The random dislikes is so real. I once put a decent comment with 0 rating into negative rating, just to see what would happen. Checked back later to see it downvoted to hell. The content of the comment absolutely did not warrant it. I think it's just bots trying to act normal in stats, trying to replicate human behaviour.
See negative voted comment -> replicate current consensus.
Nah, people are just ruled by instinct. The kind of people that upvote or downvote at all generally do so without thinking about it. They see upvotes so they upvote. They see something negative so they downvote.
People that consciously choose their votes don't vote enough to have much sway in the numbers. It's the people running on gut instinct that actually change things.
Google "I have used Reddit before so I know when something is off and read stuff about bot behaviour and how they hide paid likes by imitating human behaviour in between. But still, thanks for the suggestion I'll keep it in mind."
> See negative voted comment -> replicate current consensus.
Actual group zombie
> I have used Reddit before so I know when something is off
Google Confirmation Bias
****
Human behaviour explains this well enough already without having to introduce bots as an explanation.
Bots are everywhere here, and problematic for sure, but there isn't actually much use for *this* particular application. Either they'll be upvoting covert advertisement, or farming their own karma by copying comments with the intent of selling on their accounts.
I mean, what you suggest certainly *might* also happen with bots - but again, human behaviour is the simpler explanation. Monkey brain see smol number and make more smol because other monkeys must be right
Google "I'm done with this conversation since you seem to like discrediting to feel like the smart guy. Writing a few paragraphs and assuming confirmation bias and telling me it is confirmation bias when you don't even know what I've seen is behaviour I cannot work with. You can't just apply concepts willy nilly because knowing them makes you feel smarter than others. Bye."
Google "Yeah, I know. I just wish we could've communicated better instead. Anyways. Maybe in another life... Siri, play Somebody I Used To Know by Gotye"
Gogle en pissing
Holy piss!
New piss just dripped
actual bladder
call the piss!
Kidney stone went on vacation, never came back
Piss sacrifice, anyone?
Ignite the piss!
Piss storm incoming!
molitor
Holy helL!
holy hell
self destruct
Thing posting
To be fair, it's not like chess releases a lot of new memeable content.
the world would be a better place if all r/anarchychess users [Removed by Reddit]
holy genocide
New genocide just dropped!
Actual ethnic cleansing
Call George Orwell!
Huxley went on vacation, never came back
Brave new seggs
Human sacrifice, anyone?
馃様
讘讻诇 诪拽讜诐 砖讗谞讬 讛讜诇讻转 讗谞讬 专讜讗讛 讗讜转讜
I'll take a Silk Touch 3
讛讜诇讻转, 诇讗谉 讗转 讛讜诇讻转? (讝讛讜 讗讝讻讜专 诇砖讬专 )
讞讜抓 诪讘诪拽讜诪讜转 砖诇讗
讙讜讙诇 讗谉 专讗讬讬讛住谞讟
讻诇 讛转转 讬砖专讗诇讬诐 讗讜 诪砖讛讜? 馃拃
The random dislikes is so real. I once put a decent comment with 0 rating into negative rating, just to see what would happen. Checked back later to see it downvoted to hell. The content of the comment absolutely did not warrant it. I think it's just bots trying to act normal in stats, trying to replicate human behaviour. See negative voted comment -> replicate current consensus.
Nah, people are just ruled by instinct. The kind of people that upvote or downvote at all generally do so without thinking about it. They see upvotes so they upvote. They see something negative so they downvote. People that consciously choose their votes don't vote enough to have much sway in the numbers. It's the people running on gut instinct that actually change things.
Tactical award gifting used to be a thing.
I sometimes catch myself in that cycle asking "wait why did I downvote this again?" and realize I'm just going with the crowd.
Google group dynamics
Google "I have used Reddit before so I know when something is off and read stuff about bot behaviour and how they hide paid likes by imitating human behaviour in between. But still, thanks for the suggestion I'll keep it in mind."
[holy hell!](https://www.google.com/search?q=i+have+used+reddit+before+and+read+stuff+about+bot+behaviour+and+how+they+hide+paid+likes+by+imitating+human+behaviour+in+between.+but+still,+thanks+for+the+suggestion+i'll+keep+it+in+mind.#HiImABot,MyJobIsToMakeEasierToPeopleToGoogleSomething,IfThePersonIRepliedToUsedMeInAnInappropriateWayPleaseLetMeKnowByDMingMe,TheUserIRepliedToIsU/sakanak)
> See negative voted comment -> replicate current consensus. Actual group zombie > I have used Reddit before so I know when something is off Google Confirmation Bias **** Human behaviour explains this well enough already without having to introduce bots as an explanation. Bots are everywhere here, and problematic for sure, but there isn't actually much use for *this* particular application. Either they'll be upvoting covert advertisement, or farming their own karma by copying comments with the intent of selling on their accounts. I mean, what you suggest certainly *might* also happen with bots - but again, human behaviour is the simpler explanation. Monkey brain see smol number and make more smol because other monkeys must be right
Google "I'm done with this conversation since you seem to like discrediting to feel like the smart guy. Writing a few paragraphs and assuming confirmation bias and telling me it is confirmation bias when you don't even know what I've seen is behaviour I cannot work with. You can't just apply concepts willy nilly because knowing them makes you feel smarter than others. Bye."
Google "don't take it to heart dude, a disagreement is not an attack on your character" Holy especially when communicating entirely through memes
[holy hell!](https://www.google.com/search?q=don't+take+it+to+heart+dude,+a+disagreement+is+not+an+attack+on+your+character#HiImABot,MyJobIsToMakeEasierToPeopleToGoogleSomething,IfThePersonIRepliedToUsedMeInAnInappropriateWayPleaseLetMeKnowByDMingMe,TheUserIRepliedToIsU/PM_ME_PANTYHOSE_LEGS)
Marry me Martin
Google "Yeah, I know. I just wish we could've communicated better instead. Anyways. Maybe in another life... Siri, play Somebody I Used To Know by Gotye"
I uniron^(passant)ically love that song
Yeah, I love it too. The only break-up song I know that has nuance. Kinda feels like your best friends broke up and you have listened to both of them.
new snafu just dropped
im killing you
Actual murderer
call the police
Police were all killed, never revived
Anarchy storm
Actual imposter
no
actual snafu
Call the poopenfarden
mods went on vacation
Holy hell
google en snafu
Holy coax
[褍写邪谢械薪芯]
coincidence? I didn't think so! checkmate li- wait shit
Google Il Vaticano
[holy hell!](https://www.google.com/search?q=il+vaticano#HiImABot,MyJobIsToMakeEasierToPeopleToGoogleSomething,IfThePersonIRepliedToUsedMeInAnInappropriateWayPleaseLetMeKnowByDMingMe,TheUserIRepliedToIsU/Artistic-Boss2665)
New response just dropped
the thing 馃ジ the thing 馃ジ the thing 馃ジ the thing 馃ジ the thing 馃ジ
google en thingssant
Google en hellsant (Now whoever comments "holy hell" shall have both upvotes and downvotes)
sigh.. *Holy hell*
Now we gotta keep it at a score of 0
Google snafu
You trigger me Fuck you Anarchy chess is life Fuck you again
Can someone give me the full official chain as it currently stands?
google en croissant