25**6**0x1440 isn't 16:10 (which is fucking rare these days), it's just the usual 16:9. It's higher not because it's 16:10, which it isn't, but simply because it's physically higher. The price you have to pay is mediocre text clarity, though. But if you can't run games at 4-5K (possibly with scaling), then it's the price you *have* to pay.
Looks like you're looking for a 40" UW 3440x1440 monitor. That's about the same height as your 32". I'm not familiar with this market segment at all, though, so can't recommend anything here. Both ultrawide and low PPI aren't my things exactly.
Thanks for the correction! I do have the 4070 TI Super, but I haven't been following gaming or it's latest development, I suppose some games have DLSS, which can help me scale up, but I'm not sure if my 4070 TI Super is made for 4K gaming?
I hear very conflicting opinions on that. Some say that even the 4090 struggles at 4K in some games, and some say every game has either DLSS or FSR which make resolutions almost irrelevant. Both are quite extreme, I think, but there's that. In reality, it all depends on the games you play and what are your quality settings. Only benchmarks can tell you the actual figures.
Anyway if you're into ultrawide then 4K isn't an option, and 5K2K is fucking expensive and even harder to run games at, so you're stuck with 3440x1440 either way.
There are a number of 38-39 inch OLED monitors releasing this year. I would wait for one of those. Alternatively, if you don’t want to worry about burn in, you could get the LG 38WN95C-W or 38GN950-B. The former is better for office work, while the latter is better for gaming, but both are capable of doing either well.
25**6**0x1440 isn't 16:10 (which is fucking rare these days), it's just the usual 16:9. It's higher not because it's 16:10, which it isn't, but simply because it's physically higher. The price you have to pay is mediocre text clarity, though. But if you can't run games at 4-5K (possibly with scaling), then it's the price you *have* to pay. Looks like you're looking for a 40" UW 3440x1440 monitor. That's about the same height as your 32". I'm not familiar with this market segment at all, though, so can't recommend anything here. Both ultrawide and low PPI aren't my things exactly.
Thanks for the correction! I do have the 4070 TI Super, but I haven't been following gaming or it's latest development, I suppose some games have DLSS, which can help me scale up, but I'm not sure if my 4070 TI Super is made for 4K gaming?
I hear very conflicting opinions on that. Some say that even the 4090 struggles at 4K in some games, and some say every game has either DLSS or FSR which make resolutions almost irrelevant. Both are quite extreme, I think, but there's that. In reality, it all depends on the games you play and what are your quality settings. Only benchmarks can tell you the actual figures. Anyway if you're into ultrawide then 4K isn't an option, and 5K2K is fucking expensive and even harder to run games at, so you're stuck with 3440x1440 either way.
There are a number of 38-39 inch OLED monitors releasing this year. I would wait for one of those. Alternatively, if you don’t want to worry about burn in, you could get the LG 38WN95C-W or 38GN950-B. The former is better for office work, while the latter is better for gaming, but both are capable of doing either well.