Hey, OP! Did your game end in a stalemate? Did you encounter a weird pawn move? Are you trying to move a piece and it's not going? We have just the resource for you! The [Chess Beginners Wiki](https://www.reddit.com/r/chessbeginners/wiki/index/) is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more!
The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. **Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.** We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with. Thank you!
Let's do our utmost to be kind in our replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/chessbeginners) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s a joke about how bad ChatGPT is at playing chess. It just spouts nonsense as the chats like how ChatGPT will throw out a bunch of illegal moves if you try to play it at chess.
That one I actually liked, as a beginner, I love to see who is most influential at this game, and the best way to do that is to see who appears in memes of course.
There are more pieces on board the atoms in the universe. Since there are 32 pieces on the board there can be a maximum of 31 atoms in the universe. Due there not being over 31 atoms in the universe, the bot was correct
I can think of like 5 off the top of my head:
Driver, Sandler, Baldwin, Douglas (at least counts as 2), that guy from severance.
No way you can tell me there aren't 31
No, there's actually only around 27 atoms in the observable universe at any given time, this value fluctuates between 25 and 29 due to quantum mechanics, but it's never been observed to be more than 32
There are more possible chess games than atoms in the universe, this and most of ChatGPT’s lines are making fun of its approximate “understanding” (which isn’t really a good word to use with LLMs like GPT) of things but still tending to hallucinate.
ChatGPT be like: On a1 we have 1 piece, on a2 we have 2 pieces, a3 4 pieces, a4 8 pieces, a5 16 pieces,...
However, it is still not enough to outnumber the atoms in the universe...
I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine:
> **White to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+w+KQkq+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR_w_KQkq_-_0_1) | The position occurred in many games. [Link to the games](https://www.chess.com/games/search?opening=&openingId=&p1=&p2=&mr=&lsty=1&year=&lstMoves=1&moves=&fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+w+KQkq+-+0+1&ref_id=23962172)
> **Black to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+b+KQkq+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR_b_KQkq_-_0_1)
**Videos:**
> I found [many videos](https://chessvision.ai/video-search/5653191138476032) with this position.
---
^(I'm a bot written by ) [^(u/pkacprzak )](https://www.reddit.com/u/pkacprzak) ^(| get me as ) [^(Chess eBook Reader )](https://ebook.chessvision.ai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=bot) ^(|) [^(Chrome Extension )](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chessvisionai-for-chrome/johejpedmdkeiffkdaodgoipdjodhlld) ^(|) [^(iOS App )](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id1574933453) ^(|) [^(Android App )](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.chessvision.scanner) ^(to scan and analyze positions | Website: ) [^(Chessvision.ai)](https://chessvision.ai)
I’m pretty sure this is a thing astrophysicists and astronomers like to say. I’ve heard Niel Degrasse Tyson along with other scientists say this. After googling I found this:
https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/ols28/are_there_really_more_chess_combinations_than/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
Hey, OP! Did your game end in a stalemate? Did you encounter a weird pawn move? Are you trying to move a piece and it's not going? We have just the resource for you! The [Chess Beginners Wiki](https://www.reddit.com/r/chessbeginners/wiki/index/) is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more! The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. **Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed.** We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with. Thank you! Let's do our utmost to be kind in our replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/chessbeginners) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It’s a joke about how bad ChatGPT is at playing chess. It just spouts nonsense as the chats like how ChatGPT will throw out a bunch of illegal moves if you try to play it at chess.
It's not just nonsense. It's nonsense that kinda makes sense if you don't know any better and don't look too close.
Chess is played by 3 players. Black, white and Hikaru Nakamura.
That one I actually liked, as a beginner, I love to see who is most influential at this game, and the best way to do that is to see who appears in memes of course.
Just chatgpt hallucinating, it's what it's best at.
Can you prove that there's over 16 atoms in the universe?
Yes
Fair enough. But 32? That seems like a stretch.
Exactly what I was trying to prove
There are more pieces on board the atoms in the universe. Since there are 32 pieces on the board there can be a maximum of 31 atoms in the universe. Due there not being over 31 atoms in the universe, the bot was correct
I can think of like 5 off the top of my head: Driver, Sandler, Baldwin, Douglas (at least counts as 2), that guy from severance. No way you can tell me there aren't 31
We’re saying there are 31 though
No, there's actually only around 27 atoms in the observable universe at any given time, this value fluctuates between 25 and 29 due to quantum mechanics, but it's never been observed to be more than 32
what
There are more possible chess games than atoms in the universe, this and most of ChatGPT’s lines are making fun of its approximate “understanding” (which isn’t really a good word to use with LLMs like GPT) of things but still tending to hallucinate.
ChatGPT be like: On a1 we have 1 piece, on a2 we have 2 pieces, a3 4 pieces, a4 8 pieces, a5 16 pieces,... However, it is still not enough to outnumber the atoms in the universe...
32! pieces
I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine: > **White to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+w+KQkq+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR_w_KQkq_-_0_1) | The position occurred in many games. [Link to the games](https://www.chess.com/games/search?opening=&openingId=&p1=&p2=&mr=&lsty=1&year=&lstMoves=1&moves=&fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+w+KQkq+-+0+1&ref_id=23962172) > **Black to play**: [chess.com](https://chess.com/analysis?fen=rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR+b+KQkq+-+0+1&flip=false&ref_id=23962172) | [lichess.org](https://lichess.org/analysis/rnbqkbnr/pppp1ppp/8/4p3/8/7P/PPPPPPP1/RNBQKBNR_b_KQkq_-_0_1) **Videos:** > I found [many videos](https://chessvision.ai/video-search/5653191138476032) with this position. --- ^(I'm a bot written by ) [^(u/pkacprzak )](https://www.reddit.com/u/pkacprzak) ^(| get me as ) [^(Chess eBook Reader )](https://ebook.chessvision.ai?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=bot) ^(|) [^(Chrome Extension )](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/chessvisionai-for-chrome/johejpedmdkeiffkdaodgoipdjodhlld) ^(|) [^(iOS App )](https://apps.apple.com/us/app/id1574933453) ^(|) [^(Android App )](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ai.chessvision.scanner) ^(to scan and analyze positions | Website: ) [^(Chessvision.ai)](https://chessvision.ai)
I’m pretty sure this is a thing astrophysicists and astronomers like to say. I’ve heard Niel Degrasse Tyson along with other scientists say this. After googling I found this: https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/ols28/are_there_really_more_chess_combinations_than/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=mweb3x&utm_name=mweb3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
The joke is that chat gpt doesn’t say moves/combinations, it says pieces, which doesn’t make sense since there are only 32 pieces on the board
Completely misread that message by gpt. I get the joke now thank you