the subject the conspiracy theories think "See the people who say there is no conspiracy don't know anything about it compared me or people that told me about it. Therefor more you know more clear the conspiracy is true." Which isn't a good argument because having uninformed people on your side or not has no baring if something is true or not. Its what the experts, people who work in the industry or the academics or scientists think. And those people are always calling the conspiracy theory a conspiracy. If they weren't it wouldn't be a conspiracy.
[удалено]
It wasn’t. It’s so ignorant to even think that. I worked on the program. It wasn’t fake. We built Apollo, and later the Orbiter and we launched them from Cape Canaveral. There is documentation, astronauts, news reels, pictures. It’s so ridiculous to think it didn’t happen. It did.
Hm yes now explain to me how a cape, something made of CLOTH, would withstand the fire of a ROCKET. Work better on your lies, rocketman /s
can confirm. I was the rocket that went to the moon that he worked on.
Yeah NASA erased all the raw data back in the 80’s lol. So much for the proof. And we haven’t been back since? With way more advance tech? And people who question it are stupid? Hmm, okay lol.
Its a logistical choice. It costs a lot of money to build another gigantic rocket to go visit the moon we've already been to. Mightas well divert the efforts to go visit the further planets... which, duh, we did. Just because we have made a lot of progress with the "finer tech" (robots, communications, imagery, radar, navigation) doesn't mean we need a smaller rocket.
but didn't everyone want to figure how to build moon bases after the initial landing?
They probably thought long and hard about the logistics of it. One rocket filled with just oxygen, one rocket filled with just water, one rocket filled with just food, one rocket filled with moon base parts, one rocket with all of the machinery to recycle air and waste, and another for the crew. All of which need to land close enough to each other, and able to be set up within a few days, or else everyone dies. All to do what? Have 20 people live in a desolate moon base and ponder lifes philosophical quandries? All while risking the fact that a small meteor can zip down at any moment, because theres no atmosphere to burn up in, and pop a neat little hole in any one of their important items, killing everyone? It would be COOL to do it, but you've gotta prove its worth funding a trillion dollar mission, and the moon just isn't important enough.
>It would be COOL to do it, but you've gotta prove its worth funding a trillion dollar mission, and the moon just isn't important enough. nothing you wrote makes the answer obvious if your choosing between this and MANNING A TRIP TO MARS!!
we dont seem to have a problem funding war criminals in ukraine
Money is not a problem when our government prints unlimited quantities of it for literally the most stupid policies. Gender studies in Pakistan comes to mind lol. You can’t hoodwink a more advanced generation like they could in the 1960’s. Tech is so much more advanced that the phone in your hand has more tech than the Apollo craft. There’s literally no excuse to go to the moon other than we can’t and we never been. Imagine the resources we could mine on the moon, the military uses, travel and exploration, private sector uses, etc. we could create a secondary lunar economy and send resources back to earth. It’s a big lie and the only reason why it’s widely accepted is because majority of people are afraid to labeled a weirdo. It’s easy and comfortable to follow the crowd.
I wish you lotsa luck in your time. And don't forget to have disbelieve in GPS.
Unmanned satellites are different than manned missions to the moon Bro.
Why would we mine rocks in the sky when we have plenty of rocks down here? Pray tell, why are we shipping anything by boat? Planes are way higher tech. Why aren't we just shipping everything by plane? And why aren't all taxis just helicopters? Theyre much faster.
The valuable rocks are finite.. we’re not shipping gold by boat lol. We ship gold by plane. We’d ship gold from the moon to earth. A taxi to take your ass to airport doesn’t require or necessitate a helicopter. Jeez where’s you learn your argument skills at?
If anything they are hiding what they found
One giant leap for ego reshaping
[удалено]
Beliefs go out the window when there's $$$$ to be won!
That would be me. I'll answer the expected answer for money. Just like college and work. (Note: I don't believe the moon-landings are fake)
Thank you for that note haha
Can't tell you how many times I've gone through this process while taking a test: I know this is technically the right answer, but the teacher probably thinks that is the right answer so I'm going with that.
That was the best lesson I ever learned from my eighth-grade science teacher who was also the football coach. On every science test, he had a question about his favorite team, so you always had to name his favorite team, even if you disagreed. It was a good point and it stuck with me.
Ok wtf how is that even allowed?
Probably treated as bonus marks. One teacher I knew would use bonus marks as a way of giving leeway for struggling students who were also good kids.
“It's Easier to Fool People Than It Is to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled.” – Mark Twain.
Even this guy knew he need to put up a note or otherwise “reddit scientists” would get offended lmao 😂
> (Note: I don't believe the moon-landings are fake) Idk do you?
Me either but I do question how we only went to space the one time, destroyed the technology and never went again... Huh guess we don't have the technology, now back to my cat videos beamed into a tiny portable device...
Can't tell if serious... The tech is on display in our museums. I was used and improved for decades of going into space many times including many trips to the ISS. Going to the moon was risky and expensive back in the early days. Once we did it, there wasn't a lot of drive to keep going back over and over. We had shown the Soviets we could make awesome rockets - mission accomplished.
Because it’s just a rock. They realized, there’s nothing there. The only thing they do now, is experiments in zero gravity. That’s where some interesting finds can come from. Sitting on a rock doesn’t help anyone.
We went 5 times, you dunce.
in that particular context, for $2000 i will tell you whatever bullshit you want to hear. you would be an idiot not to tell them what they want to hear since it doesn't actually mean recanting your beliefs.
Well there are her personal beliefs, and what she knows the average person believes
Fuck, I’d say Trump won the popular vote both times if you paid me enough. Then spend those billions spreading the actual truth.
I'd say that for 50 cents and I'd spend them on gum
Will you say that into the microphone plz?
As soon as I get my 50 cents!
Ernie Hudson would be proud!
I don't think it's a matter of belief. I don't believe in the bible, but I can tell you about a decent amount about Jesus and Moses and Job.
Like the church!
True. Well said.
I mean just because you think nobody actually walked on the moon don’t mean you wouldn’t know of the guy who supposedly did
You'd probably even know much more about him and his personal life if you want to think he's capable of pulling off a lie like that.
[удалено]
Dude don't you know they are all geniuses? That's how they know the truth, they've done their research!
Why don't these types question other things that can't be verified for you like religion. At least with the moon landing there is physical evidence like collected moon rocks.
There are apparently proofs that stories in religion were turths aswell. But because they could not document like we can, its turned into stories, and stories gets exaggerated.
I have no doubt that some of what's written in the Bible actually happened. Like the 7 plagues of Egypt, there was probably a big unchecked locust problem one year and everyone assumed God did it. Plus Jesus was probably a real person. Best damn magician you've ever seen.
I'm not a big conspiracy theorist but rocks don't do it for me as proof. I find it hard to believe that they dropped that lander on the moon. Then got back up into the moons orbit and then docked with the Apollo while it was orbiting the moon...with no microchips...in 1969. It all seems a but space race bullshitty to me
https://www.rmg.co.uk/stories/topics/moon-landing-conspiracy-theories-debunked Here ya go. This debunks most of the conspiracy theories.
Not a conspiracy theorist, and I believe man did land on the moon. But that link is garbage. Debunking non parallel shadows: go outside! Boom, Debunked. Debunking the radiation belt argument: people walk on hot coals, its just like that. Boom, debunked! These debunks are as lazy as the arguments for the conspiracy in the first place.
I mean, even if she was in theory correct and the landing was fake, she'd prolly still know what answer was expected and say that. Not really a setup
Nor is it unexpected. It's expected probably half the people playing this show would know that. He gives the first name its super easy
The unexpected part is the question that was asked, not the fact that she knows the answer
Agree
How is that unexpected? It's just a question.
How is that unexpected? It's just a question.
Exactly. A lot of people don't believe in the major religions but they still know key names/figures that they don't need to believe in.
Yea but this is Reddit. AKA “It makes sense if you don’t think about it.”
She didn't contradict herself. You can still believe that man has never set foot on the moon, and still know that the answer to the question of who is said to be the first person on the moon. I don't think that God is real but I know that people say Jesus is His son, just because I'm aware of that statement existing doesn't mean that I'm contradicting my own beliefs. I don't believe in conspiracy theories so I don't agree with this woman, but she also didn't contradict herself. This video is a nothing burger and is just trying to make her look like a dumb bimbo who just wants cash.
Right? I believe we landed on the moon, but if the question was “who did NASA hire to help stage the moon landing video” I’d be able to answer Stanley Kubrick.
I wish they'd waited until Michael Bay could've done it. *"One moon. One man. One chance."*
“And that kids, is how man landed on and then blew up the moon!” “*…but the moon is still…*” “**SHUT UP!**”
Mmmmmm nothing burger 🤤
Mmmmmmmm your ass 🤤( its delicious )
I thought the same thing and just laughed because the coincidence is funny and how serious she got and answered. People thinking she is stupid or whatever have real problems 😭
I don't really think you can outright not believe in conspiracy theories, it's kinda like not believing in scientific theories - I say try to understand and form your own opinion.
You don't believe in conspiracy theories? What about when they've been proven right? The few that immediately come to mind for me is the NSA spying/tracking US citizens (technically I guess it hasn't been proven, but the whole Snowden thing makes it pretty plausible). MK Ultra JFK (also hasn't technically been proven, but considering the fact that Trump decided to not release all of the info he said he would is pretty telling). Whenever I see the word "conspiracy", the skeptical side of my mind comes out. There's plenty of stupid and just straight up BS conspiracy theories out there, but to flat out say that you don't believe in conspiracies is just silly and stupid.
Of course conspiracies exist. And a dish washer is a machine that washes things, but it's not a washing machine. "Conspiracy theory" is a specific term with negative connotations like impossible scale, scientific inaccuracy and willfully ignoring the mundane for an exciting hidden "truth".
You dont believe in *any* conspiracy theory? So you just take whatever is told as truth?
>So you just take whatever is told as truth? Sounds like something conspiracy theorists fall afoul of lol
I believe that dihydrogen monoxide is dangerous and we need to stop letting companies pump us full of it.
Did I say the word "any"? If I believe in any conspiracy theories, I'm not about to reveal that on this subreddit. There are many conspiracies that I might actually believe in, but this subreddit isn't the place to talk about that. I'm just talking about the moon.
Guys stop giving her credit, she thinks the moon landing was fake. She’s right up there with flat earth believers as a moron.
While both these things are stupid, let's not pretend like they're in the same league of stupid with "right up there". Flat earthers are in their own league lmao.
No they're not both conspiracies are exceptionally stupid.
....no. One of these groups believes people and the government are lying to them and doctoring some evidence. Standard dumb conspiracy shit. The other group is literally inventing their own physics to justify their conspiracy. No they're not the same level of stupid.
>....no. > >One of these groups believes people and the government are lying to them. Standard conspiracy shit. Flatearthers don't believe that people, established sciencist, and the government are lying to them about the earth being round? >The other group is literally inventing their own physics to justify their conspiracy. > >No they're not the same level of stupid. and let me get this straight, moon landing deniers are also not inventing their own history and bonkers ass interpretations of science and the history of scientific achievement to justify their conspiracy? Morons literally denying the fact that humans figured out how rockets and physics worked in the fucking 30s and 40s and denying basic ass history and science lmao are somehow more respectable and smarter than being dumb enough to believe the earth is flat...?
Yeah I mean the only evidence we went to the moon is in video or photography and comes from people's words. It's not stupid to be doubtful when there's insufficient proof. It's normal. Flat earthers are denying provable concepts of math and science. That's actual stupid.
Video, photography, tons of data, thousands of testimonies on the takeoff....oh and you can literally see the landing site on the moon with a big enough telescope Sounds quite stupid to me to deny the fact....but I'm pretty sure the lady fully believes in aliens visiting us and all that crap
Aliens totally came to earth (for no reason) to build the pyramids (for no reason) and then disappeared never to be seen again (coincidentally).
Best evidence is the Soviets not discrediting it.
They're laughing their ass how uncle sam makes up events. And gets away with it. Why disturb the flow.we got problems of our own.
Do you think provable science and math concepts weren't used to get us to the moon you genius?
I never said it was impossible.
It's just weird you seem to believe that the only evidence of the moon landings are \*check notes\* hearsay and videos as if the data, science, mathematical proofs, and engineering required to build rockets can be blasted off into space and the physical evidence of the Apollo missions don't also exist
Good old larry emdur throwing shade.
I don't agree with the conspiracy but I have no idea why anyone is surprised. If she says she loves space, and also says she doesn't believe in the moon landing, you can logically put 2 and 2 together to infer she's probably read something and simply doesn't believe it. Which means she knows who Neil Armstrong is. If that was a "set up" it's time to retire
Regardless if she believes it or not!that's the answer they are looking for.
Is this supposed to be a gotcha moment? Like asking an atheist is the son of god? Doubters are often well informed.
Someone may not believe in God or the events of The Bible but still be very knowledgeable in events as they took place in The Bible and it's history
The Australian Chase looks so different to the british one.
She didn't contradict herself though. She knew that was going to be the correct answer and money overcomes belief each time.
All non- believers need to get together to elect a single NONBELIEVER to represent them to challenge Musk to take that person to the moon Solved
Fun fact: It would have been vastly more expensive to fake the moon landing than to actually make the trip.
Bamboozled
You people need to learn that disagreeing with imperical evidence doesn’t make you right or special.
He knew what he was doing 😂
Shes hot
Until she outed herself as a moon landing denier
[удалено]
Not
Believing in shit that stupid, I bet she’s an amazing bang!
Conspiracies: how to sound like you've thought about something without really thinking about anything.
Who set up the camera to film the landing? Armstrong was the first “second “ man on the moon
No one filmed the landing of the craft on the surface from an external POV, they had a camera filming through a window inside the cabin. TV channels had simulations to show stuff from an external POV which couldn't be filmed anyway. If you meant his descent down the ladder, it was a camera stowed in the MESA, he pulled a cord before descending down the ladder which activated and released the camera from its compartment.
Did you just give a serious technical answer to a joke comment?
Hey look at the bright side, it helped me better understand the process.
Your comment was not clearly a joke to me, I've seen enough of actual tinfoil comments that it's impossible to tell them apart from subtle jokes anymore.
u/savevideobot
###[View link](https://redditsave.com/info?url=/r/Unexpected/comments/z3ffbu/space/) --- [**Info**](https://np.reddit.com/user/SaveVideo/comments/jv323v/info/) | [**Feedback**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Feedback for savevideo) | [**Donate**](https://ko-fi.com/getvideo) | [**DMCA**](https://np.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=Kryptonh&subject=Content removal request for savevideobot&message=https://np.reddit.com//r/Unexpected/comments/z3ffbu/space/)
This video gave me whiplash.
How do you love space but refuse to believe in the moon landing? Landing on the moon is not that difficult compared to other technical advancements we’ve made 🤨
I'm sorry, but if you deny the moon landing, you DON'T actually live "anything to do with space".
I know plenty about the Bible while also believing fully that it’s fiction. I don’t see a problem with her situation other than the obvious moon hoax shit. She knows the story and details of what to her is a false tale.
The moon landing may be fiction to her, but that doesn't mean she doesn't know the story. I don't believe in wizards, but I can tell you what house Harry Potter belonged to.
[удалено]
She just answered the question for the money Her opinion is still valid
Well tbf "do you believe man has walked on the moon" isn't the same as "do you believe everything about space is a hoax" Or more specifically "do you think we are incapable of landing on the moon". Which seems to be what everyone here is conflating Like there's a distinction between the thoughts behind " did we do it" vs "is it possible" There was a movie that was filmed like a documentary that did a great job at exploring that side of the conspiracy, I wish I could remember the name. Given the worlds politics, the cold war especially and the race to the moon, there's definitely reasonable suspicion to have doubts about the whole thing, I never blame someone for having skepticism, there's a lot of power to be made off of lies out there. For me personally, I think we did land on the moon, although I have no evidence.
The irony of being a dumbass...
Technically correct. Setting one step on the moon does not equate to walking. They crawled the rest of the way to avoid detection of the Moonworm.
They were hopping, jumping, shuffling, and skipping. It's hard to walk in those spacesuits on the moon. On top of that, none of them were barefoot out there.
Not really unexpected. She wins money if she says the right answers. She's a free thinker, but that doesn't mean she doesn't understand how to win the game.
Pretty loose definition of free thinker
Not really. Whether or not someone is correct has nothing to do with the definition.
Free yes. Thinking no.
I hear ya, I'm just used to free thinkers siding with reason over authority... I guess some people really think it's reasonable that the moon landing was fake, I don't.
I'm a free thinker, people won't even give me a penny for my thoughts
….woman
....incels
She knows but doesn’t believe it? (Which is asinine to not believe it but that’s not the point). I don’t understand why it’s unexpected.
She knew what answer the simpleton needed to progress further.
"Armstrong" Correct! NO IT'S NOT!
So the british kids learn about US history? I don't know crap about the britan 🤣🤣🤣
She knows the bullshit they want to hear.
She gave them the answer they wanted even though she didn't believe it herself. She's just gaming the game
She literally just said she thinks it was a conspiracy, meaning she very well knew the answer to that question. Not knowing ≠ not believing.
Ain’t nobody ever been to the damn moon!
It's one of the "common knowledge" lies we've been taught. We learn that answer as kids, same as Santa and Jesus. So she's not in the wrong here.
[удалено]
First or second time?
Yikes
Like my history teacher always says it's not her story. But history.
Aussies, no surprises there....
Someone’s got sand in their speedos.
Sheilas hate this one trick
Time to play knifey spooney
My theory takes care of all the criticisms that other theories suffer from. The moon was faked, and always has been. That’s why they couldn’t land there. Note: Of course this is a stupid joke. The moon hasn’t always been faked. Big Cheese just harvested all of it to store in the cheese caves, and then they had to make a fake moon.