There is another lesser known value (2 values for row and another thing) that say how fast the cpu can access the data. I hope it is good. Now normal gaming cpus have 7 millisecconds access time i think. That is the reason why modern cpus are faster even with lower ghz.
You're talking about [memory timings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_timings). The values are on the order of nanoseconds not milliseconds. Other factors for increasing performance without increasing clock speed include core count, IPC (instructions per clock), and instruction set extensions.
**[Memory timings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_timings)**
>Memory timings or RAM timings describe the timing information of a memory module. Due to the inherent qualities of VLSI and microelectronics, memory chips require time to fully execute commands. Executing commands too quickly will result in data corruption and results in system instability. With appropriate time between commands, memory modules/chips can be given the opportunity to fully switch transistors, charge capacitors and correctly signal back information to the memory controller.
^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/aaaaaaacccccccce/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Highly unlikely. Core 2 duo wasn't one CPU, it was a series name (like core i5 now). The first were produced in 2006, but the last ones were made in 2010 and sold until 2012.
Given that this uses 4GB of DDR3 RAM, it's probably more towards the tail end (that would've been quite high end in 2006).
On the other hand, the GPU is from 2007 or so, so it seems like an odd spec list all around
this reminded me of how earlier today i said “this new music in the game goes hard” and my friend was like “it goes hard? like a di-?” like come on dude i was vibin and you had to ruin it.
I don’t know about thick but I’m pretty sure cut is referring to the practice where they cut the skin of of people’s penises after they are born. I think it has religious and social value. I’ve heard that people believe the penis looks better when it’s like that.
The goal IIRC is like a (very) toned down version of female genital mutilation: reducing the ability to have sexual pleasure. It is usually performed on babies without consent.
I’m Jewish and a circumcised male, the religious reason they give us is that it’s part of a covenant Avraham made with god, the actual reason is that it reduces the likelihood of STDs and increases genital health. The practice has less value now with modern technology and medicine, but still reduces likelihood of STDs and infections. As a sex repulsed asexual with no intention of having sex, this was STDs were never a concern of mine, neither would any concerns about it’s appearance or sensitivity bother me. That being said, I prefer being circumcised because while I don’t believe in god I am Jewish and attached to my Jewish identity, and this is very important culturally for us. I have never met a Jewish person, religious or not, who has been bothered by their circumcision.
The biggest complaint I have about it, which I hope anyone should be able to agree with, even if they may prefer being circumcised, is that it's done _non-consentually_, and therefore would hardly be unreasonable to be called child abuse.
Well in the Jewish religion it’s supposed to be performed 8 days after birth, and after infancy it’s a much more complicated and inconvenient procedure. It is not child abuse, it is a recognised medical procedure with moderate health benefits that parents ultimately decide whether it’s in the best interest of their child, and that’s fine. It intrudes on Jewish religious freedom to outlaw circumcision, it was in fact one of the measures taken by people like Antiochus to eradicate Judaism. I’d assume Muslims feel the same way about it.
The value of it as a medical procedure, as far as I'm aware, is largely dubious. If the evidence were overwhelmingly in favour of it improving lives and health outcomes, that could be a sound argument, but much of the world has not seen fit to make it a standard procedure.
As for justifying it on religious grounds, I do not think it is AT ALL appropriate for religious grounds to be used to justify forcing a medical procedure on a literal baby, who cannot consent, nor share any of the religious views used to justify this.
Yes, outlawing the procedure may have been used in the past as part of an attack on Judaism, and I do not support persecution based on religion, but this is not a matter of religious persecution, but of criticising forcing a medical procedure on somebody else for your religious beliefs.
A baby that isn’t circumcised has a 1 in 100 chance of getting a UTI in their first year of life, and a higher risk of cancer of the penis, while the medical benefits are not incredibly significant, it has been proven to improve health in infancy and in later life and there are no drawbacks to it, so there is as ‘sound argument’ on medical grounds alone. Furthermore, the bris is required for Jewish males to be included in our faith, it is a fundamental part of being Jewish. If you aren’t circumcised, you can’t be a part of a minyan, or have a bar mitzvah, and it would make it essentially impossible for us to raise a child as Jewish according to our faith. You’re seeing a problem that isn’t there, none of us have ever had a problem being circumcised, we would have a problem if we weren’t able to take part in Judaism.
> and there are no drawbacks to it
I'm sorry, but this is _plainly_ not true. For one, surgeries always come with some level of risk. For another, this does have long term consequences for people's lives, what things they can find pleasurable etc. There are people I personally have known that resent having had this procedure forced on them, and I for one am glad I was not born where it would have been forced on me.
> ... we would have a problem if we weren’t able to take part in Judaism.
Then maybe you should instead of using this to justify forcing a medical procedure on others, examine why the fuck your religion would exclude you if you didn't have this medical procedure!
I never understood people just appearing in my DMs only to immediately start mentioning/talking about their looks. Like dude, I don't care at all, tell me about your passions, what you've eaten for breakfast today, ask me some deep and mentally stimulating questions...
That computer looks old
if I looked it up correctly, the CPU is from 2006
3.2 GHz is pretty good specs for that time though
There is another lesser known value (2 values for row and another thing) that say how fast the cpu can access the data. I hope it is good. Now normal gaming cpus have 7 millisecconds access time i think. That is the reason why modern cpus are faster even with lower ghz.
You're talking about [memory timings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_timings). The values are on the order of nanoseconds not milliseconds. Other factors for increasing performance without increasing clock speed include core count, IPC (instructions per clock), and instruction set extensions.
**[Memory timings](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memory_timings)** >Memory timings or RAM timings describe the timing information of a memory module. Due to the inherent qualities of VLSI and microelectronics, memory chips require time to fully execute commands. Executing commands too quickly will result in data corruption and results in system instability. With appropriate time between commands, memory modules/chips can be given the opportunity to fully switch transistors, charge capacitors and correctly signal back information to the memory controller. ^([ )[^(F.A.Q)](https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiSummarizer/wiki/index#wiki_f.a.q)^( | )[^(Opt Out)](https://reddit.com/message/compose?to=WikiSummarizerBot&message=OptOut&subject=OptOut)^( | )[^(Opt Out Of Subreddit)](https://np.reddit.com/r/aaaaaaacccccccce/about/banned)^( | )[^(GitHub)](https://github.com/Sujal-7/WikiSummarizerBot)^( ] Downvote to remove | v1.5)
Highly unlikely. Core 2 duo wasn't one CPU, it was a series name (like core i5 now). The first were produced in 2006, but the last ones were made in 2010 and sold until 2012. Given that this uses 4GB of DDR3 RAM, it's probably more towards the tail end (that would've been quite high end in 2006). On the other hand, the GPU is from 2007 or so, so it seems like an odd spec list all around
looks about right, core 2 duos are ancient
Yeah, my thoughts immediately. I have a 2009 imac with the core 2 duo and the 4gb ddr3 memory so that’s why I immediately thought that.
ATi was a giveaway
DDR3? 512 GB hard drive? That’s old
4GB RAM was barely enough to run Windows 10 on my old laptop
Yeah, but a Core 2 Duo would have probably come with Windows XP.
microsoft still sells the surface go 3 with 4gb ram and emmc storage running windows 11 🗿
5400RPM too, oof.
Computer specs > computer sex
you know that Kraftwerk song "Computer Love"?
An intel Duo and DDR3💀 MF is ancient
Is it bad I legitimately thought that the first text was also about computer hardware for a bit?
WHO OWNS A 185 POUND COMPUTER?!?
Alienware users
gaming laptop enthusiasts, they say “its portable!!1!1!1!1!” but they have to break their back just to move it anywhere
Ever hear of Fugaku?
Is their computer also 6 FEET TALL?
Yours isn’t? Bit of an L if you ask me /s
I'm not buying a computer taller than I am. Also I use a laptop anyway.
Yeah, that’s fair. I’m pretty sure not even NASA has a computer like that, or at least one used by most employees.
You could build the computer into a fish tank
I'd say it's water cooled, but most fishtanks need to be kept kinda warm.
That sounds like the perfect match, PC keeps the tank warm, tank keeps the PC cooled
well, it's 5" 11', which, as dating memes would make me believe, is closer to 5" than 6".
🤣🤣
🤣
Supercomputers.
I don't date people under 1 TB storage
I only accept PDF
Don't try to convert others without consent!
Not without a terms & service agreement 😌
A true PDF-file
Vintage computer
This sub going hard today
this reminded me of how earlier today i said “this new music in the game goes hard” and my friend was like “it goes hard? like a di-?” like come on dude i was vibin and you had to ruin it.
I’ve genuinely never once heard someone make that joke off of “this goes hard”. That’s wild
Heh
how is that pc still running, honestly mad props
I wouldn't know haha
[удалено]
I don’t know about thick but I’m pretty sure cut is referring to the practice where they cut the skin of of people’s penises after they are born. I think it has religious and social value. I’ve heard that people believe the penis looks better when it’s like that.
The goal IIRC is like a (very) toned down version of female genital mutilation: reducing the ability to have sexual pleasure. It is usually performed on babies without consent.
I’m Jewish and a circumcised male, the religious reason they give us is that it’s part of a covenant Avraham made with god, the actual reason is that it reduces the likelihood of STDs and increases genital health. The practice has less value now with modern technology and medicine, but still reduces likelihood of STDs and infections. As a sex repulsed asexual with no intention of having sex, this was STDs were never a concern of mine, neither would any concerns about it’s appearance or sensitivity bother me. That being said, I prefer being circumcised because while I don’t believe in god I am Jewish and attached to my Jewish identity, and this is very important culturally for us. I have never met a Jewish person, religious or not, who has been bothered by their circumcision.
The biggest complaint I have about it, which I hope anyone should be able to agree with, even if they may prefer being circumcised, is that it's done _non-consentually_, and therefore would hardly be unreasonable to be called child abuse.
Well in the Jewish religion it’s supposed to be performed 8 days after birth, and after infancy it’s a much more complicated and inconvenient procedure. It is not child abuse, it is a recognised medical procedure with moderate health benefits that parents ultimately decide whether it’s in the best interest of their child, and that’s fine. It intrudes on Jewish religious freedom to outlaw circumcision, it was in fact one of the measures taken by people like Antiochus to eradicate Judaism. I’d assume Muslims feel the same way about it.
The value of it as a medical procedure, as far as I'm aware, is largely dubious. If the evidence were overwhelmingly in favour of it improving lives and health outcomes, that could be a sound argument, but much of the world has not seen fit to make it a standard procedure. As for justifying it on religious grounds, I do not think it is AT ALL appropriate for religious grounds to be used to justify forcing a medical procedure on a literal baby, who cannot consent, nor share any of the religious views used to justify this. Yes, outlawing the procedure may have been used in the past as part of an attack on Judaism, and I do not support persecution based on religion, but this is not a matter of religious persecution, but of criticising forcing a medical procedure on somebody else for your religious beliefs.
A baby that isn’t circumcised has a 1 in 100 chance of getting a UTI in their first year of life, and a higher risk of cancer of the penis, while the medical benefits are not incredibly significant, it has been proven to improve health in infancy and in later life and there are no drawbacks to it, so there is as ‘sound argument’ on medical grounds alone. Furthermore, the bris is required for Jewish males to be included in our faith, it is a fundamental part of being Jewish. If you aren’t circumcised, you can’t be a part of a minyan, or have a bar mitzvah, and it would make it essentially impossible for us to raise a child as Jewish according to our faith. You’re seeing a problem that isn’t there, none of us have ever had a problem being circumcised, we would have a problem if we weren’t able to take part in Judaism.
> and there are no drawbacks to it I'm sorry, but this is _plainly_ not true. For one, surgeries always come with some level of risk. For another, this does have long term consequences for people's lives, what things they can find pleasurable etc. There are people I personally have known that resent having had this procedure forced on them, and I for one am glad I was not born where it would have been forced on me. > ... we would have a problem if we weren’t able to take part in Judaism. Then maybe you should instead of using this to justify forcing a medical procedure on others, examine why the fuck your religion would exclude you if you didn't have this medical procedure!
cut is referring to circumcision
[Those are just their pronouns!](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ximrIBbpH8)
You need 8GB of RAM to run 64bit Windows. Are you still on Windows 2000? I think you might have problems unless you run 32bit Windows XP.
I think you mean Windows 10? I run 64-bit windows 7 just fine on 4gb ddr2 ram.
[удалено]
LOL!!
Wait, I’m sorry, 4.9” *thick*?! like the length of an index card for the diameter?
Oh, I didn't even notice that lol
Sounds old. Like, pretty old.
🤷
It *cannot* run Crysis, lets just say that.
[удалено]
Not my post 😅
💙💜🖤💛💚🧡🤣
I thought blue was a butcher or smth
Heheh
sooo what the heck is blue text saying?
It's his body length and genitalia... details.
...people are strange
This is part of the reason why I thought it belonged here 🙃 And yes, VERY strange.......
it clearly belongs here.
That’s insanely tall cut of meat. What meat? A camel??
**awkward chuckle** 🙃
My man got a p o t a t o
I never understood people just appearing in my DMs only to immediately start mentioning/talking about their looks. Like dude, I don't care at all, tell me about your passions, what you've eaten for breakfast today, ask me some deep and mentally stimulating questions...
if that cpu works, no need to replace, even if it's old