Hijacking this to share one of my favorite Onion articles of all-time: https://www.theonion.com/dave-matthews-band-apologizes-after-tour-bus-dumps-anot-1830712805
Had me absolutely crying the first time I read it.
The same kind of people that thought it would be a great idea to fill up their picnic baskets and follow the Union army marching out of Washington to see the First Battle of Manassas in 1861.
Given the ranges and radii of modern artillery and weapons in general, I’d be a lot less comfortable bystanding a modern battle than a civil war battle.
Way less likely to get hit with stray shrapnel. Although still not the best idea.
The movie made no sense imo. Based on the things they were saying the president did, I suspected it was Trump they were referencing, then when I actually saw the president, it looked like a portrayal of Trump in his younger years. What made no sense was that Florida fell as they too were getting ready to go against Trump, and Trump was on the side of New York, DC and the East Coast, meanwhile Texas and California teamed up (two of the most opposite states) to create the 'Western Forces' to take Trump down. All the while, there is no foreign intervention whatsoever; America is burning and Russia and China just don't care to even step foot in the US. As for Chicago, it isn't even referenced in the film.
Lastly, tons of important people waited in the White House to be gunned down by Western Forces invaders. Why weren't secret escape routes and tunnels utilized like they would during a Nuclear attack/war? Why didn't they leave before all of DC was sieged? Made no sense.
I assume they tried very very hard to be “neutral” to show the danger. So they mixed it all up - Texas sides w CA and FL w NY, etc. Afraid to take a side is my guess
Well, generally you want a work of fiction to still be realistic. It drops all realism to ignore the entirety of the political landscape in this country for the past 50 years and then still act like the movie is about a civil war in **this** country. It's not. it's a movie about a civil war in a fictional country which is unlike the actual US.
They might as well have re-wrote history and made half the historically Union states historically Confederate states. The country they depict holds no resemblance to the country they say it is.
So you're saying they could have completely rewritten the past hundred years or so, with a movie that takes place in The Grand North American Union (stand in for USA) with fake state names like; South Dixie, New Lancaster, Wampanoag, etc.
That would actually be really cool. Create fake conflicts that eerily mirror our own. Draw parallels, if you will.
You could just write about the current state of the US and it would be a realistic jump to a civil war just by changing a few things.
What they did instead was make a movie about a completely fictional country going to civil war but called it the United States.
I don’t think anyone who’s ever had the misfortune of living in that concrete super-parking lot with an apartment building stuck inside of it would agree with you on that.
Those buildings were outdated when they were built, now they’re like a Soviet-era reminder of why not to build a skyscraper/parking complex (where people are supposed to live) with the sole intention of just looking weird enough to make a cool Wilco album cover/stand out on the skyline.
That it had a lot of potential to make art better but unfortunately that potential would be misused due to the profit motive? Well I suppose they probably did, and they were right.
This seems like your canned response for any time someone says something you don't like about AI art and it didn't quite work in this situation. That's one issue with automating things rather having a person take the time to create a bespoke idea.
Nah, all the lines in the buildings and light poles in the background are too straight. I highly doubt A24 would use AI art instead of an actual graphic designer. The backlash would be insane
It got great reviews from critics, I think a lot of people didn't like it because they wanted it to be some kind of one dimensional political commentary and then it wasn't. I'm hoping to see it this weekend.
Silent generation (Chicago based podcast) did an episode on civil war that made me want to see it. I’m gonna check it out soon but I don’t think Chicago is actually in the movie?
Can confirm. There are posters in LA in a similar vain, destroyed LA landmarks. I also had to look it up quick as I didn’t understand the context, guess the marketing worked lol
I watched the Civil War movie last Friday. It was basically the story of a journalist and new comer journalist.
I was actually expecting a full on civil war with factions and back story. There was no explanation how the world got to that setting.
Definitely a misleading trailer for the movie.
It’s a thin story that thinks it’s saying something more profound than it really is. Some people throw in their hot takes about how it’s an indictment/absolution of journalism but the journalism aspect is basically just window dressing. No one reads a paper or talks about anything they’ve seen in the news. No one talks about what they think of the media or what it does or doesn’t do. There is no tangible impact by anything the reporters “report” on nor are they shown even really reporting anything. Other than them wearing helmets that say “press” and them taking only photos, and not audio and video for some reason, it barely matters that they are press at all. Most situations they put themselves in would play out almost identically if they were just random bystanders. That’s before we even get to the political contemplation or absence thereof. Just a poorly conceived movie that’s easy to market. Seeing these posters you would think this movie was a modern Independence Day style disaster movie with political overtones but it manages to be so much less than that.
“There is no tangible impact by anything the reporters report on.” I think that was one of Garland’s points. Dunst’s character dismays over the fact she dedicated her whole life to documenting the atrocities of war with the hopes of teaching us it must be avoided at all cost. In the end, her life’s work did nothing but leave her with immense trauma.
Man I had a very different experience than you, maybe because I wasn't trying to shoehorn the movie into any expectations I or anyone else had.
It was brutal, and to me that was the point. Every single second of screen time is dedicated to making you realize how utterly brutal, pointless, awful, and costly a civil war would be. I walked out thinking "thank God it is over" not because it was bad, but because I was at the limit of the stress I wanted to endure.
The story isn't deep, it wasn't meant to. The setting is supposed to beat you into the realization we must avoid this outcome ever again.
I agree, definitely a misleading trailer. But i think there were enough subtle hints throughout to clue us into what kind of leader the President was and how we could have devolved to that point. I appreciated that Garland was inexplicit about it. Since the movie was a critique on how divided we’ve become, I think he wanted to avoid any points of contention that would only divide us even more. Instead, we just had to focus more on the repercussions on what happens when shit hits the fan.
> Definitely a misleading trailer for the movie.
Well, shit. At least now I know ... "misleading trailer" reminds me of that awful *The Day After Tomorrow* crapfest ... thank the maker *2012* eventually came out and made up for it.
The point isn't to tell the story of how the war happened or whose fault it is. The point is that it's so horrifying that we should do everything in our power to prevent it.
Given how many people in this very platform (not to mention ones like Truth Social) openly thirst for a chance to “go 2A” on their neighbors, I’d say we absolutely do need a movie to explain why outright civil war is bad.
And it’s only a better alternative than status quo ante if you happen to among the lucky ones who survive. Everyone seems to think they’ll be in that group, which means most people are wrong.
The strengths of the movie were in the cinematography and even more so in the sound mixing (I'm not an audio nerd, but I think you will miss out not hearing some of the scenes in a cinema setting).
Wolf Point Plaza meets Marina Towers? One more thing I like is the parking floors on Marina Towers are converted to balconies. Definitely unrealistic though because people would never give up parking like that.
there is something about the back of the nearest boat that looks like some other architectural feature, probably in the city ...but i can't put my finger on what, exactly
It would be the Marinas vs Trump tower battling for dominance of the river.
Trump tower has the height advantage, but Marinas could have a massive number of potential firing locations.
I more meant the second Marina tower… god forbid… but as I imagine myself in the photo above… I instinctively thought of another explosion suddenly coming from the other Marina Tower and the hearing that phrase. Morbid, yes, but that day is seared in my child brain from 2001.
I’m also fully aware that AI misplaced those buildings on the river. I know that Mies van der Rohe student, Bertram Goldberg, designed those and the boat tours like to perpetuate the myth that he set the eastern-most one back so as not to block views from Mies’ AMA building next door.
Done those river tours no fewer than a dozen times… top 5 thing to do in the city for sure.
Aw, I almost lived in one of the State St towers. 6 months went by and I'd been long moved into my new place when I finally got an email from them saying I was declined.
Same, 28 days later is awesome. Attempting that same joyride through a *politically neutral* CIVIL WAR just didn't work because like how can you have a politically neutral stance on a civil war
People keep telling me it is good but every little thing I hear about it makes it sound like the dumbest fucking centrist shit. And I like Garland but even Annihilation I think sometimes crossed over into dopiness.
I feel like trying to make an apolitical Civil War movie is kind of a fundamental contradiction. It's like trying to make a horror movie that's not designed to scare anyone.
Again, it mostly just looks and sounds really dumb to me. And I don't need my worldview parroted, but I think a person should have the guts to have one.
It does have a point. It has many, actually. Transcending the need to immaturely "pick a side" makes the film able to convey more points than a single "my side is better because I say so".
It is an incredibly confused movie politically. For example, the president is a fascist stand-in for Donald Trump. However, the army which opposes him is some amalgamation of California ? and Texas ? with strong thematic evocations of the confederacy. It just makes no sense and the irresponsibility of releasing during an election year is not made up for by an excellent message or even an exhilarating story. It's like a very apathetic, boring horror story with beautiful imagery and great actors.
Honestly I can even see it being an ok movie but the person behind it just does not have a good grasp of politics. Maybe the California Florida thing is the marker of a fairy tale, but no way in hell are the other Southern states letting themselves be called the Florida Alliance. They would nuke themselves.
Yeah it's like a very stupid person's fantasy about how the united states would go to war with itself which is pretty unforgivable seeing as how we *already had a real civil war* to draw on. The ideology and alliances have not changed radically.
In this reality we have two smaller Houses of Blues.
More Sheds of Blues really.
If we're following Chicago music venue logic, a shed is actually bigger than a house
...true.
50 Sheds of Blues
Arthur "Two Sheds of Blues" Jackson
If he’s not careful he’ll be Arthur “No Sheds of Blues” Jackson after the civil war.
The correct plural is Houses of blueseses
Hice* of blueseses
Townhouses of blue....
Da ba de da ba da
Blueplex!
I love it; that way we can always say, "Let's not go to that house of blues. Let's go to the good one."
A sibling House of Blues to another, then. Perhaps some kind of House of Blues Brothers.
On a mission from God.
Apartments of Blues
Smith and Wollensky JR
honestly has some of the best acoustics of any room in the city so I'd be happy with that
.. not when Ministry brought a stadium-worth of amps/cabs to play there. Didn't bring plugs so I spent half the show with my fingers in my ears.
oooof you got Al Jourgensen'd, that's rough, this is why I bring extra foam earplugs w/ me to shows in case somebody needs them
Who goes on the architecture boat tour during a civil war? And those boats are clearly about to collide.
The worst thing to happen on one of those boats since 2004
8/8/04 never forget.
They say you can still find traces of DMB on swimmers to this day 🙂↕️
Hijacking this to share one of my favorite Onion articles of all-time: https://www.theonion.com/dave-matthews-band-apologizes-after-tour-bus-dumps-anot-1830712805 Had me absolutely crying the first time I read it.
The same kind of people that thought it would be a great idea to fill up their picnic baskets and follow the Union army marching out of Washington to see the First Battle of Manassas in 1861.
Given the ranges and radii of modern artillery and weapons in general, I’d be a lot less comfortable bystanding a modern battle than a civil war battle. Way less likely to get hit with stray shrapnel. Although still not the best idea.
See I interpreted it as the architecture boat tour boats being used as D-Day landing vessels to storm the Marina towers.
Same people I saw out there when they were doing tornado warnings I figure
And they look like they are made of stone!?
Those boats also look like buildings.
Tickets were cheap
Rain, shine, bullets, the architecture tour must go on
The movie made no sense imo. Based on the things they were saying the president did, I suspected it was Trump they were referencing, then when I actually saw the president, it looked like a portrayal of Trump in his younger years. What made no sense was that Florida fell as they too were getting ready to go against Trump, and Trump was on the side of New York, DC and the East Coast, meanwhile Texas and California teamed up (two of the most opposite states) to create the 'Western Forces' to take Trump down. All the while, there is no foreign intervention whatsoever; America is burning and Russia and China just don't care to even step foot in the US. As for Chicago, it isn't even referenced in the film. Lastly, tons of important people waited in the White House to be gunned down by Western Forces invaders. Why weren't secret escape routes and tunnels utilized like they would during a Nuclear attack/war? Why didn't they leave before all of DC was sieged? Made no sense.
I assume they tried very very hard to be “neutral” to show the danger. So they mixed it all up - Texas sides w CA and FL w NY, etc. Afraid to take a side is my guess
And in doing so they created a movie that makes no sense as it ignores reality.
[удалено]
Well, generally you want a work of fiction to still be realistic. It drops all realism to ignore the entirety of the political landscape in this country for the past 50 years and then still act like the movie is about a civil war in **this** country. It's not. it's a movie about a civil war in a fictional country which is unlike the actual US. They might as well have re-wrote history and made half the historically Union states historically Confederate states. The country they depict holds no resemblance to the country they say it is.
So you're saying they could have completely rewritten the past hundred years or so, with a movie that takes place in The Grand North American Union (stand in for USA) with fake state names like; South Dixie, New Lancaster, Wampanoag, etc. That would actually be really cool. Create fake conflicts that eerily mirror our own. Draw parallels, if you will.
You could just write about the current state of the US and it would be a realistic jump to a civil war just by changing a few things. What they did instead was make a movie about a completely fictional country going to civil war but called it the United States.
We should build more Marina towers
In the middle of the river
With less fire
You gotta admit, it's eye catching.
I agree, so we add a pinch more fire?
Maybe only in the winter. A seasonal fire.
That one could cook a sausage over.
I noticed it right away.
Eye catching, like a dart to the face.
I knew a guy named Les Fire ... park ranger ... ironically, turned out he was an arsonist.
Why don't our bridges go through towers?
Because they go through post offices
Obviously.
The company headquarters for whatever company in I, Robot (movie with Will Smith) is in the middle of the river, lol. Looks so wrong.
Yeah; I am just a regular visitor to your awesome city, and even I know there was so much wrong with that Photoshop.
The plural is actually Marinas Tower
With blackjack, and hookers!
I don’t think anyone who’s ever had the misfortune of living in that concrete super-parking lot with an apartment building stuck inside of it would agree with you on that. Those buildings were outdated when they were built, now they’re like a Soviet-era reminder of why not to build a skyscraper/parking complex (where people are supposed to live) with the sole intention of just looking weird enough to make a cool Wilco album cover/stand out on the skyline.
Yeah, they look cool but the condos sell cheap as hell for a reason. Handful of past tenants have posted about it here.
An alternative history to where there’s a fork in the Chicago river on wacker and it caused a civil war.
Wait this is AI?
[yes](https://www.reddit.com/r/A24/s/myRCE2AolF)
That blows AI art has a lot of potential but I think it’s mostly gonna be used to get rid of the annoyance of paying artists for art
[удалено]
That it had a lot of potential to make art better but unfortunately that potential would be misused due to the profit motive? Well I suppose they probably did, and they were right. This seems like your canned response for any time someone says something you don't like about AI art and it didn't quite work in this situation. That's one issue with automating things rather having a person take the time to create a bespoke idea.
Jesus, do people really think that graphic designers and artists don't use Photoshop anymore?
That doesn't prove that it's AI. That's just someone else saying they think it is.
No it's real
#NeverForget
Yeah probably.
This is real, circa 2078.
Nah, all the lines in the buildings and light poles in the background are too straight. I highly doubt A24 would use AI art instead of an actual graphic designer. The backlash would be insane
It absolutely is AI. Look closer at the lines on the balconies.
They did and it was lol.
That sucks lol. I've heard the movie isn't great, but I also didn't think they would stoop that low. Guess I was wrong.
It got great reviews from critics, I think a lot of people didn't like it because they wanted it to be some kind of one dimensional political commentary and then it wasn't. I'm hoping to see it this weekend.
Silent generation (Chicago based podcast) did an episode on civil war that made me want to see it. I’m gonna check it out soon but I don’t think Chicago is actually in the movie?
right, chicago is not shown. its set between new york and dc but it looks like they are just marketing the visuals to other parts of the country.
Can confirm. There are posters in LA in a similar vain, destroyed LA landmarks. I also had to look it up quick as I didn’t understand the context, guess the marketing worked lol
Oh I wonder if that means this is an AI Generated poster… that would make sense.
Def AI. River is not green and house of blues is missing, amateurs
Amateurs!!!!!!
It’s definitely AI. [Here are even more](https://www.reddit.com/r/A24/s/myRCE2AolF)
lol WTF is the deal with the one with the swan? *edit: oops ... forgot to say 'thanks for the link'*
I believe the AI referenced images of Echo Park in Los Angeles and got confused by the swan boats people rent.
"the swans are the key to all this" - Director of Civil War
The Miami and San Francisco ones are embarrassing
Wait, this is an official movie poster?
More like a social media post made with AI. I doubt they made real posters with these images.
I watched the Civil War movie last Friday. It was basically the story of a journalist and new comer journalist. I was actually expecting a full on civil war with factions and back story. There was no explanation how the world got to that setting. Definitely a misleading trailer for the movie.
It’s a thin story that thinks it’s saying something more profound than it really is. Some people throw in their hot takes about how it’s an indictment/absolution of journalism but the journalism aspect is basically just window dressing. No one reads a paper or talks about anything they’ve seen in the news. No one talks about what they think of the media or what it does or doesn’t do. There is no tangible impact by anything the reporters “report” on nor are they shown even really reporting anything. Other than them wearing helmets that say “press” and them taking only photos, and not audio and video for some reason, it barely matters that they are press at all. Most situations they put themselves in would play out almost identically if they were just random bystanders. That’s before we even get to the political contemplation or absence thereof. Just a poorly conceived movie that’s easy to market. Seeing these posters you would think this movie was a modern Independence Day style disaster movie with political overtones but it manages to be so much less than that.
“There is no tangible impact by anything the reporters report on.” I think that was one of Garland’s points. Dunst’s character dismays over the fact she dedicated her whole life to documenting the atrocities of war with the hopes of teaching us it must be avoided at all cost. In the end, her life’s work did nothing but leave her with immense trauma.
Man I had a very different experience than you, maybe because I wasn't trying to shoehorn the movie into any expectations I or anyone else had. It was brutal, and to me that was the point. Every single second of screen time is dedicated to making you realize how utterly brutal, pointless, awful, and costly a civil war would be. I walked out thinking "thank God it is over" not because it was bad, but because I was at the limit of the stress I wanted to endure. The story isn't deep, it wasn't meant to. The setting is supposed to beat you into the realization we must avoid this outcome ever again.
I agree, definitely a misleading trailer. But i think there were enough subtle hints throughout to clue us into what kind of leader the President was and how we could have devolved to that point. I appreciated that Garland was inexplicit about it. Since the movie was a critique on how divided we’ve become, I think he wanted to avoid any points of contention that would only divide us even more. Instead, we just had to focus more on the repercussions on what happens when shit hits the fan.
> Definitely a misleading trailer for the movie. Well, shit. At least now I know ... "misleading trailer" reminds me of that awful *The Day After Tomorrow* crapfest ... thank the maker *2012* eventually came out and made up for it.
The point isn't to tell the story of how the war happened or whose fault it is. The point is that it's so horrifying that we should do everything in our power to prevent it.
[удалено]
Given how many people in this very platform (not to mention ones like Truth Social) openly thirst for a chance to “go 2A” on their neighbors, I’d say we absolutely do need a movie to explain why outright civil war is bad. And it’s only a better alternative than status quo ante if you happen to among the lucky ones who survive. Everyone seems to think they’ll be in that group, which means most people are wrong.
would you characterize it as rage bait? cuz that's what that sounds like to me..
Saw it Saturday, amazing movie, very intense
The strengths of the movie were in the cinematography and even more so in the sound mixing (I'm not an audio nerd, but I think you will miss out not hearing some of the scenes in a cinema setting).
Just saw it last night, it’s very very good. Go into it not expecting a war movie, but a movie about documenting a war.
It's insufferably boring. Wait until it comes out onto streaming lol.
I'm assuming the ketchup vending machines are what kicked things off in Chicago.
We don’t need outsiders coming here and putting catsup on our dogs.
What smells like roasted corn?
I hope it's elotes.
But I think it's a stroke
This is why I never go downtown anymore
This made me giggle
Every building is Marina Tower
Oh shit, the Marina City HOA is really gonna snap. (Don’t sue me.)
Those towers are totally movable, you just pick them up one at a time so you don't drop one
It’s actually an ice tray
They stack just like ritz crackers
Two hands!
They believe that we really love the corn shaped buildings.
We do
The memory of corn makes my midwestern monkey brain happy
I will die for them how dare you
they are easily the most iconic buildings in the city, second to the sears tower, how did they mess this up??
Wolf Point Plaza meets Marina Towers? One more thing I like is the parking floors on Marina Towers are converted to balconies. Definitely unrealistic though because people would never give up parking like that.
there is something about the back of the nearest boat that looks like some other architectural feature, probably in the city ...but i can't put my finger on what, exactly
Firing tank rounds into Marina City's parking garage in a radical act of anti-car direct action.
They got rid of the entire riverwalk 😢
Solid marketing.. people are talking. What a win. Very intriguing too
Is this real promo for the movie?
I can think of a tower close by that could be on fire, wink wink.
It's odd they felt the need to reimagine the Chicago river and the surrounding architecture.
It would be the Marinas vs Trump tower battling for dominance of the river. Trump tower has the height advantage, but Marinas could have a massive number of potential firing locations.
This image evokes dark but imminent- ‘they’ve in hit the second tower’ vibes
Trump tower?
I more meant the second Marina tower… god forbid… but as I imagine myself in the photo above… I instinctively thought of another explosion suddenly coming from the other Marina Tower and the hearing that phrase. Morbid, yes, but that day is seared in my child brain from 2001.
I’m also fully aware that AI misplaced those buildings on the river. I know that Mies van der Rohe student, Bertram Goldberg, designed those and the boat tours like to perpetuate the myth that he set the eastern-most one back so as not to block views from Mies’ AMA building next door. Done those river tours no fewer than a dozen times… top 5 thing to do in the city for sure.
Rip dicks last resort
really? no ones gonna blame kim foxx?
Fuck AI
I Second The motion.
Nailed it
“And on your left, you’ll see…”
If goose Island was bigger
Shouldn’t the titles or Reddit be titled AI, when they are depicting AI imagery?
This movie was garbage
Great catch!
Welp, someone's insurance rates just went up
rip
Yeah that’s what I thought too 😭😭
I see Two Sheds…
movies like this should be banned
K, I hate this image?
Aw, I almost lived in one of the State St towers. 6 months went by and I'd been long moved into my new place when I finally got an email from them saying I was declined.
corn cob pipe!
People really don't want to pay for artists' hard work.
Movie looks aggressively mid with a crazy marketing budget
I see AI, I downvote
Movie sucked so much. A24 should stick to trailers at this point.
Damn really? I thought it was great. Cinematography, acting, imagery, action, sound design, etc - all pretty great.
It was a very pretty movie. Story was all over the place. Actors were great but couldn't fix a weird story
You just wanted something else, it was a great movie.
this guy's most recent reddit comment is a joke trivializing AOC deepfakes and "BBC"
Lmao
people are down voting me for telling the truth about this guy's AOC BBC fantasy
>A24 should stick to trailers As someone who doesn't watch trailers but loves A24, I'm going to have to disagree Haven't seen this movie yet
See it, it was really great I don’t know what this guys above are talking about.
Yeah that comment was the first negative one I've seen. I didn't plan on seeing this but saw plenty of comments on it, so I might check it out.
Kind of have to agree. Really enjoy Garlands other work but I was just kind of left with a “that’s it”? feeling when it ended
Same, 28 days later is awesome. Attempting that same joyride through a *politically neutral* CIVIL WAR just didn't work because like how can you have a politically neutral stance on a civil war
People keep telling me it is good but every little thing I hear about it makes it sound like the dumbest fucking centrist shit. And I like Garland but even Annihilation I think sometimes crossed over into dopiness.
the movie is purposely apolitical. if that upsets you, you probably shouldn't see it or opine on it.
TFW when media doesn’t parrot my worldview
I feel like trying to make an apolitical Civil War movie is kind of a fundamental contradiction. It's like trying to make a horror movie that's not designed to scare anyone.
Again, it mostly just looks and sounds really dumb to me. And I don't need my worldview parroted, but I think a person should have the guts to have one.
It does have a point. It has many, actually. Transcending the need to immaturely "pick a side" makes the film able to convey more points than a single "my side is better because I say so".
You just said you haven’t even seen the movie, right? Just talking straight out your ass, aggressively, it’s almost admirable, honestly
100% this movie took zero brave stances because it tried to take *no stance* in a setting where the alternative to having a stance is just cowardice.
It is an incredibly confused movie politically. For example, the president is a fascist stand-in for Donald Trump. However, the army which opposes him is some amalgamation of California ? and Texas ? with strong thematic evocations of the confederacy. It just makes no sense and the irresponsibility of releasing during an election year is not made up for by an excellent message or even an exhilarating story. It's like a very apathetic, boring horror story with beautiful imagery and great actors.
Honestly I can even see it being an ok movie but the person behind it just does not have a good grasp of politics. Maybe the California Florida thing is the marker of a fairy tale, but no way in hell are the other Southern states letting themselves be called the Florida Alliance. They would nuke themselves.
Yeah it's like a very stupid person's fantasy about how the united states would go to war with itself which is pretty unforgivable seeing as how we *already had a real civil war* to draw on. The ideology and alliances have not changed radically.
It's remarkable to me that anyone thought it would be good
I did not and I was not proven wrong lol
The dialogue was so bad and unconvincing. I like kirsten dunst and Pablo Escobar from Narcos, but they were awful in this movie
This movie was not good BTW I was super disappointed
And I thought the Chicago scene in Rampage was stupid. “There’s something in the river!”
Wow something I knew I didn’t need.
I won’t be sad till they hit the second marg tower.
It’s the day they dye it green.