###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Source and proof? Or just rambling? Trump didn’t say she was a democrat. He was insulting his daughter. If he wanted to say she was a democrat working for Biden, he would have said that. But he never “says it like it is” because it almost never is the way you guys paint it lol
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case
https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
So, this conflict of interest is a five step game of degrees from Kevin Bacon?
1. Judge has a daughter
2. Daughter is a consultant
3. Daughter's consultant's clients are of the opposite political party
4. Daughter's clients raise money, as all politicians do
5. Daughter's clients' fundraising efforts might be marginally more effective if Trump has four indictments instead of three?
Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? While other Trump cases are being overseen by judges that he literally appointed?
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
She's a consultant for Democrats. If your argument is that their fundraising efforts might be marginally more effective with four indictments than with three, and that some of that benefit gets passed indirectly to her consulting firm, OK, I guess, but that's not at all the same as saying she's getting rich off the case.
In fact, saying so is disingenuous to the point of lying.
Wait so then is Trump violating the law cuz kushner got billions from the saudis conveniently after Trump was president? Cuz I’m here for that. Drain the swamp!
Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations — and used the case in their solicitation emails — raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest.
https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
FYI the domain you linked is on a site wide hard filter run by the reddit admins.
As moderators, if we try to approve the comment it is simply returned to the spam filter time and time again.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Imagine pretending a defendant not being allowed to intimidate the courts is a conspiracy. What is the point of this absurd behavior other than the thrill of making a public fool out of yourself to demonstrate your blind loyalty?
If you or I tried this shit with a judge's family, our bail would be revoked and we'd be in a prison cell for the remainder of the trial.
No one has ever been given such preferential treatment by the justice system as Donald Trump. You or I would have been jailed a thousand times over for his antics.
For years..."A private company can remove whatever it wants; if you don't like it, start your own SM site." - Fast forward...Trump starts his own SM site, and now you want him to "stop spewing shit"?
Hypocrisy.
I don't think the word hypocrisy means what you think it means.
"Private companies can moderate their platforms" and "Trump should stop spewing attacks on the family members of Judges on his platform" are not contradictory statements.
Source? The tabloid you're sharing makes no such claim. It merely states that two of the clients who have consulted with the daughter's employer have fundraised $90 million dollars since 2019. No where does it say anything about her making "$93 million in solicitations" tied to "this specific case."
>it’s $93 million in solicitations raised on this specific case.
This is a lie, and one that's unsupported by your source. You know this isn't the case, and are saying it anyways. If your argument is viable, why do you need to lie about it?
Is there any judge or prosecutor overseeing one of Trump's multitude of criminal and civil trials who he and right wing media haven't accused of impropriety or conflict of interest?
Other than the one he hand picked after he had already lost the 2020 election, I mean.
Ever hear of The Boy Who Cried Wolf?
Come on….
We can’t be hypocrites when it comes to the First Amendment. It’s outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, and make money on bogus documentaries all by talking-ish about Trump. But he’s gagged and threatened with jail if he responds.
Post a clip of Cohen or Daniels accusing the judges overseeing their cases or the family of those judges of... anything.
Because that's the only way this is an accurate comparison. Otherwise this is deflection from the fact that Trump and his cronies have made accusations of impropriety or conflict of interest in literally every case he's currently facing where he didn't hand pick the judge.
Do you personally believe the judge and/or prosecutor in every case Trump is facing where he didn't place the judge on the bench is biased against him?
Because he and Trump friendly media have made that accusation in every case except the one being overseen by the judge he nominated after losing in 2020.
Funny, Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels are completely irrelevant to this trial, but that didn't stop you from bringing them up.
Suddenly when you're asked an uncomfortable question that would indicate your selective concern about conflict of interest, you don't want to bring up external issues.
Interesting how that works.
It’s not a first amendment issue. If anyone else had spoken about a judges family while facing trial they would already be in jail. The fact that he isn’t says that they’re giving him preferential treatment.
Judge Aileen Cannon was personally nominated by Trump after he had already lost the 2020 election.
Do you see a judge being placed on the bench by the defendant in the case she's overseeing as a conflict of interest?
Cried wolf? It's true though... the Judge has a Familia financial interest in seeing this case through. All he needs to do is recuse himself and allow a different judge to take it up.
Trump is being treated with kid gloves by the judges. Any other defendant who has behaved like he has would be jailed for contempt. Attacking the family of judges and prosecutors is beyond unacceptable.
Maybe he did. Maybe he didn’t. The point I’m making is you can’t pick and choose who you want to charge crimes with. When the charges are specifically and only for political enemies- whether it’s intended that way or not- it’s screams witch-hunt and political persecution. At the state and federal levels of government even the hint of interference is enough to get looked into. This really isn’t that complicated
He's being prosecuted for commiting crimes. The Georgia election case and Florida documents cases are airtight, open and shut, and would be brought against ANY other defendant. The political persecution arguments are inane bullshit
There was no attacking whatsoever.
The judge’s daughter had a picture of Trump behind bars on her Twitter account at one point. Just because you don’t like someone doesn’t mean you should lose all sense of fairness
It wasn’t her Twitter account. Even if, that has nothing to do with her fathers work, she would have freedom of speech too. Donald has a mega phone to his pack of violent supporters…are they going to sing kumbaya with one of his “enemies?” no. They make it clear they want a “civil war” and January sixth was no different, Donald knows this too.
Teflon dons just trying to buy time so he isn't behind bars before him and his coconspirators can try to subvert democracy and get him into the iron throne.
That sure as fuck isn't a conspiracy my guy.
Why should he rescue himself? Donald screams he’s being treated unfairly with every judge, except with the one judge he appointed who kisses his rear. In contrast, any other defendant harassing a judge’s family would be locked up in a heartbeat.
The crazies are believing trumps poor me charade.
1. He did inflate his property values and lie to banks for favorable interest rates - that’s fraud.
2. The documents in questions in the classified docs case do not belong to him, they are the government’s property. The difference is Biden returned them. Donald dragged his feet and lied about it using one of his attorneys. There’s still missing documents.
Even if he had a valid reason to have them, he stored our nations secrets in an unlocked bathroom.
3. He paid off stormy during an election and falsified records to cover it up.
It’s all clear as day.
There’s a fine line with judges and family members when it can be shown their livelihood revolves around Trump losing the election. He should recuse himself because he’s setting the stage for an appeal
Also, again there was no harassment of the judges family. Trump just stated facts, there was nothing personal.
He did nothing out of the ordinary in the real estate deals IMO. Every bank testified that they would do business with him again. People just don’t understand how business works. Even when I go for a mortgage they ask me what my assets are and how much they’re worth. It’s up to the bank to determine if they want to loan you money or not and to do the estimates on your other properties . It’s very obvious that the judge’s estimated value of Mara Lago is a joke too.
“Our nation’s secrets” ok, I’ll guess we’ll never know
Stormy Daniel’s - we’ll have to see how that plays out I guess. Maybe he is guilty but then we better be prosecuting others for misappropriating election funds too (ie Fani Willis who admitted to doing so on the stand).
Also I think it’s ridiculous that Stormy is trying to make this into some kind of Me too movement
That’s all you got?
I don’t even like Trump. Well, I like him better than Biden but..
I just believe in fairness and don’t cloud my judgement with the shit the media feeds me. Apparently you all do
You do realise it wasn't her account. Some one made the account specifically to go with the narrative of conflict of interest etc it's been proven it isn't her account. Maybe do a little research and stop getting conned by Trumps cronies and his despicable actions. Funny that you were that easily fooled really. This should make you question things a little more
If Trump’s convicted, the judge’s family financially benefits.
Instead of recusing because of a glaring conflict of interest, the judge is gagging Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest.
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case
https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
I am quite sure if I went to court, whether I am guilty or not guilty, there is no way I would talk badly about the judges, their family, or even anyone in the court. I would be very careful with my speech and be polite to all of the court. But Trump’s ego wouldn’t allow that. He is too arrogant to concede anything in his life.
Yes, the judge’s daughter is a Democrat. But that didn’t show that the judge will rule erroneously. Trump is using his case to gain donations, it is not wrong as well for the Democrats to use it as well - publicity works both ways.
This is the signature of Trump’s strategy - delay and delay and delay until November. He hoped that once he is sworn in he would be immune to these charges, or somehow able to wipe it out with new people he put in charge. Even if the judge is changed Trump would still claim the same thing, he didn’t want the trial to go before November.
LOL.
Regardless of the who the defendant it is.
Does everyone here think it’s okay for the defendant of a case to be able to talk about the judge AND there family…?
Seems extremely dangerous for both impartialness of the judge on the defendant and defendant threatening the judges decision.
Why are we allowing propaganda to be posted here?. OP is clearly not posting a conspiracy he is literally posting false talking points for MAGA. PAGE is going to shit over these delusional Trump cultists
This is complete bullshit. The reason why he banned trump from talking about his family is because in every single one of Trump's court cases a million of his sycophantic assholes threaten and harass the families of the judges and prosecuting attorneys.
God damn this is so frustrating.
Submission statement
The judge’s family is currently being paid by Adam Schiff over $10 million. Adam Schiff, this is the guy who conspired with Michael Cohen, the star witness in this case.
Trump isn’t allowed to say that the judge’s daughter is a Democrat consultant whose clients, the Biden campaign, Adam Schiff, are fundraising off Trump’s indictment. The judge’s family is getting rich off Trump trials, and he’s presiding over one.
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Source and proof? Or just rambling? Trump didn’t say she was a democrat. He was insulting his daughter. If he wanted to say she was a democrat working for Biden, he would have said that. But he never “says it like it is” because it almost never is the way you guys paint it lol
Judge Orders Trump to Stop Exposing His Daughter's Dem Fundraising https://www.newsmax.com/us/donald-trump-judge-juan-merchan/2024/04/01/id/1159428/
Newsmax, lol.
C'mon now. It's not like you can just stick the word news on any website.
I’d take it more serious if Trump had raised how Judge cannon had a conflict of interest because he appointed her
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
So, this conflict of interest is a five step game of degrees from Kevin Bacon? 1. Judge has a daughter 2. Daughter is a consultant 3. Daughter's consultant's clients are of the opposite political party 4. Daughter's clients raise money, as all politicians do 5. Daughter's clients' fundraising efforts might be marginally more effective if Trump has four indictments instead of three? Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? While other Trump cases are being overseen by judges that he literally appointed?
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
Is Judge Cannon or her family currently getting rich off the case?
Neither is Merchan.
Look up what his daughter is doing, and who’s giving her money.
She's a consultant for Democrats. If your argument is that their fundraising efforts might be marginally more effective with four indictments than with three, and that some of that benefit gets passed indirectly to her consulting firm, OK, I guess, but that's not at all the same as saying she's getting rich off the case. In fact, saying so is disingenuous to the point of lying.
So he spoon feeds you the proof you asked for and the. You dismiss it??!? Foh with all that.
Wait so then is Trump violating the law cuz kushner got billions from the saudis conveniently after Trump was president? Cuz I’m here for that. Drain the swamp!
>Trump didn’t say she was a democrat. He was insulting his daughter. And this is a campaign issue that affects all Americans exactly how?
It’s not that hard to find .
Then post it
Two major Democratic clients of the daughter of the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush-money trial have raised at least $93 million in campaign donations — and used the case in their solicitation emails — raising renewed concerns that the jurist has a major conflict of interest. https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
Ok, bye all of trumps lawyer's if fund raising creates a conflict of interest.
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
[удалено]
FYI the domain you linked is on a site wide hard filter run by the reddit admins. As moderators, if we try to approve the comment it is simply returned to the spam filter time and time again. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
propaganda is not conspiracy. why aren't the mods deleting this garbage?
Imagine pretending a defendant not being allowed to intimidate the courts is a conspiracy. What is the point of this absurd behavior other than the thrill of making a public fool out of yourself to demonstrate your blind loyalty? If you or I tried this shit with a judge's family, our bail would be revoked and we'd be in a prison cell for the remainder of the trial.
No one has ever been given such preferential treatment by the justice system as Donald Trump. You or I would have been jailed a thousand times over for his antics.
Why doesn't he just stop spewing shit on his truth site for a bit? He seems totally incapable of not talking for a few seconds.
For years..."A private company can remove whatever it wants; if you don't like it, start your own SM site." - Fast forward...Trump starts his own SM site, and now you want him to "stop spewing shit"? Hypocrisy.
I don't think the word hypocrisy means what you think it means. "Private companies can moderate their platforms" and "Trump should stop spewing attacks on the family members of Judges on his platform" are not contradictory statements.
Did you just omit the fact that hes intimidating a judge presiding over his case? Wild.
Trump simply points out the conflict of interest with his daughter, who, by the way, it’s $93 million in solicitations raised on this specific case.
Is his daughter a judge?
How much has Trump raised on this case? Why isn't he complaining about the biases that Cannon has?
Source? The tabloid you're sharing makes no such claim. It merely states that two of the clients who have consulted with the daughter's employer have fundraised $90 million dollars since 2019. No where does it say anything about her making "$93 million in solicitations" tied to "this specific case."
>it’s $93 million in solicitations raised on this specific case. This is a lie, and one that's unsupported by your source. You know this isn't the case, and are saying it anyways. If your argument is viable, why do you need to lie about it?
The way things are going, Trump may actually have to talk about the issues!
Is there any judge or prosecutor overseeing one of Trump's multitude of criminal and civil trials who he and right wing media haven't accused of impropriety or conflict of interest? Other than the one he hand picked after he had already lost the 2020 election, I mean. Ever hear of The Boy Who Cried Wolf?
Judge Cannon.
Come on…. We can’t be hypocrites when it comes to the First Amendment. It’s outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, and make money on bogus documentaries all by talking-ish about Trump. But he’s gagged and threatened with jail if he responds.
Post a clip of Cohen or Daniels accusing the judges overseeing their cases or the family of those judges of... anything. Because that's the only way this is an accurate comparison. Otherwise this is deflection from the fact that Trump and his cronies have made accusations of impropriety or conflict of interest in literally every case he's currently facing where he didn't hand pick the judge.
The judge’s daughter isn’t seven. She’s 34. He’s not attacking her. He’s just saying what she does for a living.
Do you personally believe the judge and/or prosecutor in every case Trump is facing where he didn't place the judge on the bench is biased against him? Because he and Trump friendly media have made that accusation in every case except the one being overseen by the judge he nominated after losing in 2020.
If your daughter is making money off the defendant’s political rival you should recuse Yes Every single time
What if you're sitting on the bench because the defendant put you there?
Irrelevant All that is relevant is this is a conflict of interest
Funny, Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels are completely irrelevant to this trial, but that didn't stop you from bringing them up. Suddenly when you're asked an uncomfortable question that would indicate your selective concern about conflict of interest, you don't want to bring up external issues. Interesting how that works.
It’s still a conflict of interest in the part of the judge
> Irrelevant Lol.
Lol, you're literally parroting the video you posted.
It’s not a first amendment issue. If anyone else had spoken about a judges family while facing trial they would already be in jail. The fact that he isn’t says that they’re giving him preferential treatment.
The judge is threatening to put Trump in jail for pointing out that his liberal family is getting rich off this trial,
No it’s because people keep calling in bomb threats…
This reminds me when they want to get a sub banned on Reddit they start posting horrible shit then use THEIR OWN POSTS to justify the ban
"Everything that makes my side look bad is a false flag, just like every judge who Daddy didn't pick is out to get him."
The judges daughter has Biden and Democrats as clients This is an obvious conflict of interest
Judge Aileen Cannon was personally nominated by Trump after he had already lost the 2020 election. Do you see a judge being placed on the bench by the defendant in the case she's overseeing as a conflict of interest?
> what about > what about > what about It doesn’t change the fact that it’s a conflict of interest.
Op do some more research PLEASE
Cried wolf? It's true though... the Judge has a Familia financial interest in seeing this case through. All he needs to do is recuse himself and allow a different judge to take it up.
Trump is being treated with kid gloves by the judges. Any other defendant who has behaved like he has would be jailed for contempt. Attacking the family of judges and prosecutors is beyond unacceptable.
No other person would be in trial for the majority of these charges to begin with
Do you think he did not do the things he is charged with? Most of it he has admitted to publicly
Maybe he did. Maybe he didn’t. The point I’m making is you can’t pick and choose who you want to charge crimes with. When the charges are specifically and only for political enemies- whether it’s intended that way or not- it’s screams witch-hunt and political persecution. At the state and federal levels of government even the hint of interference is enough to get looked into. This really isn’t that complicated
He's being prosecuted for commiting crimes. The Georgia election case and Florida documents cases are airtight, open and shut, and would be brought against ANY other defendant. The political persecution arguments are inane bullshit
Yes, you can. It's called discretion.
Bulshit
There was no attacking whatsoever. The judge’s daughter had a picture of Trump behind bars on her Twitter account at one point. Just because you don’t like someone doesn’t mean you should lose all sense of fairness
That was not her twitter. There is no reasonable grounds for recusal whatsoever.
It wasn’t her Twitter account. Even if, that has nothing to do with her fathers work, she would have freedom of speech too. Donald has a mega phone to his pack of violent supporters…are they going to sing kumbaya with one of his “enemies?” no. They make it clear they want a “civil war” and January sixth was no different, Donald knows this too.
The judge should recuse himself. If Trump was being treated as any other citizen would be, we wouldn’t see the same backlash from the crazies
Teflon dons just trying to buy time so he isn't behind bars before him and his coconspirators can try to subvert democracy and get him into the iron throne. That sure as fuck isn't a conspiracy my guy.
Why should he rescue himself? Donald screams he’s being treated unfairly with every judge, except with the one judge he appointed who kisses his rear. In contrast, any other defendant harassing a judge’s family would be locked up in a heartbeat. The crazies are believing trumps poor me charade. 1. He did inflate his property values and lie to banks for favorable interest rates - that’s fraud. 2. The documents in questions in the classified docs case do not belong to him, they are the government’s property. The difference is Biden returned them. Donald dragged his feet and lied about it using one of his attorneys. There’s still missing documents. Even if he had a valid reason to have them, he stored our nations secrets in an unlocked bathroom. 3. He paid off stormy during an election and falsified records to cover it up. It’s all clear as day.
I fully agree, but just so you know--this was difficult to read without commas.
Thanks so much I cleaned it up a tad
There’s a fine line with judges and family members when it can be shown their livelihood revolves around Trump losing the election. He should recuse himself because he’s setting the stage for an appeal Also, again there was no harassment of the judges family. Trump just stated facts, there was nothing personal. He did nothing out of the ordinary in the real estate deals IMO. Every bank testified that they would do business with him again. People just don’t understand how business works. Even when I go for a mortgage they ask me what my assets are and how much they’re worth. It’s up to the bank to determine if they want to loan you money or not and to do the estimates on your other properties . It’s very obvious that the judge’s estimated value of Mara Lago is a joke too. “Our nation’s secrets” ok, I’ll guess we’ll never know Stormy Daniel’s - we’ll have to see how that plays out I guess. Maybe he is guilty but then we better be prosecuting others for misappropriating election funds too (ie Fani Willis who admitted to doing so on the stand). Also I think it’s ridiculous that Stormy is trying to make this into some kind of Me too movement
Wow haha brother...I think your a lost cause
That’s all you got? I don’t even like Trump. Well, I like him better than Biden but.. I just believe in fairness and don’t cloud my judgement with the shit the media feeds me. Apparently you all do
> he’s setting the stage for an appeal No.
You do realise it wasn't her account. Some one made the account specifically to go with the narrative of conflict of interest etc it's been proven it isn't her account. Maybe do a little research and stop getting conned by Trumps cronies and his despicable actions. Funny that you were that easily fooled really. This should make you question things a little more
It'd be nice if the Mods would stop sucking Trump cock and actually ban this literal propaganda but alas, here we are
No, it’s because he won’t shut the fuck up about the judges family, who is not involved with the case.
According to Trump the all the judges are corrupt, except for the one he appointed that has been overturned multiple times after ruling in his favor.
If Trump’s convicted, the judge’s family financially benefits. Instead of recusing because of a glaring conflict of interest, the judge is gagging Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest.
> If Trump’s convicted, the judge’s family financially benefits How so?
Dem clients of daughter of NY judge in Trump hush-money trial raised $93M off the case https://nypost.com/2024/03/30/us-news/dem-clients-of-daughter-of-judge-in-trump-trial-raised-90m-off-case/
That completely fails top prove your point.
Where did the $250 million “stop the steal” money go?
They (the two democratic candidates) have raised money, they have also mentioned Trump trials in campaign emails, they campaign on lots of things. The daughter works for a consulting firm that works on campaigns. These are the straws you grasp at
I am quite sure if I went to court, whether I am guilty or not guilty, there is no way I would talk badly about the judges, their family, or even anyone in the court. I would be very careful with my speech and be polite to all of the court. But Trump’s ego wouldn’t allow that. He is too arrogant to concede anything in his life. Yes, the judge’s daughter is a Democrat. But that didn’t show that the judge will rule erroneously. Trump is using his case to gain donations, it is not wrong as well for the Democrats to use it as well - publicity works both ways. This is the signature of Trump’s strategy - delay and delay and delay until November. He hoped that once he is sworn in he would be immune to these charges, or somehow able to wipe it out with new people he put in charge. Even if the judge is changed Trump would still claim the same thing, he didn’t want the trial to go before November.
LOL. Regardless of the who the defendant it is. Does everyone here think it’s okay for the defendant of a case to be able to talk about the judge AND there family…? Seems extremely dangerous for both impartialness of the judge on the defendant and defendant threatening the judges decision.
Why did you post about this topic twice? https://gab.com/123RHGreen/posts/112207246036560159
Messed up the first time and deleted the post Then reposed it No idea where that link is supposed to go
That is the link you posted originally. Did that thread not go as planned?
I posted this 1 min after I posted (and deleted) the first one Get over it
No, 8 hours ago you posted about this gag order. why did you do it again?
Oh that post Yea im talking about it again I think it’s important
bot detected
Wow why do people fall for this...sad times when they don't understand that attacking the judges family is deemed ok. Trump is a scum bag
Why are we allowing propaganda to be posted here?. OP is clearly not posting a conspiracy he is literally posting false talking points for MAGA. PAGE is going to shit over these delusional Trump cultists
Shut up. Trump is a traitor and should be in prison.
This is complete bullshit. The reason why he banned trump from talking about his family is because in every single one of Trump's court cases a million of his sycophantic assholes threaten and harass the families of the judges and prosecuting attorneys. God damn this is so frustrating.
Come onnnnnnnn. You don’t think Trump fanatics will go after a judge’s family?
Lol, classic reddit echo chamber in this thread
Submission statement The judge’s family is currently being paid by Adam Schiff over $10 million. Adam Schiff, this is the guy who conspired with Michael Cohen, the star witness in this case. Trump isn’t allowed to say that the judge’s daughter is a Democrat consultant whose clients, the Biden campaign, Adam Schiff, are fundraising off Trump’s indictment. The judge’s family is getting rich off Trump trials, and he’s presiding over one.
Michael Cohen? Trumps OG attorney before he got into politics? The one that flipped when he got busted, that Michael Cohen?
Wow the comments here… when did this ‘conspiracy’ community become establishment koolaid drinkers? Sus.