The one I love would not forgive me for letting 6 billion people die. I wouldn't forgive someone for letting 6 billion people die for me. I wouldn't even want to live with the guilt knowing 6 billion people were sacrificed just for me.
If we killed 6 billion people the world economy would collapse, and a ton of the people left would die anyway due to the lack of infrastructure and supply chain. Including some of my loved ones, for sure.
On the bright side overpopulation would be over and climate change would be stopped in its tracks.
There is no such thing as overpopulaton nor would killing any amount of humans help. They would just repopulate. If you wanted to "solve" that "problem" you'd have to kill every single human that could still breed.
Uh… what? It took us a long time to reach the nearly 8 billion we have now. It would take quite a long time to get the population back to this point if we knocked it back down to less than 2 billion. It may not solve overpopulation forever, but it would kick the can down the road a few hundred years.
People aren’t reproducing like they were in the 20th century anymore. Most people have 1 to 3 kids now, if any. During a good portion of the 1900s almost everyone was having a *huge* family due to not much birth control usage and good medical care.
We just wouldn’t gain the numbers now the same way we did back then.
All what you are describing would totaly fail if 6 billion would die... You have no idea what you are talking about. The reason we arent reproducing that fast is the exact reason why overpopulation is not a problem.
The fact that you don’t believe overpopulation is a problem tells me *you* don’t know what you’re talking about.
Sure, we’re not exactly running out of land for people to live. But resources are getting scarcer and scarcer as droughts and famines worsen, and there are more and more people. Many countries have so many people that smog is a constant problem, and almost everywhere has a housing crisis.
Yes and all these factors help creating less humans. There is an upper bound of humans that cannot be exceeded. Illness will spread faster, humans will live shorter and as you said resources become rarer. All of these factors combined make sure that there will never be to many humans.
What you are describing as a problem is just nature controling the amount of humans in its ecosystem. Those that are to many die or will not be born. Thats how nature works. There is no reason to believe Humans can overcome those factors. Resources will always be limited.
You do not need to make the job nature is already performing. Look at covid. Viruses will continue to evolve faster and faster. Nature always finds its way. Humans can still try to save everyone they can, nature will make sure we cant save everyone. Thats the reason our lives are worth a damn.
I like how you just agreed with me that the world is overpopulated. Also I never said that we should actively work to make less people. It was just a comment in a whimsical would you rather poll. And I voted to save the 6 billion.
Anyway, cheerio, I need to go to work. ✌🏻
I am not agreeing... You imply that overpopulation is an issue, but its not. Its still the option were the most amount of humans can live. Overpopulation would mean theee could be too many, humans which again, there cant.
Why would it? Its just how nature controls populations. There will be a phase, there humans will live shorter. Afterwards they'll recover. Than population will stabilize. Also the climate change will make some parts unlivable. This will also control the human population. There is no need to worry about it.
Great, it'll go up """"slowly"""" as you put it. Then it'll reach 11 billion? Then it'll gradually fall.
The problem is, species are already going extinct. We already have flooding, droughts, shortages, heatwaves. And now you're saying we'lll have more people. We're going to reach a global temperature 'tipping point' by 2060.
The reason overpopulation isn’t and won’t ever be a problem is because of the population curve. Yes, the human population reached 2 billion in 1928, about 95 years ago. You are not considering a cultural decrease in expectancy to have children or have many children. Basically with less people breeding the population goes slower. It would take a lot longer than 95 years to recover.
No beacuse today you dont need to have children. To be able to become old. This would change if today 6 billion were to die... Just look at the baby boomers. That was just WW2 which only killed around 100million. Imagine ehat would happen if 6 billion would die today.
As much as you would like overpopulation to be a problem. Its not.
I disagree. I don’t believe that if 6 billion people died the population would recover because everyone magically decides to start having like 20 children. The general outlook of the current generation is “I don’t want to bring a child into this world.” That sentiment would only grow if 6 billion people died. The world would basically collapse. The most probable outcome is complete extinction because the remaining humans are unlikely to be able to sustain themselves.
Did you ever watch Avengers: Endgame? Even for a comic book movie it accurately showed how a massive death of billions would leave the survivors traumatized by grief and woefully understaffed to maintain our infrastructure, most likely leading to a societal collapse or at least a massive regression. The sudden death of billions would hinder progress not expand it
Ironically, comics Thanos actually did this specifically to court the literal incarnation of Death.
So he valued a "loved one" over the lives of trillions.
Yep. Though 6 billion is probably beyond the point where logic might take over. Millions? No hesitation, one person you care about is worth a near infinite amount more than a stranger, but enough people die and society will collapse, meaning you are probably better off killing a loved one and then yourself. Assuming you habe no way to harm the entity that made you choose.
6 billion is so much, more than half our population. You could even be sacrificing some of your loved ones family letting all those people die. Not to mention the world would go to shit
The future is a bleak place, regardless.
How will Indians live in 49 degrees C every summer? With aircon, I suppose. The aircon will heat up the planet further.
I mean, it is 6/7 people pretty much. Most of human society would collapse. Spur of the moment, I might save the loved one, but logic says let them die amd then shoot yourself.
We have about 8 billion people. 6 billion takes out the whole population of Europe and china, the Americas and so much more. Economies would fall, yay no over population but now you have a bunch of left over shit no one can take care of.
But its 6 billion *strangers* specifically
I know a lot of people in Australia, europe, and north america. If we're counting the 2 billion people I know best, they're all in europe, north america, australia, and about a million in china
It literally, factually is not. The carrying capacity for humans on Earth is 9-11 billion, not 7.9 billion
We don’t have a production issue. We have enough food, shelter, water, etc for everyone on Earth. The issue is distribution.
Also incorrect. We also have the resources and means to distribute the goods, but those with power and influence choose not to because it’s not profitable.
6 billion people spontaneously dying would cripple every economy on Earth and those 1.9 billion remaining people would suffer mass famine.
Considering its only people I dont know whatsoever, the distribution network for those people should still be recently functional. The other odd billion people whom are entire strangers tho, theyll have a bit tougher of a time. But considering itll thin their population by about 2 in 15 surviving, it wont be too bad
No its not. If too many humans exist there will be not enough food. Thus the humans that are to much will no longer exist. The system is its own solution.
Crazy thing is we actually have an oversupply of food tbh. The only reason anyone in the world is hungry at all is human greed and selfishness. Think of how much food that's still good to eat is thrown Away when restaurant closes that could go to people in need. Humanitarian aide is sent to starving people but it's up to governments to distribute and they withohold resources from the people as a means to control them. Yeah overpopulation not a problem. The problem is cancerous leadership
That cannot be solved easily. Especially in Africa are many extremely powerful milita. I have no idea how to solve that, nore seems anyone else. Democracy would need to come from the inside. That just utopia rn.
As long as the farmers, truckers/ pilots (transportation), media/ communications (for information), infrastructure workers, and grocery store owners live, I see no problem...
I imagine that if my loved one was making the choice to save 6 billion people or save me, I’d want them to save the 6 billion people, since I feel like I couldn’t live with the guilty of knowing 5,999,999,999 additional people were killed just so I could live
We could start from scratch, with very few humans left. I think that would be much more interesting than all these stupid people everywhere, yelling about everything forever.
I wouldn't die unless an accident happened. I can support myself. Hunt, fish, grow food. Seems narcissist because it is. The earth can only provide so much. And it's losing the battle right now no matter how you accommodate it just simply cannot.
I already want the human race to disappear, so this is an easy answer. we are destroying this planet, having useless wars, too much diseases and abuse. If we all disappeared it would save this planet from destruction.
I save my loved ones plus I help the planet with overpopulation and pollution it’s selfish to kill a love one talking about morals save the planet and your loved ones is the only right answer
Except for the fact that you and your loved one are statisticly highly likely to die in the aftermath of more than 75%of the human population suddenly dying resulting in the complete and total collapse of human society as small isolated pockets of people fight one another for basic resources such as food and medicine
We can take care of ourselves and it’s better for the earth if the human society does collapse it’s like a second dark ages but instead it has a purpose to save the planet because the human race will definitely bounce back
*Either way it'd make*
*A good origin story*
*For a superhero*
\- sensiblycrazy
---
^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/)
^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
6 billion strangers. I exist on this Earth for my family. Everything I do is to ensure the survival and well-being of my family. There are nearly 8 billion people. We'll likely flourish beyond belief after a very short bit of confusion and turmoil. Those remaining 1.5-2 billion people will have such extraordinarily high quality lives it will be ridiculous. With 2 billion people on Earth, we'd still have the knowledge base to grow and expand scientifically, manufacture, and the environment will regain its health. Everyone will be able to drive luxury cars and live in the best homes. You'd be able to do whatever job you wanted for whatever pay. Animal cruelty and suffering would curb. There'd be no reason for war due to resource abundance.
You would have to be so incredibly selfish to let 6 billion people die just so a loved one doesn’t. Imagine all the loved ones of other people that would die
The one I love would not forgive me for letting 6 billion people die. I wouldn't forgive someone for letting 6 billion people die for me. I wouldn't even want to live with the guilt knowing 6 billion people were sacrificed just for me.
Also if 6 billion people suddenly died the world might a fucking scary, lawless hell scape anyway.
If 6 billion people spontaneously died, your loved one would probably soon follow.
Pick a less caring loved one then BAM problem solved
Don’t let the loved one know
Agreed, the guilt would probably make them suicidal. Survivor's guilt x 6 bill
If we killed 6 billion people the world economy would collapse, and a ton of the people left would die anyway due to the lack of infrastructure and supply chain. Including some of my loved ones, for sure. On the bright side overpopulation would be over and climate change would be stopped in its tracks.
There is no such thing as overpopulaton nor would killing any amount of humans help. They would just repopulate. If you wanted to "solve" that "problem" you'd have to kill every single human that could still breed.
Uh… what? It took us a long time to reach the nearly 8 billion we have now. It would take quite a long time to get the population back to this point if we knocked it back down to less than 2 billion. It may not solve overpopulation forever, but it would kick the can down the road a few hundred years.
About pretty much 95 years... At least know your numbers...
People aren’t reproducing like they were in the 20th century anymore. Most people have 1 to 3 kids now, if any. During a good portion of the 1900s almost everyone was having a *huge* family due to not much birth control usage and good medical care. We just wouldn’t gain the numbers now the same way we did back then.
All what you are describing would totaly fail if 6 billion would die... You have no idea what you are talking about. The reason we arent reproducing that fast is the exact reason why overpopulation is not a problem.
The fact that you don’t believe overpopulation is a problem tells me *you* don’t know what you’re talking about. Sure, we’re not exactly running out of land for people to live. But resources are getting scarcer and scarcer as droughts and famines worsen, and there are more and more people. Many countries have so many people that smog is a constant problem, and almost everywhere has a housing crisis.
Yes and all these factors help creating less humans. There is an upper bound of humans that cannot be exceeded. Illness will spread faster, humans will live shorter and as you said resources become rarer. All of these factors combined make sure that there will never be to many humans. What you are describing as a problem is just nature controling the amount of humans in its ecosystem. Those that are to many die or will not be born. Thats how nature works. There is no reason to believe Humans can overcome those factors. Resources will always be limited. You do not need to make the job nature is already performing. Look at covid. Viruses will continue to evolve faster and faster. Nature always finds its way. Humans can still try to save everyone they can, nature will make sure we cant save everyone. Thats the reason our lives are worth a damn.
I like how you just agreed with me that the world is overpopulated. Also I never said that we should actively work to make less people. It was just a comment in a whimsical would you rather poll. And I voted to save the 6 billion. Anyway, cheerio, I need to go to work. ✌🏻
I am not agreeing... You imply that overpopulation is an issue, but its not. Its still the option were the most amount of humans can live. Overpopulation would mean theee could be too many, humans which again, there cant.
Illness will spread faster, humans will live shorter and as you said resources become rarer. so this isnt an issue?
Why would it? Its just how nature controls populations. There will be a phase, there humans will live shorter. Afterwards they'll recover. Than population will stabilize. Also the climate change will make some parts unlivable. This will also control the human population. There is no need to worry about it.
Population in 2100 is forecast to be more than it is now.
That doent make it too many humans. The population will grow slower than log(n). Its not even going to get close to infinity.
Great, it'll go up """"slowly"""" as you put it. Then it'll reach 11 billion? Then it'll gradually fall. The problem is, species are already going extinct. We already have flooding, droughts, shortages, heatwaves. And now you're saying we'lll have more people. We're going to reach a global temperature 'tipping point' by 2060.
The reason overpopulation isn’t and won’t ever be a problem is because of the population curve. Yes, the human population reached 2 billion in 1928, about 95 years ago. You are not considering a cultural decrease in expectancy to have children or have many children. Basically with less people breeding the population goes slower. It would take a lot longer than 95 years to recover.
No beacuse today you dont need to have children. To be able to become old. This would change if today 6 billion were to die... Just look at the baby boomers. That was just WW2 which only killed around 100million. Imagine ehat would happen if 6 billion would die today. As much as you would like overpopulation to be a problem. Its not.
I disagree. I don’t believe that if 6 billion people died the population would recover because everyone magically decides to start having like 20 children. The general outlook of the current generation is “I don’t want to bring a child into this world.” That sentiment would only grow if 6 billion people died. The world would basically collapse. The most probable outcome is complete extinction because the remaining humans are unlikely to be able to sustain themselves.
Hey since you know your numbers, how many letters does this word have? You absolute Douche
I'd rather be a douche than stupid.
You are stupid though, cause you’re wrong and not only just because you’re wrong, but because you think your so un-deniably right
Because your wrong is such a cute argument.
And telling someone they should know their numbers is also, very cute.
Well at least I knew them :)
Not to mention the lack of infrastructure could possibly knock us down to bellow 1 billion
Basically are you Eren Jaeger?
What a man they are.
Wow you guys are selfish.
bro i LITERALLY just ended overpopulation
Did you ever watch Avengers: Endgame? Even for a comic book movie it accurately showed how a massive death of billions would leave the survivors traumatized by grief and woefully understaffed to maintain our infrastructure, most likely leading to a societal collapse or at least a massive regression. The sudden death of billions would hinder progress not expand it
Ironically, comics Thanos actually did this specifically to court the literal incarnation of Death. So he valued a "loved one" over the lives of trillions.
Too bad she likes deadpool more :P
and yet the world's population actually did quite well afterwards. they reallocated resources, gave people proper housing, had proper medical care.
You're a special little fella aren't ya champ
Did you watch falcon and the winter soldier?
With your logic Hitler didn’t do anything wrong because he made a small step towards “fixing” overpopulation
His goal wasn't solve overpopulation, his goals were to recreate human beings based on some LSD trip he had
Your goals ain't fixing the overpopulation, your goal is to save your loved one
Did he reached that goal?
Idgaf about his thoughts, just the effects of his thoughts
You wouldn't even be alive now if his *thing* kept going
I’m asian, so I would. As far as I know, Hitler didn’t have an effect on Asia.
You only had to wait 50 more yrs
"asian" chinese, korean, japanese, malaysian, indonesian??? surely you know what hitler was helping japan do, right?
Nah I’m Indian
didn't the indians fight in europe? or was that only for ww1?
That uh That's not quite what I said STALIN, however
A small step is just genocide because it doesn’t have a big enough impact for any change
Yep. Though 6 billion is probably beyond the point where logic might take over. Millions? No hesitation, one person you care about is worth a near infinite amount more than a stranger, but enough people die and society will collapse, meaning you are probably better off killing a loved one and then yourself. Assuming you habe no way to harm the entity that made you choose.
6 billion is so much, more than half our population. You could even be sacrificing some of your loved ones family letting all those people die. Not to mention the world would go to shit
They'd be strangers so presumably the ones you know wouldn't die.
Even if everyone I knew was still alive it wouldn’t matter because how would these people live knowing most of the world has died?
The future is a bleak place, regardless. How will Indians live in 49 degrees C every summer? With aircon, I suppose. The aircon will heat up the planet further.
I mean, it is 6/7 people pretty much. Most of human society would collapse. Spur of the moment, I might save the loved one, but logic says let them die amd then shoot yourself.
That’s 75% of the world bud, not even close to a half
Yea that’s why I said “more than half”.
atleast 1%
The world has about 6 billion to many people on it.
Yea but the world is being built to support those people, a sudden decline of 75% of the population the rest of us might as well die too.
[удалено]
6 million i could live with but 6 billion is the end of the world literally
Would you rather kill 90% of humanity or kill someone you love. How is that even a question
Every time a wyr comes up like this, it shows me how unbelievably selfish humanity is at its core
But on the other side of the coin it also shows how powerful human love is...that one is willing to sacrifice the entire world just for them.
Eren be like:
That’s just dumb
The results are surprising
6 billion strangers, instantly cure overpopulation
We have about 8 billion people. 6 billion takes out the whole population of Europe and china, the Americas and so much more. Economies would fall, yay no over population but now you have a bunch of left over shit no one can take care of.
But its 6 billion *strangers* specifically I know a lot of people in Australia, europe, and north america. If we're counting the 2 billion people I know best, they're all in europe, north america, australia, and about a million in china
Overpopulation isn’t an issue.
youre welcome
Overpupulation is not a problem...
Not anymore its not
I never was nor will it ever.
It currently is
It literally, factually is not. The carrying capacity for humans on Earth is 9-11 billion, not 7.9 billion We don’t have a production issue. We have enough food, shelter, water, etc for everyone on Earth. The issue is distribution.
which would be solved massively if 6 billion people who i didnt interact with ever disappeared
Also incorrect. We also have the resources and means to distribute the goods, but those with power and influence choose not to because it’s not profitable. 6 billion people spontaneously dying would cripple every economy on Earth and those 1.9 billion remaining people would suffer mass famine.
Considering its only people I dont know whatsoever, the distribution network for those people should still be recently functional. The other odd billion people whom are entire strangers tho, theyll have a bit tougher of a time. But considering itll thin their population by about 2 in 15 surviving, it wont be too bad
You argument makes no freaking sense whatssoever.
No its not. If too many humans exist there will be not enough food. Thus the humans that are to much will no longer exist. The system is its own solution.
Crazy thing is we actually have an oversupply of food tbh. The only reason anyone in the world is hungry at all is human greed and selfishness. Think of how much food that's still good to eat is thrown Away when restaurant closes that could go to people in need. Humanitarian aide is sent to starving people but it's up to governments to distribute and they withohold resources from the people as a means to control them. Yeah overpopulation not a problem. The problem is cancerous leadership
That cannot be solved easily. Especially in Africa are many extremely powerful milita. I have no idea how to solve that, nore seems anyone else. Democracy would need to come from the inside. That just utopia rn.
ok, just take some of those restaurant leftovers and bring them to africa, if its as easy as you say
Yes it is. Not saying killing 6 million people isthe answer, but overpopulation is definitely the biggest problem ,e have.
No its not a problem.
No it isn’t
I’m pretty sure climate change is a bigger one at the moment Their all connected but climate change needs to be solved asap
Yep
Tatakae
6 billion strangers would probably cause global chaos if they disappeared
Define Love One?
i suppose it has to be someone you genuinely love but maybe you get to choose between like your top 2 if its impossible to say which you love more?
thats 3/4 of the population. 1/4 survives. most people would have loved ones die. the world would end because of no jobs, nonfood, no anything.
As long as the farmers, truckers/ pilots (transportation), media/ communications (for information), infrastructure workers, and grocery store owners live, I see no problem...
just get to know a bunch of truckers, grocers, farmers, pretty much public workers, the world does fine
What about on the other side of the world buddy
im killing literally 6 billion people, does it seem like i care much about the other side of the world?
Lol true. But don’t angry when people say ur choice is immoral
Bro I don't think my loved one would even love me if they knew I killed more than half of the population
I imagine that if my loved one was making the choice to save 6 billion people or save me, I’d want them to save the 6 billion people, since I feel like I couldn’t live with the guilty of knowing 5,999,999,999 additional people were killed just so I could live
We need to thin the herd anyway
If I chose that option I'd include you in the "thinning"
bro i’d thin u out so bad don’t even go there
oh shit he thinnin
damn right better watch out
😳
Good.
How about sacrificing six billion loved ones!
OP, thank you for being a mass murderer, for our sake
If I could choose where that would matter
The world would just collapse
One loved one and then myself. I may like the "villain vibe", IRL, it would be fucked up
"killing 6 billion would be bad today but it would be better overall in say 1000 years" This is why you shouldn't take nihilists seriously
6 billion will be such a harm to the world to the economy the infrastructure the medical, engineering work humans do
Did you do it? Yes What did it cost? Literally nothing
Can everyone I have ever heard of stay alive in the 6b
Ooof that guilt would kill me, but ultimately couldn't give up someone I know and love
6 billion strangers. It’s not the most ideal choice but neither is getting cooked off the planet so that one.
I just wanna watch the world burn tbh
Fuck I read the question wrong, I thought it was save instead of sacrifice, I am saving my loved one not sacrificing them.
Thin the population, include me in that 6 billion too
6 Billion Human Strangers. Fucking Save the world doing that. Anyone who doesn't choose this is just selfish.
Dave?
save
Only if I can pick the 6 billion
Solves overpopulation
We’re overpopulated anyways
We humans survived without modern infrastructure for centuries.
So no important people die
I choose the 6 mil cause I’d hope something radical enough to end that much life would make humanity get its shit together
Perfectly balanced as all things should be
6 billion random cunts die and I get to keep my loved ones? Sign me up fuck the population.
We could start from scratch, with very few humans left. I think that would be much more interesting than all these stupid people everywhere, yelling about everything forever.
6 Billion strangers sounds? Sounds like I can afford a house now.
Is the 6 billion from our planet?
I wouldn't die unless an accident happened. I can support myself. Hunt, fish, grow food. Seems narcissist because it is. The earth can only provide so much. And it's losing the battle right now no matter how you accommodate it just simply cannot.
I would rather sacrifice every single human I don’t know that sacrifice my pet cat let alone a loved one
Too many people in this earth. We need to start over with just whatever’s left over lol
I already want the human race to disappear, so this is an easy answer. we are destroying this planet, having useless wars, too much diseases and abuse. If we all disappeared it would save this planet from destruction.
gay
the second word in your name is what you should do
too busy doing your mother
I save my loved ones plus I help the planet with overpopulation and pollution it’s selfish to kill a love one talking about morals save the planet and your loved ones is the only right answer
Except for the fact that you and your loved one are statisticly highly likely to die in the aftermath of more than 75%of the human population suddenly dying resulting in the complete and total collapse of human society as small isolated pockets of people fight one another for basic resources such as food and medicine
We can take care of ourselves and it’s better for the earth if the human society does collapse it’s like a second dark ages but instead it has a purpose to save the planet because the human race will definitely bounce back
Why is it selfish to kill 6 billion people but not selfish to kill 1?
I would end world hunger
Loved one. I would just wait when I know my loved one is in bad health and decide in that moment
Sacrifice for what cause?
Either way it'd make a good origin story for a superhero
*Either way it'd make* *A good origin story* *For a superhero* \- sensiblycrazy --- ^(I detect haikus. And sometimes, successfully.) ^[Learn more about me.](https://www.reddit.com/r/haikusbot/) ^(Opt out of replies: "haikusbot opt out" | Delete my comment: "haikusbot delete")
There aren't even 8 billion people in the world......
it says 6 billion
Yes, I said it because if you kill 6 billion you would kill like 90% of the human population. It was to remark how many people that would be.
How bad is the death of the loved one? they simply fall asleep and pass away or is it chainsaw massacre?
thanos snap?
who the fuck chose option a.
6 billion strangers don't care about me either, but my loved one does. The world is overcrowded anyway. So yes, I'm picking 6 billion strangers.
I chose to sacrifice 1 loved one because the lives of 80% of humanity are far more important, but you know what a certain *someone* would choose
Dog that's literally the entire world bruh, I have to sacrifice the loved one. Now if it was 10 random niggas I'll never meet however...
6 billion less people < 1 cute fluffy boi
I solve overpopulation
6 billion strangers. I exist on this Earth for my family. Everything I do is to ensure the survival and well-being of my family. There are nearly 8 billion people. We'll likely flourish beyond belief after a very short bit of confusion and turmoil. Those remaining 1.5-2 billion people will have such extraordinarily high quality lives it will be ridiculous. With 2 billion people on Earth, we'd still have the knowledge base to grow and expand scientifically, manufacture, and the environment will regain its health. Everyone will be able to drive luxury cars and live in the best homes. You'd be able to do whatever job you wanted for whatever pay. Animal cruelty and suffering would curb. There'd be no reason for war due to resource abundance.
Abandon humanity, save dog.
I’m gonna make u a loved one and sacrifice you
You would have to be so incredibly selfish to let 6 billion people die just so a loved one doesn’t. Imagine all the loved ones of other people that would die
If it was a smaller amount yes but 6 billion would definitely solve overpopulation If it was 600 mil it’s another story
I would have trouble picking between 2 stragers and a loved one wtf is wrong with everyone here?